25 found
Order:
  1.  44
    The Axioms of Subjective Probability.Peter C. Fishburn - 1986 - Statistical Science 1 (3):335-358.
  2. Nontransitive measurable utility.Peter C. Fishburn - 1982 - Journal of Mathematical Psychology 26:31–67.
  3. On Harsanyi's utilitarian cardinal welfare theorem.Peter C. Fishburn - 1984 - Theory and Decision 17 (1):21-28.
  4.  54
    Even-chance lotteries in social choice theory.Peter C. Fishburn - 1972 - Theory and Decision 3 (1):18-40.
  5.  67
    A theory of subjective expected utility with vague preferences.Peter C. Fishburn - 1975 - Theory and Decision 6 (3):287-310.
  6.  97
    Fair division of indivisible items.Steven J. Brams, Paul H. Edelman & Peter C. Fishburn - 2003 - Theory and Decision 55 (2):147-180.
    This paper analyzes criteria of fair division of a set of indivisible items among people whose revealed preferences are limited to rankings of the items and for whom no side payments are allowed. The criteria include refinements of Pareto optimality and envy-freeness as well as dominance-freeness, evenness of shares, and two criteria based on equally-spaced surrogate utilities, referred to as maxsum and equimax. Maxsum maximizes a measure of aggregate utility or welfare, whereas equimax lexicographically maximizes persons' utilities from smallest to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  7.  66
    Models of individual preference and choice.Peter C. Fishburn - 1977 - Synthese 36 (3):287 - 314.
  8.  61
    Noncompensatory preferences.Peter C. Fishburn - 1976 - Synthese 33 (1):393 - 403.
  9.  17
    On the nature of expected utility.Peter C. Fishburn - 1977 - In Maurice Allais & Ole Hagen (eds.), Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais Paradox. D. Reidel. pp. 243--257.
  10.  42
    The axioms and algebra of ambiguity.Peter C. Fishburn - 1993 - Theory and Decision 34 (2):119-137.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  11. Subjective expected utility: A review of normative theories. [REVIEW]Peter C. Fishburn - 1981 - Theory and Decision 13 (2):139-199.
  12.  41
    Paradoxes of Fair Division.Steven J. Brams, Paul H. Edelman & Peter C. Fishburn - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy 98 (6):300.
  13.  46
    Mixture axioms in linear and multilinear utility theories.Peter C. Fishburn & Fred S. Roberts - 1978 - Theory and Decision 9 (2):161-171.
  14.  41
    On the foundations of mean-variance analyses.Peter C. Fishburn - 1979 - Theory and Decision 10 (1-4):99-111.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  15.  99
    Utility theory with inexact preferences and degrees of preference.Peter C. Fishburn - 1970 - Synthese 21 (2):204 - 221.
    a–b* c–d is taken to mean that your degree of preference for a over b is less than your degree of preference for c over d. Various properties of the strength-of-preference comparison relation * are examined along with properties of simple preferences defined from *. The investigation recognizes an individual's limited ability to make precise judgments. Several utility theorems relating a–b * c–d to u(a)–u(b) are included.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  16.  38
    Anonymity conditions in social choice theory.Donald E. Campbell & Peter C. Fishburn - 1980 - Theory and Decision 12 (1):21-39.
  17.  43
    Binary 2 x 2 Games.Peter C. Fishburn - 1990 - Theory and Decision 29 (3):165.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  39
    Convex stochastic dominance with finite consequence sets.Peter C. Fishburn - 1974 - Theory and Decision 5 (2):119-137.
  19.  43
    Dimensions of election procedures: Analyses and comparisons.Peter C. Fishburn - 1983 - Theory and Decision 15 (4):371-397.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20.  65
    Ordered preference differences without ordered preferences.Peter C. Fishburn - 1986 - Synthese 67 (2):361 - 368.
    Axiomatizations of ordered preference differences typically assume that preferences are ordered. However, the mere assumption that preference differences can be ordered says nothing about whether preferences themselves are ordered. Utility representations for ordered differences without ordered preferences are investigated.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  37
    Signed orders in linear and nonlinear utility theory.Peter C. Fishburn & Irving H. La Valle - 1996 - Theory and Decision 40 (1):79-101.
  22.  50
    Unique nontransitive measurement on finite sets.Peter C. Fishburn - 1990 - Theory and Decision 28 (1):21-46.
  23.  40
    An analysis of simple counting methods for ordering incomplete ordinal data.William V. Gehrlein & Peter C. Fishburn - 1977 - Theory and Decision 8 (3):209-227.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24.  39
    Equivalent decision trees and their associated strategy sets.Irving H. Lavalle & Peter C. Fishburn - 1987 - Theory and Decision 23 (1):37-63.
  25.  67
    Majority efficiencies for simple voting procedures: Summary and interpretation. [REVIEW]Peter C. Fishburn & William V. Gehrlein - 1982 - Theory and Decision 14 (2):141-153.