Results for 'simple reactions'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  25
    Simple reaction time as a function of the relative frequency of the preparatory interval.Theodore P. Zahn & David Rosenthal - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (1):15.
  2. Simple Reactions.E. B. Titchener - 1895 - Philosophical Review 4:330.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  25
    Comparative Simple Reactions to Light and Sound.F. L. Wells, C. M. Kelley & G. Murphy - 1921 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 4 (1):57.
  4.  13
    Simple reaction time as a function of time uncertainty.Edmund T. Klemmer - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 54 (3):195.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5.  10
    Secular Slowing of Auditory Simple Reaction Time in Sweden.Guy Madison, Michael A. Woodley of Menie & Justus Sänger - 2016 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10:190223.
    There are indications that simple reaction time might have slowed in Western countries, based on both cohort- and multi-study comparisons. A possible limitation of the latter method in particular is measurement error stemming from methods variance, which results from the fact that instruments and experimental conditions change over time and between studies. We therefore set out to measure the simple auditory reaction time (SRT) of 7,081 individuals (2,997 males and 4,084 females) born in Sweden 1959-1985 (subjects were aged (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6.  45
    Simple reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity in decibels of light and sound.David L. Kohfeld - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 88 (2):251.
  7.  19
    Simple reactions.E. B. Titchener - 1895 - Mind 4 (13):74-81.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  8.  23
    Simple reaction time to change as a substitute for the disjunctive reaction.A. Steinman & S. Veniar - 1944 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 34 (2):152.
  9.  15
    Simple reaction time as a function of preparation for a subsequent choice reaction time task.Joseph E. Kovesdi & Stefan Slak - 1982 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 20 (1):45-47.
  10.  8
    Simple réaction à un double commentaire.Maurice Lagueux - 1984 - Dialogue 23 (3):493-501.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11.  21
    Initial improvement in simple reaction time.In-Mao Liu & Shang-Wu Kuo - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (4p1):593.
  12.  30
    Time uncertainty in simple reaction time.Edmund T. Klemmer - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (3):179.
  13.  32
    The Victorians were still faster than us. Commentary: Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time.Michael Anthony Woodley of Menie, Jan te Nijenhuis & Raegan Murphy - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9:150650.
  14.  20
    Effects Simulating Fatigue in Simple Reactions.F. L. Wells, C. M. Kelley & G. Murphy - 1921 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 4 (2):137.
  15.  10
    On Attention and Simple Reaction.F. L. Wells, C. M. Kelley & G. Murphy - 1921 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 4 (5):391.
  16.  16
    Criterion effects in simple reaction time: Results with stimulus intensity and duration manipulations.A. J. Sanford - 1972 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 95 (2):370.
  17.  17
    Ear Preference in a Simple Reaction-Time Task.J. Richard Simon - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):49.
  18.  12
    Foreperiod effects in simple reaction time: Anticipation or expectancy?Joan G. Snodgrass - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p2):1.
  19.  57
    Factors influencing the latency of simple reaction time.David L. Woods, John M. Wyma, E. William Yund, Timothy J. Herron & Bruce Reed - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
  20.  30
    Psychophysically principled models of visual simple reaction time.Philip L. Smith - 1995 - Psychological Review 102 (3):567-593.
  21.  33
    Effects of foreperiod, foreperiod variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time.D. H. Drazin - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (1):43.
  22. Multiple detector models of simple reaction-time.Pl Smith - 1991 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 29 (6):497-497.
  23.  19
    Some exposure duration effects in simple reaction time.Ira H. Bernstein, D. Gregory Futch & D. L. Schurman - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 97 (3):317.
  24.  23
    Effects of preknowledge and stimulus intensity upon simple reaction time.Jeffrey M. Speiss - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1):109.
  25.  12
    Stimulus Intensity and Adaptation Level As Determinants of Simple Reaction Time.David L. Kohfeld - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 76 (3p1):468.
  26.  10
    The 'type-theory' of the simple reaction.E. B. Titchener - 1896 - Mind 5 (18):236-241.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  27.  14
    Tapping rate and expectancy in simple reaction time tasks.P. A. Vroon & A. G. Vroon - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1):85.
  28.  19
    Attention bias and the relation of perception lag to simple reaction time.A. J. Sanford - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (3):443.
  29.  17
    Effects of foreperiod, induced muscular tension, and stimulus regularity on simple reaction time.Warren H. Teichner - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (4):277.
  30.  10
    ‘Failure of Bloch’ s law for simple reaction time.Mitchell Grossberg - 1974 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 4 (2):147-149.
  31.  4
    The Effect of Caffein and Acetanilid on Simple Reaction Time.W. Schilling - 1921 - Psychological Review 28 (1):72-79.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  18
    Altered Inhibitory Mechanisms in Parkinson’s Disease: Evidence From Lexical Decision and Simple Reaction Time Tasks.Alban Letanneux, Jean-Luc Velay, François Viallet & Serge Pinto - 2021 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15.
    IntroductionAlthough the motor signs of Parkinson’s disease are well defined, nonmotor symptoms, including higher-level language deficits, have also been shown to be frequent in patients with PD. In the present study, we used a lexical decision task to find out whether access to the mental lexicon is impaired in patients with PD, and whether task performance is affected by bradykinesia.Materials and MethodsParticipants were 34 nondemented patients with PD, either without medication or under optimum medication. A total of 19 age-matched control (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  24
    Effects of timing signal of simple reaction time with "non-aging" foreperiods.Marilyn Granjon, Jean Requin, Henri Durup & Guy Reynard - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (1):139.
  34.  16
    Effects of the intensity of auditory and visual ready signals on simple reaction time.David L. Kohfeld - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (1p1):88.
  35.  23
    Effects of false feedback and stimulus intensity on simple reaction time.Kerm Henriksen - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (2):287.
  36.  14
    Remote action potentials at the moment of response in a simple reaction-time situation.Robert L. Henderson - 1952 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 44 (4):238.
  37.  20
    A comparison of choreic with normal children on the basis of simple reaction times to visual and auditory stimuli.D. A. Bradshaw - 1937 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (2):184.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38.  31
    The type-theory of the simple reaction.E. B. Titchener - 1895 - Mind 4 (16):506-514.
  39.  20
    The effects of brief variable foreperiods on simple reaction time.Donald J. Polzella, Eric G. Ramsey & Samuel M. Bower - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (5):467-469.
  40.  7
    Intensity and predictability of background noise as determinants of simple reaction time.David L. Kohfeld & Dennis W. Goedecke - 1978 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 12 (2):129-132.
  41.  25
    The `type-theory' of the simple reaction.E. B. Titchener - 1896 - Mind 5 (18):236-241.
  42.  5
    Review of Zur beurtheilung der zusammengesetzten reactionen, Beobachtungen bei zusammengesetzten reactionen. Zwei briefliche mittheilungen an den herausgeber, Simple reactions, and Two points in reaction-time experimentation. [REVIEW]No Authorship Indicated - 1895 - Psychological Review 2 (2):200-202.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Simple chemical reactions in the solid state: Towards elaborating a conception. [REVIEW]A. Korobov - 2005 - Foundations of Chemistry 7 (3):307-314.
    In contrast to the conventional homogeneous kinetics, there is no conception of a simple reaction in the solid-state reaction kinetics. The geometric-probabilistic phenomenology currently in use is not adequate for describing the interplay between the chemical mechanism and the observed kinetic behaviour. An attempt is made to formulate a conception of simple reaction in the solid state as a basis for constructing kinetic models of involved reactions.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  24
    Some simple apparatus for serial reactions.J. F. Dashiell - 1930 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 13 (4):352.
  45.  29
    Some Experiments on Simple and Choice Reaction Time.Joan Gay Snodgrass, R. Duncan Luce & Eugene Galanter - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (1):1.
  46.  13
    Laws of the simple visual reaction time.Warren H. Teichner & Marjorie J. Krebs - 1972 - Psychological Review 79 (4):344-358.
  47.  47
    The Radiation Reaction Problem in a Simple Coupled Model.Armando Bernui - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (1):121-138.
    The complete description of the interaction between an external electromagnetic field and a charged particle causing it to radiate is one of the most fundamental problems in classical electrodynamics. Here we provide a simple coupled model that describes via the Lagrangian of the physical system the full radiation reaction process resulting from the particle–field interactions which simulate the electromagnetic ones. The particle and field evolution equations obtained from the Lagrangian are studied as an initial value problem giving rise to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Le Temps de réaction simple des sensations olfactives.N. Vaschide - 1902 - Revue de Philosophie 3:198.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  19
    Group factors in simple and discriminative reaction times.R. H. Seashore, R. Starmann, W. E. Kendall & J. S. Helmick - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (4):346.
  50.  30
    Individual differences in simple auditory reaction times of hands, feet and jaws.S. H. Seashore & R. H. Seashore - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (4):342.
1 — 50 / 1000