Search results for 'Schemata' (try it on Scholar)

308 found
Order:
  1. John Corcoran (2006). Schemata: The Concept of Schema in the History of Logic. Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 12 (2):219-240.
    The syllogistic figures and moods can be taken to be argument schemata as can the rules of the Stoic propositional logic. Sentence schemata have been used in axiomatizations of logic only since the landmark 1927 von Neumann paper [31]. Modern philosophers know the role of schemata in explications of the semantic conception of truth through Tarski’s 1933 Convention T [42]. Mathematical logicians recognize the role of schemata in first-order number theory where Peano’s second-order Induction Axiom is (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  79
    Jens Harbecke (2013). On the Distinction Between Law Schemata and Causal Laws. Acta Analytica 28 (4):423-434.
    The paper argues against the widely accepted assumption that the causal laws of (completed) physics, in contrast to those of the special sciences, are essentially strict. This claim played an important role already in debates about the anomalousness of the mental, and it currently experiences a renaissance in various discussions about mental causation, projectability of special science laws, and the nature of physical laws. By illustrating the distinction with some paradigmatic physical laws, the paper demonstrates that only law schemata (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Marco Mazzone (2011). Schemata and Associative Processes in Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (8):2148-2159.
    The notion of schema has been given a major role by Recanati within his conception of primary pragmatic processes, conceived as a type of associative process. I intend to show that Recanati’s considerations on schemata may challenge the relevance theorist’s argument against associative explanations in pragmatics, and support an argument in favor of associative (versus inferential) explanations. More generally, associative relations can be shown to be schematic, that is, they have enough structure to license inferential effects without any appeal (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  14
    P. Lévine & J. -Ch Pomerol (1989). Knowledge Representation by Schemata in Financial Expert Systems. Theory and Decision 27 (1-2):147-161.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  63
    Jay F. Rosenberg (1997). Kantian Schemata and the Unity of Perception. In Language and Thought. Hawthorne: De Gruyter
  6.  24
    Penelope A. Lewis & Simon J. Durrant (2011). Overlapping Memory Replay During Sleep Builds Cognitive Schemata. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (8):343-351.
    Sleep enhances integration across multiple stimuli, abstraction of general rules, insight into hidden solutions and false memory formation. Newly learned information is better assimilated if compatible with an existing cognitive framework or schema. This article proposes a mechanism by which the reactivation of newly learned memories during sleep could actively underpin both schema formation and the addition of new knowledge to existing schemata. Under this model, the overlapping replay of related memories selectively strengthens shared elements. Repeated reactivation of memories (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  7.  32
    Marco Mazzone (2015). Constructing the Context Through Goals and Schemata: Top-Down Processes in Comprehension and Beyond. Frontiers in Psychology 1 (13).
    My main purpose here is to provide an account of context selection in utterance understanding in terms of the role played by schemata and goals in top-down processing. The general idea is that information is organized hierarchically, with items iteratively organized in chunks—here called “schemata”—at multiple levels, so that the activation of any items spreads to schemata that are the most accessible due to previous experience. The activation of a schema, in turn, activates its other components, so (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  8
    Marco Mazzone (2014). Crossing the Associative/Inferential Divide: Ad Hoc Concepts and the Inferential Power of Schemata. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 5 (4):583-599.
    How do we construct ad hoc concepts, especially those characterised by emergent properties? A reasonable hypothesis, suggested both in psychology and in pragmatics , is that some sort of inferential processing must be involved. I argue that this inferential processing can be accounted for in associative terms. My argument is based on the notion of inference as associative pattern completion based on schemata, with schemata being conceived in turn as patterns of concepts and their relationships. The possible role (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  7
    J. D. Hamkins & A. W. Apter (2001). Indestructible Weakly Compact Cardinals and the Necessity of Supercompactness for Certain Proof Schemata. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 47 (4):563-572.
    We show that if the weak compactness of a cardinal is made indestructible by means of any preparatory forcing of a certain general type, including any forcing naively resembling the Laver preparation, then the cardinal was originally supercompact. We then apply this theorem to show that the hypothesis of supercompactness is necessary for certain proof schemata.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  10.  75
    Dale Jacquette (2010). Circularity or Lacunae in Tarski's Truth-Schemata. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 19 (3):315-326.
    Tarski avoids the liar paradox by relativizing truth and falsehood to particular languages and forbidding the predication to sentences in a language of truth or falsehood by any sentences belonging to the same language. The Tarski truth-schemata stratify an object-language and indefinitely ascending hierarchy of meta-languages in which the truth or falsehood of sentences in a language can only be asserted or denied in a higher-order meta-language. However, Tarski’s statement of the truth-schemata themselves involve general truth functions, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  20
    Pavel Naumov (2006). Upper Bounds on Complexity of Frege Proofs with Limited Use of Certain Schemata. Archive for Mathematical Logic 45 (4):431-446.
    The paper considers a commonly used axiomatization of the classical propositional logic and studies how different axiom schemata in this system contribute to proof complexity of the logic. The existence of a polynomial bound on proof complexity of every statement provable in this logic is a well-known open question.The axiomatization consists of three schemata. We show that any statement provable using unrestricted number of axioms from the first of the three schemata and polynomially-bounded in size set of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  14
    John Collins (2003). Horwich's Schemata Meet Syntactic Structures. Mind 112 (447):399-432.
    Paul Horwich (1998), following a number of others, proposes a schematic compositional format for the specification of the meanings of complex expressions. The format is schematic in the sense that it identifies grammatical schemata that do not presuppose any particular account of primitive word meanings: whatever the nature of meanings, the application of the schemata to them will serve to explain compositionality. This signals, for Horwich, that compositionality is a non-substantive constraint on theories of meaning. Drawing on a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  4
    Lowell Nissen (1971). Neutral Functional Statement Schemata. Philosophy of Science 38 (2):251-257.
    The claim that there are nonpurposive functional statements is critically examined by looking at nine translation schemata, several of which are drawn from recent literature. All but one or two fail, suggesting that all functional statements (a) are causal (and not about probabilities or necessary conditions), and (b) have implicit reference to goals. If so, then the possibility of nonpurposive functional statements rests squarely on the possibility of nonpurposive goals.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  2
    Matti Kamppinen (1993). Cognitive Schemata. In Consciousness, Cognitive Schemata, and Relativism. Kluwer 133--168.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  2
    J. O. Wisdom (1980). Schemata in Social Science. Part One: Cstructural and Operational. Inquiry 23 (4):445 – 464.
    Some twenty different background approaches, or schemata, permeate the social sciences. Most of their exponents regard their choice as excluding the rest. This paper is concerned to show that all such conflict is merely disputatious since virtually all the schemata require one another. Taking the individual's need to act as starting-point, certain restrictions limiting his freedom of action are identified as factors of the overt societal situation. These, however, fail to explain all aspects of his powerlessness, to account (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  2
    J. O. Wisdom (1981). Schemata in Social Science. Part Two: Metatheoretical. Inquiry 24 (1):3 – 19.
    The schema, or theoretical framework, holism, is concerned with the essence of society as a whole. Though undermined by Popper, it cannot be refuted ? nor proved. The extreme alternative is individualism. Several forms, due to Freud, Wittgenstein, and phenomenology, make presuppositions that require the individualist interpretation of society to be reopened at a new point. Popper's ? or Weber's ? is the sturdiest; its units being individual actions plus their unintended by?products. The Weber?Popper schema can provide a framework for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Fernand Gobet, Peter C. R. Lane & Martyn Lloyd-Kelly (2015). Chunks, Schemata, and Retrieval Structures: Past and Current Computational Models. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. Garvin Melles (1994). Natural Internal Forcing Schemata Extending ZFC: Truth in the Universe? Journal of Symbolic Logic 59 (2):461-472.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Jennifer A. McMahon (2003). Perceptual Constraints and Perceptual Schemata:The Possibility of Perceptual Style. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 61 (3):259–273.
    <The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com > -- In this paper I carve out a space between the concept of "the object" and the seemingly endless ways in which "the object" can be represented pictorially. I will call the aspect of the pictorial representation which is made possible by this space, the pictorial representation's "style". I will explore this space by drawing upon theories of pictorial representation, leaving out, for the sake of my purposes here, a consideration of the (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  15
    Charles Kemp, Noah D. Goodman & Joshua B. Tenenbaum (2007). Learning Causal Schemata. In McNamara D. S. & Trafton J. G. (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society 389--394.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  21. Hao Wang (1953). Certain Predicates Defined by Induction Schemata. Journal of Symbolic Logic 18 (1):49-59.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  3
    Peer F. Bundgaard, Svend Ostergaard & Frederik Stjernfelt (2006). Waterproof Fire Stations? Conceptual Schemata and Cognitive Operations Involved in Compound Constructions. Semiotica 2006 (161):363-393.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  23.  56
    Malcolm Bull (1994). Scheming Schemata. British Journal of Aesthetics 34 (3):207-217.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  11
    Jerzy Kotas (1971). The Modular Logic as a Calculus of Logical Schemata. Studia Logica 27 (1):73 - 79.
  25.  4
    H. E. Rose (1965). A Note on Reducible Induction Schemata. Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 11 (2):121-126.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  11
    H. H. Williams (1894). Kant's Doctrine of the Schemata. The Monist 4 (3):375-384.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  13
    S. Kaminski (1965). Rules for Syllogisms with the Consideration of Schemata with Negated Subject Terms. Studia Logica 16 (1):52-52.
  28.  33
    L. R. Rogers (1965). Representation and Schemata. British Journal of Aesthetics 5 (2):159-178.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  13
    Daniel O. Dahlstrom (1984). Transzendentale Schemata, Kategorien und Erkenntnisarten. Kant-Studien 75 (1-4):38-54.
  30.  4
    Mirosław Kutyłowski (1986). Restricted Collection and Comprehension Schemata in Weak Set Theories. Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 32 (35-36):545-549.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  4
    Freddy Bugge Christiansen & Marcus W. Feldman (1998). Algorithms, Genetics, and Populations: The Schemata Theorem Revisited. Complexity 3 (3):57-64.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32.  9
    Bonnie K. Ray & David H. Krantz (1996). Foundations of the Theory of Evidence: Resolving Conflict Among Schemata. Theory and Decision 40 (3):215-234.
  33.  43
    Susan Carey (2008). Math Schemata and the Origins of Number Representations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):645-646.
    The contrast Rips et al. draw between and approaches to understanding the origin of the capacity for representing natural number is a false dichotomy. Its plausibility depends upon the sketchiness of the authors' own proposal. At least some of the proposals they characterize as bottom-up are worked-out versions of the very top-down position they advocate. Finally, they deny that the structures that these putative bottom-up proposals consider to be sources of natural number are even precursors of concepts of natural number. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  11
    Husain Sarkar (1979). Putnam's Schemata. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):125-137.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  26
    Arthur Melnick (2001). Categories, Logical Functions, and Schemata in Kant. Review of Metaphysics 54 (3):615 - 639.
  36.  6
    Saharon Shelah & Charles Steinhorn (1990). The Nonαxiomαtizαbility of 1.(0^) by Finitely Many Schemata. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 31 (1):1-13.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  12
    Willis Doney (1966). Körner on Categorial Schemata. Journal of Philosophy 63 (19):561-564.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  34
    Stephan Käufer (2003). Schemata, Hammers, and Time: Heidegger's Two Derivations of Judgment. [REVIEW] Topoi 22 (1):79-91.
    In his Kant interpretations of the late 1920s and in Being and Time, Heidegger develops two distinct, yet related, derivations of the possibility of judgment from temporal conditions. This paper presents each derivation, establishes the strict analogy between the two, and uses it to explain the structure and shortcoming of the interpretation of ecstatic temporality as the unitary ground of objective experience.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  2
    Alan Ross Anderson, Nuel D. Belnap & John R. Wallace (1960). Independent Axiom Schemata for the Pure Theory of Entailment. Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 6 (1-6):93-95.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  5
    Raymond J. Mooney (1990). Learning Plan Schemata From Observation: Explanation‐Based Learning for Plan Recognition. Cognitive Science 14 (4):483-509.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  7
    Alan Ross Anderson, Nuel D. Belnap & John R. Wallace (1960). Independent Axiom Schemata for the Pure Theory of Entailment. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 6 (1‐6):93-95.
  42.  9
    Theodor Leiber (1996). Kategorien, Schemata und empirische Begriffe: Kants Beitrag zur kognitiven Psychologie. Kant-Studien 87 (1):1-41.
  43.  3
    Richard P. Nielsen & Jean M. Bartunek (1996). Opening Narrow, Routinized Schemata to Ethical Stakeholder Consciousness and Action. Business and Society 35 (4):483-519.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  44.  8
    Timothy L. Hubbard (1993). Auditory Representational Momentum: Musical Schemata and Modularity. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (3):201-204.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  3
    Cees van Leeuwen (1987). Schemata and Representational Constraints. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10 (3):448.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  10
    Peter Krausser (1976). Zu einer systematischen Rekonstruktion der Erkenntnis- und Wissenschaftstheorie in Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Teil VI: Zum Verhältnis von Kategorien, Schemata und Grundsätzen und der Rolle der Analogien-Kapitel in der sogenannten 'Deduktion'. Kant-Studien 67 (1-4):141-155.
  47.  4
    Chris Onof, Understanding Schematism and the Nature of Schemata.
    Book synopsis: The five volumes contain the main papers and lectures of invited speakers that were presented at the X. International Kant Congress in Sao Paolo in 2005.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  3
    Hoke Robinson (2013). Empirical Intuitions, Schemata, and Concepts in Kant’s Critical Epistemology. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 331-344.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  15
    Sandra B. Rosenthal & Patrick L. Bourgeois (1979). Lewis, Heidegger, and Kant: Schemata and the Structure of Perceptual Experience. Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):239-248.
  50.  15
    Alan Ross Anderson (1957). Independent Axiom Schemata for Von Wright's M. Journal of Symbolic Logic 22 (3):241-244.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 308