Results for 'stimulus generalization curves for auditory intensity, pigeon'

988 found
Order:
  1.  18
    On the form of stimulus generalization curves for auditory intensity.Eric G. Heinemann & Sheila Chase - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (3):483.
  2.  17
    Conditional stimulus control.Eric G. Heinemann & Sheila Chase - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):187.
  3.  30
    Analysis of stimulus generalization with a psychophysical method.Eric G. Heinemann, Edward Avin, Mary A. Sullivan & Sheila Chase - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):215.
  4.  19
    Supplementary report: Stimulus generalization gradients along a luminosity continuum.Gary Olson & Richard A. King - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (4):414.
  5.  16
    Influence of frequency on the estimation of time for auditory, visual, and tactile modalities: The kappa effect.Darryl A. Yoblick & Gavriel Salvendy - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (2):157.
  6.  45
    TMS effects on subjective and objective measures of vision: Stimulation intensity and pre- versus post-stimulus masking.Tom A. de Graaf, Sonja Cornelsen, Christianne Jacobs & Alexander T. Sack - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1244-1255.
    Transcranial magnetic stimulation can be used to mask visual stimuli, disrupting visual task performance or preventing visual awareness. While TMS masking studies generally fix stimulation intensity, we hypothesized that varying the intensity of TMS pulses in a masking paradigm might inform several ongoing debates concerning TMS disruption of vision as measured subjectively versus objectively, and pre-stimulus versus post-stimulus TMS masking. We here show that both pre-stimulus TMS pulses and post-stimulus TMS pulses could strongly mask visual stimuli. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  7.  16
    Stimulus generalization along one and two dimensions in pigeons.Charles M. Butter - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (4):339.
  8.  10
    The Roles of Consonant, Rime, and Tone in Mandarin Spoken Word Recognition: An Eye-Tracking Study.Ting Zou, Yutong Liu & Huiting Zhong - 2022 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
    This study investigated the relative role of sub-syllabic components in spoken word recognition of Mandarin Chinese using an eye-tracking experiment with a visual world paradigm. Native Mandarin speakers were presented with four pictures and an auditory stimulus. They were required to click the picture according to the sound stimulus they heard, and their eye movements were tracked during this process. For a target word, nine conditions of competitors were constructed in terms of the amount of their phonological (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  42
    Measurement of sensory intensity.Richard M. Warren - 1981 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4 (2):175-189.
    The measurement of sensory intensity has had a long history, attracting the attention of investigators from many disciplines including physiology, psychology, physics, mathematics, philosophy, and even chemistry. While there has been a continuing doubt by some that sensation has the properties necessary for measurement, experiments designed to obtain estimates of sensory intensity have found that a general rule applies: Equal stimulus ratios produce equal sensory ratios. Theories concerning the basis for this simple psychophysical rule are discussed, with emphasis given (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   167 citations  
  10.  12
    Stimulus generalization as a function of UCS intensity in eyelid conditioning.John J. Porter - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (3):311.
  11.  16
    Surface Stickiness Perception by Auditory, Tactile, and Visual Cues.Hyungeol Lee, Eunsil Lee, Jiye Jung & Junsuk Kim - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10:471990.
    This study aimed to explore the psychophysical bases of multisensory surface stickiness perception by investigating how sensitively humans perceive different levels of stickiness intensity conveyed by auditory, tactile, and visual cues. First, we sorted five different sticky stimuli by perceived intensity in ascending order for each modality separately and evaluated the discrimination sensitivities of each participant using a fitted psychometric curve. Results showed that perceptual intensity orders were not identical to physical intensity order and that the sequential order of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  56
    Measuring consciousness: Task accuracy and awareness as sigmoid functions of stimulus duration.Kristian Sandberg, Bo Martin Bibby, Bert Timmermans, Axel Cleeremans & Morten Overgaard - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1659-1675.
    When consciousness is examined using subjective ratings, the extent to which processing is conscious or unconscious is often estimated by calculating task performance at the subjective threshold or by calculating the correlation between accuracy and awareness. However, both these methods have certain limitations. In the present article, we propose describing task accuracy and awareness as functions of stimulus intensity as suggested by Koch and Preuschoff . The estimated lag between the curves describes how much stimulus intensity must (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  13.  61
    Do Auditory Mismatch Responses Differ Between Acoustic Features?HyunJung An, Shing Ho Kei, Ryszard Auksztulewicz & Jan W. H. Schnupp - 2021 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15.
    Mismatch negativity is the electroencephalographic waveform obtained by subtracting event-related potential responses evoked by unexpected deviant stimuli from responses evoked by expected standard stimuli. While the MMN is thought to reflect an unexpected change in an ongoing, predictable stimulus, it is unknown whether MMN responses evoked by changes in different stimulus features have different magnitudes, latencies, and topographies. The present study aimed to investigate whether MMN responses differ depending on whether sudden stimulus change occur in pitch, duration, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14.  19
    Time-intensity equivalence relations for auditory pulse trains.Irwin Pollack - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 100 (2):239.
  15.  35
    Audiovisual Cross-Modal Correspondences in the General Population.Cesare Parise & Charles Spence - 2013 - In Julia Simner & Edward Hubbard (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Synesthesia. Oxford University Press.
    For more than a century now, researchers have acknowledged the existence of seemingly arbitrary crossmodal congruency effects between dimensions of sensory stimuli in the general population. Such phenomena, known by a variety of terms including 'crossmodal correspondences', involve individual stimulus properties, rely on a crossmodal mapping of unisensory features, and appear to be shared by the majority of individuals. In other words, members of the general population share underlying preferences for specific pairings across the senses. Crossmodal correspondences between complementary (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  16.  18
    A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.John M. Pearce - 1987 - Psychological Review 94 (1):61-73.
  17.  12
    Stimulus generalization as a function of drive shift.Robert B. Zajonc & David V. Cross - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (4):363.
  18.  28
    Relative priming of temporal local-global levels in auditory hierarchical stimuli.Alexandra List & Timothy Justus - 2010 - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 72 (1):193–208.
    Priming is a useful tool for ascertaining the circumstances under which previous experiences influence behavior. Previously, using hierarchical stimuli, we demonstrated (Justus & List, 2005) that selectively attending to one temporal scale of an auditory stimulus improved subsequent attention to a repeated (vs. changed) temporal scale; that is, we demonstrated intertrial auditory temporal level priming. Here, we have extended those results to address whether level priming relied on absolute or relative temporal information. Both relative and absolute temporal (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  9
    Similarity space for auditory signals differing in frequency and intensity.Irwin Pollack & Naif Khouri - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 13 (4):209-211.
  20.  21
    A model for stimulus generalization and discrimination.Robert R. Bush & Frederick Mosteller - 1951 - Psychological Review 58 (6):413-423.
  21.  11
    Formulation of a generalization surface for the simultaneous variation of stimulus and response similarity.Michael Shea - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):353.
  22.  34
    Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer: III. The new learning method.Salvatore C. Caronite & David R. Thomas - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (3):385.
  23.  10
    Certain relationships between stimulus intensity and stimulus generalization.William Heyman - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (4):239.
  24.  23
    Stimulus generalization as a function of testing procedure and response measure.Richard H. Hiss & David R. Thomas - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):587.
  25.  20
    Stimulus generalization after equal training on two stimuli.Harry I. Kalish & Norman Guttman - 1957 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 53 (2):139.
  26.  24
    Stimulus generalization after training on three stimuli: A test of the summation hypothesis.Harry I. Kalish & Norman Guttman - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (4):268.
  27.  14
    Stimulus generalization as a function of level of motivation.David R. Thomas & Richard A. King - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (5):323.
  28.  17
    Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer: II. Effects of discrimination training.David R. Thomas & Salvatore C. Caronite - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 68 (4):402.
  29.  23
    Is Emotional Magnitude Spatialized? A Further Investigation.Kevin J. Holmes, Candelaria Alcat & Stella F. Lourenco - 2019 - Cognitive Science 43 (4):e12727.
    Accumulating evidence suggests that different magnitudes (e.g., number, size, and duration) are spatialized in the mind according to a common left–right metric, consistent with a generalized system for representing magnitude. A previous study conducted by two of us (Holmes & Lourenco, ) provided evidence that this metric extends to the processing of emotional magnitude, or the intensity of emotion expressed in faces. Recently, however, Pitt and Casasanto () showed that the earlier effects may have been driven by a left–right mapping (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  30.  36
    Analysis of the Validity of Kuznets Curve of Energy Intensity among D-8 Countries: Panel-ARDL Approach.Parto Fazli & Ebrahim Abbasi - 2018 - International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences 81:1-12.
    Publication date: 16 April 2018 Source: Author: Parto Fazli, Ebrahim Abbasi The objective of the study is to test experimentally the Kuznets curve of energy intensity in selected developing countries with the focus of D-8 countries during 1990-2014. According to the results, and by using the static and dynamic estimators and the Panel- ARDL model, the Kuznets curve was accepted for energy intensity and the per capita income threshold was estimated $3931.25. The urbanization rate and the degree of industrialization have (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  50
    Discriminability and stimulus generalization.Norman Guttman & Harry I. Kalish - 1956 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 51 (1):79.
  32.  25
    Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer: IV. Concurrent generalization of reinforcing and discriminative stimulus functions following fixed-interval training.David R. Thomas & Donald V. Derosa - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (2):260.
  33.  16
    Primary stimulus generalization in discrimination learning as a function of number of trials and incidental cue differences.Leopold O. Walder - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 61 (2):178.
  34.  13
    Stimulus generalization along the dimension of S+ as a function of discrimination learning with and without error.Joseph Lyons - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):95.
  35.  22
    Comparison of stimulus generalization following variable-ratio and variable-interval training.David R. Thomas & Richard W. Switalski - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 71 (2):236.
  36.  30
    Stimulus generalization following fixed interval training.Dorothy S. Konick & David R. Thomas - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (4):689.
  37.  29
    Intensity of the conditioned stimulus and strength of conditioning: II. The conditioned galvanic skin response to an auditory stimulus.David A. Grant & Dorothy E. Schneider - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (1):35.
  38.  6
    A Cognitive Interpretation of Intensity Effects in Stimulus Generalization.Frank Restle - 1964 - Psychological Review 71 (6):514-516.
  39.  22
    Stimulus intensity dynamism (V) and stimulus generalization.Clark L. Hull - 1949 - Psychological Review 56 (2):67-76.
  40.  24
    Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization for human subjects.Theodore J. Doll & David R. Thomas - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 75 (4):508.
  41.  26
    Stimulus intensity effects between and within subjects in auditory reaction time: A variable criterion analysis.G. Robert Grice, Robert Nullmeyer & V. Alan Spiker - 1979 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 14 (3):143-145.
  42.  23
    Effects of interdimensional training on stimulus generalization.Richard W. Switalski, Joseph Lyons & David R. Thomas - 1966 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (5):661.
  43.  9
    Stimulus intensity, site of stimulation, and individual reactivity as determinants of the energy threshold for pricking pain.Donald J. Dillon - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (4):559.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  64
    Piéron's Law Holds During Stroop Conflict: Insights Into the Architecture of Decision Making.Tom Stafford, Leanne Ingram & Kevin N. Gurney - 2011 - Cognitive Science 35 (8):1553-1566.
    Piéron's Law describes the relationship between stimulus intensity and reaction time. Previously (Stafford & Gurney, 2004), we have shown that Piéron's Law is a necessary consequence of rise-to-threshold decision making and thus will arise from optimal simple decision-making algorithms (e.g., Bogacz, Brown, Moehlis, Holmes, & Cohen, 2006). Here, we manipulate the color saturation of a Stroop stimulus. Our results show that Piéron's Law holds for color intensity and color-naming reaction time, extending the domain of this law, in line (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  45.  17
    The effects of drive and discrimination training on stimulus generalization.David R. Thomas - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):24.
  46.  18
    Auditory reaction time as a function of stimulus intensity, frequency, and rise time.Jeffrey L. Santee & David L. Kohfeld - 1977 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 10 (5):393-396.
  47.  3
    Common or distinct deficits for auditory and visual hallucinations?Johanna C. Badcock & Murray T. Maybery - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):757-758.
    The dual-deficit model of visual hallucinations (Collerton et al. target article) is compared with the dual-deficit model of auditory hallucinations (Waters et al., in press). Differences in cognitive mechanisms described may be superficial. Similarities between these models may provide the basis for a general model of complex hallucinations extended across disorders and modalities, involving shared (overlapping) cognitive processes.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  19
    Joint effects of stimulus intensity and preparatory interval on simple auditory reaction time.Jack Botwinick - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 80 (2p1):348.
  49.  19
    Effects of context on the postdiscrimination gradient of stimulus generalization.John W. Donahoe, James H. McCroskery & W. Kirk Richardson - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (1):58.
  50.  44
    Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization.Harley M. Hanson - 1959 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 58 (5):321.
1 — 50 / 988