Collected works of author predominantly on Sakyapa liturgical, rituals, and sadhanas texts.

Study on Trilaksaṇa, the four seals of the Buddhist doctrine.

作者是西藏共產黨的創始人，也是世界第一人以辯證法證出月球存有液態水。這是一本以辯證法原理闡述的論文彙編，書中詳細分析質量的運動周期，為了解辯證結構規律及運動規律之專著。.

本书基本内容可分主体的社会辩证法与次体的自然辩证法两大部分。对于辩证法构成根基的逻辑公式及推动根基的周期定律,对社会及自然各主要学科的辩证分析作了扼要的论述。.

Comparative analytical study on two truths according to interpretation of eminent masters Gautama Buddha and Mi-bo Gśen-rab of Bon-po sect; includes their brief biographies.

本书作者耗费数十年心血,研究和总结出来辩证法结构与运动规律的逻辑公式、周期定律及其示意图解,对社会科学和自然科学各主要学科作了辩证的分析,探索了它们的本质联系和运动规律。.

Handbook for Buddhist ethical aspects for Bhutanese youngsters.

On the exposition of Buddhist logic; study initiated by Ngagyur Nyingma Institute.

Collected works predominantly on Buddhist doctrines and philosophy.

Critical study predominantly on Budhist philosophy; includes some artciles on Tibetan literary criticism.

Critical study on some important philosophical points of Buddhism and methods of cleansing social problems through Buddhist doctrines.

Bkaḥ-Ḥgyur: ka-ya [volume 1-25], Text number 1-729. Rgyud -- ra-a, kṣa, ki-tsi [volume 26-49], Text number 730-759. Śer-phyin -- tshi-ʼi [volume 50-55], Text number 760. Dkon-brtsegs -- yi-ri [volume 56-61], Text number 761. Phal-chn -- ai, ku-ke [volume 62-93], Text number 762-1029. Mdo-sna-tshogs -- khe-phe [volume 94-106], Text number 1030-1055. Ḥdul-ba.

Rgyal ba rdo rje 'chaṅ yab yam gyi rnam thar rin chen gter mdzod -- Saṅs rgyas thams cad kyi rnam 'phrul Rje-btsan Ti-lo-pa'i rnam mgur -- Bde gśegs phag mo gru pa'i rnam thar -- Bram zc chen pos mdzad pa'i ṅoh ha bskor gsum blo gsal mgal brgyan -- Bka' yoṅ dag pa'i tshad ma źes bya ba mkha'i 'gro ma'i man ṅag -- Bya btaṅ stag rtse sku skye'i rtogs brjod med snaṅ chu zla'i zlos gar (...) -- 'Gu-ru rin-po-che'i rnam thar bstod pa dbyid kyi sgra dbyaṅs. (shrink)

Collected works of Shes-rab-rgya-mtsho, 1884-1968 on Gelukpa doctrines etc.

On correct method of understanding various Buddhist philosophical concepts according to sutras and tantras in accordance with Karmapa VIII Mi-bskyod-rdo-rje interpreation.

Selected works of author predominantly on Buddhist dialectical and logical study.

Selected works of author's on critical analysis on different concepts of Buddhist doctrines and philosophy.

Selected writings of Dmu-dge Thub-bstan-rgya-mtsho, etc. on diverse subjects of Tibetan Buddhist doctrines and philosophy.

Collected works of Dge-lugs-pa scholar predominantly on doctrines, commentary on Vasubandhu's Abhidharmakośa, study on Abhisamayālaṅkāra of Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāparāmitā, Buddhist logic, philosophy, rituals, etc.

Collected works of the author on Buddhism and Dge-lugs-pa doctrines; includes biography.

On the fundamental essence of Buddhist logic and dialectical studies.

Collection of Kagyudpa scholar's texts on Buddhist logics.

Democratic countries, such as Australia, face the dilemma of preserving public and national security without sacrificing fundamental freedoms. In the context where the rule of law is an underlying assumption of the constitutional framework, Emergency Powers in Australia provides a succinct analysis of the sorts of emergency which have been experienced in Australia and an evaluation of the legal weapons available to the authorities to cope with these emergencies. It analyses the scope of the defence power to determine the constitutionality (...) of federal legislation to deal with wartime crises and the 'war' on terrorism, the extent of the executive power and its relationship to the prerogative, the deployment of the defence forces in aid of the civil power, the statutory frameworks regulating the responses to civil unrest, and natural disasters. The role of the courts when faced with challenges to the invocation of emergency powers is explained and analysed. (shrink)

Collected articles on Burmese linguistic and literature.

Commentary on Tshad ma rigs gter, a work on Buddhist logic by Sa-skya Paṇḍi-ṭa Kun-dgaʾ-rgyal-mtshan, 1182-1251.

Study on Tibetan Buddhist logic; includes some poems and essays.

Study on Buddhist logic according to Candrakīrti.

Study on the development and differences in philosophy among various Buddhist sects.

Buddhist dialectic reasoning and debates for beginner.

In this paper I assess the adequacy of no-conspiracy conditions employed in the usual derivations of the Bell inequality in the context of EPR correlations. First, I look at the EPR correlations from a purely phenomenological point of view and claim that common cause explanations of these cannot be ruled out. I argue that an appropriate common cause explanation requires that no-conspiracy conditions are re-interpreted as mere common cause-measurement independence conditions. In the right circumstances then, violations of measurement independence need (...) not entail any kind of conspiracy (nor backwards in time causation). To the contrary, if measurement operations in the EPR context are taken to be causally relevant in a specific way to the experiment outcomes, their explicit causal role provides the grounds for a common cause explanation of the corresponding correlations. (shrink)

Fitch’s Paradox shows that if every truth is knowable, then every truth is known. Standard diagnoses identify the factivity/negative infallibility of the knowledge operator and Moorean contradictions as the root source of the result. This paper generalises Fitch’s result to show that such diagnoses are mistaken. In place of factivity/negative infallibility, the weaker assumption of any ‘level-bridging principle’ suffices. A consequence is that the result holds for some logics in which the “Moorean contradiction” commonly thought to underlie the result is (...) in fact consistent. This generalised result improves on the current understanding of Fitch’s result and widens the range of modalities of philosophical interest to which the result might be fruitfully applied. Along the way, we also consider a semantic explanation for Fitch’s result which answers a challenge raised by Kvanvig. (shrink)

kk states that knowing entails knowing that one knows, and K¬K states that not knowing entails knowing that one does not know. In light of the arguments against kk and K¬K⁠, one might consider modally qualified variants of those principles. According to weak kk, knowing entails the possibility of knowing that one knows. And according to weakK¬K⁠, not knowing entails the possibility of knowing that one does not know. This paper shows that weak kk and weakK¬K are much stronger than (...) they initially appear. Jointly, they entail kk and K¬K⁠. And they are susceptible to variants of the standard arguments against kk and K¬K⁠. This has interesting implications for the debate on positive introspection and for deeper issues concerning the structure and limits of knowability. (shrink)