21 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Cedric Paternotte (Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München)
  1.  36
    Samir Okasha & Cedric Paternotte (2012). Group Adaptation, Formal Darwinism and Contextual Analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25 (6):1127–1139.
    We consider the question: under what circumstances can the concept of adaptation be applied to groups, rather than individuals? Gardner and Grafen (2009, J. Evol. Biol.22: 659–671) develop a novel approach to this question, building on Grafen's ‘formal Darwinism’ project, which defines adaptation in terms of links between evolutionary dynamics and optimization. They conclude that only clonal groups, and to a lesser extent groups in which reproductive competition is repressed, can be considered as adaptive units. We re-examine the conditions under (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  2. Milena Ivanova & Cedric Paternotte (2013). Theory Choice, Good Sense and Social Consensus. Erkenntnis 78 (5):1109-1132.
    There has been a significant interest in the recent literature in developing a solution to the problem of theory choice which is both normative and descriptive, but agent-based rather than rule-based, originating from Pierre Duhem’s notion of ‘good sense’. In this paper we present the properties Duhem attributes to good sense in different contexts, before examining its current reconstructions advanced in the literature and their limitations. We propose an alternative account of good sense, seen as promoting social consensus in science, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  10
    Samir Okasha & Cédric Paternotte (2014). Adaptation, Fitness and the Selection-Optimality Links. Biology and Philosophy 29 (2):225-232.
    We critically examine a number of aspects of Grafen’s ‘formal Darwinism’ project. We argue that Grafen’s ‘selection-optimality’ links do not quite succeed in vindicating the working assumption made by behavioural ecologists and others—that selection will lead organisms to exhibit adaptive behaviour—since these links hold true even in the presence of strong genetic and developmental constraints. However we suggest that the selection-optimality links can profitably be viewed as constituting an axiomatic theory of fitness. Finally, we compare Grafen’s project with Fisher’s ‘fundamental (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4. Cedric Paternotte & Jonathan Grose (2013). Social Norms and Game Theory: Harmony or Discord? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (3):551-587.
    Recent years have witnessed an increased number of game-theoretic approaches to social norms, which apparently share some common vocabulary and methods. We describe three major approaches of this kind (due to Binmore, Bicchieri and Gintis), before comparing them systematically on five crucial themes: generality of the solution, preference transformation, punishment, epistemic conditions and type of explanation. This allows us to show that these theories are, by and large, less compatible than they seem. We then argue that those three theories struggle (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. Cedric Paternotte (2011). Being Realistic About Common Knowledge: A Lewisian Approach. Synthese 183 (2):249-276.
  6.  26
    Cedric Paternotte (2013). The Epistemic Core of Weak Joint Action. Philosophical Psychology (1):1-24.
    Over the last three decades, joint action has received various definitions, which for all their differences share many features. However, they cannot fit some perplexing cases of weak joint action, such as demonstrations, where agents rely on distinct epistemic sources, and as a result, have no first-hand knowledge about each other. I argue that one major reason why the definition of such collective actions is akin to the classical ones is that it crucially relies on the concept of common knowledge. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  4
    Cédric Paternotte (forthcoming). Social Interactions and The Prisoner's Dilemma. Metascience:1-4.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  10
    Cedric Paternotte & Milena Ivanova (forthcoming). Virtues and Vices in Scientific Practice. Synthese:1-21.
    The role intellectual virtues play in scientific inquiry has raised significant discussions in the recent literature. A number of authors have recently explored the link between virtue epistemology and philosophy of science with the aim to show whether epistemic virtues can contribute to the resolution of the problem of theory choice. This paper analyses how intellectual virtues can be beneficial for successful resolution of theory choice. We explore the role of virtues as well as vices in scientific inquiry and their (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  36
    Cédric Paternotte (2012). Minimal Cooperation. Philosophy of the Social Sciences (1):0048393112457428.
    Most definitions of cooperation provide sufficient but not necessary conditions. This paper describes a form of minimal cooperation, corresponding to mass actions implying many agents, such as demonstrations. It characterizes its intentional, epistemic, strategic, and teleological aspects, mostly obtained from weakening classical concepts. The rationality of minimal cooperation turns out to be part of its definition, whereas it is usually considered as an optional though desirable feature. Game-theoretic concepts thus play an important role in its definition. The paper concludes by (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  92
    Samir Okasha, Ken Binmore, Jonathan Grose & Cédric Paternotte (2010). Cooperation, Conflict, Sex and Bargaining. Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):257-267.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  57
    Cedric Paternotte (2010). Review of Brian Skyrms, Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (11).
