Results for 'Jesus Zamoro Bonilla'

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  24
    The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences.Ian C. Jarvie & Jesus Zamoro Bonilla (eds.) - 2011 - SAGE.
    In this excting Handbook, Jarvie and Bonilla provide a broad and democratic coverage of the many currents in social science.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  49
    Brian Skyrms. 2010. Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information (Jesús Zamora Bonilla).Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2012 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (3):400-402.
  3. La Lonja Del Saber.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2004
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Where is Economic Methodology Going? Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla.Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla - 2001 - Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1):135-138.
  5.  17
    On Bridging Philosophy and Sociology of Science: Reply to Jesús Zamora Bonilla.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):370-372.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences, Edited by Ian Jarvie and Jesús Zamora-Bonilla. SAGE Publications, 2011, Xvii + 749 Pages. [REVIEW]Brian Epstein - 2012 - Economics and Philosophy 28 (3):428-435.
  7.  42
    The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences by Ian Jarvie & Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Eds. [REVIEW]Johanna Thoma - 2014 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 29 (2):311-315.
  8. Scientific Inference and the Pursuit of Fame: A Contractarian Approach.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):300-323.
    Methodological norms are seen as rules defining a competitive game, and it is argued that rational recognition-seeking scientists can reach a collective agreement about which specific norms serve better their individual interests, especially if the choice is made `under a veil of ignorance', i.e. , before knowing what theory will be proposed by each scientist. Norms for theory assessment are distinguished from norms for theory choice (or inference rules), and it is argued that pursuit of recognition only affects this second (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  9.  44
    Science Studies and the Theory of Games.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2006 - Perspectives on Science 14 (4):525-557.
    Being scientific research a process of social interaction, this process can be studied from a game-theoretic perspective. Some conceptual and formal instruments that can help to understand scientific research as a game are introduced, and it is argued that game theoretic epistemology provides a middle ground for 'rationalist' and 'constructivist' theories of scientific knowledge. In the first part , a description of the essential elements of game of science is made, using an inferentialist conception of rationality. In the second part (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  10. Science as a Persuasion Game.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2006 - Episteme 2:189-201.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  11.  91
    Credibility, Idealisation, and Model Building: An Inferential Approach.Xavier Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2009 - Erkenntnis 70 (1):101-118.
    In this article we defend the inferential view of scientific models and idealisation. Models are seen as "inferential prostheses" construed by means of an idealisation-concretisation process, which we essentially understand as a kind of counterfactual deformation procedure . The value of scientific representation is understood in terms not only of the success of the inferential outcomes arrived at with its help, but also of the heuristic power of representation and their capacity to correct and improve our models. This provides us (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   26 citations  
  12.  1
    The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences.Ian C. Jarvie & Jesus Zamora-Bonilla (eds.) - 2011 - Sage Publications.
    In this exciting Handbook, Ian Jarvie and Jesús Zamora-Bonilla have put together a wide-ranging and authoritative overview of the main philosophical currents and traditions at work in the social sciences today. Starting with the history of social scientific thought, this Handbook sets out to explore that core fundamentals of social science practice, from issues of ontology and epistemology to issues of practical method. Along the way it investigates such notions as paradigm, empiricism, postmodernism, naturalism, language, agency, power, culture, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  13.  30
    Verisimilitude and the Scientific Strategy of Economic Theory.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 1999 - Journal of Economic Methodology 6 (3):331-350.
  14.  9
    The Nature of Co-Authorship: A Note on Recognition Sharing and Scientific Argumentation.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2014 - Synthese 191 (1):97-108.
    Co-authorship of papers is very common in most areas of science, and it has increased as the complexity of research has strengthened the need for scientific collaboration. But the fact that papers have more than an author tends to complicate the attribution of merit to individual scientists. I argue that collaboration does not necessarily entail co-authorship, but that in many cases the latter is an option that individual authors might not choose, at least in principle: each author might publish in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  15.  6
    Realism Versus Anti-Realism: Philosophical Problem or Scientific Concern?Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2019 - Synthese 196 (10):3961-3977.
    The decision whether to have a realist or an anti-realist attitude towards scientific hypotheses is interpreted in this paper as a choice that scientists themselves have to face in their work as scientists, rather than as a ‘philosophical’ problem. Scientists’ choices between realism and instrumentalism are interpreted in this paper with the help of two different conceptual tools: a deflationary semantics grounded in the inferentialist approach to linguistic practices developed by some authors, and an epistemic utility function that tries to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16.  75
    Truthlikeness Without Truth: A Methodological Approach.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 1992 - Synthese 93 (3):343-372.
    In this paper, an attempt is made to solve various problems posed to current theories of verisimilitude: the problem of linguistic variance; the problem of which are the best scientific methods for getting the most verisimilar theories; and the question of the ontological commitment in scientific theories. As a result of my solution to these problems, and with the help of other considerations of epistemological character, I conclude that the notion of 'Tarskian truth' is dispensable in a rational interpretation of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  17.  7
    Zamora Bonilla, Jesús: Sacando consecuencias. Una filosofía para el siglo XXI, tecnos, madrid, 2017, 227p.Adrián Requejo Doval - 2018 - Agora 37 (2).
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18.  26
    The Nature of Co-Authorship: A Note on Recognition Sharing and Scientific Argumentation.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2012 - Synthese (1):1-12.
    Co-authorship of papers is very common in most areas of science, and it has increased as the complexity of research has strengthened the need for scientific collaboration. But the fact that papers have more than an author tends to complicate the attribution of merit to individual scientists. I argue that collaboration does not necessarily entail co-authorship, but that in many cases the latter is an option that individual authors might not choose, at least in principle: each author might publish in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  19. Does the homo economicus sense of duty?Jesus Bonilla - 2004 - Endoxa 18:297-320.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Why Are Good Theories Good? Reflections on Epistemic Values, Confirmation, and Formal Epistemology.Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2013 - Synthese 190 (9):1533-1553.
    Franz Huber’s (2008a) attempt to unify inductivist and hypothetico-deductivist intuitions on confirmation by means of a single measure are examined and compared with previous work on the theory of verisimilitude or truthlikeness. The idea of connecting ‘the logic of confirmation’ with ‘the logic of acceptability’ is also critically discussed, and it is argued that ‘acceptability’ takes necessarily into account some pragmatic criteria, and that at least two normative senses of ‘acceptability’ must be distinguished: ‘acceptable’ in the sense of ‘being allowed (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21.  13
    What Games Do Scientists Play? Rationality and Objectivity in a Game-Theoretic Approach to the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge.Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2010 - In M. Dorato M. Suàrez (ed.), Epsa Epistemology and Methodology of Science. Springer. pp. 323--332.
  22.  88
    Science as a Persuasion Game: An Inferentialist Approach.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2006 - Episteme 2 (3):189-201.
    Scientific research is reconstructed as a language game along the lines of Robert Brandom's inferentialism. Researchers are assumed to aim at persuading their colleagues of the validity of some claims. The assertions each scientist is allowed or committed to make depend on her previous claims and on the inferential norms of her research community. A classification of the most relevant types of inferential rules governing such a game is offered, and some ways in which this inferentialist approach can be used (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  23.  70
    Realism Versus Anti-Realism: Philosophical Problem or Scientific Concern?Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2019 - Synthese 196 (10):3961-3977.
    The decision whether to have a realist or an anti-realist attitude towards scientific hypotheses is interpreted in this paper as a choice that scientists themselves have to face in their work as scientists, rather than as a ‘philosophical’ problem. Scientists’ choices between realism and instrumentalism are interpreted in this paper with the help of two different conceptual tools: a deflationary semantics grounded in the inferentialist approach to linguistic practices developed by some authors, and an epistemic utility function that tries to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24. The Elementary Economics of Scientific Consensus.Bonilla Jesús P. Zamora - 1999 - Theoria 14 (3):461-488.
    The scientist's decision of accepting a given proposition is assumed to be dependent on two factors: the scientist's 'private' information about the value of that statement and the proportion of colleagues who also accept it. This interdependence is modelled in an economic fashion, and it is shown that it may lead to multiple equilibria. The main conclusions are that the evolution of scientific knowledge can be path, dependent, that scientific revolutions can be due to very small changes in the empirical (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  25.  48
    Optimal Judgment Aggregation.Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla - unknown
    A necessary condition for a group being taken as a rational agent is that its choices and judgements are ‘logically contestable’, but this can lead to problems of aggregation, as Arrow impossibility theorem or the discursive dilemma. This paper proposes a contractarian or constitutional approach: the relevant thing is what aggregation mechanisms would be preferred by the members of the group. Two distinctions need to be made: first, judgement aggregation is not aggregation of decisions, and judgement aggregation needs be distinguished (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  26.  8
    The Elementary Economics of Scientific Consensus.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 1999 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 14 (3):461-488.
    The scientist’s decision of accepting a given proposition is assumed to be dependent on two factors: the scientist’s ‘private’ information about the value of that statement and the proportion of colleagues who also accept it. This interdependence is modelled in an economic fashion, and it is shown that it may lead to multiple equilibria. The main conclusions are that the evolution of scientific knowledge can be path-dependent, that scientific revolutions can be due to very small changes in the empirical evidence, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  27.  45
    Rhetoric, Induction, and the Free Speech Dilemma.Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (2):175-193.
