In an (indirectly or involuntarily) iconoclastic subject, Claude Fintz proposes to put in perspective the conceptual universe of the humanities by confronting it with the thought of a master of contemporary Indian advaita, Nisargadatta Maharaj—as reflected by his disciple Ramesh S. Balsekar. In this “between” of the scientific and spiritual quest, the great notions of the philosophy of the subject will resonate. The author hypothesizes that this paradoxical encounter is likely to bring out the mystery of a first-person (...) search where, in the context of a certain philosophy of consciousness (resonating with the quest of Henri Michaux), the looking subject turns out to be the mirror of the looked object. This apocalypse projects vitriol on the conceptual bubbles that are the so-called subject (and his free will), knowledge and imagination—all constituents of the human “sciences”, bordered in fact by nothingness, according to a “vacant” anthropology. (shrink)

Au travers des expérimentations multiformes de chez Michaux, le corps, dans sa globalité charnelle et mentale, apparaît comme un avatar de l’énergie : un manchon de vent qui stabilise provisoirement un paquet d’énergies, voilà ce que la drogue apprend de la réalité du sujet. Cette interprétation métaphysique de l’énergie en vient à fonder sa pratique artistique : l’énergie, jamais neutre, prend une coloration affective, accessible à une forme de connaissance émotionnelle. C’est ainsi également que Michaux, par sympathie, comprend la folie (...) comme un phénomène énergétique et il reprend contact avec certains aspects méconnus de l’imagination créatrice et participante ; l’artiste (re)connaît « comment les choses se tiennent » sous la surface phénoménale. Il découvre en outre une utilisation singulière de l’énergie, à travers sa pratique de la malédiction. Puis, passant de l’art à l’art de vivre, il apprend enfin à utiliser l’énergie de ses échecs. Michaux par le corps-énergie accède à un savoir sur la nature du Réel : toute matière (et toute trace) s’avère être de l’énergie que l’on peut domestiquer, transformer et transmettre. Car celle‑ci se transmet à travers le corps, d’un esprit à un esprit, soulignant ainsi le lien qui existe entre corps et esprit, et production et réception des signes. (shrink)

Le texte qui suit est un entretien réalisé à Grenoble, le 22 octobre 2015, avec François Jullien, professeur à Paris 7, philosophe, helléniste et sinologue, titulaire de la chaire sur l’altérité à la Maison des sciences de l’homme. Il s’entretient avec Claude Fintz, professeur de langue et littérature françaises à l’Université Grenoble Alpes. François Jullien évoque d’abord des questions méthodologiques ; puis il développe sa conception de l’entretien, du métissage culturel, ainsi que sa critique des notions d’entre-deux et (...) d’imaginaire. The text which follows is an interview, realized in Grenoble, 22 October 2015, with François Jullien, professor in Paris 7, philosopher, hellenist and sinologist, holder of the pulpit on the otherness to the the House of the Human Sciences. He speaks with Claude Fintz, professor of French contemporary language and literature in Université Grenoble Alpes. First François Jullien evokes methodological questions; then he develops his conception of the interview, the cultural interbreeding, as well as his criticism of the notions of in-between and imaginary. (shrink)

Notre projet commun dans l’écriture de cet article consiste à présenter une réflexion sur l’imaginaire du corps contemporain afin de mettre ce dernier en perspective de recherches et de réflexions plurielles. Nous examinons d’abord le contexte général de l’imaginaire avant de détailler les liens ténus qu’il entretient avec la question du corps. Nous mettons ainsi en lumière l’imaginaire du corps et ses enjeux sociétaux, esthétiques et anthropologiques. We aim in this paper to developp an brief epistemological survey about the imagination (...) of the contemporary body and to underline the diversity of questions that are at stake in this issue. We first analyse the general epistemology of cultural imagination in order to detect its tenuous links with the questions raised by the body. It allows us to assess the specificities of the imagination of the contemporary body and their social, esthetic and anthropological impact in our cultures. (shrink)

Notre analyse a pour objectif de souligner l’existence d’un rayonnement ombreux du mythe du Phénix, plus puissant que l’actualisation de mythèmes académiquement répertoriés. Nous mettrons en lumière son étonnante vivacité et son impressionnante capacité d’adaptation — mais aussi la profonde originalité de la poétique de Morsy. Mêlant en effet dénonciation et incertitude, révolte et espérance, apocalypse et renaissance, elle indique une aspiration à renverser un ordre établi. Poésie et mythe, à partir d’une réflexion polémique sur l’histoire, ont retrouvé ici leur (...) commune origine. En dépit de ses nombreuses ambiguïtés, le Phénix structure l’imaginaire crépusculaire du recueil : il est avant tout puissance de transgression, source secrète de sa poétique. Our analysis has for objective to underline the existence of a shadowy radiation of the myth of the Phoenix, more powerful than the mythemes academically listed. We shall bring to light its surprising liveliness and its impressive capacity of adaptation—but also the profound originality of Morsy’s poetics. Indeed mixing denunciation and uncertainty, revolt and hope, apocalypse and revival, it indicates the purpose to knock down an established order. Poetry and myth, from a polemical reflection on the history, found here their common origin. In spite of its numerous ambiguities, the Phoenix structures the crepuscular imagination of his collections of poetry: it is above all power of transgression, the secret spring of his poetics. (shrink)

