Graduate studies at Western
Critical Horizons 10 (3):341-370 (2009)
|Abstract||In this article I intend to show the strict relation between the notions of “second nature” and “recognition”. To do so I begin with a problem (circularity) proper to the theory of Hegelian and post- Hegelian Anerkennung. The solution strategy I propose is signifi cant also in terms of bringing into focus the problems connected with a notion of “space of reasons” that stems from the Hegelian concept of “Spirit”. I thus broach the notion of “second nature” as a bridgeconcept that can play a key role both for a renewal of the theory of Anerkennung and for a rethinking of the “space of reasons” within the debate between Robert Brandom and John McDowell. Against this background I illustrate the novelties introduced by the dialectical conception of the relation between fi rst and second nature developed by Hegel and the contribution this idea can make to a revisited theory of recognition as a phenomenon articulated on two levels. I then return to the question of the space of reasons to show the contribution the renewed conception of recognition as second nature makes to the definition of its intrinsic sociality as something that is not in principle opposed to a sense of naturalness.|
|Keywords||Second Nature Recognition Hegel John McDowell Robert Brandom Terry Pinkard Robert Pippin Wilfrid Sellars Space of reasons Spirit|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Italo Testa (2011). Social Space and the Ontology of Recognition. In Heikki Ikäheimo Arto Laitinen (ed.), Recognition and Social Ontology. Brill Books (pp. 287-308).
Italo Testa (2012). How Does Recognition Emerge From Nature? The Genesis of Consciousness in Hegel’s Jena Writings. Critical Horizons 13 (2):176-196.
Robert Sinnerbrink (2004). Recognitive Freedom: Hegel and the Problem of Recognition. Critical Horizons 5 (1):271-295.
Italo Testa (2007). Criticism From Within Nature: The Dialectic Between First and Second Nature From McDowell to Adorno. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (4):473-497.
Italo Testa (2009). Criticism and Normativity. Brandom and Habermas Between Kant and Hegel. In D. Canale G. Tuzet (ed.), The Rules of Inference. Inferentialism in Law and Philosophy, Egea, Milano. Egea (pp. pp. 29-44).
Piotr Makowski (2008). Hegel on Recognition: Moral Implications of ‘Lordship and Bondage’ Dialectic. Hegel Jahrbuch:119-124.
James R. O.’Shea (2012). Prospects for a Stereoscopic Vision of Our Thinking Nature: On Sellars, Brandom, and Millikan. Humana.Mente 21.
Stephen Houlgate (2010). Action, Right and Morality in Hegel's Philosophy of Right. In Arto Laitinen & Constantine Sandis (eds.), Hegel on Action. Palgrave Macmillan.
Arto Laitinen & Constantine Sandis (eds.) (2010). Hegel on Action. Palgrave Macmillan.
Saul Tobias (2006). Hegel and the Politics of Recognition. Owl of Minerva 38 (1/2):101-126.
T. Midtgarden (2013). Conflicting and Complementary Conceptions of Discursive Practice in Non-Metaphysical Interpretations of Hegel. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (6):559-576.
Paul Redding (2011). “The Relevance of Hegel’s “Absolute Spirit” to Social Normativity”. In Heikki Ikäheimo & Arto Laitinen (eds.), Recognition and Social Ontology. Brill.
P. Canivez (2011). Pathologies of Recognition. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (8):851-887.
Added to index2011-10-29
Total downloads35 ( #39,349 of 740,480 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,739 of 740,480 )
How can I increase my downloads?