Search results for 'Lya Kremer' (try it on Scholar)

281 found
Sort by:
  1. Miriam Ben‐Peretz & Lya Kremer (1982). Value Education as Perceived by Parents, Teachers and Pupils in Israel. Journal of Moral Education 11 (4):259-265.score: 240.0
    Abstract The perplexity that characterizes moral education was the motive for undertaking this study. A field selection of terminal and instrumental values served as its frame of reference. Two questions were posed by the investigators: Is there any difference in the degree of importance which parents, teachers and pupils attach to these values? Do different schools rate these values differently? A sample consisting of 531 pupils, 251 parents and 38 teachers, randomly selected from five Israeli high schools, were asked to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Edmund Kowalski & Józef Kremer (1992). Autobiografia/Józef Kremer; przygotował do druku Edmund Kowalski. Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 37.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Philip Kremer (2008). Supervaluation Fixed-Point Logics of Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (5):407 - 440.score: 60.0
    Michael Kremer defines fixed-point logics of truth based on Saul Kripke’s fixed point semantics for languages expressing their own truth concepts. Kremer axiomatizes the strong Kleene fixed-point logic of truth and the weak Kleene fixed-point logic of truth, but leaves the axiomatizability question open for the supervaluation fixed-point logic of truth and its variants. We show that the principal supervaluation fixed point logic of truth, when thought of as consequence relation, is highly complex: it is not even analytic. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Philip Kremer, The Truth is Sometimes Simple.score: 60.0
    Philip Kremer, Department of Philosophy, McMaster University Note: The following version of this paper does not contain the proofs of the stated theorems. A longer version, complete with proofs, is forthcoming. §1. Introduction. In "The truth is never simple" (1986) and its addendum (1988), Burgess conducts a breathtakingly comprehensive survey of the complexity of the set of truths which arise when you add a truth predicate to arithmetic, and interpret that predicate according to the fixed point semantics or (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Philip Kremer (2010). The Modal Logic of Continuous Functions on the Rational Numbers. Archive for Mathematical Logic 49 (4):519-527.score: 60.0
    Let ${{\mathcal L}^{\square\circ}}$ be a propositional language with standard Boolean connectives plus two modalities: an S4-ish topological modality □ and a temporal modality ◦, understood as ‘next’. We extend the topological semantic for S4 to a semantics for the language ${{\mathcal L}^{\square\circ}}$ by interpreting ${{\mathcal L}^{\square\circ}}$ in dynamic topological systems, i.e., ordered pairs 〈X, f〉, where X is a topological space and f is a continuous function on X. Artemov, Davoren and Nerode have axiomatized a logic S4C, and have shown (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Marḳus Ḳremer (2008). Den Frieden Verantworten: Politische Ethik Bei Francisco Suarez (1548-1617). Kohlhammer.score: 60.0
    Kremer zeigt am Beispiel zwischenstaatlicher Herrschaftsausübung, wie Suárez vom Begriff des gerechten Friedens her seine Theorie des politischen Handelns unter der Perspektive des Heils entfaltet.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Philip Kremer, Mathematical Logic.score: 30.0
    modality , understood as ‘next’. We extend the topological semantic for S4 to a semantics for the language L by interpreting L in dynamic topological systems, i.e. ordered pairs X, f , where X is a topological space and f is a..
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Michael Kremer (2000). Wilson on Kripke's Wittgenstein. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):571-584.score: 30.0
  9. Michael Kremer, To What Extent is Solipsism a Truth?score: 30.0
    My title1 is taken from one of the most obscure, and most discussed, sections of an already obscure and much discussed work, the discussion of the self, the world, and solipsism in sections 5.6-5.641 of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico- Philosophicus.2 Wittgenstein writes: 5.6 The limits of my language mean the limits of my world. 5.61 Logic fills the world: the limits of the world are also its limits. We cannot therefore say in logic: This and this there is in the (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Michael Kremer (2001). The Purpose of Tractarian Nonsense. Noûs 35 (1):39–73.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Michael Kremer, Comments on Klima, Contemporary "Essentialism" Vs. Aristotelian Essentialism.score: 30.0
    Gyula begins with a contrast between contemporary scare-quotes essentialism and Aristotelian full-blooded essentialism. The former is a semantic thesis couched in the vocabulary of possible-worlds semantics, holding that some terms are rigid designators, while the latter is a metaphysical thesis, couched in a more ancient vocabulary, holding that things have essences. Gyula argues that the more traditional metaphysical framework deserves reconsideration, both because it can help us with problems arising from the contemporary approach, and because it possesses greater expressive power (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Michael Joseph Kremer (2000). Judgment and Truth in Frege. Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (4):549-581.score: 30.0
    Thomas Ricketts has developed a powerful interpretation of Frege on judgment, truth and logic. Recently, Ricketts has modified his reading, holding that judgment is an act of knowledge-acquisition; this rules out incorrect judgment. I argue that Ricketts goes too far here. I criticize the textual basis for Ricketts's new view, and show that the interpretive problems which led him to this change can be met without such extreme measures. Thus, I defend Ricketts' earlier view against his own later modification. Along (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Philip Kremer (2009). Comparing Fixed-Point and Revision Theories of Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (4):363 - 403.score: 30.0
    In response to the liar’s paradox, Kripke developed the fixed-point semantics for languages expressing their own truth concepts. (Martin and Woodruff independently developed this semantics, but not to the same extent as Kripke.) Kripke’s work suggests a number of related fixed-point theories of truth for such languages. Gupta and Belnap develop their revision theory of truth in contrast to the fixed-point theories. The current paper considers three natural ways to compare the various resulting theories of truth, and establishes the resulting (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Michael Kremer (2010). Sense and Reference: The Origins and Development of the Distinction. In Tom Ricketts & Michael D. Potter (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Frege. Cambridge University Press. 220--292.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Philip Kremer (2010). How Truth Behaves When There's No Vicious Reference. Journal of Philosophical Logic 39 (4):344 - 367.score: 30.0
    In The Revision Theory of Truth (MIT Press), Gupta and Belnap (1993) claim as an advantage of their approach to truth "its consequence that truth behaves like an ordinary classical concept under certain conditions—conditions that can roughly be characterized as those in which there is no vicious reference in the language." To clarify this remark, they define Thomason models, nonpathological models in which truth behaves like a classical concept, and investigate conditions under which a model is Thomason: they argue that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Michael Kremer (1994). The Argument of "on Denoting". Philosophical Review 103 (2):249-297.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Michael Kremer (1988). Kripke and the Logic of Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 17 (3):225 - 278.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Michael Kremer (2002). Mathematics and Meaning in Tractatus. Philosophical Investigations 25 (3):272–303.score: 30.0
  19. Mark Lance & Philip Kremer (1996). The Logical Structure of Linguistic Commitment II: Systems of Relevant Commitment Entailment. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (4):425 - 449.score: 30.0
    In "The Logical Structure of Linguistic Commitment I" (The Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (1994), 369-400), we sketch a linguistic theory (inspired by Brandom's Making it Explicit) which includes an "expressivist" account of the implication connective, →: the role of → is to "make explicit" the inferential proprieties among possible commitments which proprieties determine, in part, the significances of sentences. This motivates reading (A → B) as "commitment to A is, in part, commitment to B". Our project is to study (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Philip Kremer, Does Truth Behave Like a Classical Concept When There is No Vicious Reference?score: 30.0
    §1. Introduction. When truth-theoretic paradoxes are generated, two factors seem to be at play: the behaviour that truth intuitively has; and the facts about which singular terms refer to which sentences, and so on. For example, paradoxicality might be partially attributed to the contingent fact that the singular term, "the italicized sentence on page one", refers to the sentence, The italicized sentence on page one is not true. Factors of this second kind might be represented by a ground model: an (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Michael Kremer (2010). Must We Choose? Should We? In Bernhard Weiss & Jeremy Wanderer (eds.), Reading Brandom: On Making It Explicit. Routledge. 227.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Michael Kremer (2004). How Not to Argue for Incompatibilism. Erkenntnis 60 (1):1-26.score: 30.0
    Ted A. Warfield has recently employed modal logic to argue that compatibilism in the free-will/determinism debate entails the rejection of intuitively valid inferences. I show that Warfield's argument fails. A parallel argument leads to the false conclusion that the mere possibility of determinism, together with the necessary existence of any contingent propositions, entails the rejection of intuitively valid inferences. The error in both arguments involves a crucial equivocation, which can be revealed by replacing modal operators with explicit quantifiers over possible (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Michael Kremer (2008). Review of Gottlob Frege, Dale Jacquette (Tr.), The Foundations of Arithmetic. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (1).score: 30.0
    Last spring, as I was beginning a graduate seminar on Frege, I received a complimentary copy of this new translation of his masterwork, The Foundations of Arithmetic . I had ordered Austin's famous translation, well-loved for the beauty of its English and the clarity with which it presents Frege's overall argument, but known to be less than literal, and to sometimes supplement translation with interpretation. I was intrigued by Dale Jacquette's promise "to combine literal accuracy and readability for beginning students (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Philip Kremer (1999). Relevant Identity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (2):199-222.score: 30.0
    We begin to fill a lacuna in the relevance logic enterprise by providing a foundational analysis of identity in relevance logic. We consider rival interpretations of identity in this context, settling on the relevant indiscernibility interpretation, an interpretation related to Dunn's relevant predication project. We propose a general test for the stability of an axiomatisation of identity, relative to this interpretation, and we put various axiomatisations to this test. We fill our discussion out with both formal and philosophical remarks on (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Elmar J. Kremer (1997). The Cosmological Argument Without the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Faith and Philosophy 14 (1):62-70.score: 30.0
    We formulate a version of the Cosmological Argument that deploys an epistemic principle of explanation in place of the traditional Principle of Sufficient Reason. The epistemic principle asserts that if there is a possible explanation of a fact, and some proposition is entailed by that explanation and by every other possible explanation of that fact, it is reasonable to accept that proposition. We try to show that there is a possible explanation of the fact that there are contingent beings and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Mark Norris Lance & Philip Kremer (1994). The Logical Structure of Linguistic Commitment I: Four Systems of Non-Relevant Commitment Entailment. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (4):369 - 400.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Michael Kremer (1988). Logic and Meaning: The Philosophical Significance of the Sequent Calculus. Mind 97 (385):50-72.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Michael Kremer (2007). Read on Identity and Harmony – a Friendly Correction and Simplification. Analysis 67 (294):157–159.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Philip Kremer (1997). Dunn's Relevant Predication, Real Properties and Identity. Erkenntnis 47 (1):37-65.score: 30.0
    We critically investigate and refine Dunn's relevant predication, his formalisation of the notion of a real property. We argue that Dunn's original dialectical moves presuppose some interpretation of relevant identity, though none is given. We then re-motivate the proposal in a broader context, considering the prospects for a classical formalisation of real properties, particularly of Geach's implicit distinction between real and ''Cambridge'' properties. After arguing against these prospects, we turn to relevance logic, re-motivating relevant predication with Geach's distinction in mind. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Philip Kremer & Michael Kremer (2003). Some Supervaluation-Based Consequence Relations. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):225-244.score: 30.0
    In this paper, we define some consequence relations based on supervaluation semantics for partial models, and we investigate their properties. For our main consequence relation, we show that natural versions of the following fail: upwards and downwards Lowenheim-Skolem, axiomatizability, and compactness. We also consider an alternate version for supervaluation semantics, and show both axiomatizability and compactness for the resulting consequence relation.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Philip Kremer (1997). On the Complexity of Propositional Quantification in Intuitionistic Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (2):529-544.score: 30.0
    We define a propositionally quantified intuitionistic logic Hπ + by a natural extension of Kripke's semantics for propositional intutionistic logic. We then show that Hπ+ is recursively isomorphic to full second order classical logic. Hπ+ is the intuitionistic analogue of the modal systems S5π +, S4π +, S4.2π +, K4π +, Tπ +, Kπ + and Bπ +, studied by Fine.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Michael Kremer (1985). Frege's Theory of Number and the Distinction Between Function and Object. Philosophical Studies 47 (3):313 - 323.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Michael Kremer (2008). Soames on Russell's Logic: A Reply. Philosophical Studies 139 (2):209 - 212.score: 30.0
    In “What is History For?,” Scott Soames responds to criticisms of his treatment of Russell’s logic in volume 1 of his Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century. This note rebuts two of Soames’s replies, showing that a first-order presentation of Russell’s logic does not fit the argument of the Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, and that Soames’s contextual definition of classes does not match Russell’s contextual definition of classes. In consequence, Soames’s presentation of Russell’s logic misrepresents what Russell took to be (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Philip Kremer (1989). Relevant Predication: Grammatical Characterisations. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 18 (4):349 - 382.score: 30.0
    This paper reformulates and decides a certain conjecture in Dunn's 'Relevant Predication 1: The Formal Theory' (Journal of Philosophical Logic 16, 347-381, 1987). This conjecture of Dunn's relates his object-language characterisation of a property's being relevant in a variable x to certain grammatical characterisations of relevance, analogous to some given by Helman, in 'Relevant Implication and Relevant Functions' (to appear in Entailment: The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, vol. 2, by Alan Ross Anderson, Nuel Belnap, and J. Michael Dunn et (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Philip Kremer, The Revision Theory of Truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Radical Contextualism, Josef Stern, James Conant, Michael Kremer, David Finkelstein & Jason Bridges (2007). Nat Hansen. Philosophy 2:2006-2007.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Philip Kremer (2009). Dynamic Topological S5. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 160 (1):96-116.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Philip Kremer, Matching Topological Products and Frame Products of Modal Logics.score: 30.0
    The simplest combination of unimodal logics L1 and L2 into a bimodal logic is their fusion, L1 ⊗ L2, axiomatized by the theorems of L1 for 1 and of L2 for 2. Shehtman introduced combinations that are not only bimodal, but two-dimensional: he defined 2-d Cartesian products of 1-d Kripke frames, using these Cartesian products to define the frame product L1 × L2 of L1 and L2. Van Benthem, Bezhanishvili, ten Cate and Sarenac generalized Shehtman’s idea and introduced the topological (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Philip Kremer (1993). Quantifying Over Propositions in Relevance Logic: Nonaxiomatisability of Primary Interpretations of ∀P and ∃P. Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (1):334-349.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Elmar Kremer, Antoine Arnauld. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Michael Kremer (2002). Logic and Language in Wittgenstein's Tractatus. Philosophical Review 111 (2):327-330.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Michael Kremer (2006). Logicist Responses to Kant: (Early) Frege and (Early) Russell. Philosophical Topics 34 (1/2):163-188.score: 30.0
  43. Michael Kremer (1997). Contextualism and Holism in the Early Wittgenstein. Philosophical Topics 25 (2):87-120.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Michael Kremer (1992). The Multiplicity of General Propositions. Noûs 26 (4):409-426.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Philip Kremer (1993). The Gupta-Belnap Systems ${Rm S}^#$ and ${Rm S}^*$ Are Not Axiomatisable. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 34 (4):583-596.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Richard L. Kremer (1986). Defending Lavoisier: The French Academy's Prize Competition of 1821. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 8 (1):41 - 65.score: 30.0
    In 1821 the French Académie Royale des Sciences sponsored a prize competition on the causes of animal heat. Carefully designing the contest to serve several interests, the Académie (especially Cuvier and Berthollet) sought to defend Lavoisier's theory and method for studying animal heat and to restore a pre-1789 ideal of non-utilitarian scientific practice. Changing standards of precision in physical research, however, sabotaged these intentions. Even with improved experimental apparatus and techniques, the chief contestants could not quantitatively confirm Lavoisier's theory. Unpublished (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Michael Kremer (2002). Intuitive Consequences of the Revision Theory of Truth. Analysis 62 (4):330–336.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Philip Kremer (forthcoming). Quantified Modal Logic on the Rational Line. The Review of Symbolic Logic:1-16.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Elmar J. Kremer (1994). The Hume-Plantinga Objection to the Argument From Design. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 68:85-92.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Michael Kremer (1987). 'If' is Unambiguous. Noûs 21 (2):199-217.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 281