Search results for 'Lya Kremer' (try it on Scholar)

263 found
Order:
  1.  7
    Miriam Ben‐Peretz & Lya Kremer (1982). Value Education as Perceived by Parents, Teachers and Pupils in Israel. Journal of Moral Education 11 (4):259-265.
    Abstract The perplexity that characterizes moral education was the motive for undertaking this study. A field selection of terminal and instrumental values served as its frame of reference. Two questions were posed by the investigators: Is there any difference in the degree of importance which parents, teachers and pupils attach to these values? Do different schools rate these values differently? A sample consisting of 531 pupils, 251 parents and 38 teachers, randomly selected from five Israeli high schools, were asked to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Edmund Kowalski & Józef Kremer (1992). Autobiografia/Józef Kremer; przygotował do druku Edmund Kowalski. Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 37.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  31
    Philip Kremer (2010). The Modal Logic of Continuous Functions on the Rational Numbers. Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (4):519-527.
    Let ${{\mathcal L}^{\square\circ}}$ be a propositional language with standard Boolean connectives plus two modalities: an S4-ish topological modality □ and a temporal modality ◦, understood as ‘next’. We extend the topological semantic for S4 to a semantics for the language ${{\mathcal L}^{\square\circ}}$ by interpreting ${{\mathcal L}^{\square\circ}}$ in dynamic topological systems, i.e., ordered pairs 〈X, f〉, where X is a topological space and f is a continuous function on X. Artemov, Davoren and Nerode have axiomatized a logic S4C, and have shown (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  56
    Philip Kremer (2008). Supervaluation Fixed-Point Logics of Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (5):407 - 440.
    Michael Kremer defines fixed-point logics of truth based on Saul Kripke’s fixed point semantics for languages expressing their own truth concepts. Kremer axiomatizes the strong Kleene fixed-point logic of truth and the weak Kleene fixed-point logic of truth, but leaves the axiomatizability question open for the supervaluation fixed-point logic of truth and its variants. We show that the principal supervaluation fixed point logic of truth, when thought of as consequence relation, is highly complex: it is not even analytic. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  32
    Philip Kremer, The Truth is Sometimes Simple.
    Philip Kremer, Department of Philosophy, McMaster University Note: The following version of this paper does not contain the proofs of the stated theorems. A longer version, complete with proofs, is forthcoming. §1. Introduction. In "The truth is never simple" and its addendum, Burgess conducts a breathtakingly comprehensive survey of the complexity of the set of truths which arise when you add a truth predicate to arithmetic, and interpret that predicate according to the fixed point semantics or the revision-theoretic semantics (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Mark Kremer (ed.) (2004). Plato's Cleitophon: On Socrates and the Modern Mind. Lexington Books.
    The Cleitophon has recently been discovered to be Plato's dialogue introducingThe Republic. In this volume of essays, Editor, Translator, and Author Mark Kremer introduces seminal work that understands The Cleitophon as an ancient discussion of what scholars today refer to as posthumanism and postmodernism. Thoroughly original, this volume is an invaluable resource to all disciplines that attempt to come to terms with our emerging global society.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  1
    Marḳus Ḳremer (2008). Den Frieden Verantworten: Politische Ethik Bei Francisco Suarez (1548-1617). Kohlhammer.
    Kremer zeigt am Beispiel zwischenstaatlicher Herrschaftsausübung, wie Suárez vom Begriff des gerechten Friedens her seine Theorie des politischen Handelns unter der Perspektive des Heils entfaltet.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  10
    Michael Kremer (2015). Penelope Maddy: The Logical Must: Wittgenstein on Logic. Journal of Philosophy 112 (12):671-677.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  72
    Stefan Linquist, Brent Saylor, Karl Cottenie, Tyler A. Elliott, Stefan C. Kremer & T. Ryan Gregory (2013). Distinguishing Ecological From Evolutionary Approaches to Transposable Elements. Biological Reviews 88 (3):573- 584.
    Considerable variation exists not only in the kinds of transposable elements (TEs) occurring within the genomes of different species, but also in their abundance and distribution. Noting a similarity to the assortment of organisms among ecosystems, some researchers have called for an ecological approach to the study of transposon dynamics. However, there are several ways to adopt such an approach, and it is sometimes unclear what an ecological perspective will add to the existing co-evolutionary framework for explaining transposon-host interactions. This (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  50
    M. Kremer (2005). Review: From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. [REVIEW] Mind 114 (454):447-453.
  11.  2
    Philip Kremer & Grigori Mints (2005). Dynamic Topological Logic. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 131 (1-3):133-158.
    Dynamic topological logic provides a context for studying the confluence of the topological semantics for S4, topological dynamics, and temporal logic. The topological semantics for S4 is based on topological spaces rather than Kripke frames. In this semantics, □ is interpreted as topological interior. Thus S4 can be understood as the logic of topological spaces, and □ can be understood as a topological modality. Topological dynamics studies the asymptotic properties of continuous maps on topological spaces. Let a dynamic topological system (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  12. M. Kremer (2002). Logic and Language in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Philosophical Review 111 (2):327-330.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Michael Kremer (1992). The Multiplicity of General Propositions. Noûs 26 (4):409-426.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  2
    Philip Kremer (2013). Strong Completeness of S4 for Any Dense-in-Itself Metric Space. Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (3):545-570.
    In the topological semantics for modal logic, S4 is well-known to be complete for the rational line, for the real line, and for Cantor space: these are special cases of S4’s completeness for any dense-in-itself metric space. The construction used to prove completeness can be slightly amended to show that S4 is not only complete, but also strongly complete, for the rational line. But no similarly easy amendment is available for the real line or for Cantor space and the question (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  17
    Michael Kremer (1997). Marti on Descriptions in Carnap's S. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (6):629-634.
    This note is a friendly amendment to Marti's analysis of the failure of Føllesdal's argument that modal distinctions collapse in Carnap's logic S2. Føllesdal's argument turns on the treatment of descriptions. Marti considers how modal descriptions, which Carnap banned, might be handled; she adopts an approach which blocks Føllesdal's argument, but requires a separate treatment of non-modal descriptions. I point out that a more general treatment of descriptions in S2 is possible, and indeed is implicit in Marti's informal discussion, and (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  16.  44
    Michael Kremer (1988). Kripke and the Logic of Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (3):225 - 278.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  17.  64
    Michael Kremer (2010). Sense and Reference: The Origins and Development of the Distinction. In Tom Ricketts & Michael D. Potter (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Frege. Cambridge University Press 220--292.
    Frege’s distinction between sense (Sinn) and meaning (Bedeutung) is his most influential contribution to philosophy, however central it was to his own projects, and however he may have conceived its importance. Philosophers of language influenced by, or reacting against the distinction, and historians of philosophy commenting on it, have all contributed to the voluminous literature surrounding it.1 Nonetheless in this essay I hope to shed new light on the distinction by considering it in the context of the development of Frege’s (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18.  60
    Michael Kremer (2001). The Purpose of Tractarian Nonsense. Noûs 35 (1):39–73.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  19.  55
    Philip Kremer (2009). Comparing Fixed-Point and Revision Theories of Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (4):363-403.
    In response to the liar’s paradox, Kripke developed the fixed-point semantics for languages expressing their own truth concepts. Kripke’s work suggests a number of related fixed-point theories of truth for such languages. Gupta and Belnap develop their revision theory of truth in contrast to the fixed-point theories. The current paper considers three natural ways to compare the various resulting theories of truth, and establishes the resulting relationships among these theories. The point is to get a sense of the lay of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  20.  28
    Michael Kremer (2007). The Cardinal Problem of Philosophy. In Alice Crary (ed.), Wittgenstein and the Moral Life: Essays in Honor of Cora Diamond. MIT 143.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  20
    Réné Kremer (1927). La Philosophie en Belgique en 1926. New Scholasticism 1 (3):259-266.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  35
    Philip Kremer & Michael Kremer (2003). Some Supervaluation-Based Consequence Relations. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):225-244.
    In this paper, we define some consequence relations based on supervaluation semantics for partial models, and we investigate their properties. For our main consequence relation, we show that natural versions of the following fail: upwards and downwards Lowenheim-Skolem, axiomatizability, and compactness. We also consider an alternate version for supervaluation semantics, and show both axiomatizability and compactness for the resulting consequence relation.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  23.  8
    Philip Kremer (2014). Quantified Modal Logic on the Rational Line. Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (3):439-454.
  24.  43
    Michael Kremer (2002). Intuitive Consequences of the Revision Theory of Truth. Analysis 62 (4):330–336.
  25.  42
    Philip Kremer (2010). How Truth Behaves When There's No Vicious Reference. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (4):344 - 367.
    In The Revision Theory of Truth (MIT Press), Gupta and Belnap (1993) claim as an advantage of their approach to truth "its consequence that truth behaves like an ordinary classical concept under certain conditions—conditions that can roughly be characterized as those in which there is no vicious reference in the language." To clarify this remark, they define Thomason models, nonpathological models in which truth behaves like a classical concept, and investigate conditions under which a model is Thomason: they argue that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26.  8
    Stefan Linquist, Karl Cottenie, Tyler Elliott, Brent Saylor, Stefan Kremer & T. Ryan Gregory, Applying Ecological Models to Communities of Genetic Elements: The Case of Neutral Theory.
    A promising recent development in molecular biology involves viewing the genome as a miniecosystem, where genetic elements are compared to organisms and the surrounding cellular and genomic structures are regarded as the local environment. Here we critically evaluate the prospects of Ecological Neutral Theory, a popular model in ecology, as it applies at the genomic level. This assessment requires an overview of the controversy surrounding neutral models in community ecology. In particular, we discuss the limitations of using ENT both as (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  76
    Michael Kremer, To What Extent is Solipsism a Truth?
    My title1 is taken from one of the most obscure, and most discussed, sections of an already obscure and much discussed work, the discussion of the self, the world, and solipsism in sections 5.6-5.641 of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico- Philosophicus.2 Wittgenstein writes: 5.6 The limits of my language mean the limits of my world. 5.61 Logic fills the world: the limits of the world are also its limits. We cannot therefore say in logic: This and this there is in the (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  65
    Michael Kremer (2000). Judgment and Truth in Frege. Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (4):549-581.
    Thomas Ricketts has developed a powerful interpretation of Frege on judgment, truth and logic. Recently, Ricketts has modified his reading, holding that judgment is an act of knowledge-acquisition; this rules out incorrect judgment. I argue that Ricketts goes too far here. I criticize the textual basis for Ricketts's new view, and show that the interpretive problems which led him to this change can be met without such extreme measures. Thus, I defend Ricketts' earlier view against his own later modification. Along (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29.  18
    Alexander Krémer (2012). Etika richarda rortyho. Filozofia 67 (6):442-449.
    Rirchard Rorty has criticized the riiditiy of the classical ethics of Kant, and he claims that we do not have absolute moral norms in metaphysical sense.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  32
    Philip Kremer (1997). On the Complexity of Propositional Quantification in Intuitionistic Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (2):529-544.
    We define a propositionally quantified intuitionistic logic Hπ + by a natural extension of Kripke's semantics for propositional intutionistic logic. We then show that Hπ+ is recursively isomorphic to full second order classical logic. Hπ+ is the intuitionistic analogue of the modal systems S5π +, S4π +, S4.2π +, K4π +, Tπ +, Kπ + and Bπ +, studied by Fine.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  31.  43
    Philip Kremer (1999). Relevant Identity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (2):199-222.
    We begin to fill a lacuna in the relevance logic enterprise by providing a foundational analysis of identity in relevance logic. We consider rival interpretations of identity in this context, settling on the relevant indiscernibility interpretation, an interpretation related to Dunn's relevant predication project. We propose a general test for the stability of an axiomatisation of identity, relative to this interpretation, and we put various axiomatisations to this test. We fill our discussion out with both formal and philosophical remarks on (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  32.  1
    Michael Kremer (2014). Mark Textor, Frege on Sense and Reference. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2 (10).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  20
    Philip Kremer (1993). Quantifying Over Propositions in Relevance Logic: Nonaxiomatisability of Primary Interpretations of ∀P and ∃P. Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (1):334-349.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  34.  32
    Michael Kremer (2010). Must We Choose? Should We? In Bernhard Weiss & Jeremy Wanderer (eds.), Reading Brandom: On Making It Explicit. Routledge 227.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  45
    Mark Lance & Philip Kremer (1996). The Logical Structure of Linguistic Commitment II: Systems of Relevant Commitment Entailment. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (4):425 - 449.
    In "The Logical Structure of Linguistic Commitment I" (The Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (1994), 369-400), we sketch a linguistic theory (inspired by Brandom's Making it Explicit) which includes an "expressivist" account of the implication connective, →: the role of → is to "make explicit" the inferential proprieties among possible commitments which proprieties determine, in part, the significances of sentences. This motivates reading (A → B) as "commitment to A is, in part, commitment to B". Our project is to study (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  36.  34
    Michael Kremer (2002). Mathematics and Meaning in Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations 25 (3):272–303.
  37.  38
    Michael Kremer (1994). The Argument of "on Denoting". Philosophical Review 103 (2):249-297.
  38.  58
    Michael Kremer (2000). Wilson on Kripke's Wittgenstein. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):571-584.
    George Wilson has recently defended Kripke’s well-known interpretation of Wittgenstein against the criticisms of John McDowell. Wilson claims that these criticisms rest on misunderstandings of Kripke and that, when correctly understood, Kripke’s interpretation stands up to them well. In particular, Wilson defends Kripke’s Wittgenstein against the charge of “non-factualism” about meaning. However, Wilson has not appreciated the full significance of McDowell’s criticism. I use a brief exploration of Kripke’s analogy between Wittgenstein and Hume to put this significance in sharp relief. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  6
    Michael Kremer (2012). I. Russell's Merit—the Obvious Interpretation. In Jl Zalabardo (ed.), Wittgenstein's Early Philosophy. Oxford University Press 195.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  32
    Michael Kremer (1988). Logic and Meaning: The Philosophical Significance of the Sequent Calculus. Mind 97 (385):50-72.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  41. Michael Kremer & Rachel Glennerster (2005). Strong Medicine: Creating Incentives for Pharmaceutical Research on Neglected Diseases. Ethics & International Affairs 19 (3).
    The authors suggest creating a scheme that offers new incentives for research on diseases disproportionately affecting the poor, with the goal of making development of neglected disease vaccines a lucrative endeavor for pharmaceutical companies.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  42.  63
    Philip Kremer, Mathematical Logic.
    modality , understood as ‘next’. We extend the topological semantic for S4 to a semantics for the language L by interpreting L in dynamic topological systems, i.e. ordered pairs X, f , where X is a topological space and f is a..
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  32
    Michael Kremer (2004). How Not to Argue for Incompatibilism. Erkenntnis 60 (1):1-26.
    Ted A. Warfield has recently employed modal logic to argue that compatibilism in the free-will/determinism debate entails the rejection of intuitively valid inferences. I show that Warfield's argument fails. A parallel argument leads to the false conclusion that the mere possibility of determinism, together with the necessary existence of any contingent propositions, entails the rejection of intuitively valid inferences. The error in both arguments involves a crucial equivocation, which can be revealed by replacing modal operators with explicit quantifiers over possible (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  44.  4
    M. Kremer (2002). Intuitive Consequences of the Revision Theory of Truth. Analysis 62 (4):330-336.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  4
    M. Kremer (2007). Read on Identity and Harmony - a Friendly Correction and Simplification. Analysis 67 (2):157-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  25
    Mark Norris Lance & Philip Kremer (1994). The Logical Structure of Linguistic Commitment I: Four Systems of Non-Relevant Commitment Entailment. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (4):369 - 400.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  47.  38
    Michael Kremer (2007). Read on Identity and Harmony – a Friendly Correction and Simplification. Analysis 67 (294):157–159.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48.  34
    Elmar J. Kremer (1997). The Cosmological Argument Without the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):62-70.
    We formulate a version of the Cosmological Argument that deploys an epistemic principle of explanation in place of the traditional Principle of Sufficient Reason. The epistemic principle asserts that if there is a possible explanation of a fact, and some proposition is entailed by that explanation and by every other possible explanation of that fact, it is reasonable to accept that proposition. We try to show that there is a possible explanation of the fact that there are contingent beings and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  9
    Philip Kremer (1993). The Gupta-Belnap Systems ${Rm S}^#$ and ${Rm S}^*$ Are Not Axiomatisable. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (4):583-596.
  50.  31
    Michael Kremer (2002). Logic and Language in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Philosophical Review 111 (2):327-330.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 263