  12.  5
    Cédric Paternotte (2014). Cooperation and Its Evolution. [REVIEW] Acta Biotheoretica 62 (1):109-114.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  14
    Cedric Paternotte (2013). Seven Principles to Rule Them All. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 28 (4):683-692.
    Coen offers a unified explanation of natural selection, development, learning and cultural change, based on seven fundamental principles: population variation, persistence, reinforcement, competition, cooperation, combinatorial richness and recurrence. I discuss whether all seven principles are justified, successfully fit the four processes, encompass life processes only, and have any strong explanatory import. I find each of these claims doubtful.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  19
    Cedric Paternotte (2011). Rational Choice Theory. In I. Jarvie & J. Zamorra-Bonilla (eds.), Chapter 14 of The Sage Handbook of Philosophy of Social Science. Sage Publications 307.
  15.  10
    Cedric Paternotte (forthcoming). Shared Adaptiveness is Not Group Adaptation - Commentary of E. Van der Vliert's 'Climato-Economic Habitats Support Patterns of Human Needs, Stresses, and Freedoms'. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
    Climate stresses and monetary resources seem to lead to different collective adaptations. However, the reference to adaptation and to ambiguous collective dimensions appears premature; populations may entertain nothing more than shared adaptiveness. At this point, the intricacy of the underlying evolutionary processes (cultural selection, fitness-utility decoupling) very much obscures any diagnosis based on correlations.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  7
    Samir Okasha & Cedric Paternotte (2014). The Formal Darwinism Project: Editors' Introduction. Biology and Philosophy 29 (2):153-154.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  15
    Cedric Paternotte (2009). Une Forme Minimale de Cooperation. Dialogue 48 (02):235-267.
    La plupart des nombreuses définitions existantes d’une action coopérative en fournissent des conditions suffisantes plutôt que nécessaires. Nous définissons ici une forme minimale de coopération, correspondant aux actions de masse, telles des manifestations. Nous en détaillons les aspects intentionnel, épistémique, stratégique et téléologique, généralement obtenus par affaiblissement spécifique de concepts classiques. Parallèlement, nous soulignons le rôle crucial de concepts issus de la théorie des jeux pour la définition d’une action coopérative. Enfin, nous soutenons que la rationalité d’une action coopérative minimale (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  10
    Cedric Paternotte (2011). Comment on Raimo Tuomela. Joint Action: How Rational? How Irreducible? Analyse & Kritik 33 (1):87-92.
    In his 'Cooperation as joint action', Tuomela presents a we-mode account of cooperation, which he argues has several advantages over an individual account. This commentary examines to what extent this is true. In particular, I assess three related characteristics of we-mode joint action: its possible rationality, its greater efficiency, and its alleged irreducibility to purely individual properties, which are recurring points of the article.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  6
    Cédric Paternotte (2013). Shared Adaptiveness is Not Group Adaptation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (5):499-500.
    Climate stresses and monetary resources seem to lead to different collective adaptations. However, the reference to adaptation and to ambiguous collective dimensions appears premature; populations may entertain nothing more than shared adaptiveness. At this point, the intricacy of the underlying evolutionary processes (cultural selection, fitness-utility decoupling) very much obscures any diagnosis based on correlations.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Jonathan Grose & Cedric Paternotte (2013). Social Norms: Repeated Interactions, Punishment, and Context Dependence. Public Reason 5 (1):3-13.
  21. Cedric Paternotte (2015). Parallels Between Joint Action and Biological Individuality. In Thomas Pradeu & Alexandre Guay (eds.), Individuals Across The Sciences. Oxford University Press
    There exist many definitions of human joint action, or of what makes a group similar to an individual. However, they do not agree and are not directly reducible to each other. This multiplicity is due to a lack of constraints on them. I argue that they should at least meet an efficiency constraint: any account of joint action has to justify how it reliably leads agents to cooperation. One avenue consists in exploring the analogy between definitions of joint action and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography