Graduate studies at Western
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105 (2):177-190 (2005)
|Abstract||In the first part of the paper I try to explain why the disjunctive theory of perception can seem so counterintuitive by focusing on two of the standard arguments against the view-the argument from subjective indiscriminability and the causal argument. I suggest that by focusing on these arguments, and in particular the intuitions that lie behind them, we gain a clearer view of what the disjunctive theory is committed to and why. In light of this understanding, I then present an argument for the disjunctive theory based on the claim that the content of experience is particular and not general|
|Keywords||Disjunction Epistemology Experience Objective Perception Subjective|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Nathan Bauer (2010). Kant's Subjective Deduction. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):433-460.
Pete Mandik (2000). Objective Subjectivity: Allocentric and Egocentric Representations in Thought and Experience. Dissertation, Washington University
V. Haksar (1981). Nagel on Subjective and Objective. Inquiry 24 (March):105-21.
S. Kay Toombs (1990). The Temporality of Illness: Four Levels of Experience. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 11 (3).
Paul Coates (1998). Perception and Metaphysical Skepticism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 72 (72):1-28.
John I. Biro (2006). A Point of View on Points of View. Philosophical Psychology 19 (1):3-12.
Jennifer S. Hawkins (2010). The Subjective Intuition. Philosophical Studies 148 (1):61 - 68.
Thomas Nagel (1974). What is It Like to Be a Bat? Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Robert Francescotti (1993). Subjective Experience and Points of View. Journal of Philosophical Research 18:25-36.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #15,820 of 739,461 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #26,423 of 739,461 )
How can I increase my downloads?