Related categories
Siblings:
367 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 367
  1. Flor Emilce Cely Á (2011). El yo como tema de análisis fenomenológico. Ideas Y Valores 60 (146):59-72.
    Husserl comenzó oponiéndose a la posibilidad de considerar el yo como centro de referencia esencial de los actos intencionales. Sin embargo, luego aceptó incluirlo en la descripción fenomenológica como centro de referencia de las vivencias intencionales. Se analizan esos dos momentos y se estudia su..
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. M. A. (1969). Der Wahrheitsbegriff Bei Husserl Und Heidegger. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 22 (3):580-580.
  3. Hans Aebli (1984). What is Intentionality and Who has Intentions in a Structuralist Model of Knowledge, Action and Thought. Dialectica 38 (2‐3):231-242.
    SummaryThe philosophical core of a psychological theory of cognitive processes is developped and commented, focussing on the problem of intentionality, this term being taken in the normal and in the phenomenological sense. Actions, perceived processes, their states and results, operations and concepts are seen as related insofar as they all establish relations between elements, are generated by construction and can be objectivated. These acts and/or the objectives that control them, are intentional insofar as their structure is activated. Such activation is (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Lilian Alweiss (2009). Between Internalism and Externalism: Husserl's Account of Intentionality. Inquiry 52 (1):53 – 78.
    There is a strong consensus among analytic philosophers that Husserl is an internalist and that his internalism must be understood in conjunction with his methodological solipsism. This paper focuses on Husserl's early work the, Logical Investigations , and explores whether such a reading is justified. It shows that Husserl is not a methodological solipsist: He neither believes that meaning can be reduced to the individual, nor does he assign an explanatory role for meaning to the subject. Explanatory priority is assigned (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Graciano GonzÁlez R. Arnaiz (1991). Responsibility As the Principle of Individuality: An Alternative to Husserl's Theory of Intuition. Analecta Husserliana 35:107.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Kristana Arp (2010). Husserlian Intentionality and Everyday. In Thomas Nenon & Lester Embree (eds.), Issues in Husserl's II (Contributions to Phenomenology).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Kristana Arp (1996). Husserlian Intentionality and Everyday Coping. In Thomas Nenon & Lester Embree (eds.), Issues in Husserl's Ideas Ii. 161--171.
    In his book Being-in-the-World Hubert Dreyfus charges that Husserl’s conception of intentionality cannot account for the practice of everyday coping skills, while Heidegger’s thought can. Drawing from the third section of Ideas II as well as other of Husserl’s works, I pull together a Husserlian intentional analysis of everyday coping to show that Dreyfus is wrong.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John E. Atwell (1977). Husserl on Signification and Object. In Jitendranath Mohanty (ed.), American Philosophical Quarterly. Nijhoff. 83--93.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Johannes D. Balle (2008). Husserls typisierende Apperzeption und die Phänomenologie dynamischer Intentionalität. In Filip Mattens (ed.), Meaning and Language: Phenomenological Perspectives. Springer. 89--104.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Kimberly Baltzer-Jaray (2011). Austrian Phenomenology: Brentano, Husserl, Meinong, and Others on Mind and Object. [REVIEW] Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 15 (2):209-212.
  11. Marina Paola Banchetti (1991). Edmund Husserl: Intentionality and Meaning. Dissertation, University of Miami
    This dissertation gives what I consider to be the proper account of Edmund Husserl's theories of intentionality and meaning. This account stresses that meaning is the content of intentional acts of consciousness and thus establishes the necessary connection between meaning and consciousness. ;I also maintain that the two leading interpretations of Husserl's concept of the noema, the traditional interpretation of Aron Gurwitsch and the more recent interpretation of Dagfinn Follesdal, are unsatisfactory because each ignores some fundamental aspect of Husserl's concept (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino (2004). Ibn Sina and Husserl on Intention and Intentionality. Philosophy East and West 54 (1):71-82.
    : The concepts of intention and intentionality were particularly significant notions within the Christian, Jewish, and Islamic medieval philosophical traditions, and they regained philosophical importance in the twentieth century. The theories of intention and intentionality of the medieval Islamic philosopher and physician Ibn Sina and the phenomenological philosopher and mathematician Edmund Husserl are examined, compared, and contrasted here, showing that Ibn Sina's conception of intention is naturalistic and, in its naturalism, is influenced by the medical professional culture to which Ibn (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Archana Barua (2003). Husserl, Heidegger And The Intentionality Question. Minerva 7:44-59.
    Raising an ontological question regarding the meaning of ‘a being’ and also the meaning of an ‘intelligentbeing’, Heidegger identifies intentionality with the skilful coping of a social, norm bound, engaged andcontext dependent embodied being. This he describes in terms of a Dasein, a being-in-the-world, and itstool using activity with respect to social practices and norms. Unlike Husserl’s, intentionality in Heideggeris primarily semantic: the necessary conditions of skilful coping are also the necessary conditions ofintentional acts. The entire question of computers attaining (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Imants Barušs (1989). Categorical Modelling of Husserl's Intentionality. Husserl Studies 6 (1):25-41.
    This paper is concerned with the application of constructions from category theory to Smith and McIntyre's interpretation of Husserl's intentionality. 1 Not only did Hussefl's own ideas change in the course of his lifetime 2 but there are a number of interpretations of Husserl's work 3 so that the line of philosophical investigation that Husserl strongly influenced is still in the process of development. In this vein, Smith and McIntyre have recognized the potential for a possible worlds interpretation of intentionality (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Ligia Beltechi (2002). The Intentional Character Of Imagination At Husserl / Le Caractere Intentionnel De L’imagination Chez Husserl. Studia Philosophica 1.
    La pensée phénoménologique de Husserl retrouve le problème de l’imagination en tant que problème de l’histoire de la philosophie qui, depuis l’antiquité, a resurgi sans cesse en marquant chaque époque. Sans jamais renoncer au dialogue philosophique à travers les siècles, la perspective phénoménologique sur l’imagination introduit quelque chose de radicalement nouveau qui place l’imaginaire au centre de l’expérience mondaine car, par l’intermédiaire d’un vécu particulier, elle concerne à la fois le rapport de l’homme à la vérité, à l’altérité et à (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. J. Benoist (1995). Husserl Et le Mythe de la Signification (Ie Recherche Logique). Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):526 - 552.
    The author attempts to demonstrate that the way in which Husserl is analysing 'meaning' in his 1st Logical Investigation, may be considered to be a test case for intentionality. Even at this early stage intentionality, which henceforth becomes a permanent model, is recognized as 'meaning', i.e. as signifying an object. Such an interpretation of the 'meaning' phenomenon is greatly diverging from the reductive intuitionism often attributed to Husserl. 'Meaning' is not dependent on intuition but constitutes by itselfa relation to an (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Jocelyn Benoist (2008). Grammatik und Intentionalität (Ⅳ. Logische Untersuchung). In Verena Mayer (ed.), Edmund Husserl: Logische Untersuchungen.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jocelyn Benoist (2007). Two (or Three) Conceptions of Intentionality. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 69 (1):79 - 103.
    Except for some eliminativists, the notion of intentionality is considered to be oneof the common goods of 20th century philosophy of mind. However, this rather general label may hide deeper differences. In his 'Husserl Memorial Lecture' Jocelyn Benoist investigates the different possible conceptions of intentionality and the problem of its nature. To examine this question he concurs with Wilfrid Sellars and John McDowell by positing an alternative between two conceptions of intentionality, taken either as a relation or not. From this (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jocelyn Benoist (2005). Reinach et la visée (das meinen) : décliner l'intentionalité. Les Etudes Philosophiques 1 (1):19-37.
    L’auteur esquisse une présentation de la théorie reinachienne des diverses modalités de l’intentionalité. Il se concentre sur celle que Reinach nomme « meinen ». Il montre comment celle-ci dérive de la phénoménologie husserlienne du signifier , mais aussi comment les deux concepts divergent. Il insiste sur l’originalité du concept reinachien de « penser » , qui est élaboré précisément dans le contexte de la phénoménologie du meinen et qui porte la théorie phénoménologique de l’intentionalité à ses propres limites.The author gives (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jocelyn Benoist (2002). Entre Acte Et Sens Recherches Sur la Th'eorie Ph'enom'enologique de la Signification. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jocelyn Benoist (2001). Intentionalit'e Et Langage Dans les Recherches Logiques de Husserl. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  22. Jocelyn Benoist (2000). Husserl entre Brentano et Bolzano : jugement et proposition. Manuscrito 23 (2):11-39.
    Il est bien connu que, dans la Ve Recherche Logique, Husserl critique la théorie brentanienne du jugement. Son problème est de définir le “porteur” de vérité auquel le jugement donne une valeur de vérité. Un tel projet le conduit très près du propositionalisme bolzanien. Alors la théorie phénoménologique du jugement apparaît comme une sorte de compromis entre la psychologie brentanienne de l’acte et un point de vue purement sémantique hérité de Bolzano. La question demeure de savoir si une telle conciliation (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jocelyn Benoist, Fulfilment.
    It seems reasonable to say that the basic problem of Husserl’s phenomenology is the possibility for the mind to get related to the world. In Brentano’s view, intentionality was a universal characterization of the mental. In Husserl’s, it becomes as well the framework of the possible contact of the mind with the world. As Hilary Putnam observes: “‘Brentano’s thesis’ was meant by him to serve as a way of showing the autonomy of mentalistic psychology (‘act-psychology’) by showing that the mental (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Jocelyn Benoist, Robert Brisart & Jacques English (1998). Liminaires Ph'enom'enologiques Recherches Sur le d'Eveloppement de la Th'eorie de la Signification de Husserl. Facultâes Universitaires Saint-Louis.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Arianna Bernardi (2011). Intenzionalità E Semantica Logica in Edmund Husserl E Anton Marty. Quodlibet.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Rudolf Bernet (2008). Intention und Erfüllung, Evidenz und Wahrheit (Ⅵ. Logische Untersuchung, §§ 1-39, 67-70). In Verena Mayer (ed.), Edmund Husserl: Logische Untersuchungen.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Rudolf Bernet (2008). Intention und Erfüllung, Evidenz und Wahrheit (VI. Logische Untersuchung. In Verena E. Mayer & Christopher Erhard (eds.), Edmund Husserl: Logische Untersuchungen. Akademie Verlag Berlin. 35--189.
  28. Rudolf Bernet (2004). Wirkliche Zeit und Phantasiezeit. Zu Husserls Begriff der zeitlichen Individuation. Phänomenologische Forschungen (xxxx):xxxx.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Rudolf Bernet (2002). Real Time And Imaginary Times. On The Husserlian Conception Of Temporal Individuation / Le Temps Reel Et Les Temps Imaginaires. Sur La Conception Husserlienne De L’individuation Temporelle. Studia Philosophica 2.
    Après avoir donné une idée générale du processus d’individuation chez Husserl, l’étude analyse minutieusement la manière dont la temporalité propre aux actes de la perception interne et externe, du ressouvenir et de la phantasia constitue, d’après les Manuscrits de Bernau, l’individualité de l’objet intentionnel. Une attention toute particulière est accordée à ce qui distingue les objets fictifs des objets idéaux et qui permet de leur attribuer une forme spécifique d’individuation . L’étude apporte également des éclaircissements en ce qui concerne la (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Rudolf Bernet (1994). An Intentionality Without Subject or Object? Man and World 27 (3):231-255.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Christian Beyer (2011). Husserl über Begriffe. In Verena Mayer, Christopher Erhard, Marisa Scherini & Uwe Meixner (eds.), Die Aktualität Husserls. Karl Alber.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Christian Beyer (2000). Intentionalität und Referenz. Eine sprachanalytische Studie zu Husserls transzendentaler Phänomenologie. Mentis.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Christian Beyer (1997). Hussearle's Representationalism and the “Hypothesis of the Background”. Synthese 112 (3):323-352.
    John Searle''s hypothesis of the Background seems to conflict with his initial representationalism according to which each Intentional state contains a particular content that determines its conditions of satisfaction. In Section I of this essay I expose Searle''s initial theory of Intentionality and relate it to Edmund Husserl''s earlier phenomenology. In Section II I make it clear that Searle''s introduction of the notion of Network, though indispensable, does not, by itself, force us to modify that initial theory. However, a comparison (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Matteo Bianchin (2002). Intentionalität und Interpretation Auffassung, Auslegung und Interpretation in der Phänomenologie Husserls. Studia Phaenomenologica 2 (3-4):45-63.
  35. Edgar Charles Boedeker (1998). The Concept of Showing in the Early Writings of Heidegger and Wittgenstein. Dissertation, Northwestern University
    This is an investigation into two philosophical developments that took place between 1912 and 1929. I examine Ludwig Wittgenstein's confrontation with Bertrand Russell's views of the nature of logical truth and proof; and Martin Heidegger's confrontation with Edmund Husserl's views of perception and language. There are striking and surprising parallels between these two confrontations, and comparing them helps to illuminate some of the underlying issues at stake. I argue the following. Wittgenstein and Heidegger provide both a criticism and an alternative (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Andrea Borsato (forthcoming). M. Wehrle: Horizonte der Aufmerksamkeit. Entwurf Einer Dynamischen Konzeption der Aufmerksamkeit Aus Phänomenologischer Und Kognitionspsychologischer Sicht. Husserl Studies:1-10.
    Zum Inhalt des BuchesDurch seine Theorie des thematischen Feldes war A. Gurwitsch überzeugt, „ein wesentliches Fundament für die Lehre von der Ichhaftigkeit des Attentionalen erschüttert“ zu haben . Nun kreist M. Wehrles Untersuchung subjektiver Horizonte gerade um die Ichhaftigkeit des Attentionalen und geht somit in die entgegengesetzte Richtung als das Vorhaben Gurwitschs: Die Autorin versucht nachzuweisen, dass es ohne subjektive Tätigkeit keine Aufmerksamkeit gibt. Motor der Aufmerksamkeit ist das Interesse, und Interesse wird in Anlehnung an Husserls Erfahrung und Urteil als (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Leo Joseph Bostar (1986). The Development of Husserl's Concept of Evidence. Dissertation, New School for Social Research
    This study approaches the philosophy of Edmund Husserl as a theory of reason through an elaboration of his developing phenomenological determination of the experiential and methodological dimensions of the experience of evidence. The task is, then, two-fold: to trace Husserl's deepening understanding of the nature and theoretical centrality of the phenomenological concept of evidence and to uncover at the same time its relation to his growing insight into the nature of reason. To this end, the study is divided into chapters (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jonathan Eddy Bremer (1992). Merleau-Ponty's Theory of Intentionality in the "Phenomenology of Perception" and its Logical Development From Husserl and Heidegger. Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada)
    The point of my dissertation is to arrive at a comprehensive understanding of Merleau-Ponty's theory of intentionality as it is presented in the Phenomenology of Perception. I will do this in two major ways. ;First, I will situate Merleau-Ponty's theory of intentionality within its philosophical context by showing that it is the end result of a logical development of intentionality from Husserl and Heidegger. I argue that the philosophical problem of immanence and transcendence is the primary catalyst in the development (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Irene Breuer (2015). Husserls Lehre von den sinnlichen und kategorialen Anschauungen: Der sinnliche Überschuss des Sinnbildungsprozesses und seine doxische Erkenntnisform. In Peter Remmers & Christoph Asmuth (eds.), Ästhetisches Wissen. De Gruyter. 231-246.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Thiemo Breyer (2010). Attentivité et responsivité. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique (10):1-18.
    La présente étude prend son point de départ dans les cours donnés par Husserl à Göttingen dans les années 1904-1905, Hauptstücke aus der Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis . À partir des notions ébauchées dans ces cours de jeunesse, nous aimerions indiquer quelques possibilités encore largement inexploitées concernant l’analyse de l’intersubjectivité. Les thèmes de l’attentionnalité ( Attentionalität ) et de l’interattentionnalité seront ainsi présentés à partir d’une comparaison entre l’attention ( Aufmerksamkeit ) active et passive d’une part, et l’attentivité ( (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Thiemo Breyer (2008). Erfahrung und Ausdruck. Phänomenologie im Umbruch bei Husserl und seinen Nachfolgern. [REVIEW] Perspektiven der Philosophie 34:369-376.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Robert Brisart (2009). La théorie des assomptions chez le jeune Husserl. Philosophiques 36 (2):399-425.
    Afin de « sauver une existence » pour les objets dont il est question dans les représentations mathématiques, le jeune Husserl invente en 1894 une théorie des assomptions. Notre but est d’explorer cette théorie pour montrer en quoi elle constituait une alternative probante par rapport à l’ontologie réaliste et à la conception correspondantiste de la vérité. De celles-ci, pourtant, Husserl ne parviendra pas à se départir à l’époque, comme en témoigne la dichotomie qu’il opère entre la signification et la perception, (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. John Josef Bruin (1998). The Intentionality of Questions and Answers: A Phenomenological Analysis of the Questioning Act. Dissertation, University of Guelph (Canada)
    A good deal of work has already been done on the topic of questions, most of it in recent years, and most of it on the "logic" of questions. Yet in spite of all the attention paid to the topic, what has not received sufficient treatment is the phenomenology of question and answer, in the Husserlian sense of that word, "phenomenology". The present work has two aims: to fill in this gap in the phenomenological literature and to examine the intentionality (...)
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. R. Bruzina (1995). Burt C. Hopkins, "Intentionality in Husserl and Heidegger: The Problem of the Original Method and Phenomenon of Phenomenology". [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 12 (3):227-233.
  45. Ronald Charles Bruzina (1966). Logos and Eidos: A Study in the Phenomenological Meaning of 'Concept' According to Husserl and Merleau-Ponty. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
  46. Ronald Bruzina & Thomas Nenon (1995). Burt C. Hopkins. 'Intentionality in Husserl and Heidegger'. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 12 (3).
    The title of Burt Hopkins' book may not be such as to capture the reader, for the two names put side by side have each lost some of their former lustre. Husserl is long outmoded to many (though not perhaps to the readers of Husserl Studies!), and for others Heidegger's status as transcendent sage fits poorly with his actions as col- laborator with one of the political demons of the twentieth century - and that from all-too-human motives. The title, however, (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Damian Byers (2003). Intentionality and Transcendence: Closure and Openness in Husserl's Phenomonoloy. University of Wisconsin Press.
    Damian Byers analyzes the form Husserl gives to the problem of knowledge--the way this form influences the development of the phenomenological method, and the results of its application.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Dorion Cairns (2001). Theory of Intentionality in Husserl. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 32 (2):116-124.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Clotilde Calabi (1987). Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language. Topoi 6 (2):139-142.
    In the last twenty years, beginning with a seminal paper by Dagfinn Follesdal published in 1969,1 analytic philosophy has shown a renewed and increasing interest in Husserl's phenomenology. 2 In Husserl and Inten- tionality, David Woodruff Smith and Ronald Mclntyre give an important contribution to this line of research. The book is written in the analytic tradition, and represents in part an attempt at making phenomenology palatable to those who look suspiciously at 'continental philosophy'. Thus it provides a double service: (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. John D. Caputo (1986). Husserl, Heidegger, and the Question of a "Hermeneutic" Phenomenology. In Joseph J. Kockelmans (ed.), Husserl Studies. Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology and University Press of America. 157-178.
1 — 50 / 367