Philosophy of Science (December) 586 (December):586-606 (1991)
|Abstract||Rosenberg argues that intentional generalizations in the human sciences cannot be law-like because they are not amenable to significant empirical refinement. This irrefinability is said to result from the principle that supposedly controls in intentional explanation also serving as the standard for successful interpretation. The only credible evidence bearing on such a principle would then need conform to it. I argue that psychological generalizations are refinable and can be nomic. I show how empirical refinement of psychological generalizations is possible by considering concrete cases. A sufficiently detailed view of the role of psychological generalizations in interpretation allows us to find in psychological investigations instances of bootstrap testing|
|Keywords||Generalization Intentional Psychology Science Testability|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
M. F. Egan (1989). What's Wrong with the Syntactic Theory of Mind. Philosophy of Science 56 (December):664-74.
Abraham Rudnick (2003). Paranoia and Reinforced Dogmatism: Beyond Critical Rationality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (3):339-350.
David H. Sanford (1997). Chisholm on Brentano's Thesis. In Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. Chicago: Open Court.
Thomas D. Senor (1992). Two Factor Theories, Meaning Wholism and Intentionalistic Psychology: A Reply to Fodor. Philosophical Psychology 5 (2):133-151.
Kenneth G. Lucey (1975). The Testability of the Identity Theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (August):142-147.
Andr Kukla (1989). Meaning Holism and Intentional Psychology. Analysis 49 (October):173-175.
Jeff Foss (1984). Reflections on Peirce's Concepts of Testability and the Economy of Research. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:28 - 39.
Martin Carrier (1998). In Defense of Psychological Laws. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12 (3):217 – 232.
Murat Aydede & P. Robbins (2001). Are Frege Cases Exceptions to Intentional Generalizations? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):1-22.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads7 ( #133,479 of 549,087 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?