16 found
Order:
Disambiguations
James W. Tanaka [11]James Tanaka [3]James N. Tanaka [1]James William Tanaka [1]
  1.  15
    What is "Special" About Face Perception?Martha J. Farah, Kevin D. Wilson, Maxwell Drain & James N. Tanaka - 1998 - Psychological Review 105 (3):482-498.
  2.  52
    A Holistic Account of the Own-Race Effect in Face Recognition: Evidence From a Cross-Cultural Study.James W. Tanaka, Markus Kiefer & Cindy M. Bukach - 2004 - Cognition 93 (1):B1-B9.
  3.  18
    Mixed Emotions: Holistic and Analytic Perception of Facial Expressions.James W. Tanaka, Martha D. Kaiser, Sean Butler & Richard Le Grand - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (6):961-977.
  4.  29
    The Entry Point of Face Recognition: Evidence for Face Expertise.James W. Tanaka - 2001 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (3):534.
  5.  52
    Features, Configuration and Holistic Face Processing.James W. Tanaka & Iris Gordon - 2011 - In Andy Calder, Gillian Rhodes, Mark Johnson & Jim Haxby (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press. pp. 177--194.
    This article explores the concept of recognizing a face holistically and examines the experimental paradigms that serve as the “gold standards” for holistic perception. It discusses the contribution of featural and configural information to the holistic process and the controversy surrounding these often misunderstood concepts. It claims that the recruitment of holistic processes is what distinguishes faces from most types of object recognition. The discussion focuses on the kind of featural and configural information that is impaired in an inverted face (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  6.  85
    The Role of Color in High-Level Vision.James Tanaka, Daniel Weiskopf & Pepper Williams - 2001 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (5):211-215.
  7.  23
    Looking Across Domains to Understand Infant Representation of Emotion.Paul C. Quinn, Gizelle Anzures, Carroll E. Izard, Kang Lee, Olivier Pascalis, Alan M. Slater & James W. Tanaka - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (2):197-206.
    A comparison of the literatures on how infants represent generic object classes, gender and race information in faces, and emotional expressions reveals both common and distinctive developments in the three domains. In addition, the review indicates that some very basic questions remain to be answered regarding how infants represent facial displays of emotion, including (a) whether infants form category representations for discrete classes of emotion, (b) when and how such representations come to incorporate affective meaning, (c) the developmental trajectory for (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  8.  23
    Looking Across Domains to Understand Infant Representation of Emotion.Paul C. Quinn, Gizelle Anzures, Carroll E. Izard, Kang Lee, Alan M. Slater, Olivier Pascalis & James W. Tanaka - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (2).
  9.  32
    Race-Specific Perceptual Discrimination Improvement Following Short Individuation Training With Faces.Rankin W. McGugin, James W. Tanaka, Sophie Lebrecht, Michael J. Tarr & Isabel Gauthier - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (2):330-347.
    This study explores the effect of individuation training on the acquisition of race-specific expertise. First, we investigated whether practice individuating other-race faces yields improvement in perceptual discrimination for novel faces of that race. Second, we asked whether there was similar improvement for novel faces of a different race for which participants received equal practice, but in an orthogonal task that did not require individuation. Caucasian participants were trained to individuate faces of one race (African American or Hispanic) and to make (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  10.  18
    How Category Structure Influences the Perception of Object Similarity: The Atypicality Bias.James William Tanaka, Justin Kantner & Marni Bartlett - 2012 - Frontiers in Psychology 3.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11.  22
    Composites, Compromises, and CHARM: What is the Evidence for Blend Memory Representations?Jonathan W. Schooler & James W. Tanaka - 1991 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 120 (1):96-100.
  12.  24
    Angry Facial Expressions Bias Gender Categorization in Children and Adults: Behavioral and Computational Evidence.Laurie Bayet, Olivier Pascalis, Paul C. Quinn, Kang Lee, ÉDouard Gentaz & James W. Tanaka - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  12
    An Other-Race Effect for Configural and Featural Processing of Faces: Upper and Lower Face Regions Play Different Roles.Zhe Wang, Paul C. Quinn, James W. Tanaka, Xiaoyang Yu, Yu-Hao P. Sun, Jiangang Liu, Olivier Pascalis, Liezhong Ge & Kang Lee - 2015 - Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  10
    Can Singular Examples Change Implicit Attitudes in the Real-World?Leslie E. Roos, Sophie Lebrecht, James W. Tanaka & Michael J. Tarr - 2013 - Frontiers in Psychology 4.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  20
    Where Are Object Properties? In the World or in the Mind?James Tanaka - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):493-494.
    This commentary questions whether the category properties of an object can be determined independent of the experience of the categorizer. Expertise studies have shown that the judged properties of an object can differ from expert to novice and from expert to expert. The expertise findings indicate that object properties exist not only in the world, but in the mind of the categorizer.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16.  17
    Parts, Features, and Expertise.James Tanaka - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):37-38.
    Research in expert categorization is consistent with the Schyns et al. claim that functional features are determined by constraints imposed by the learning history of the categorizer and the demands of the categorization task. However, the expertise work also suggests that a distinction should be drawn between the categorizer's perceptions of the constituent parts of the object and its functional features. Although experts and novices may parse a domain-specific object into the same parts, their featural interpretations of those parts may (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark