David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Oxford University Press (2010)
Disagreement is common: even informed, intelligent, and generally reasonable people often come to different conclusions when confronted with what seems to be the same evidence. Can the competing conclusions be reasonable? If not, what can we reasonably think about the situation? This volume examines the epistemology of disagreement. Philosophical questions about disagreement arise in various areas, notably politics, ethics, aesthetics, and the philosophy of religion: but this will be the first book focusing on the general epistemic issues arising from informed disagreement. Ten leading philosophers offer specially written essays which together will offer a starting-point for future work on this topic.
|Keywords||Disagreement Epistemology Testimony|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Andy Egan (2010). Disputing About Taste. In Ted Warfield & Richard Feldman (eds.), Disagreement. OUP
Kevin Melchionne, Acquired Taste. Contemporary Aesthetics.
Elisabeth Schellekens (2009). Taste and Objectivity: The Emergence of the Concept of the Aesthetic. Philosophy Compass 4 (5):734-743.
Michael J. Shaffer (2007). Taste, Gastronomic Expertise and Objectivity. In Fritz Allhoff & David Monroe (eds.), Food & Philosophy. Blackwell
Béatrice Longuenesse (2003). Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste". Inquiry 46 (2):143 – 163.
Theodore Gracyk (2011). Delicacy in Hume's Theory of Taste. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 9 (1):1-16.
Kevin Melchionne (2010). On the Old Saw “I Know Nothing About Art but I Know What I Like". Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):131-141.
Carl Knight (2009). Egalitarian Justice and Valuational Judgment. Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (4):482-498.
David G. Stern (1991). Are Disagreements About Taste Possible? A Discussion of Kant's Antinomy of Taste. Iowa Review 21 (2):66-71.
David Hume (1965). Of the Standard of Taste, and Other Essays. Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill.
Milagros Gallo (2008). Taste Learning in Rodents: Compounds and Individual Taste Cues Recognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (1):80-81.
Christopher Browne Garnett (1968). Taste. New York, Exposition Press.
Robin James (2009). In but Not of, of but Not In: On Taste, Hipness, and White Embodiment. Contemporary Aesthetics 2 (Aesthetics and Race).
Katharine J. Hamerton (2008). Malebranche, Taste, and Sensibility: The Origins of Sensitive Taste and a Reconsideration of Cartesianism's Feminist Potential. Journal of the History of Ideas 69 (4):533-558.
Dominic McIver Lopes (2008). Virtues of Art: Good Taste. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):197-211.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-04
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?