À travers le présent entretien, Salah Stétié, écrivain au carrefour d’au moins deux traditions culturelles, envisage son rapport singulier à la question de l’entre-deux. Il évoque en particulier le lien très étroit qui l’unit aux civilisations de la Méditerranée ; la question de l’intervalle l’amène à parler du sens de son écriture poétique, de son rapport à la langue et à la traduction. Plus surprenant sans doute est le contexte premier qu’il donne à son exploration poétique, selon une inspiration très (...) orientale : une physique spirituelle de l’énergie — de la danse de l’énergie, au centre de laquelle le poète se tient, à « la source des vertiges ». C’est une entité quasi impersonnelle et insituable qui écrit, à la croisée des dimensions mentales, spirituelles et verbales — et d’un inconscient qui serait beaucoup plus large que le personnel. Cependant, pour Salah Stétié, le poète, loin de ne résider nulle part, développe une « citoyenneté surplombante » qui lui permet de circuler dans toute l’étendue du réel, de l’embrasser dans son ensemble et d’en témoigner sans exclusive. Through this interview, Salah Stétié, writer in the crossroads of at least two cultural traditions, envisages his singular relationship in the question of the in-between. He evokes in particular the very narrow link which unites him with the civilizations of the Mediterranean Sea ; the question of the interval leads him to speak about the sense of its poetic writing, about its relationship in the language and in the translation. More surprising doubtless is the first context which he gives to his poetic exploration, according to a very oriental inspiration: a spiritual physics of the energy—of the dance of the energy, in the center of which the poet stands, near to “the spring of the dizzinesses”. It is a quasi-impersonal and insituable entity who writes, between the mental, spiritual and verbal dimensions—and of an unconsciousness which would be much wider than the personal one. However, for Salah Stétié, the poet, far from livig in Utopia, develops an “overhanging citizenship” who allows him to travel in all the areas of the reality, to embrace them and to testify of them without any exclusive. (shrink)

It is puzzling to notice that in his 1784 essay on Enlightenment, Kant addresses every human being with his watchword « Have the courage to use your own understanding! », while at the same time he seems to restrict the access to the public discussion of matters of common interest to the learned persons. This begs the question: Is the participation in the public debate part and parcel of Kant’s conception of Aufklärung? A positive answer to this question is given (...) by Katerina Deligiorgi in her Kant and the Culture of Enlightenment. A critical assessment of this book will lead us however to consider that Kant has a differentiated approach to enlightenment depending on whether someone is educated or uneducated. Following Rousseau, Kant has come to recognize as a matter of fact this inequality toward the products of culture. Now the two-level conception of enlightenment entailed by this inequality becomes explicit in the 1790s, especially in the very last work Kant has published: The Conflict of the Faculties. (shrink)

Découvert récemment, le premier cours de Paul Tillich sur la philosophie de la religion montre à quel point la philosophie critique de Kant fut une influence déterminante sur la genèse de la pensée tillichienne. Tillich applique la méthode critique de manière ingénieuse pour définir la fonction religieuse. Il voit également dans la notion kantienne de l’inconditionné l’amorce d’une saisie intuitive de la nature irréductiblement irrationnelle de la religion. Pour Tillich, ce noyau mystique du rationalisme kantien mène tout droit au mysterium (...) tremendum et fascinans de la phénoménologie religieuse de Rudolf Otto. Mais Tillich va plus loin en affirmant que notre orientation fondamentale vers l’inconditionné constitue le vrai point de départ du religieux, même lorsque cela se fait sous un déguisement profane. (shrink)

Reading Nietzsche, knowing humanism -- Nietzsche's humanist genealogy -- In the region of likeness: family resemblances -- A single web of meaning -- All in one: horizon, goal, and doctrine -- Nietzsche the terrible -- Reprise and ascent -- Nietzsche's works -- Bibliography -- Index.

In many species of reptiles, sex is determined at fertilization by zygotic sex chromosome composition. In other species, including all crocodilians, most turtles and some lizards, sex is determined by temperature during the earlier stages of gonadal differentiation. The effects of exogenous estrogens, antiestrogens and aromatase inhibitors at different temperatures have unambiguously demonstrated the involvement of estrogens in sexual differentiation of the gonads. Aromatase is the enzyme that converts androgens to estrogens. Gonadal aromatase activity is well correlated with gonadal structure. (...) It increases exponentially in differentiating ovaries, whereas it remains low in differentiating testes. Moreover, there is a high correlation between the thermosensitive periods for both ovary differentiation and increase in aromatase activity. We suggest that a thermosensitive factor intervenes, directly or indirectly, in the transcriptional regulation of the aromatase gene in reptiles with temperature‐dependent sex determination. (shrink)

On est porté à sous-estimer le rôle authentiquement productif de la raison dans la Dialectique transcendantale de la Critique de la raison pure. Cet article propose une illustration de ce rôle à l'occasion des Paralogismes de la raison pure, qui ne sont rendus possibles que sur la base d'une fiction négative opérée à partir du sens interne. Cette illustration s'inscrit dans la perspective plus large d'une interprétation de la Dialectique transcendantale en vertu d'une théorie du schématisme, laissée au second plan (...) par Kant en raison de la prépondérance des motivations critiques.We tend to underestimate the authentically productive role of reason in the Transcendental Dialectic of the Critique of Pure Reason. This paper suggests an illustration of this role as it can be traced in the Paralogisms of Pure Reason, which themselves became possible on the basis of a negative fiction exerted toward the inner sense. This illustration is part of a larger perspective aiming at an interpretation of the Transcendental Dialectic on the ground of a theory of schematism, which is somehow overshadowed by Kant's critical intentions. (shrink)

When we reconstruct Fichte's philosophy of nature of the Jena period, we notice striking similarities between the conception of organism in theDoctrine of Scienceand Schelling's corresponding developments in his earlyNaturphilosophie.Even though both thinkers agree to consider organic nature within the framework of transcendental idealism, it is nevertheless possible at this stage to discover slight differences in their interpretation which announce their future disagreement on the status of a philosophy of nature. If, for instance, organism for both Fichte and Schelling can (...) be considered as ananalogonof the absolute, much depends on whether they conceive this analogy from a practical or theoretical point of view. (shrink)

»Als dies geschrieben wurde, war das Verständnis für Fichtes Bedeutung noch geringer als heute. Ganz allmählich bricht sich die Einsicht Bahn, wieviel von diesem großen Denker gerade für die Transzendentalphilosophie zu lernen ist., S. 95.«.

»Als dies geschrieben wurde, war das Verständnis für Fichtes Bedeutung noch geringer als heute. Ganz allmählich bricht sich die Einsicht Bahn, wieviel von diesem großen Denker gerade für die Transzendentalphilosophie zu lernen ist., S. 95.«.

The aim of this paper is to set out some features of Kant’s conception of transcendental philosophy. I would like to argue that this philosophy, although it is situated at a higher level of discourse than common knowledge, does not essentially transcend the limits that it sets to this knowledge. In order to achieve this, I stress the fact that Kant regards experience as a mere “possibility.” Now, the Critique of Pure Reason explains that the human understanding cannot conceive of (...) an absolute possibility, but only a relative one, namely a possibility that is tied to conditions. And possible experience as a whole is no exception here. Hence the expression “conditions of the possibility of experience” which designates the topic of the Transcendental Analytic. This also means that experience is “contingent”. It is not in itself necessary; rather, it is dependent upon certain conditions. But then we learn that the most important transcendental conditions for this experience, i.e., the dynamic principles, are themselves “contingent”. Consequently, these transcendental conditions are not unconditioned; they in turn depend on empirical conditions, over which they have no control. (shrink)

The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that aesthetics had its place in Fichte’s early system of the WL, and that due to contingent circumstances he did not have the chance to expound it. But we can reconstruct the main lines of what his aesthetics would have looked like if we pay attention to the article sent to Schiller in 1795 on the “spirit” and the “letter” in philosophy, completing it with the courses he gave in the preceding months (...) on that topic and with other sources. We discover not only that aesthetics is an important part of the philosophical system but that art stands close the act of philosophising itself. In fact, both the philosopher and the artist draw from the same original source: “spirit” as defined in Kant’s third Critique. For the philosopher as well as for the artist the central faculty is then “imagination”, an imagination that relies on “feeling”. In the end Fichte sketches an aesthetics based on the creative genius of the artist, leaving little room for the faculty of judgment and for taste, that is: the receptive attitude toward beauty, that play a prominent role in Kant’s aesthetics. (shrink)