271 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Mauricio Suarez [81]Francisco Suárez [54]Alfonso García Suárez [31]Bernardo Fueyo Suárez [16]
David Suarez [15]Luis Fernando Cardona Suárez [13]M. Suárez [10]Edna Suárez [7]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
Profile: Mauricio Suárez (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, London School of Economics)
Profile: David Suarez (University of California, Berkeley)
Profile: Marta Suarez (Rutgers University - New Brunswick)
Profile: Miguel Angel Lerzundi Suarez (Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales)
Profile: Maria Suarez (Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA))
Profile: Juan Antonio Florido Suarez (Birkbeck College)
Profile: Enrique Suárez (IES Llanera)
Profile: Alfonso García Suárez (Universidad de Oviedo)
Profile: John Mark Suarez
Profile: Antoine Suarez (Center for Quantum Philosophy)
Other users were found but are not shown.
  1. Mauricio Suarez (2003). Scientific Representation: Against Similarity and Isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):225-244.
    I argue against theories that attempt to reduce scientific representation to similarity or isomorphism. These reductive theories aim to radically naturalize the notion of representation, since they treat scientist's purposes and intentions as non-essential to representation. I distinguish between the means and the constituents of representation, and I argue that similarity and isomorphism are common but not universal means of representation. I then present four other arguments to show that similarity and isomorphism are not the constituents of scientific representation. I (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   57 citations  
  2.  96
    Mauricio Suárez (2004). An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):767-779.
    This paper defends an inferential conception of scientific representation. It approaches the notion of representation in a deflationary spirit, and minimally characterizes the concept as it appears in science by means of two necessary conditions: its essential directionality and its capacity to allow surrogate reasoning and inference. The conception is defended by showing that it successfully meets the objections that make its competitors, such as isomorphism and similarity, untenable. In addition the inferential conception captures the objectivity of the cognitive representations (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   46 citations  
  3. Mauricio Suárez (2010). Scientific Representation. Philosophy Compass 5 (1):91-101.
    Scientific representation is a currently booming topic, both in analytical philosophy and in history and philosophy of science. The analytical inquiry attempts to come to terms with the relation between theory and world; while historians and philosophers of science aim to develop an account of the practice of model building in the sciences. This article provides a review of recent work within both traditions, and ultimately argues for a practice-based account of the means employed by scientists to effectively achieve representation (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  4. Mauricio Suárez (2009). Scientific Fictions as Rules of Inference. In Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization. Routledge 158--178.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5. Mauricio Suárez & Nancy Cartwright (2007). Theories: Tools Versus Models. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 39 (1):62-81.
    In “The Toolbox of Science” (1995) together with Towfic Shomar we advocated a form of instrumentalism about scientific theories. We separately developed this view further in a number of subsequent works. Steven French, James Ladyman, Otavio Bueno and Newton Da Costa (FLBD) have since written at least eight papers and a book criticising our work. Here we defend ourselves. First we explain what we mean in denying that models derive from theory – and why their failure to do so should (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  6.  65
    Adam Morton & Mauricio Suarez (2001). Kinds of Models. In Model Validation: perspectives in hydrological science. 11-22.
    We separate metaphysical from epistemic questions in the evaluation of models, taking into account the distinctive functions of models as opposed to theories. The examples a\are very varied.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  13
    María de la Cruz Déniz Déniz & Ma Katiuska Cabrera Suárez (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility and Family Business in Spain. Journal of Business Ethics 56 (1):27 - 41.
    Despite the economic relevance and distinctiveness of family firms, little attention has been devoted to researching their nature and functioning. Traditionally, family firms have been associated both to positive and negative features in their relationships with the stakeholders. This can be linked to different orientations toward corporate social responsibility. Thus, this research aims to identify the approaches that Spanish family firms maintain about social responsibility, based on the model developed by Quazi and O' Brien Journal of Business Ethics 25, 33-51 (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  8.  23
    Mauricio Suárez (2015). Deflationary Representation, Inference, and Practice. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:36-47.
    This paper defends the deflationary character of two recent views regarding scientific representation, namely RIG Hughes’ DDI model and the inferential conception. It is first argued that these views’ deflationism is akin to the homonymous position in discussions regarding the nature of truth. There, we are invited to consider the platitudes that the predicate “true” obeys at the level of practice, disregarding any deeper, or more substantive, account of its nature. More generally, for any concept X, a deflationary approach is (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9.  98
    Mauricio Suárez (2013). Interventions and Causality in Quantum Mechanics. Erkenntnis 78 (2):199-213.
    I argue that the Causal Markov Condition (CMC) is in principle applicable to the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) correlations. This is in line with my defence in the past of the applicability of the Principle of Common Cause to quantum mechanics. I first review a contrary claim by Dan Hausman and Jim Woodward, who endeavour to preserve the CMC against a possible counterexample by asserting that the conditions for the application of the CMC are not met in the EPR experiment. In their (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10.  94
    Mauricio Suárez (2007). Quantum Propensities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (2):418-438.
    This paper reviews four attempts throughout the history of quantum mechanics to explicitly employ dispositional notions in order to solve the quantum paradoxes, namely: Margenau’s latencies, Heisenberg’s potentialities, Maxwell’s propensitons, and the recent selective propensities interpretation of quantum mechanics. Difficulties and challenges are raised for all of them, and it is concluded that the selective propensities approach nicely encompasses the virtues of its predecessors. Finally, some strategies are discussed for reading dispositional notions into two other well-known interpretations of quantum mechanics, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  11. Kevin Connolly, Diana Acosta Navas, Umut Baysan, Janiv Paulsberg & David Suarez, Sensory Substitution Conference Full Report.
    This report highlights and explores five questions that arose from the workshop on sensory substitution and augmentation at the British Academy, March 26th through 28th, 2013.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. David Suarez, Diana Acosta Navas, Umut Baysan & Kevin Connolly (forthcoming). Sensory Substitution and Non-Sensory Feelings. In Fiona Macpherson (ed.), Sensory Substitution and Augmentation. Oxford University Press
    One of the central limitations of sensory substitution devices (SSDs) is their inability to reproduce the non-sensory feelings that are normally associated with visual experiences, especially hedonic and aesthetic responses. This limitation is sometimes reported to cause SSD users frustration. To make matters worse, it is unclear that improvements in acuity, bandwidth, or training will resolve the issue. Yet, if SSDs are to actually reproduce visual experience in its fullness, it seems that the reproduction of non-sensory feelings will be of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  66
    Mauricio Suárez (2007). Quantum Propensities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 38 (2):418-438.
    This paper reviews four attempts throughout the history of quantum mechanics to explicitly employ dispositional notions in order to solve the quantum paradoxes, namely: Margenau's latencies, Heisenberg's potentialities, Maxwell's propensitons, and the recent selective propensities interpretation of quantum mechanics. Difficulties and challenges are raised for all of them, and it is concluded that the selective propensities approach nicely encompasses the virtues of its predecessors. Finally, some strategies are discussed for reading similar dispositional notions into two other well-known interpretations of quantum (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  14.  47
    Nancy Cartwright, Towfic Shomar & Mauricio Suárez (1995). The Tool Box of Science: Tools for the Building of Models with a Superconductivity Example. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 44:137-149.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  15.  79
    M. Suarez (2004). Quantum Selections, Propensities and the Problem of Measurement. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):219-255.
    This paper expands on, and provides a qualified defence of, Arthur Fine's selective interactions solution to the measurement problem. Fine's approach must be understood against the background of the insolubility proof of the quantum measurement. I first defend the proof as an appropriate formal representation of the quantum measurement problem. The nature of selective interactions, and more generally selections, is then clarified, and three arguments in their favour are offered. First, selections provide the only known solution to the measurement problem (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  16.  8
    Mauricio Suárez, Representation in Science.
    This article provides a state of the art review of the philosophical literature on scientific representation. It first argues that the topic emerges historically mainly out of what may be called the modelling tradition. It then introduces a number of helpful analytical distinctions, and goes on to divide contemporary approaches to scientific representation into two distinct kinds, substantive and deflationary. Analogies with related discussions of artistic representation in aesthetics, and of the nature of truth in metaphysics are pursued. It is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  56
    Mauricio Suárez (2004). On Quantum Propensities: Two Arguments Revisited. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 61 (1):1-16.
    Peter Milne and Neal Grossman have argued against Popper's propensity interpretation of quantum mechanics, by appeal to the two-slit experiment and to the distinction between mixtures and superpositions, respectively. In this paper I show that a different propensity interpretation successfully meets their objections. According to this interpretation, the possession of a quantum propensity by a quantum system is independent of the experimental set-ups designed to test it, even though its manifestations are not.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  18.  14
    Mauricio Suárez (2015). Bohmian Dispositions. Synthese 192 (10):3203-3228.
    This paper argues for a broadly dispositionalist approach to the ontology of Bohmian mechanics . It first distinguishes the ‘minimal’ and the ‘causal’ versions of Bohm’s theory, and then briefly reviews some of the claims advanced on behalf of the ‘causal’ version by its proponents. A number of ontological or interpretive accounts of the wave function in BM are then addressed in detail, including configuration space, multi-field, nomological, and dispositional approaches. The main objection to each account is reviewed, namely the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  67
    Mauricio Suárez (ed.) (2009). Fictions in Science: Philosophical Essays on Modeling and Idealization. Routledge.
    As these essays demonstrate, within the bounds of what is empirically possible, a scientist's capacity for invention and creative thinking matches that of any ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  20.  6
    Mauricio Suárez (1999). Theories, Models, and Representations. In L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian & P. Thagard (eds.), Model-Based Reasoning in Scientific Discovery. Kluwer/Plenum 75--83.
    I argue against an account of scientific representation suggested by the semantic, or structuralist, conception of scientific theories. Proponents of this conception often employ the term “model” to refer to bare “structures”, which naturally leads them to attempt to characterize the relation between models and reality as a purely structural one. I argue instead that scientific models are typically “representations”, in the pragmatist sense of the term: they are inherently intended for specific phenomena. Therefore in general scientific models are not (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  21. James Ladyman, Otávio Bueno, Mauricio Suárez & Bas van Fraassen (2011). Scientific Representation: A Long Journey From Pragmatics to Pragmatics. [REVIEW] Metascience 20 (3):417-442.
    Scientific representation: A long journey from pragmatics to pragmatics Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11016-010-9465-5 Authors James Ladyman, Department of Philosophy, University of Bristol, 9 Woodland Rd, Bristol, BS8 1TB UK Otávio Bueno, Department of Philosophy, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA Mauricio Suárez, Department of Logic and Philosophy of Science, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain Bas C. van Fraassen, Philosophy Department, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA Journal Metascience Online (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22. Mauricio Suárez (2004). Causal Processes and Propensities in Quantum Mechanics. Theoria 19 (3):271-300.
    In an influential article published in 1982, Bas Van Fraassen developed an argument against causal realism on the basis of an analysis of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations of quantum mechanics. Several philosophers of science and experts in causal inference -including some causal realists like Wesley Salmon- have accepted Van Fraassen’s argument, interpreting it as a proof that the quantum correlations cannot be given any causal model. In this paper I argue that Van Fraassen’s article can also be interpreted as a good (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  23.  18
    Francesca Pero & Mauricio Suárez (2016). Varieties of Misrepresentation and Homomorphism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 6 (1):71-90.
    This paper is a critical response to Andreas Bartels’ sophisticated defense of a structural account of scientific representation. We show that, contrary to Bartels’ claim, homomorphism fails to account for the phenomenon of misrepresentation. Bartels claims that homomorphism is adequate in two respects. First, it is conceptually adequate, in the sense that it shows how representation differs from misrepresentation and non-representation. Second, if properly weakened, homomorphism is formally adequate to accommodate misrepresentation. We question both claims. First, we show that homomorphism (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Mauricio Suárez (2007). Causal Inference in Quantum Mechanics: A Reassessment. In Federica Russo & Jon Williamson (eds.), Causality and Probability in the Sciences. College Publications 65-106.
    There has been an intense discussion, albeit largely an implicit one, concerning the inference of causal hypotheses from statistical correlations in quantum mechanics ever since John Bell’s first statement of his notorious theorem in 1966. As is well known, its focus has mainly been the so-called Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (“EPR”) thought experiment, and the ensuing observed correlations in real EPR like experiments. But although implicitly the discussion goes as far back as Bell’s work, it is only in the last two decades that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  25.  20
    Mauricio Suárez (2011). Propensities and Pragmatism. Journal of Philosophy 110 (2):61-102.
    : This paper outlines a genuinely pragmatist conception of propensity, and defends it against common objections to the propensity interpretation of probability, prominently Humphreys’ paradox. The paper reviews the paradox and identifies one of its key assumptions, the identity thesis, according to which propensities are probabilities. The identity thesis is also involved in empiricist propensity interpretations deriving from Popper’s influential original proposal, and makes such interpretations untenable. As an alternative, I urge a return to Charles Peirce’s original insights on probabilistic (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  26.  18
    Mauricio Suárez, Scientific Representation: A Bibliography.
    Scientific representation is a booming field nowadays within the philosophy of science, with many papers published regularly on the topic every year, and several yearly conferences and workshops held on related topics. Historically, the topic originates in two different strands in 20th-century philosophy of science. One strand begins in the 1950s, with philosophical interest in the nature of scientific theories. As the received or “syntactic” view gave way to a “semantic” or “structural” conception, representation progressively gained the center stage. Yet, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Martine Nida-rümelin & Juan Suarez (2009). Reddish Green: A Challenge for Modal Claims About Phenomenal Structure. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (2):346-391.
    We discuss two modal claims about the phenomenal structure of color experiences: (i) violet experiences are necessarily experiences of a color that is for the subject on that occasion phenomenally composed of red and blue (the modal claim about violet) and (ii) no subject can possibly have an experience of a color that is for it then phenomenally composed of red and green (the modal claim about reddish green). The modal claim about reddish green is undermined by empirical results. We (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28. Mauricio Suárez & Iñaki San Pedro (2010). Causal Markov, Robustness and the Quantum Correlations. In Mauricio Suarez (ed.), Causes, Probabilities and Propensities in Physics. Springer 173–193.
    It is still a matter of controversy whether the Principle of the Common Cause (PCC) can be used as a basis for sound causal inference. It is thus to be expected that its application to quantum mechanics should be a correspondingly controversial issue. Indeed the early 90’s saw a flurry of papers addressing just this issue in connection with the EPR correlations. Yet, that debate does not seem to have caught up with the most recent literature on causal inference generally, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29.  20
    Mauricio Suárez (2014). A Critique of Empiricist Propensity Theories. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (2):215-231.
    I analyse critically what I regard as the most accomplished empiricist account of propensities, namely the long run propensity theory developed by Donald Gillies . Empiricist accounts are distinguished by their commitment to the ‘identity thesis’: the identification of propensities and objective probabilities. These theories are intended, in the tradition of Karl Popper’s influential proposal, to provide an interpretation of probability that renders probability statements directly testable by experiment. I argue that the commitment to the identity thesis leaves empiricist theories, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  96
    Antoine Suarez (2009). On Bell, Suarez-Scarani, and Leggett Experiments: Reply to a Comment by Marek Żukowski in [Found. Phys. 38:1070, 2008]. Foundations of Physics 39 (2):156-159.
    It is shown that the before-before (or Suarez-Scarani) experiment refutes hidden variable models with a deterministic (“realistic”) nonlocal part, whereas experiments violating Leggett-type inequalities refute models with biased random local part. Therefore the claim that Gröblacher et al. (Nature 446:871–875, 2007) present “an experimental test of nonlocal realism” is misleading, and Marek Żukowski’s (Found. Phys. 38:1070, 2008) comment misses the point. A new experiment is suggested.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Kevin Connolly, John Donaldson, David M. Gray, Emily McWilliams, Sofia Ortiz-Hinojosa & David Suarez, Cognitive Penetration? (Network for Sensory Research Toronto Workshop on Perceptual Learning: Question Four).
    This is an excerpt from a report that highlights and explores five questions which arose from the workshop on perceptual learning and perceptual recognition at the University of Toronto, Mississauga on May 10th and 11th, 2012. This excerpt explores the question: What counts as cognitive penetration?
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  91
    Antoine Suarez (2008). Nonlocal “Realistic” Leggett Models Can Be Considered Refuted by the Before-Before Experiment. Foundations of Physics 38 (6):583-589.
    Nonlocal “realistic” Leggett models can be considered refuted by the before-before experiment. “Single preferred frame” models are not refuted by this experiment but bear severe oddities.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  23
    Horacio Velasco Suárez (2009). Algunas consideraciones sobre Santo Tomás, Chesterton y el sentido común. The Chesterton Review En Español 3 (1):99-114.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  21
    Mauricio Suárez (2005). The Semantic View, Empirical Adequacy, and Application (Concepción Semántica, Adecuación Empírica y Aplicación). Critica 37 (109):29 - 63.
    It is widely accepted in contemporary philosophy of science that the domain of application of a theory is typically larger than its explanatory covering power: theories can be applied to phenomena that they do not explain. I argue for an analogous thesis regarding the notion of empirical adequacy. A theory's domain of application is typically larger than its domain of empirical adequacy: theories are often applied to phenomena from which they receive no empirical confirmation. \\\ Existe en la filosofía de (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  35.  22
    Horacio Velasco Suárez (2010). El hombre que fue Jueves. The Chesterton Review En Español 4 (1):93-95.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  69
    Valerio Scarani, Jean-Daniel Bancal, Antoine Suarez & Nicolas Gisin (2014). Strong Constraints on Models That Explain the Violation of Bell Inequalities with Hidden Superluminal Influences. Foundations of Physics 44 (5):523-531.
    We discuss models that attempt to provide an explanation for the violation of Bell inequalities at a distance in terms of hidden influences. These models reproduce the quantum correlations in most situations, but are restricted to produce local correlations in some configurations. The argument presented in (Bancal et al. Nat Phys 8:867, 2012) applies to all of these models, which can thus be proved to allow for faster-than-light communication. In other words, the signalling character of these models cannot remain hidden.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  12
    Mauricio Suárez, Scientific Representation, Denotation, and Fictional Entities.
    I critically review RIG Hughes’ Denotation-Demonstration-Interpretation account of scientific representation, focusing in particular on the representation of fictional entities in science. I find the original account lacking, but argue that it can be extended in suitable ways. In particular I argue that an extension of this account that weakens the denotation and interpretation conditions can accommodate fictions. This extension also reveals the essential deflationary nature of scientific representation, by bringing into relief the functional roles of denotation and interpretation.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  82
    Kevin Connolly, Diana Acosta Navas, Umut Baysan, Janiv Paulsberg & David Suarez, Sensory Substitution Conference Report Question One.
    This is an excerpt from a report on the Sensory Substitution and Augmentation Conference at the British Academy in March of 2013. This portion of the report explores the question: Does sensory substitution generate perceptual or cognitive states?
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Kevin Connolly, John Donaldson, David M. Gray, Emily McWilliams, Sofia Ortiz-Hinojosa & David Suarez, Report on the Network for Sensory Research Toronto Workshop on Perceptual Learning.
    This report highlights and explores five questions which arose from the workshop on perceptual learning and perceptual recognition at the University of Toronto, Mississauga on May 10th and 11th, 2012: 1. How should we demarcate perceptual learning from perceptual development? 2. What are the origins of multimodal associations? 3. Does our representation of time provide an amodal framework for multi-sensory integration? 4. What counts as cognitive penetration? 5. How can philosophers and psychologists most fruitfully collaborate?
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Michael Dickson, Don Howard, Scott Tanona, Mathias Frisch, Eric Winsberg, Arnold Koslow, Paul Teller, Ronald N. Giere, Mary S. Morgan & Mauricio Suárez (2004). 1. Preface Preface (P. Vii). Philosophy of Science 71 (5).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  41.  76
    Kevin Connolly, Diana Acosta Navas, Umut Baysan, Janiv Paulsberg & David Suarez, Sensory Substitution Conference Question Three.
    This is an excerpt from a report on the Sensory Substitution and Augmentation Conference at the British Academy in March of 2013. This portion of the report explores the question: How does sensory substitution interact with the brain’s architecture?
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  18
    Horacio Velasco Suárez (2007). Chesterton, y el Relato Policial Argentino. The Chesterton Review En Español 1 (1):134-145.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Mauricio Suárez (2004). Causal Processes and Propensities in Quantum Mechanics. Theoria 19 (3):271-300.
    In an influential article published in 1982, Bas Van Fraassen developed an argument against causal realism on the basis of an analysis of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen correlations of quantum mechanics. Several philosophers of science and experts in causal inference -including some causal realists like Wesley Salmon- have accepted Van Fraassen’s argument, interpreting it as a proof that the quantum correlations cannot be given any causal model. In this paper I argue that Van Fraassen’s article can also be interpreted as a good (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Kevin Connolly, John Donaldson, David M. Gray, Emily McWilliams, Sofia Ortiz-Hinojosa & David Suarez, Philosophy/Psychology Collaboration (Network for Sensory Research Toronto Workshop on Perceptual Learning: Question Five).
    This is an excerpt from a report that highlights and explores five questions which arose from the workshop on perceptual learning and perceptual recognition at the University of Toronto, Mississauga on May 10th and 11th, 2012. This excerpt explores the question: How can philosophers and psychologists most fruitfully collaborate?
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  17
    Mauricio Suárez, Mellor. 2005 Probability: A Philosophical Introduction.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  71
    Kevin Connolly, Diana Acosta Navas, Umut Baysan, Janiv Paulsberg & David Suarez, Sensory Substitution Conference Question Four.
    This is an excerpt from a report on the Sensory Substitution and Augmentation Conference at the British Academy in March of 2013. This portion of the report explores the question: Can normal non-sensory feelings be generated through sensory substitution?
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  16
    Mauricio Suárez, Dispositions, Causes and Propensities in Science. Introduction.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Mauricio Suárez (2008). Experimental Realism Reconsidered: How Inference to the Most Likely Cause Might Be Sound. In Nancy Cartwright, Stephan Hartmann, Carl Hoefer & Luc Bovens (eds.), Nancy Cartwright's Philosophy of Science. Routledge 137--63.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  49.  46
    Mauricio Suárez & Albert Solé (2006). On the Analogy Between Cognitive Representation and Truth. Theoria 21 (1):39-48.
    In this paper we claim that the notion of cognitive representation (and scientific representation in particular) is irreducibly plural. By means of an analogy with the minimalist conception of truth, we show thatthis pluralism is compatible with a generally deflationary attitude towards representation. We then explore the extent and nature of representational pluralism by discussing the positive and negative analogies between the inferential conception of representation advocated by one of us and the minimalist conception of truth.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  50.  63
    Kevin Connolly, Diana Acosta Navas, Umut Baysan, Janiv Paulsberg & David Suarez, Sensory Substitution Conference Question Two.
    This is an excerpt from a report on the Sensory Substitution and Augmentation Conference at the British Academy in March of 2013. This portion of the report explores the question: What can sensory substitution tell us about perceptual learning?
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 271