15 found
Order:
  1. Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-Analysis of Predictive Validity.Eric Luis Uhlmann - unknown
    This review of 122 research reports (184 independent samples, 14,900 subjects) found average r ϭ .274 for prediction of behavioral, judgment, and physiological measures by Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures. Parallel explicit (i.e., self-report) measures, available in 156 of these samples (13,068 subjects), also predicted effectively (average r ϭ .361), but with much greater variability of effect size. Predictive validity of self-report was impaired for socially sensitive topics, for which impression..
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  2.  34
    When It Takes a Bad Person to Do the Right Thing.Eric Luis Uhlmann, Luke Zhu & David Tannenbaum - 2013 - Cognition 126 (2):326-334.
  3.  24
    Money is Essential: Ownership Intuitions Are Linked to Physical Currency.Eric Luis Uhlmann & Luke Zhu - 2013 - Cognition 127 (2):220-229.
  4.  72
    Do Normative Standards Advance Our Understanding of Moral Judgment?David A. Pizarro & Eric Luis Uhlmann - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (4):558-559.
    Sunstein's review of research on moral heuristics is rich and informative – even without his central claim that individuals often commit moral errors. We question the value of positing such a normative moral framework for the study of moral judgment. We also propose an alternative standard for evaluating moral judgments – that of subjective rationality.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  5.  29
    Varieties of Social Cognition.Eric Luis Uhlmann, David A. Pizarro & Paul Bloom - 2008 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 38 (3):293-322.
    Recent work within psychology demonstrates that unconscious cognition plays a central role in the judgments and actions of individuals. We distinguish between two basic types unconscious social cognition: unconsciousness of the influences on judgments and actions, and unconscious of the mental states that give rise to judgments and actions. Influence unconsciousness is corroborated by strong empirical evidence, but unconscious states are difficult to verify. We discuss procedures aimed at providing conclusive evidence of state unconsciousness, and apply them to recent empirical (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  6.  9
    Making Prepublication Independent Replication Mainstream.Warren Tierney, Martin Schweinsberg & Eric Luis Uhlmann - 2018 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 41.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  7.  30
    The Logic of Moral Outrage.Eric Luis Uhlmann - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (1):38-38.
    McCullough et al.'s functionalist model of revenge is highly compatible with the person-centered approach to moral judgment, which emphasizes the adaptive manner in which social perceivers derive character information from moral acts. Evidence includes act–person dissociations in which an act is seen as less immoral than a comparison act, yet as a clearer indicator of poor moral character.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  3
    Attitudes or Cultural Knowledge?Eric Luis Uhlmann, T. Andrew Poehlman & Brian A. Nosek - 2012 - In Jon Hanson & John Jost (eds.), Ideology, Psychology, and Law. Oup Usa.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9.  2
    Quantifying the Prevalence and Adaptiveness of Behavioral Rationalizations.Warren Tierney & Eric Luis Uhlmann - 2020 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 43.
    Critical aspects of the “rationality of rationalizations” thesis are open empirical questions. These include the frequency with which past behavior determines attitudes, the extent to which post hoc justifications take on a life of their own and shape future actions, and whether rationalizers experience benefits in well-being, social influence, performance, or other desirable outcomes.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  26
    Blood is Thicker: Moral Spillover Effects Based on Kinship.Eric Luis Uhlmann, Luke Zhu, David A. Pizarro & Paul Bloom - 2012 - Cognition 124 (2):239-243.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  12
    Conformity Under Uncertainty: Reliance on Gender Stereotypes in Online Hiring Decisions.Eric Luis Uhlmann & Raphael Silberzahn - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (1):103-104.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  23
    Post Hoc Rationalism in Science.Eric Luis Uhlmann - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):214-214.
    In advocating Bayesian Enlightenment as a solution to Bayesian Fundamentalism, Jones & Love (J&L) rule out a broader critique of rationalist approaches to cognition. However, Bayesian Fundamentalism is merely one example of the more general phenomenon of Rationalist Fundamentalism: the tendency to characterize human judgments as rational and optimal in a post hoc manner, after the empirical data are already known.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  20
    System-Justifying Motives Can Lead to Both the Acceptance and the Rejection of Innate Explanations for Group Differences.Eric Luis Uhlmann, Luke Zhu, Victoria L. Brescoll & George E. Newman - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (5):503-504.
    Recent experimental evidence indicates that intuitions about inherence and system justification are distinct psychological processes, and that the inherence heuristic supplies important explanatory frameworks that are accepted or rejected based on their consistency with one's motivation to justify the system.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  21
    The Motivated Use and Neglect of Base Rates.Eric Luis Uhlmann, Victoria L. Brescoll & David Pizarro - 2007 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (3):284-285.
    Ego-justifying, group-justifying, and system-justifying motivations contribute to base-rate respect. People tend to neglect (and use) base rates when doing so allows them to draw desired conclusions about matters such as their health, the traits of their in-groups, and the fairness of the social system. Such motivations can moderate whether people rely on the rule-based versus associative strategies identified by Barbey & Sloman (B&S).
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  23
    The Problem of the Null in the Verification of Unconscious Cognition.Eric Luis Uhlmann - 2014 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37 (1):42-43.