This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
22 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
  1. Pilar Fernández Beites (1993). Evidencia y verdad. Unproblema en la fenomenología de E. Husserl. Logos 27:195-216.
    This paper reflects on how the possibility of meaningful evidence is to be assumed in view that all our linguistic exercises take place in the context of a discursive horizon where we are situated. To do this, the paper starts distinguishing two phenomena: first, the possibility of meaningful evidence and second, the horizontal character that is inherent to the deployment of linguistic meaning. Furthermore, through a discussion with Husserl and Wittgenstein, the paper considers how those two phenomena are to be (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Rudolf Bernet (2008). Intention und Erfüllung, Evidenz und Wahrheit (VI. Logische Untersuchung. In Verena E. Mayer & Christopher Erhard (eds.), Edmund Husserl: Logische Untersuchungen. Akademie Verlag Berlin 35--189.
  3. Leo J. Bostar (1987). The Methodological Significance of Husserl's Concept of Evidence and its Relation to the Idea of Reason. Husserl Studies 4 (2):143-167.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Leo Joseph Bostar (1986). The Development of Husserl's Concept of Evidence. Dissertation, New School for Social Research
    This study approaches the philosophy of Edmund Husserl as a theory of reason through an elaboration of his developing phenomenological determination of the experiential and methodological dimensions of the experience of evidence. The task is, then, two-fold: to trace Husserl's deepening understanding of the nature and theoretical centrality of the phenomenological concept of evidence and to uncover at the same time its relation to his growing insight into the nature of reason. To this end, the study is divided into chapters (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Deborah Chaffin (1985). Edmund Husserl, 'The Apodicticity of Recollection'. Husserl Studies 2 (1):3-32.
    The text "The Apodicticity of Recollection" dates from 1922-23, and may be viewed as Husserl's clear recognition of the extent to which the descriptive phenomenology of immediacy is bound up with a reconstructive phenomenology of justificiation. Such recognition is manifest through the original treatment he gives the analysis of internal time-consciousness, and especially memory. In addition, his remarks on the nature of the transcendental ego add much strength to the interpretation of this text as a contribution to Husserl's longstanding concern (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. R. Cobb-Stevens (1985). G. Heffernan, "Bedeutung Und Evidenz Bei Edmund Husserl". [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 2 (2):225.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Bernard P. Dauenhauer (1976). Husserl's Phenomenological Justification of Universal Rigorous Science. International Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1):63-80.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. George Heffernan (2013). Vom Wesen der Evidenz zur Evidenz vom Wesen. Eine kritische Analyse der methodologischen Reduktion der Evidenz auf adäquate Selbstgegebenheit in Husserls Die Idee der Phänomenologie. In Stefania Centrone (ed.), Versuche über Husserl. Meiner
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. George Heffernan (2009). On Husserl's Remark That “[s]Elbst Eine Sich Als Apodiktisch Ausgebende Evidenz Kann Sich Als Täuschung Enthüllen …” (XVII 164:32–33): Does the Phenomenological Method Yield Any Epistemic Infallibility? [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 25 (1):15-43.
    Addressing Walter Hopp’s original application of the distinction between agent-fallibility and method-fallibility to phenomenological inquiry concerning epistemic justification, I question whether these are the only two forms of fallibility that are useful or whether there are not also others that are needed. In doing so, I draw my inspiration from Husserl, who in the beginnings of his phenomenological investigations struggled with the distinction between noetic and noematic analyses. For example, in the Preface to the Second Edition of the Logical Investigations (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. George Heffernan (1999). A Study in the Sedimented Origins of Evidence: Husserl and His Contemporaries Engaged in a Collective Essay in the Phenomenology and Psychology of Epistemic Justification. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 16 (2):83-181.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. George Heffernan (1998). Miscellaneous Lucubrations on Husserl's Answer to the Question 'Was Die Evidenz Sei': A Contribution to the Phenomenology of Evidence on the Occasion of the Publication of Husserliana Volume XXX. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 15 (1):1-75.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. George Heffernan (1987). Bedeutung und Evidenz bei Edmund Husserl. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 177 (4):508-509.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. George Heffernan (1983). Bedeutung Und Evidenz Bei Edmund Husserl Das Verhältnis Zwischen der Bedeutungs- Und der Evidenztheorie in den "Logischen Untersuchungen" Und der "Formalen Und Transzendentalen Logik".
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. David Hemmendinger (1975). Husserl's Concepts of Evidence and Science. The Monist 59 (1):81-97.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Juha Himanka (2006). How Does a Dark Room Appear: Husserl's Illumination of the Breakthrough of Logical Investigations. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 6 (2):1-8.
    Evidence is the very core of Husserlian phenomenology, with the term “evidence” signifying for Husserl the phenomenological perspective on the question of truth. In contrast to the conventional philosophical understanding of “truth” in mainly epistemological terms, Husserl’s notion of “evidence”, as elaborated in his Logical Investigations (1900–1), is more essentially ontological, pointing to the way in which a phenomenon becomes clear to us in its constitution. Husserl’s main point in the Sixth Investigation was that we can “see” how evidence functions (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Walter Hopp (2009). Reply to Heffernan. Husserl Studies 25 (1):45-49.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Nam-In Lee (2007). Experience and Evidence. Husserl Studies 23 (3):229-246.
    It is the aim of this paper to assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concept of evidence. In Sect. 1, I will summarize Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concept of evidence. In Sect. 2, I will delineate Husserl’s concept of experience and in Sect. 3, I will try to define the concept of evidence in Husserl. In Sect. 4–6, I will assess Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concepts of evidence and show that Levinas’s criticism of Husserl’s concept of evidence is out of the (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Bence Marosan (2009). Apodicticity and Transcendental Phenomenology. Perspectives: International Postgraduate Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):78-101.
    This paper deals with the concept and meaning of apodicticity or apodictic self-evidence from a phenomenological point of view. The foremost aim of phenomenology is to return to original intuitions, that is, to bring everything to original intuitive givenness and to provide an intuitive basis for philosophical theories. Phenomenology gives a broad interpretation of the concept of intuition. The notion of apodicticity for Husserl is closely related to this conception of self-givenness of objects in intuition. This paper deals partly with (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jerry Alan Moore (1982). Husserl's Theory of Intentionality: The Ideality Thesis, Evidence, and the Open Experience. Dissertation, Tulane University
    In the Logical Investigations, Husserl proposed intentionality as the basic mode of objective reference. When the mind's intention is satisfied by the limiting self-givenness of the object, then the subject has evidence for his assertion. The evidence Husserl means is self-evidence, and since self-evidence provides the ideal form of knowledge, it is in self-evidence that the judging subject can experience the certitude which alone constitutes the rational foundation of knowledge. For Husserl, philosophic certainty is a kind of insight. ;Husserl's theory (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Henry Pietersma (1989). Truth and the Evident. In William R. McKenna & J. N. Mohanty (eds.), Husserl's Phenomenology: A Textbook. University Press of America 213--248.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Hans Bernhard Schmid (2001). Apodictic Evidence. Husserl Studies 17 (3):217-237.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. P. Trotignon (1987). Heffernan . - Bedeutung und Evidenz bei Edmund Husserl. [REVIEW] Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 177:508.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation