Will the Real Empathy Please Stand Up? A Case for a Narrow Conceptualization
Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):40-65 (2011)
| Abstract | A longstanding problem with the study of empathy is the lack of a clear and agreed upon definition. A trend in the recent literature is to respond to this problem by advancing a broad and all-encompassing view of empathy that applies to myriad processes ranging from mimicry and imitation to high-level perspective taking. I argue that this response takes us in the wrong direction and that what we need in order to better understand empathy is a narrower conceptualization, not a broader one. I propose that empathy be conceptualized as a complex, imaginative process through which an observer simulates another person's situated psychological states while maintaining clear self–other differentiation. I defend my view through an examination of three processes: emotional contagion, a process of self-oriented perspective taking that I call “pseudo-empathy,” and empathy proper. Drawing on recent findings in social neuroscience, I highlight the differences among these processes and discuss conceptual, empirical, and normative reasons for keeping them theoretically and conceptually distinct. | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesMark Coeckelbergh (2007). Who Needs Empathy? A Response to Goldie's Arguments Against Empathy and Suggestions for an Account of Mutual Perspective-Shifting in Contexts of Help and Care. Ethics and Education 2 (1):61-72.
Martin L. Hoffman (2001). How Automatic and Representational is Empathy, and Why. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):38-39.
Christian Miller (2011). Defining Empathy: Thoughts on Coplan's Approach. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):66-72.
Elias L. Khalil (2001). Similarity Versus Familiarity: When Empathy Becomes Selfish. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):41-41.
Aaron Simmons (forthcoming). In Defense of the Moral Significance of Empathy. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice:1-15.
Fritz Breithaupt (2012). A Three-Person Model of Empathy. Emotion Review 4 (1):84-91.
Julian Paul Keenan & Mark A. Wheeler (2001). Elucidation of the Brain Correlates of Cognitive Empathy and Self-Awareness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (1):40-41.
Jesse Prinz (2011). Against Empathy. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):214-233.
Doris Bischof-Köhler (2012). Empathy and Self-Recognition in Phylogenetic and Ontogenetic Perspective. Emotion Revies 4 (1):40-48.
Douglas Hollan (2012). Emerging Issues in the Cross-Cultural Study of Empathy. Emotion Review 4 (1):70-78.
Jessica Pierce (2008). Mice in the Sink. Environmental Philosophy 5 (1):75-96.
Stephen Darwall (2011). Being With. Southern Journal of Philosophy 49 (s1):4–24.
Amy Coplan & Peter Goldie (eds.) (2011). Empathy: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
Jeanette Kennett (2002). Autism, Empathy and Moral Agency. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (208):340-357.
Marjorie O'Loughlin (1998). Overcoming the Problems of Difference in Education: Empathy as Intercorporeality. Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (4):283-293.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2011-09-05Total downloads39 ( #29,721 of 548,973 )Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #25,799 of 548,973 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