    Scientists can choose different claims as interpretations of the results of their research. Scientific rhetoric is understood as the attempt to make those claims most beneficial for the scientists' interests. A rational choice, game-theoretic model is developed to analyze how this choice can be made and to assess it from a normative point of view. The main conclusion is that `social' interests (pursuit of recognition) may conflict with `cognitive' ones when no constraints are put on the choices of the authors (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  28.  59
    Verisimilitude, Structuralism and Scientific Progress.Jesùs P. Zamora Bonilla - 1996 - Erkenntnis 44 (1):25 - 47.
    An epistemic notion of verisimilitude (as the 'degree in which a theory seems closer to the full truth to a scientific community') is defined in several ways. Application to the structuralist description of theories is carried out by introducing a notion of 'empirical regularity' in structuralist terms. It is argued that these definitions of verisimilitude can be used to give formal reconstructions of scientific methodologies such as falsificationism, conventionalism and normal science.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  29. Verisimilitude and the Dynamics of Scientific Research Programmes.Jesús Bonilla - 2002 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 33 (2):349-368.
    Some peculiarities of the evaluation of theories within scientific research programmes and of the assessing of rival SRPs are described assuming that scientists try to maximise an ‘epistemic utility function’ under economic and institutional constraints. Special attention is given to Lakatos' concepts of ‘empirical progress’ and ‘theoretical progress’. A notion of ‘empirical verisimilitude’ is defended as an appropriate utility function. The neologism ‘methodonomics’ is applied to this kind of studies.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  30.  40
    Un Modelo Simple de Aproximacion a la Verdad.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 1993 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 8 (1):135-148.
    The process of scientific investigation is reconstructed as a process of empirical approximation to the truth. This last concept is explicated as a combination of “degree of simmilarity between theory A and the strongest accepted empirical law at moment t” and the “degree of depth of this empirical law”. A number of methodological theorems are proved, and avision of science closer to sophisticated falsificationism is mathematically deduced from our definitions.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  38
    Review of How Do You Know? The Economics of Ordinary Knowledge. [REVIEW]Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2010 - Economics and Philosophy 26 (3):401-406.
  32.  10
    Inferentialism, Degrees of Commitment, and Ampliative Reasoning.Jesús Zamora Bonilla, Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Javier González de Prado Salas - 2017 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 4):909-927.
    Our purpose in this paper is to contribute to a practice-based characterization of scientific inference. We want to explore whether Brandom’s pragmatist–inferentialist framework can suitably accommodate several types of ampliative inference common in scientific reasoning and explanation. First, we argue that Brandom’s view of induction in terms of merely permissive inferences is inadequate; in order to overcome the shortcoming of Brandom’s proposal, we put forward an alternative conception of inductive, probabilistic reasoning by appeal to the notion of degrees of commitment. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  26
    Normativity and Self-Interest in Scientific Research.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):71-81.
    In this paper I want to present the guiding lines of a research programme into the economics of scientific knowledge, a programme whose ultimate goal is to develop what I would like to call a contractarian epistemology. The structure of the paper is as follows: in the first section I will comment on two conflicting approaches to the topic of rationality in science: the view of the rationality of scientific knowledge as deriving from the employment of sound methodological norms, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34.  7
    Reasons Which Influence on the Students' Decision to Take a University Course: Differences by Gender and Degree.Jesús Manuel López-Bonilla, Ramón Barrera Barrera, Mª Ángeles Rodríguez Serrano, Luis Miguel López-Bonilla, Beatriz Palacios Florencio, Mª Carmen Reyes Rodríguez & Borja Sanz Altamira - 2012 - Educational Studies 38 (3):297-308.
    After compulsory secondary education; many teenagers face the process of choosing a university degree. This process involves uncertainties referred to their personal abilities, interests, social expectations and professional future. The present work is aimed at determining whether the reasons behind the selection of a particular university degree differ depending on the chosen degree. Another objective is determining whether these reasons differ significantly according to gender. The sample comprises 983 students belonging to the area of social and legal sciences at the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  35.  17
    Science: The Rules of the Game.Jesús Zamora-Bonilla - 2010 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 18 (2):294-307.
    Popper’s suggestion of taking methodological norms as conventions is examined from the point of view of game theory. The game of research is interpreted as a game of persuasion, in the sense that every scientists tries to advance claims, and that her winning the game consists in her colleagues accepting some of those claims as the conclusions of some arguments. Methodological norms are seen as elements in a contract established amongst researchers, that says what inferential moves are legitimate or compulsory (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  30
    Skyrms. 2010. Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2012 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (3):400-402.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  24
    Representaciones en la ciencia. [REVIEW]Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 1999 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 14 (2):380-382.
  38.  14
    The Market for Scientific Lemons, and the Marketization of Science.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2019 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 34 (1):133-145.
