37 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Stephen R. Latham [37]Stephen Rogers Latham [1]
  1.  6
    Molecular HIV Surveillance and Public Health Ethics: Old Wine in New Bottles.Liza Dawson & Stephen R. Latham - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (10):39-41.
    Volume 20, Issue 10, October 2020, Page 39-41.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  8
    Personal Transformation and Advance Directives: An Experimental Bioethics Approach.Brian D. Earp, Stephen R. Latham & Kevin P. Tobia - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):72-75.
    Volume 20, Issue 8, August 2020, Page 72-75.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  19
    Political Theory, Values and Public Health.Stephen R. Latham - 2016 - Public Health Ethics 9 (2):139-149.
    This article offers some general criticisms of the idea that any political theory can legitimate public health interventions, and then some particular criticisms of Civic Republicanism as a political theory for public health. Civic Republicanism, I argue, legitimizes liberty-infringing public health interventions by demanding high levels of civic engagement in framing and reviewing them; to demand such engagement in pursuit of such a baseline value as health will leave insufficient civic energy for the pursuit of higher values.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  18
    Asymmetrical Intuitions.Stephen R. Latham - 2018 - American Journal of Bioethics 18 (11):54-55.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  8
    Responsibility for Collateral Harm.Stephen R. Latham - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (10):55-57.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  33
    Kant Condemned All Suicide.Stephen R. Latham - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (6):49-51.
  7.  15
    Expert Bioethics Testimony.Stephen R. Latham - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):242-247.
    The question of whether the normative testimony of ethics experts should be admissible under the rules of evidence has been the subject of much debate. Professor Imwinkelried's paper is an effort to get us, for a moment, to change that subject. He seeks to turn our attention, instead, to a means by which bioethics experts’ normative analyses might come before the court without regard to the rules of evidence - a means lying formally outside those rules’ jurisdiction. The court, he (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  8.  7
    Expert Bioethics Testimony.Stephen R. Latham - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):242-247.
    The question of whether the normative testimony of ethics experts should be admissible under the rules of evidence has been the subject of much debate. Professor Imwinkelried's paper is an effort to get us, for a moment, to change that subject. He seeks to turn our attention, instead, to a means by which bioethics experts’ normative analyses might come before the court without regard to the rules of evidence - a means lying formally outside those rules’ jurisdiction. The court, he (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  9.  11
    Moral Distress and Cooperation With Wrongdoing.Stephen R. Latham - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (12):31-32.
  10.  28
    Some Limits of Decision-Theory in Bioethics: Rights, Ends, and Thick Concepts.Stephen R. Latham - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (3):56 – 58.
  11.  15
    Too Few Physicians, or Too Many?Stephen R. Latham - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (1):11-12.
  12.  8
    Professionalization of Clinical Ethics Consultation: Defining (Down) the Code.Stephen R. Latham - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (5):54-56.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  21
    Whither the Affordable Care Act?Stephen R. Latham - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (3):14-15.
  14.  21
    US Law and Animal Experimentation: A Critical Primer.Stephen R. Latham - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 42 (s1):S35 - S39.
  15.  10
    The (Low) Life of Ethics Codes.Stephen R. Latham - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):46 – 48.
  16.  12
    Debating Medical Utility, Not Futility: Ethical Dilemmas in Treating Critically Ill People Who Use Injection Drugs.Stephen R. Baldassarri, Ike Lee, Stephen R. Latham & Gail D'Onofrio - 2018 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 46 (2):241-251.
    Physicians who care for critically ill people with opioid use disorder frequently face medical, legal, and ethical questions related to the provision of life-saving medical care. We examine a complex medical case that illustrates these challenges in a person with relapsing injection drug use. We focus on a specific question: Is futility an appropriate and useful standard by which to determine provision of life-saving care to such individuals? If so, how should such determinations be made? If not, what alternative decisionmaking (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17.  6
    “Aid in Dying” in the Courts.Stephen R. Latham - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (3):11-12.
  18.  2
    Avoiding Ineffective End‐of‐Life Care: A Lesson From Triage?Stephen R. Latham - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (3):71-72.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  5
    A Note—and a Call—From the Weeds.Stephen R. Latham - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (3):inside front cover-inside front.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  21
    Between Public Opinion and Public Policy: Human Embryonic Stem-Cell Research and Path-Dependency.Stephen R. Latham - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):800-806.
    In bioethics as in other areas of health policy, historical institutional factors can shape policy independently of interests or public opinion. This article finds policy divergence among countries with similar national moral views of stem cell research, and explains that divergence as the product of path-dependency.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21.  7
    Between Public Opinion and Public Policy: Human Embryonic Stem-Cell Research and Path-Dependency.Stephen R. Latham - 2009 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):800-806.
    My aim in this paper is simply to show that, in bioethics no less than in other areas of health care, policy in democracies is shaped not only by principles and values, but also — and to some extent independently — by the shape and history of particular political institutions and past policies. “Path dependency,” or what one scholar has called the “accidental logics” of already-existing institutions, condition and guide national policy choices. These institutional and historical pressures can even create (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  14
    Conflict of Interest in Medical Practice.Stephen R. Latham - 2001 - In Michael Davis & Andrew Stark (eds.), Conflict of Interest in the Professions. Oxford University Press. pp. 279--301.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  9
    Ethics and Politics.Stephen R. Latham - 2002 - American Journal of Bioethics 2 (1):46 – 47.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  9
    Lawrence Gostin's Enthusiastic Globalism.Stephen R. Latham - 2016 - Hastings Center Report 46 (6):43-44.
    These are hard days for globalism. A major candidate for the United States presidency ran on an anti-immigration, anti-free-trade platform and denounced such venerable international institutions as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and the United Nations. The European Union is under threat after the vote for Brexit; the Euro is under strain. China is denouncing and ignoring the result of an international arbitration over its claims to the South China Sea. Nationalist, xenophobic political parties are in the ascendency around the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  7
    Non-Human Germline Interventions.Stephen R. Latham - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (8):23-25.
    Volume 20, Issue 8, August 2020, Page 23-25.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Policy and Politics: Speaking Off Label.Stephen R. Latham - forthcoming - Hastings Center Report.
  27.  17
    Review of Marc A. Rodwin, Conflicts of Interest and the Future of Medicine: The United States, France and Japan. [REVIEW]Stephen R. Latham - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (10):36 - 37.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 10, Page 36-37, October 2011.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  10
    Review of The Story of Success. [REVIEW]Stephen R. Latham - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 3:115-117.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  15
    Review of Wesley J. Smith, Secondhand Smoke. [REVIEW]Stephen R. Latham - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):65 – 66.
  30.  22
    Speaking Off Label.Stephen R. Latham - 2010 - Hastings Center Report 40 (6):9-10.
    In the United States, while it is legal for physicians to prescribe drugs for “off-label” indications (uses for which the drugs do not have Food and Drug Administration approval), it is largely—though not entirely—illegal for drug manufacturers to promote off-label uses of their drugs to physicians. In recent months, the rules against off-label marketing have been rigorously enforced: in October, Allergan reached a $375 million settlement over off-label promotion of Botox; in September, Novartis settled an off-label marketing dispute for $422.5 (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  15
    Trump's Abortion‐Promoting Aid Policy.Stephen R. Latham - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (4):7-8.
    On the fourth day of his presidency, Donald Trump reinstated and greatly expanded the “Mexico City policy,” which imposes antiabortion restrictions on U.S. foreign health aid. In general, the policy has prohibited U.S. funding of any family-planning groups that use even non-U.S. funds to perform abortions; prohibited aid recipients from lobbying for liberalization of abortion laws; prohibited nongovernment organizations from creating educational materials on abortion as a family-planning method; and prohibited health workers from referring patients for legal abortions in any (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  10
    The Author Replies.Stephen R. Latham - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 45 (5):3-4.
    A response to “Normalizing Aid-in-Dying within the Practice of Medicine,” by Kathryn L. Tucker.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  6
    The Author Replies.Stephen R. Latham - 2014 - Hastings Center Report 44 (2):5-5.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  26
    The "Real-Life" Death Panel, Reformed.Stephen R. Latham - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (1):53-53.
    The United Kingdom's coalition government has just begun the most sweeping overhaul of the National Health Service since its inception.1 Under the reforms, 80 percent of the NHS budget will be handed over to about five hundred local consortia of primary care physicians, who will be empowered to make medical spending and allocation decisions for their patients. The 152 existing Primary Care Trusts (PCTs), which purchase hospital and community care for patients and oversee primary care physicians in their regions, will (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  9
    Time to Decriminalize HIV Status.Stephen R. Latham - 2013 - Hastings Center Report 43 (5):12-13.
    We punish people who recklessly or deliberately expose others to HIV? Why not try to force HIV-positive individuals to disclose their.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  8
    The United Kingdom Revisits Its Surrogacy Law.Stephen R. Latham - 2020 - Hastings Center Report 50 (1):6-7.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  3
    Work Requirements That Don't Work.Stephen R. Latham - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (6):5-6.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark