Related categories
Subcategories:
298 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 298
Material to categorize
  1. G. A. (1973). Metakritik der Formalen Logik. Review of Metaphysics 27 (2):381-382.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Evandro Agazzi (1983). Modern Logic--A Survey. Historical, Philosophical, and Mathematical Aspects of Modern Logic and its Applications. Mind 92 (366):286-288.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Saʻīd Akbarī (2007). .
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Quṭb al-Taḥtānī & Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad (2003). .
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Robert Albin (2012). BEYOND MODES OF OBJECTIVITY. Logos and Episteme (3):361-371.
    ABSTRACT: Frege, and others who followed him, stressed the role of fallibility as a means to defining ‘objectivity.’ By defining objective judgments as fallible, these philosophers contributed to the consolidation of a theory of objectivity which suggested interpreting epistemological, as well as other judgements, as being objective. An important philosophical implication of this theory lies in its disclosure of the interrelations between truth and objectivity. In light of this insight, and based on an analysis of instances of false (epistemological and (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Layman E. Allen (1968). Review: A. N. Prior, A. I. Melden, Escapism: The Logical Basis of Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (4):610-611.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Enrique Alvarez & Manuel Correia (2012). Syllogistic with Indefinite Terms. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):297-306.
    This paper presents a restructured set of axioms for categorical logic. In virtue of it, the syllogistic with indefinite terms is deduced and proved, within the categorical logic boundaries. As a result, the number of all the conclusive syllogisms is deduced through a simple and axiomatic methodology. Moreover, the distinction between immediate and mediate inferences disappears, which reinstitutes the unity of Aristotelian logic.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Edgar Andrade-Lotero & Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2012). Validity, the Squeezing Argument and Alternative Semantic Systems: The Case of Aristotelian Syllogistic. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):387 - 418.
    We investigate the philosophical significance of the existence of different semantic systems with respect to which a given deductive system is sound and complete. Our case study will be Corcoran's deductive system D for Aristotelian syllogistic and some of the different semantic systems for syllogistic that have been proposed in the literature. We shall prove that they are not equivalent, in spite of D being sound and complete with respect to each of them. Beyond the specific case of syllogistic, the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Irving H. Anellis (2012). Editor's Introduction to Jean van Heijenoort, Historical Development of Modern Logic. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):301-326.
    Van Heijenoort’s account of the historical development of modern logic was composed in 1974 and first published in 1992 with an introduction by his former student. What follows is a new edition with a revised and expanded introduction and additional notes.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Irving H. Anellis (2012). Jean van Heijenoort's Conception of Modern Logic, in Historical Perspective. Logica Universalis 6 (3-4):339-409.
    I use van Heijenoort’s published writings and manuscript materials to provide a comprehensive overview of his conception of modern logic as a first-order functional calculus and of the historical developments which led to this conception of mathematical logic, its defining characteristics, and in particular to provide an integral account, from his most important publications as well as his unpublished notes and scattered shorter historico-philosophical articles, of how and why the mathematical logic, whose he traced to Frege and the culmination of (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Thomas Aristotle, Robert Taylor, Simplicius, Ammonius & Wilks (1807). The Organon; or, Logical Treatises of Aristotle. Printed for the Translator, Manor-Place, Walworth, Surrey; by Robert Wilks, 89, Chancery-Lane, Fleet-Street.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Robert L. Armstrong (1970). Reduction and Deduction of Syllogisms. New Scholasticism 44 (2):273-277.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Antoine Arnauld, Pierre Nicole & T. Spencer Baynes (1850). Logic or, the Art of Thinking : Being the Port-Royal Logic. Sutherland and Knox Simpkin, Marshall.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. E. J. Ashworth (1974). Some Additions to Risse's Bibliographia Logica. Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (3):361-365.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. J. L. Austin (1952). LUKASIEWICZ, J. -Aristotle's Syllogistic, From the Standpoint of Modern Formal Logic. [REVIEW] Mind 61:395.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. L. K. B. (1959). Formale Logik. Review of Metaphysics 12 (4):665-665.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Victor Balowitz (1988). George Englebretsen, Ed., The New Syllogistic. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 8:481-483.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. J. Banas (2003). Aristotelian Versus Stoic Logic. Filozofia 58 (8):551-563.
    This paper deals with Aristotelian and Stoic logic. In the first part the author writes about the history of logic and shows, why Stoic logic had not been studied properly from the Middle Ages up to the beginning of the 20th century, when an increasing interest in the study of Stoic logic is visible. The paper describes the character of Aristotelian and Stoic logic respectively. Stoic logic is first introduced as a system of propositional logic. On this basis a complementarity (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Y. Bar-Hillel (1967). Bernard Bolzano. In Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York, Macmillan. 2--337.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. John A. Barker & Thomas D. Paxson Jr (1985). Aristotle Vs. Diodorus: Who Won the Fatalism Debate? Philosophy Research Archives 11:41-76.
    We develop a modified system of standard logic, Augmented Standard Logic , and we employ ASL in an effort to show that, contrary to prevailing opinion, both Aristotle and Diodorus presented impressive arguments, having valid structures and highly plausible premisses, in their famous fatalism debate. We argue that ASL, which contains standard logic and a full system of modal and temporal logic emanating from a modicum of primitives, should not only enable one to appreciate the sophisticated philosophizing which characterized this (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jonathan Barnes (1999). Aristotle and Stoic Logic. In Katerina Ierodiakonou (ed.), Topics in Stoic Philosophy. Clarendon Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jonathan Barnes (1990). The Prior Analytics. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (2):234-236.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Gary Bedell (1992). Aristotelian Logic. Review of Metaphysics 46 (1):175-176.
  24. W. Bednarowski (1955). Hamilton's Quantification of the Predicate. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56:217 - 240.
    This paper consists roughly of three parts. In the first part, an attempt has been made to find some tenable interpretation of Hamilton's logic. This results in accepting that Hamilton's logic can be "saved" if it is understood as being an everday language version of Euler's relations, i.e., extensional relations between terms (classes). In the second part, the propositions of Euler and the propositions of Aristotle are compared and found to be interdefinable: every proposition of Aristotle can be defined by (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Ian Begg & J. Peter Denny (1969). Empirical Reconciliation of Atmosphere and Conversion Interpretations of Syllogistic Reasoning Errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (2):351.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Albert A. Bennett (1938). Review: Emanuele Abita, Compatibilita degli Assiomi della Logica. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 3 (4):162-162.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. J. Berg (forthcoming). Bolzano, the Prescient Encyclopedist: In His Wissenschaftslehre Bernard Bolzano Tried to Lay Down a Logically Satisfactory Foundation of Mathematics and Theory of Probability. Grazer Philosophische Studien.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. K. Berka (1978). Aristotle Theory of Deduction. Filosoficky Casopis 26 (6):879-895.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Karel Berka (1981). Bernard Bolzano. Horizont.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Max Black (1947). Review: Jean Cavailles, Albert Lautman, La Pensee Mathematique. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):21-22.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Albert Blumberg (1967). Logic, Modern. In Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York, Macmillan. 5--6.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Susanne Bobzien (2006). Ancient Logic. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    ABSTRACT: A comprehensive introduction to ancient (western) logic from earliest times to the 6th century CE, with an emphasis on topics which may be of interest to contemporary logicians. Content: 1. Pre-Aristotelian Logic 1.1 Syntax and Semantics 1.2 Argument Patterns and Valid Inference 2. Aristotle 2.1 Dialectics 2.2 Sub-sentential Classifications 2.3 Syntax and Semantics of Sentences 2.4 Non-modal Syllogistic 2.5 Modal Logic 3. The early Peripatetics: Theophrastus and Eudemus 3.1 Improvements and Modifications of Aristotle's Logic 3.2 Prosleptic Syllogisms 3.3 Forerunners (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Susanne Bobzien (2003). Stoic Logic. In Brad Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    ABSTRACT: An introduction to Stoic logic. Stoic logic can in many respects be regarded as a fore-runner of modern propositional logic. I discuss: 1. the Stoic notion of sayables or meanings (lekta); the Stoic assertibles (axiomata) and their similarities and differences to modern propositions; the time-dependency of their truth; 2.-3. assertibles with demonstratives and quantified assertibles and their truth-conditions; truth-functionality of negations and conjunctions; non-truth-functionality of disjunctions and conditionals; language regimentation and ‘bracketing’ devices; Stoic basic principles of propositional logic; 4. (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. George Boger (2004). Aristotle's Underlying Logic. In Dov M. Gabbay, John Woods & Akihiro Kanamori (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Elsevier. 1--101.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. R. Bosley (1979). "Ancient Logic and Its Modern Interpretations." Edited by J. Corcoran. [REVIEW] Mind 88:284.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. S. Bozzi (2013). Logica Dimostrativa. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2):183 - 187.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. G. Buchdahl (1948). Logic and History. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 26:94.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Bernd Buldt, Review of "Irving H. Anellis: Historical Development of Modern Logic”. [REVIEW]
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Adam Bülow-Jacobsen & Sten Ebbesen (1982). Vaticanus Urbinas Graecus 35. An Edition of the Scholia on Aristotle’s Sophistici Elenchi. Cahiers de l'Institut du Moyen-Âge Grec Et Latin 43:45-120.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jean Buridan (2005). Summulae de Propositionibus. Brepols.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. E. B. C. (1964). Short Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 17 (4):623-623.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. V. C. C. (1956). Logik. Review of Metaphysics 10 (2):362-362.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. V. C. C. (1956). Logik. Review of Metaphysics 10 (2):362-362.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Javier Picón Casas (2009). Los futuros contingentes y De Interpretatione, IX. Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 26:51-61.
    Some authors have talken about the problem of the future contingents Aristotle exposed in De Interpretatione IX. But most of them do not explain the role of that chapter in his own work. Last analysis always try to find a formal solution. And this is very significative because De Interpretatione is a treatise that belongs to the semantic of the Organon. In this article we show that: 1. The aim of the problem of future contigents is not only formal and (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Hypothetical Syllogisms Was Changed (2000). Why the Order of the Figures of the Hypothetical Syllogisms Was Changed. Classical Quarterly 50:247-251.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Alonzo Church (1970). Review: Paul Kurtz, American Philosophy in the Twentieth Century: A Sourcebook. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (2):312-313.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Alonzo Church (1954). Review: A. N. Prior, The Parva Logicalia in Modern Dress. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 19 (1):73-74.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. J. Corcoran & G. Boger (2011). Protasis in Prior Analytics: Proposition or Premise. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 17:151 - 2.
    The word pro-tasis is etymologically a near equivalent of pre-mise, pro-position, and ante-cedent—all having positional, relational connotations now totally absent in contemporary use of proposition. Taking protasis for premise, Aristotle’s statement (24a16) -/- A protasis is a sentence affirming or denying something of something…. -/- is not a definition of premise—intensionally: the relational feature is absent. Likewise, it is not a general definition of proposition—extensionally: it is too narrow. This paper explores recent literature on these issues.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. John Corcoran, A BIBLIOGRAPHY: JOHN CORCORAN's PUBLICATIONS ON ARISTOTLE 1972–2015.
    This presentation includes a complete bibliography of John Corcoran’s publications devoted at least in part to Aristotle’s logic. Sections I–IV list 20 articles, 43 abstracts, 3 books, and 10 reviews. It starts with two watershed articles published in 1972: the Philosophy & Phenomenological Research article that antedates Corcoran’s Aristotle’s studies and the Journal of Symbolic Logic article first reporting his original results; it ends with works published in 2015. A few of the items are annotated with endnotes connecting them with (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. John Corcoran (2014). Truth-Preserving and Consequence-Preserving Deduction Rules”,. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 20:130-1.
    A truth-preservation fallacy is using the concept of truth-preservation where some other concept is needed. For example, in certain contexts saying that consequences can be deduced from premises using truth-preserving deduction rules is a fallacy if it suggests that all truth-preserving rules are consequence-preserving. The arithmetic additive-associativity rule that yields 6 = (3 + (2 + 1)) from 6 = ((3 + 2) + 1) is truth-preserving but not consequence-preserving. As noted in James Gasser’s dissertation, Leibniz has been criticized for (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 298