    Scientific research is based on the division of cognitive labour: every scientist has to trust that other colleagues have checked whether the items that are taken as knowledge, and she cannot check by herself, are reliable enough. I apply ideas from the field known as ‘information economics’ to analyse the scientists’ incentives to produce items of knowledge of an ‘adequate’ quality, under the assumption that a big part of what one observes in her empirical research is not available for the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences.I. C. Jarvie, Zamora Bonilla & P. Jesús (eds.) - 2011 - Sage Publications.
    In this exciting Handbook, Ian Jarvie and Jesús Zamora-Bonilla have put together a wide-ranging and authoritative overview of the main philosophical currents and traditions at work in the social sciences today. Starting with the history of social scientific thought, this Handbook sets out to explore that core fundamentals of social science practice, from issues of ontology and epistemology to issues of practical method. Along the way it investigates such notions as paradigm, empiricism, postmodernism, naturalism, language, agency, power, culture, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  27
    Peddling Science: An Essay Review of Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):833-839.
    Science Bought and Sold collects a large portion of the most relevant works on the `economics of scientific knowledge production,' as well as other more recent and unpublished papers on the topic, and the long introductory essay by the editors is an illuminating guide to the field. In this critical notice, I argue that economic theorising about scientific research is providing a peaceful meeting point for many of the combatants in the `science wars,' one from which both epistemic and political (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  20
    Presentation.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2003 - Theoria 18 (3):255-257.
  42.  91
    Optimal Judgment Aggregation.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):813-824.
    The constitution of a collective judgment is analyzed from a contractarian point of view. The optimal collective judgment is defined as the one that maximizes the sum of the utility each member gets from the collective adoption of that judgment. It is argued that judgment aggregation is a different process from the aggregation of information and public deliberation. This entails that the adoption of a collective judgment should not make any rational member of the group change her individual opinion, and (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  43.  16
    Unos dos mil tres indios. Reflexiones sobre la pragmática, el principio de economía y la teoría de juegos.Jesús Pedro Zamora Bonilla - 2010 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 51:47-58.
    El principio de racionalidad, o de economía, puede expresarse como la hipótesis de que los sujetos tienden a llevar a cabo aquellas acciones que maximizan la diferencia entre beneficios y costes. Este principio es ampliamente aplicado en las ciencias sociales, sobre todo, obviamente, en la teoría económica, si bien en el último medio siglo ha sido aplicado también de manera creciente a otras ramas de dichas disciplinas (sociología, ciencia política, antropología, historia, etc.). En este artículo se discute la posibilidad de (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  86
    Meaning and Testability in the Structuralist Theory of Science.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2003 - Erkenntnis 59 (1):47 - 76.
    The connection between scientific knowledge and our empirical access to realityis not well explained within the structuralist approach to scientific theories. I arguethat this is due to the use of a semantics not rich enough from the philosophical pointof view. My proposal is to employ Sellars–Brandom's inferential semantics to understand how can scientific terms have empirical content, and Hintikka's game-theoretical semantics to analyse how can theories be empirically tested. The main conclusions are that scientific concepts gain their meaning through `basic (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  45.  15
    Cooperation, Competition, and the Contractarian View of Scientific Research.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - unknown
    Using the approach known as ‘Economics of Scientific Knowledge’, this paper defends the view of scientific norms as the result of a ‘social contract’, i.e., as an equilibrium in the game of selecting the norms under which to proceed to play the game of scientific research and publication. A categorisation of the relevant types of scientific norms is offered, as well as a discussion about the incentives of the researchers in choosing some or other alternative rules.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46.  3
    Introducción a las comparaciones de confianza. [REVIEW]Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 1996 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 11 (2):227-228.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47.  9
    Moulines y el realismo.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 1995 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 10 (1):193-208.
    Moulines’ arguments against several types of realism in his book Pluralidad y recursion are considered and a defence of scientific realism consistent with structuralism is offered as a plausible answer to Moulines’ criticisms.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  7
    Peddling Science: An Essay Review of Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science*Philip Mirowski and Esther‐Mirjam Sent , Science Bought and Sold: Essays in the Economics of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press , Ix + 573 Pp., $80.00 , $33.00. [REVIEW]Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (4):833-839.
    Science Bought and Sold collects a large portion of the most relevant works on the ‘economics of scientific knowledge production,’ as well as other more recent and unpublished papers on the topic, and the long introductory essay by the editors is an illuminating guide to the field. In this critical notice, I argue that economic theorising about scientific research is providing a peaceful meeting point for many of the combatants in the ‘science wars,’ one from which both epistemic and political (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  10
    Douglas, Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2010 - Theoria : An International Journal for Theory, History and Fundations of Science 25 (1):99-102.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  8
    El debate sobre el cambio climático interpretado como un juego de persuasión.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla & Leonardo Monzonis Forner - 2013 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 28 (1):77-96.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 1000