11 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Jennifer B. McCormick [11]Jennifer McCormick [3]
  1.  68
    Strangers at the benchside: Research ethics consultation.Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4 – 13.
    Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  2.  63
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Strangers at the Beachside: Research Ethics Consultation”.Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4-6.
    Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  3.  59
    Parents’ attitudes toward consent and data sharing in biobanks: A multisite experimental survey.Armand H. Matheny Antommaria, Kyle B. Brothers, John A. Myers, Yana B. Feygin, Sharon A. Aufox, Murray H. Brilliant, Pat Conway, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Nanibaa’ A. Garrison, Carol R. Horowitz, Gail P. Jarvik, Rongling Li, Evette J. Ludman, Catherine A. McCarty, Jennifer B. McCormick, Nathaniel D. Mercaldo, Melanie F. Myers, Saskia C. Sanderson, Martha J. Shrubsole, Jonathan S. Schildcrout, Janet L. Williams, Maureen E. Smith, Ellen Wright Clayton & Ingrid A. Holm - 2018 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 9 (3):128-142.
    Background: The factors influencing parents’ willingness to enroll their children in biobanks are poorly understood. This study sought to assess parents’ willingness to enroll their children, and their perceived benefits, concerns, and information needs under different consent and data-sharing scenarios, and to identify factors associated with willingness. Methods: This large, experimental survey of patients at the 11 eMERGE Network sites used a disproportionate stratified sampling scheme to enrich the sample with historically underrepresented groups. Participants were randomized to receive one of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. [REVIEW]Adam Nishimura, Jantey Carey, Patricia J. Erwin, Jon C. Tilburt, M. Hassan Murad & Jennifer B. McCormick - 2013 - BMC Medical Ethics 14 (1):28.
    Obtaining informed consent is a cornerstone of biomedical research, yet participants comprehension of presented information is often low. The most effective interventions to improve understanding rates have not been identified.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   57 citations  
  5.  44
    Utilizing Focus Groups with Potential Participants and Their Parents: An Approach to Inform Study Design in a Large Clinical Trial.Sandeep Kadimpati, Jennifer B. McCormick, Yichen Chiu, Ashley B. Parker, Aliya Z. Iftikhar, Randall P. Flick & David O. Warner - 2014 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 5 (3):31-38.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6.  30
    The Media and Behavioral Genetics: Alternatives Coexisting with Addiction Genetics.Barbara A. Koenig, Rachel Hammer, Jennifer B. McCormick, Jenny Ostergren & Molly J. Dingel - 2015 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 40 (4):459-486.
    To understand public discourse in the United States on genetic causation of behavioral disorders, we analyzed media representations of genetic research on addiction published between 1990 and 2010. We conclude first that the media simplistically represent biological bases of addiction and willpower as being mutually exclusive: behaviors are either genetically determined, or they are a choice. Second, most articles provide only cursory or no treatment of the environmental contribution. A media focus on genetics directs attention away from environmental factors. Rhetorically, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  34
    Prudentia Populo: Involving the Community in Biobank Governance.Megan A. Allyse, Jennifer B. McCormick & Richard R. Sharp - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (9):1-3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  23
    Responding to Implicit Bias in Abusive Head Trauma Evaluations and Reporting in the PICU: Ethical Consideration During a Clinical Trial.Kent P. Hymel & Jennifer B. McCormick - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (10):114-115.
    Volume 19, Issue 10, October 2019, Page 114-115.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  32
    Bridging the gap: ethical considerations of providing psychological assessment results in research studies.Alexandra C. Kirsch, Michael J. Zaccariello, Jennifer B. McCormick, Richard R. Sharp, Randall P. Flick & David O. Warner - 2021 - Ethics and Behavior 31 (6):381-394.
    ABSTRACT There is limited guidance about whether and how to provide psychological assessment results to research participants. This paper considers several ethical challenges associated with offering individual research results in psychological assessment research. Additionally, the process used to return individual results within a study examining neurodevelopmental effects of anesthesia exposure in children and adolescents is described. Almost all participants requested to know if results were concerning; however, only around a third of those with concerning findings sought additional feedback. Ongoing research (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  28
    Is It Ethically Acceptable to Screen Patients for Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Not Offer Them Positive Air Pressure Therapy in a Clinical Trial?Adelaide Doussau, Joel T. Wu & Jennifer B. McCormick - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (10):76-77.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  19
    Mining the Data: Exploring Rural Patients’ Attitudes about the Use of Their Personal Information in Research.Jennifer B. McCormick, Margaret Hopkins, Erik B. Lehman & Michael J. Green - 2022 - AJOB Empirical Bioethics 13 (2):89-106.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark