57 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Daniel P. Sulmasy [57]Daniel Patrick Sulmasy [1]
See also
Daniel Sulmasy
Georgetown University
  1. What is Conscience and Why is Respect for It so Important?Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2008 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3):135-149.
    The literature on conscience in medicine has paid little attention to what is meant by the word ‘conscience.’ This article distinguishes between retrospective and prospective conscience, distinguishes synderesis from conscience, and argues against intuitionist views of conscience. Conscience is defined as having two interrelated parts: (1) a commitment to morality itself; to acting and choosing morally according to the best of one’s ability, and (2) the activity of judging that an act one has done or about which one is deliberating (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   65 citations  
  2.  48
    Tolerance, Professional Judgment, and the Discretionary Space of the Physician.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2017 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 26 (1):18-31.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  3.  7
    Whole-Brain Death and Integration: Realigning the Ontological Concept with Clinical Diagnostic Tests.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (5):455-481.
    For decades, physicians, philosophers, theologians, lawyers, and the public considered brain death a settled issue. However, a series of recent cases in which individuals were declared brain dead yet physiologically maintained for prolonged periods of time has challenged the status quo. This signals a need for deeper reflection and reexamination of the underlying philosophical, scientific, and clinical issues at stake in defining death. In this paper, I consider four levels of philosophical inquiry regarding death: the ontological basis, actual states of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4.  26
    Conscience, Tolerance, and Pluralism in Health Care.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (6):507-521.
    Increasingly, physicians are being asked to provide technical services that many believe are morally wrong or inconsistent with their beliefs about the meaning and purposes of medicine. This controversy has sparked persistent debate over whether practitioners should be permitted to decline participation in a variety of legal practices, most notably physician-assisted suicide and abortion. These debates have become heavily politicized, and some of the key words and phrases are being used without a clear understanding of their meaning. In this essay, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  51
    The Varieties of Human Dignity: A Logical and Conceptual Analysis.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (4):937-944.
    The word ‘dignity’ is used in a variety of ways in bioethics, and this ambiguity has led some to argue that the term must be expunged from the bioethical lexicon. Such a judgment is far too hasty, however. In this article, the various uses of the word are classified into three serviceable categories: intrinsic, attributed, and inflorescent dignity. It is then demonstrated that, logically and linguistically, the attributed and inflorescent meanings of the word presuppose the intrinsic meaning. Thus, one cannot (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  6.  11
    Unrealistic Optimism in Early-Phase Oncology Trials.Lynn A. Jansen, Paul S. Appelbaum, William Mp Klein, Neil D. Weinstein, William Cook, Jessica S. Fogel & Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2011 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 33 (1):1.
    Unrealistic optimism is a bias that leads people to believe, with respect to a specific event or hazard, that they are more likely to experience positive outcomes and/or less likely to experience negative outcomes than similar others. The phenomenon has been seen in a range of health-related contexts—including when prospective participants are presented with the risks and benefits of participating in a clinical trial. In order to test for the prevalence of unrealistic optimism among participants of early-phase oncology trials, we (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  7. Dignity and Bioethics : History, Theory, and Selected Applications.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2008 - In Adam Schulman (ed.), Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics. [President's Council on Bioethics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  8.  61
    “Reinventing” the Rule of Double Effect.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2007 - In Bonnie Steinbock (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 114--49.
    The Rule of Double Effect has played an important role in bioethics, especially during the last fifty years. Its major application in bioethics has been in providing physicians who are opposed to euthanasia with a moral justification for using opioid analgesics in treating the pain of patients whose death might thereby be hastened. It has also prominently been applied to certain obstetric cases. The scope of application of double effect is actually much broader than medical ethics, extending to cover such (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  9. Speaking of the Value of Life.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (2):181-199.
    The notion of the value of life is often invoked in discussions regarding medical care for the sick and the dying. This theme has figured in arguments about medical ethics for decades, but many of the phrases associated with this concept have received little serious scrutiny. It is true that some philosophers have declared a few commonly used phrases such as “the sanctity of life,” “the infinite value of life,” and “the value of life itself” to be unclear at best (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  10.  76
    Diseases and Natural Kinds.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (6):487-513.
    David Thomasma called for the development of a medical ethics based squarely on the philosophy of medicine. He recognized, however, that widespread anti-essentialism presented a significant barrier to such an approach. The aim of this article is to introduce a theory that challenges these anti-essentialist objections. The notion of natural kinds presents a modest form of essentialism that can serve as the basis for a foundationalist philosophy of medicine. The notion of a natural kind is neither static nor reductionistic. Disease (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  11.  91
    Proportionality, Terminal Suffering and the Restorative Goals of Medicine.Lynn A. Jansen & Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (4-5):321-337.
    Recent years have witnessed a growing concern that terminally illpatients are needlessly suffering in the dying process. This has ledto demands that physicians become more attentive in the assessment ofsuffering and that they treat their patients as `whole persons.'' Forthe most part, these demands have not fallen on deaf ears. It is nowwidely accepted that the relief of suffering is one of the fundamentalgoals of medicine. Without question this is a positive development.However, while the importance of treating suffering has generally (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  12.  63
    Killing and Allowing to Die: Another Look.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1998 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (1):55-64.
    One of the most important questions in the debate over the morality of euthanasia and assisted suicide is whether an important distinction between killing patients and allowing them to die exists. The U.S. Supreme Court, in rejecting challenges to the constitutionality of laws prohibiting physician-assisted suicide, explicitly invoked this distinction, but did not explicate or defend it. The Second Circuit of the U.S. Court of Appeals had previously asserted, also without argument, that no meaningful distinction exists between killing and allowing (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  13.  19
    Christian Witness in Health Care.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2016 - Christian Bioethics 22 (1):45-61.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  14.  53
    Patient Expectations of Benefit From Phase I Clinical Trials: Linguistic Considerations in Diagnosing a Therapeutic Misconception.K. P. Weinfurt, Daniel P. Sulmasy, Kevin A. Schulman & Neal J. Meropol - 2003 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (4):329-344.
    The ethical treatment of cancer patientsparticipating in clinical trials requiresthat patients are well-informed about thepotential benefits and risks associated withparticipation. When patients enrolled in phaseI clinical trials report that their chance ofbenefit is very high, this is often taken as evidence of a failure of the informed consent process. We argue, however, that some simple themes from the philosophy of language may make such a conclusion less certain. First, the patient may receive conflicting statements from multiple speakers about the expected (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  15.  23
    Edmund Pellegrino's Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine: An Overview.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2014 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 24 (2):105-112.
    Pellegrino was there at the beginning of the field. In the 1950s and 60s, before there was a Kennedy Institute of Ethics or a Hastings Center; before the word ‘bioethics’ itself was coined, Pellegrino was writing articles such as "Ethical Considerations in the Practice of Medicine and Nursing," published in 1964. He was among those who started the Society for Health and Human Values—a precursor organization to the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. He was the founding editor of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  16.  65
    What is an Oath and Why Should a Physician Swear One?Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1999 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 20 (4):329-346.
    While there has been much discussion about the role of oaths in medical ethics, this discussion has previously centered on the content of various oaths. Little conceptual work has been done to clarify what an oath is, or to show how an oath differs from a promise or a code of ethics, or to explore what general role oath-taking by physicians might play in medical ethics. Oaths, like promises, are performative utterances. But oaths are generally characterized by their greater moral (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  17.  10
    The Ethical Obligation of the Dead Donor Rule.Anne L. Dalle Ave, Daniel P. Sulmasy & James L. Bernat - 2020 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 23 (1):43-50.
    The dead donor rule originally stated that organ donors must not be killed by and for organ donation. Scholars later added the requirement that vital organs should not be procured before death. Some now argue that the DDR is breached in donation after circulatory determination of death programs. DCDD programs do not breach the original version of the DDR because vital organs are procured only after circulation has ceased permanently as a consequence of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy. We hold that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18.  87
    Deliberative Democracy and Stem Cell Research in New York State: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 63-78.
    Many states in the U.S. have adopted policies regarding human embryonic stem cell (hESC) research in the last few years. Some have arrived at these policies through legislative debate, some by referendum, and some by executive order. New York has chosen a unique structure for addressing policy decisions regarding this morally controversial issue by creating the Empire State Stem Cell Board with two Committees—an Ethics Committee and a Funding Committee. This essay explores the pros and cons of various policy arrangements (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  19.  41
    Moral Status, Justice, and the Common Morality: Challenges for the Principlist Account of Moral Change.Kevin E. Hodges & Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2013 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 23 (3):275-296.
    The idea that ethics can be derived from a common morality, while controversial, has become very influential in biomedical ethics. Although the concept is employed by several theories, it has most prominently been given a central role in principlism, an ethical theory endorsed by Tom Beauchamp and James Childress in Principles of Biomedical Ethics (2009).1 This text has become a cornerstone of medical ethics education, an achievement that has been commended by critics and supporters alike. It articulates a system of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  20.  25
    Perceptions of Control and Unrealistic Optimism in Early-Phase Cancer Trials.Lynn A. Jansen, Daruka Mahadevan, Paul S. Appelbaum, William M. P. Klein, Neil D. Weinstein, Motomi Mori, Catherine Degnin & Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (2):121-127.
    Purpose Recent research has found unrealistic optimism among patient-subjects in early-phase oncology trials. Our aim was to investigate the cognitive and motivational factors that evoke this bias in this context. We expected perceptions of control to be a strong correlate of unrealistic optimism. Methods A study of patient-subjects enrolled in early-phase oncology trials was conducted at two sites in the USA. Respondents completed questionnaires designed to assess unrealistic optimism and several risk attribute variables that have been found to evoke the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  91
    Commentary: Double Effect—Intention is the Solution, Not the Problem.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2000 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 28 (1):26-29.
  22. Death, Dignity, and the Theory of Value.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2002 - Ethical Perspectives 9 (2):103-130.
    The word ‘dignity’ arises continuously in the debate over euthanasia and assisted suicide, both in Europe and in North America. Unlike the phrases ‘autonomy’ and ‘slippery slope’, ‘dignity’ is used by those on both sides of the question. For example, the organizations most prominently associated with the campaign that culminated in the recent legalization of euthanasia in Belgium are the Association pour la Droit de Mourir dans la Dignité and Recht op Waardig Sterven. Yet when Belgium passed its euthanasia law, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  23.  44
    Terri Schiavo and the Roman Catholic Tradition of Forgoing Extraordinary Means of Care.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2005 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 33 (2):359-362.
    Media coverage and statements by various Catholic spokespersons regarding the case of Terri Schiavo has generated enormous and deeply unfortunate confusion regarding Church teaching about the use of life-sustaining treatments. Two weeks ago, for example, I received a letter from the superior of a community of Missionary Sisters of Charity, who operate a hospice here in the United States The Missionary Sisters of Charity are the community founded by Mother Theresa, the 20th Century saint whose primary ministry was to rescue (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  24.  11
    Bioethics, Conflicts of Interest, the Limits of Transparency.Lynn A. Jansen & Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2003 - Hastings Center Report 33 (4):40-43.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  25.  22
    Death and Dignity in Catholic Christian Thought.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2017 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (4):537-543.
    This article traces the history of the concept of dignity in Western thought, arguing that it became a formal Catholic theological concept only in the late nineteenth century. Three uses of the word are distinguished: intrinsic, attributed, and inflorescent dignity, of which, it is argued, the intrinsic conception is foundational. The moral norms associated with respect for intrinsic dignity are discussed briefly. The scriptural and theological bases for adopting the concept of dignity as a Christian idea are elucidated. The article (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26.  15
    Context and scale: Distinctions for improving debates about physician “rationing”.Jon C. Tilburt & Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2017 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2017 12:1 12 (1):5.
    Important discussions about limiting care based on professional judgment often devolve into heated debates over the place of physicians in bedside rationing. Politics, loaded rhetoric, and ideological caricature from both sides of the rationing debate obscure precise points of disagreement and consensus, and hinder critical dialogue around the obligations and boundaries of professional practice. We propose a way forward by reframing the rationing conversation, distinguishing between the scale of the decision and its context avoiding the word “rationing.” We propose to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  27.  13
    Context and Scale: Distinctions for Improving Debates About Physician “Rationing”.Jon C. Tilburt & Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2017 - Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 12:5.
    Important discussions about limiting care based on professional judgment often devolve into heated debates over the place of physicians in bedside rationing. Politics, loaded rhetoric, and ideological caricature from both sides of the rationing debate obscure precise points of disagreement and consensus, and hinder critical dialogue around the obligations and boundaries of professional practice. We propose a way forward by reframing the rationing conversation, distinguishing between the scale of the decision and its context avoiding the word “rationing.” We propose to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28.  26
    Dear Dr. Peabody.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2016 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 59 (4):562-566.
    Francis W. Peabody, MDDepartment of MedicineBoston City Hospital and Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, MassachusettsMarch 19, 2017Dear Dr. Peabody,Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review your manuscript "The Care of the Patient." It has been carefully considered by the editors and two external reviewers. We regret to inform you that it cannot be considered further for publication in the Prestigious Journal of Medicine.Chief among our reasons is that it is overly long. Opinion pieces—especially non-data driven articles about topics like ethics—should (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29. What's so Special About Medicine?Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (1):379-380.
    Health care has increasingly come to be understood as a commodity. The ethical implications of such an understanding are significant. The author argues that health care is not a commodity because health care (1) is non-proprietary, (2) serves the needs of persons who, as patients, are uniquely vulnerable, (3) essentially involves a special human relationship which ought not be bought or sold, (4) helps to define what is meant by necessity and cannot be considered a commodity when subjected to rigorous (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  30. Emergency Contraception for Women Who Have Been Raped: Must Catholics Test for Ovulation, or is Testing for Pregnancy Morally Sufficient?Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2006 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (4):305-331.
    : On the grounds that rape is an act of violence, not a natural act of intercourse, Roman Catholic teaching traditionally has permitted women who have been raped to take steps to prevent pregnancy, while consistently prohibiting abortion even in the case of rape. Recent scientific evidence that emergency contraception (EC) works primarily by preventing ovulation, not by preventing implantation or by aborting implanted embryos, has led Church authorities to permit the use of EC drugs in the setting of rape. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  31.  40
    Futility and the Varieties of Medical Judgment.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1997 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 18 (1-2):63-78.
    Pellegrino has argued that end-of-life decisions should be based upon the physician's assessment of the effectiveness of the treatment and the patient's assessment of its benefits and burdens. This would seem to imply that conditions for medical futility could be met either if there were a judgment of ineffectiveness, or if the patient were in a state in which he or she were incapable of a subjective judgment of the benefits and burdens of the treatment. I argue that a theory (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  32.  56
    The Logos of the Genome: Genomes as Parts of Organisms.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (6):535-540.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  33.  10
    On Substituted Arguments.Daniel P. Sulmasy & Lois Snyder Sulmasy - 2015 - Journal of Medical Ethics 41 (9):732-733.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  23
    Macklin, Ruth. Against Relativism: Cultural Diversity and the Search for Ethical Universals in Medicine.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2001 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 1 (3):467-469.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  35. Catholic Health Care: Not Dead Yet.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2001 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 1 (1):41-50.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  51
    End-of-Life Decision Making: When Patients and Surrogates Disagree.Peter B. Terry, Margaret Vettese, John Song, Jane Forman, Karen B. Haller, Deborah J. Miller, R. Stallings & Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1998 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 10 (4):286-293.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  37.  76
    Crossing the Bridge: A Time of Transition for Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2002 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 23 (1):5-7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  26
    Patients' Perceptions of the Quality of Informed Consent for Common Medical Procedures.Daniel P. Sulmasy, Lisa S. Lehmann, David M. Levine & R. R. Raden - 1994 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 5 (3):189.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39. Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Before, During, and After the Holocaust.Sheldon Rubenfeld & Daniel P. Sulmasy (eds.) - 2020 - Lexington Books.
    This book provides a history of Nazi medical euthanasia programs, demonstrating that arguments in their favor were widely embraced by Western medicine before the Third Reich. Contributors find significant continuities between history and current physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia and urge caution about their legalization or implementation.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  22
    The Diagnosis of St. Francis: Evidence for Leprosy.Joanne Schatzlein & Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1987 - Franciscan Studies 47 (1):181-217.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  7
    An Open Letter to Norman Cantor Regarding Dementia and Physician‐Assisted Suicide.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (4):28-30.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Book Review: T. A. Cavanaugh, Double-Effect Reasoning: Doing Good and Avoiding Evil . Xxiv + 220 Pp. £45 , ISBN 978—0—19— 927219—8. [REVIEW]Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2008 - Studies in Christian Ethics 21 (3):438-442.
  43.  11
    Christian Ethics and the Delivery of Health Care.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (5):42-42.
  44.  7
    Christian Ethics and the Delivery of Health CareThe Changing Face of Health Care: A Christian Appraisal of Managed Care, Resource Allocation, and Patient-Caregiver Relationships.Daniel P. Sulmasy, John F. Kilner, Robert D. Orr & Judith Allen Shelly - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (5):42.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  27
    Catholic Health Care at the Edge of Ground Zero.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2002 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 2 (1):15-16.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  2
    Correction to: Whole-brain death and integration: realigning the ontological concept with clinical diagnostic tests.Daniel P. Sulmasy - forthcoming - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics:1-2.
    My article, “Whole-brain death and integration: Realigning the ontological concept with clinical diagnostic tests”.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  17
    Ethical Principles, Process, and the Work of Bioethics Commissions.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (S1):S50-S53.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  58
    Editorial: Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics Celebrates its 25th Birthday.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2004 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (1):1-2.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  22
    Health Care Justice and Hospice Care.Daniel P. Sulmasy - forthcoming - Hastings Center Report.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  19
    Jonas, Hans. The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2002 - Review of Metaphysics 55 (4):863-865.
1 — 50 / 57