Search results for 'eleatic' (try it on Scholar)

92 found
Sort by:
  1. Mark Colyvan (1998). Can the Eleatic Principle Be Justified? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 28 (3):313 - 335.score: 18.0
    The Eleatic Principle or causal criterion is a causal test that entities must pass in order to gain admission to some philosophers’ ontology.1 This principle justifies belief in only those entities to which causal power can be attributed, that is, to those entities which can bring about changes in the world. The idea of such a test is rather important in modern ontology, since it is neither without intuitive appeal nor without influential supporters. Its supporters have included David Armstrong (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Michael Rea (2001). How to Be an Eleatic Monist. Noûs 35 (s15):129-151.score: 18.0
    There is a tradition according to which Parmenides of Elea endorsed the following set of counterintuitive doctrines: (a) There exists exactly one material thing. (b) What exists does not change. (g) Nothing is generated or destroyed. (d) What exists is undivided. For convenience, I will use the label ‘Eleatic monism’ to refer to the conjunction of a–d.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2011). Why Spinoza is Not an Eleatic Monist (Or Why Diversity Exists). In Philip Goff (ed.), Spinoza on Monism. Palgrave.score: 15.0
    “Why did God create the World?” is one of the traditional questions of theology. In the twentieth century this question was rephrased in a secularized manner as “Why is there something rather than nothing?” While creation - at least in its traditional, temporal, sense - has little place in Spinoza’s system, a variant of the same questions puts Spinoza’s system under significant pressure. According to Spinoza, God, or the substance, has infinitely many modes. This infinity of modes follow from the (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Montgomery Furth (1968). Elements of Eleatic Ontology. Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 (2).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Graham Oddie (1982). Armstrong on the Eleatic Principle and Abstract Entities. Philosophical Studies 41 (2):285 - 295.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Josh Parsons (2004). The Eleatic Hangover Cure. Analysis 64 (4):364–366.score: 15.0
    It’s well known that one way to cure a hangover is by a “hair of the dog” — another alcoholic drink. The drawback of this method is that, so it would appear, it cannot be used to completely cure a hangover, since the cure simply induces a further hangover at a later time, which must in turn either be cured or suffered through.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. G. E. L. Owen (1960). Eleatic Questions. Classical Quarterly 10 (1-2):84-.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Thomas M. Lennon (2007). The Eleatic Descartes. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (1):29-45.score: 15.0
    : Given Descartes's conception of extension, space and body, there are deep problems about how there can be any real motion. The argument here is that in fact Descartes takes motion to be only phenomenal. The paper sets out the problems generated by taking motion to be real, the solution to them found in the Cartesian texts, and an explanation of those texts in which Descartes appears on the contrary to regard motion as real.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jonathan Barnes (1979). Parmenides and the Eleatic One. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 61 (1):1-21.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Kenneth Neil M. Dorter, Form and Good in Plato's Eleatic Dialogues.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Simon Prosser (2006). The Eleatic Non-Stick Frying Pan. Analysis 66 (291):187–194.score: 15.0
    A novel way of making a non-stick frying pan using a topologically open surface is described. While the article has a slight humorous element to it, it is also intended to contain some serious philosophical points concerning the nature of infinitely divisible matter and the kind of contact that must occur between objects in order for them to interact.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Eric C. Sanday (2009). Eleatic Metaphysics in Plato's Parmenides : Zeno's Puzzle of Plurality. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 23 (3):pp. 208-226.score: 15.0
  13. Gustavo E. Romero (2013). From Change to Spacetime: An Eleatic Journey. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 18 (1):139-148.score: 15.0
    I present a formal ontological theory where the basic building blocks of the world can be either things or events. In any case, the result is a Parmenidean worldview where change is not a global property. What we understand by change manifests as asymmetries in the pattern of the world-lines that constitute 4-dimensional existents. I maintain that such a view is in accord with current scientific knowledge.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Patricia Kenig Curd (1993). Eleatic Monism in Zeno and Melissus. Ancient Philosophy 13 (1):1-22.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Scott Berman (1996). Form and Good in Plato's Eleatic Dialogues. Ancient Philosophy 16 (2):487-491.score: 15.0
  16. Laura Grams (2012). The Eleatic Visitor's Method of Division. Apeiron 45 (2):130-156.score: 15.0
  17. V. Tejera (1978). Plato's Politicus, an Eleatic Sophist on Politics. Philosophy and Social Criticism 5 (1):106-125.score: 15.0
  18. R. B. B. Wardy (1988). Eleatic Pluralism. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 70 (2):125-146.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Wallace Matson (1984). Eleatic Motions. Philosophical Inquiry 6 (3-4):184-201.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. V. Tejera (1978). Plato's Politicus: An Eleatic Sophist on Politics (Part II). Philosophy and Social Criticism 5 (2):106-125.score: 15.0
  21. G. B. Kerferd (1961). Eleatic Philosophy J. H. M. M. Loenen: Parmenides, Melissus, Gorgias. A Reinterpretation of Eleatic Philosophy. Pp. 207. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1959. Paper, Fl. 14.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 11 (01):26-27.score: 15.0
  22. M. Schofield (1998). The Legacy of Parmenides. Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought. P Curd. The Classical Review 48 (2):347-348.score: 15.0
  23. Jacob Howland (1996). Form and Good in Plato's Eleatic Dialogues. Review of Metaphysics 49 (3):646-648.score: 15.0
  24. Mitchell H. Miller (1999). The Legacy of Parmenides, Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (1):157-159.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Samuel C. Wheeler (1983). Megarian Paradoxes as Eleatic Arguments. American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (3):287-295.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Luis Andres Bredlow (2011). Plato and Invention of the Eleatic School (Sof. 242 D). Convivium 24:25-42.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. R. S. B. (1960). Parmenides, Melissus, Gorgias. A Reinterpretation of Eleatic Philosophy. Review of Metaphysics 14 (1):173-174.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. P. Curd (1998). Eleatic Arguments. In Jyl Gentzler (ed.), Method in Ancient Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 1--28.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Adam Drozdek (forthcoming). Eleatic Being: Finite or Infinite? Hermes.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Denis Grey & J. H. M. M. Loenen (1961). Parmenides, Melissus, Gorgias: A Reinterpretation of Eleatic Philosophy. Journal of Hellenic Studies 81:184.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Jacob Howland (1993). The Eleatic Stranger's Socratic Condemnation of Socrates. Polis 12:15-36.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Samuel C. Wheeler Iii (1983). Megarian Paradoxes as Eleatic Arguments. American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (3):287 - 295.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Donna Jones (2008). The Eleatic Bergson. Diacritics 37 (1):21-31.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. M. C. Scholar (1965). Parmenides, Melissus and Gorgias. A Reinterpretation of Eleatic Philosophy (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 3 (2):255-260.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. David Sedley (2008). Atomism's Eleatic Roots. In Patricia Curd & Daniel W. Graham (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. H. Tarrant (2000). The Legacy of Parmenides: Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought. By Patricia Curd. The European Legacy 5 (2):322-322.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. J. E. Raven (1948). Pythagoreans and Eleatics. Cambridge [Eng.]University Press.score: 7.0
  38. Sam Cowling (forthcoming). Advice for Eleatics. In Chris Daly (ed.), Palgrave Handbook of Philosophical Methods.score: 6.0
    Eleaticism ties ontology to causality by denying the impossibility of causally inert entities. This paper examines some challenges regarding the proper formulation and general plausibility of Eleaticism. After suggesting how Eleatics ought to respond to these challenges, I consider the prospects for extending Eleaticism from ontology to ideology by requiring all primitive ideology to be causal in nature. Surprisingly enough, the resulting view delivers an eternalist and possibilist metaphysical picture in the neighborhood of Lewisian modal realism.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Bradley Dowden, Zeno’s Paradoxes. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 6.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Michael Patzia, Xenophanes. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 6.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Author unknown, Parmenides. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 6.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Paul Benacerraf (1962). Tasks, Super-Tasks, and the Modern Eleatics. Journal of Philosophy 59 (24):765-784.score: 5.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2010). Acosmism or Weak Individuals?: Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite. Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):pp. 77-92.score: 5.0
    Like many of his contemporaries, Hegel considered Spinoza a modern reviver of ancient Eleatic monism, in whose system “all determinate content is swallowed up as radically null and void”. This characterization of Spinoza as denying the reality of the world of finite things had a lasting influence on the perception of Spinoza in the two centuries that followed. In this article, I take these claims of Hegel to task and evaluate their validity. Although Hegel’s official argument for the unreality (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Daniel E. Gershenson & Daniel A. Greenberg (1962). Aristotle Confronts the Eleatics: Two Arguments on 'The One'. Phronesis 7 (2):137 - 151.score: 5.0
  45. G. B. Kerferd (1952). The Eleatics Jean Zafiropulo: L'École Éléate. Parménide, Zénon, Mélissos. (Collection d'Études Anciennes.) Pp. 304. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1950. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 2 (02):76-77.score: 5.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. T. Whittaker (1924). A Note on the Eleatics. Mind 33 (132):428-432.score: 5.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. J. Tate (1950). Pythagoreans and Eleatics J. E. Raven: Pythagoreans and Eleatics. An Account of the Interaction Between the Two Opposed Schools During the Fifth and Early Fourth Centuries B.C. Pp. Viii+196. Cambridge: University Press, 1948. Cloth, 12s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 64 (3-4):109-111.score: 5.0
  48. John F. Callahan (1950). Pythagoreans and Eleatics. Thought 25 (4):755-758.score: 5.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. William A. Gerhard (1950). Pythagoreans and Eleatics. New Scholasticism 24 (3):335-336.score: 5.0
  50. G. B. Kerferd (1978). Presocratic Studies R. E. Allen, David J. Furley: Studies in Presocratic Philosophy, Vol. Ii: Eleatics and Pluralists. Pp. Viii + 440. London: Routledge, 1975. Cloth, £7·95. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 28 (01):79-80.score: 5.0
1 — 50 / 92