Results for 'stimulus‐response repertoires'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  32
    Exploring the evolution of complexity in signaling networks.John H. Holland - 2001 - Complexity 7 (2):34-45.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  2.  13
    Stimulus-response contiguity in classical aversive conditioning.R. A. Champion - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):35.
  3. A stimulus-response analysis of anxiety and its role as a reinforcing agent.O. H. Mowrer - 1939 - Psychological Review 46 (6):553-565.
  4.  25
    Stimulus-response generalization with discrete response choices.Gustav Levine - 1960 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 60 (1):23.
  5.  28
    Spatial stimulus-response compatibility and affordance effects are not ruled by the same mechanisms.Marianna Ambrosecchia, Barbara F. M. Marino, Luiz G. Gawryszewski & Lucia Riggio - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
  6.  81
    Stimulus, response, meaning.Jonathan Bennett - unknown
  7.  11
    Stimulus-response coding and amount of information as determinants of reaction time.Sidney Hellyer - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (5):521.
  8.  22
    The stimulus-response crisis.Robyn Wilford, Juan Ardila-Cifuentes, Edward Baggs & Michael L. Anderson - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45.
    Yarkoni correctly recognizes that one reason for psychology's generalizability crisis is the failure to account for variance within experiments. We argue that this problem, and the generalizability crisis broadly, is a necessary consequence of the stimulus-response paradigm widely used in psychology research. We point to another methodology, perturbation experiments, as a remedy that is not vulnerable to the same problems.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  5
    Stimulus-Response Theorie endlicher Automaten.P. Suppes - 1983 - In Michael Heidelberger & Wolfgang Balzer (eds.), Zur Logik Empirischer Theorien. De Gruyter. pp. 245-280.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10.  78
    Behaviorism, finite automata, and stimulus response theory.Raymond J. Nelson - 1975 - Theory and Decision 6 (August):249-67.
    In this paper it is argued that certain stimulus-response learning models which are adequate to represent finite automata (acceptors) are not adequate to represent noninitial state input-output automata (transducers). This circumstance suggests the question whether or not the behavior of animals if satisfactorily modelled by automata is predictive. It is argued in partial answer that there are automata which can be explained in the sense that their transition and output functions can be described (roughly, Hempel-type covering law explanation) while their (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  11.  12
    Effect of stimulus-response meaningfulness on paired-associate learning and retention.V. K. Kothurkar - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (3):305.
  12.  7
    Effect of stimulus-response delay on ear superiority for dichotically presented digits.Israel Nachshon & Amiram Carmon - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 99 (2):288.
  13. Associations to stimulus-response theories of language.Thomas G. Bever - 1968 - In T. Dixon & Deryck Horton (eds.), Verbal Behavior and General Behavior Theory. Prentice-Hall. pp. 478--494.
  14.  4
    A stimulus-response analysis of the hoarding habit in the rat.Melvin H. Marx - 1950 - Psychological Review 57 (2):80-93.
  15.  8
    A stimulus-response analysis of the interaction of cue-producing and instrumental responses.Albert E. Goss - 1955 - Psychological Review 62 (1):20-31.
  16.  13
    Stimulus-response compatibility effect in left-right discriminations.Leslie A. Whitaker - 1980 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (5):345-347.
  17. What stimulus-response-effector relations are learned in choice-reaction tasks.Rw Proctor & A. Dutta - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (6):458-458.
  18.  11
    The stimulus-response relation.J. L. Mursell - 1922 - Psychological Review 29 (2):146-162.
  19.  21
    Stimulus-response meaning theory.Jonathan Bennett - 1984 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7 (4):553.
  20.  13
    Stimulus–response compatibility based on affective arousal.Thomas Kleinsorge - 2009 - Cognition and Emotion 23 (4):663-674.
  21.  8
    A stimulus-response analysis of repression and insight in psychotherapy.F. J. Shaw - 1946 - Psychological Review 53 (1):36-42.
  22.  15
    Stimulus-response theory of automata and TOTE hierarchies: A reply to Arbib.Patrick Suppes - 1969 - Psychological Review 76 (5):511-514.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23.  15
    The Stimulus-Response Fallacy in Psychology.L. L. Thurstone - 1923 - Psychological Review 30 (5):354-369.
  24.  20
    Stimulus-response compatibility as a determinant of interference in a Stroop-like task.Elaine Fox - 1992 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30 (5):377-380.
  25.  21
    Total time and stimulus-response imagery in paired-associate learning.John H. Mueller & Frank L. Slaymaker - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 85 (2):288.
  26.  14
    Amount and locus of stimulus-response overlap in paired-associate acquisition.Douglas L. Nelson & Richard M. Garland - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (2):297.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  36
    Subjective reports of stimulus, response, and decision times in speeded tasks: How accurate are decision time reports?Jeff Miller, Paula Vieweg, Nicolas Kruize & Belinda McLea - 2010 - Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1013-1036.
    Four experiments examined how accurately participants can report the times of their own decisions. Within an auditory reaction time task, participants reported the time at which the tone was presented, they decided on the response, or the response key was pressed. Decision time reports were checked for plausibility against the actual RTs, and we compared the effects of experimental manipulations on these two measures to see whether the reported decision times showed appropriate effects. In addition, we estimated the amount of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  28.  15
    Two roads leading to the same evaluative conditioning effect? Stimulus-response binding versus operant conditioning.Tarini Singh, Christian Frings & Eva Walther - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.
    Evaluative Conditioning (EC) refers to changes in our liking or disliking of a stimulus due to its pairing with other positive or negative stimuli. In addition to stimulus-based mechanisms, recent research has shown that action-based mechanisms can also lead to EC effects. Research, based on action control theories, has shown that pairing a positive or negative action with a neutral stimulus results in EC effects (Stimulus-Response binding). Similarly, research studies using Operant Conditioning (OC) approaches have also observed EC effects. The (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  13
    Cognitive versus stimulus-response theories of learning.Kenneth W. Spence - 1950 - Psychological Review 57 (3):159-172.
  30.  15
    Multidimensional vector model of stimulus–response compatibility.Motonori Yamaguchi & Robert W. Proctor - 2012 - Psychological Review 119 (2):272-303.
  31.  10
    Strength of auditory stimulus-response compatability as a function of task complexity.James Callan, Diane Klisz & Oscar A. Parsons - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 102 (6):1039.
  32. Intentional control of automatic stimulus-response translation.Bernhard Hommel - 2000 - In Yves Rossetti (ed.), Beyond Dissociation: Interaction Between Dissociated Implicit and Explicit Processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  33.  13
    Emotional arousal does not modulate stimulus-response binding and retrieval effects.Carina G. Giesen & Andreas B. Eder - 2022 - Cognition and Emotion 36 (8):1509-1521.
    The adaptation-by-binding account and the arousal-biased competition model suggest that emotional arousal increases binding effects for transient links between stimuli and responses. Two highly-powered, pre-registered experiments tested whether transient stimulus-response bindings are stronger for high versus low arousing stimuli. Emotional words were presented in a sequential prime-probe design in which stimulus relation, response relation, and stimulus arousal were orthogonally manipulated. In Experiment 1 (N = 101), words with high and low arousal levels were presented individually in prime and probe displays. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  1
    In defense of stimulus-response psychology.J. R. Kantor - 1933 - Psychological Review 40 (4):324-336.
  35. Suppes from Stimulus-response to Brain Waves Analysis: A Tale on the White Knight of Behaviorism.Claudia Arrighi - 2006 - Epistemologia 29 (2):267-290.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  5
    On a stimulus-response analysis of insight in psychotherapy.William Seeman - 1951 - Psychological Review 58 (4):302-305.
  37.  5
    Knowledge and stimulus-response psychology.D. E. Berlyne - 1954 - Psychological Review 61 (4):245-254.
  38.  16
    Memory limitations of stimulus-response models.Michael A. Arbib - 1969 - Psychological Review 76 (5):507-510.
  39.  17
    Video touch-screen stimulus-response surface for use with primates.Timothy F. Elsmore, John K. Parkinson & Roger L. Mellgren - 1989 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 27 (1):60-63.
  40.  21
    Further studies of reminiscence effects with variations in stimulus-response relationships.Donald A. Riley - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (2):101.
  41.  32
    Learning and performance on a key-pressing task as function of the degree of spatial stimulus-response correspondence.Robert E. Morin & David A. Grant - 1955 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 49 (1):39.
  42.  26
    Flowers and spiders in spatial stimulus-response compatibility: does affective valence influence selection of task-sets or selection of responses?Motonori Yamaguchi, Jing Chen, Scott Mishler & Robert W. Proctor - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (5):1003-1017.
    ABSTRACTThe present study examined the effect of stimulus valence on two levels of selection in the cognitive system, selection of a task-set and selection of a response. In the first experiment, participants performed a spatial compatibility task in which stimulus-response mappings were determined by stimulus valence. There was a standard spatial stimulus-response compatibility effect for positive stimuli and a reversed SRC effect for negative stimuli, but the same data could be interpreted as showing faster responses when positive and negative stimuli (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  43.  23
    Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--A model and taxonomy.Sylvan Kornblum, Thierry Hasbroucq & Allen Osman - 1990 - Psychological Review 97 (2):253-270.
  44. Introspection and cognitive brain mapping: from stimulus–response to script–report.Anthony Ian Jack & Andreas Roepstorff - 2002 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 (8):333-339.
    Cognitive science has wholeheartedly embraced functional brain imaging, but introspective data are still eschewed to the extent that it runs against standard practice to engage in the systematic collection of introspective reports. However, in the case of executive processes associated with prefrontal cortex, imaging has made limited progress, whereas introspective methods have considerable unfulfilled potential. We argue for a re-evaluation of the standard ‘cognitive mapping’ paradigm, emphasizing the use of retrospective reports alongside behavioural and brain imaging techniques. Using all three (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   73 citations  
  45.  70
    What Influences Physicians’ Online Knowledge Sharing? A Stimulus–Response Perspective.Xin Zhang, Xiaojia Dong, Xinxiang Xu, Jiahui Guo & Feng Guo - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
    During the COVID-19 pandemic, online health platforms and physicians’ online knowledge sharing played an important role in public health crisis management and disease prevention. What influences physicians’ online knowledge sharing? From the psychological perspective of stimulus–response, this study aims to explore how patients’ visit and patients’ consultation influence physicians’ online knowledge sharing considering the contingent roles of physicians’ online expertise and online knowledge sharing experience. Based on 6-month panel data of 45,449 physician–month observations from an online health platform in China, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  26
    Effect of spatial separation of stimulus, response, and reinforcement on selective learning in children.Wendell E. Jeffrey & Leslie B. Cohen - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (6):577.
  47.  26
    Do semantic priming and retrieval of stimulus-response associations depend on conscious perception?Maayan Avneon & Dominique Lamy - 2019 - Consciousness and Cognition 69:36-51.
  48.  9
    Intimacy Effects on Action Regulation: Retrieval of Observationally Acquired Stimulus–Response Bindings in Romantically Involved Interaction Partners Versus Strangers.Carina Giesen, Virginia Löhl, Klaus Rothermund & Nicolas Koranyi - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  49. Towards a computational account of context mediated affective stimulus-response translation.Pascal Haazebroek, Saskia Van Dantzig & Bernhard Hommel - 2009 - In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  12
    The relation between learning and stimulus–response binding.Christian Frings, Anna Foerster, Birte Moeller, Bernhard Pastötter & Roland Pfister - forthcoming - Psychological Review.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000