Results for 'Jesus Zamoro Bonilla'

1000+ found
Order:
  1. La Caverna de Platón y Los Cuarenta Ladrones: Divertimentos Sobre Filosofía, Religión, Ciencia y Racionalidad.Zamora Bonilla & P. Jesús - 2011 - Pourquoi-Pas Editores.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. The Sage Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences.I. C. Jarvie, Zamora Bonilla & P. Jesús (eds.) - 2011 - Sage Publications.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  28
    Brian Skyrms. 2010. Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information (Jesús Zamora Bonilla).Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2012 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (3):400-402.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  17
    El debate sobre el cambio climático interpretado como un juego de persuasión.Jesús Pedro Zamora Bonilla & Leonardo Monzonís Forner - 2013 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 28 (76):77-96.
    Los científicos tratan de persuadir a sus colegas y, en última instancia, al conjunto de la sociedad, para que acepten sus tesis, descubrimientos y propuestas. Desarrollan para ello una serie de estrategias que pueden ser estudiadas como un “juego de persuasión” en el que intervienen, además de los procesos de argumentación formal e informal típicamente estudiados por la lógica y metodología de la ciencia, aspectos tradicionalmente considerados “sociológicos”. En este artículo se analiza el debate sobre la ciencia del cambio climático (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. The Surprise Exam Paradox, Rationality, and Pragmatics: A Simple Game‐Theoretic Analysis.José Luis Ferreira & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (3):285-299.
    The surprise exam paradox has attracted the attention of prominent logicians, mathematicians and philosophers for decades. Although the paradox itself has been resolved at least since Quine, some aspects of it are still being discussed. In this paper we propose, following Sober, to translate the paradox into the language of game theory to clarify these aspects. Our main conclusions are that a much simpler game?theoretic analysis of the paradox is possible, which solves most of the puzzles related to it, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. 10. Interpreting Quantum Field Theory Interpreting Quantum Field Theory (Pp. 348-378).Michael Friedman, Robert DiSalle, J. D. Trout, Shaun Nichols, Maralee Harrell, Clark Glymour, Carl G. Wagner, Kent W. Staley, Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla & Frederick M. Kronz - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  7.  35
    Realism Versus Anti-Realism: Philosophical Problem or Scientific Concern?Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - forthcoming - Synthese:1-17.
    The decision whether to have a realist or an anti-realist attitude towards scientific hypotheses is interpreted in this paper as a choice that scientists themselves have to face in their work as scientists, rather than as a ‘philosophical’ problem. Scientists’ choices between realism and instrumentalism are interpreted in this paper with the help of two different conceptual tools: a deflationary semantics grounded in the inferentialist approach to linguistic practices developed by some authors, and an epistemic utility function that tries to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  48
    Science as a Persuasion Game: An Inferentialist Approach.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2005 - Episteme 2 (3):189-201.
    Scientific research is reconstructed as a language game along the lines of Robert Brandom's inferentialism. Researchers are assumed to aim at persuading their colleagues of the validity of some claims. The assertions each scientist is allowed or committed to make depend on her previous claims and on the inferential norms of her research community. A classification of the most relevant types of inferential rules governing such a game is offered, and some ways in which this inferentialist approach can be used (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9.  39
    Meaning and Testability in the Structuralist Theory of Science.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2003 - Erkenntnis 59 (1):47 - 76.
    The connection between scientific knowledge and our empirical access to realityis not well explained within the structuralist approach to scientific theories. I arguethat this is due to the use of a semantics not rich enough from the philosophical pointof view. My proposal is to employ Sellars–Brandom's inferential semantics to understand how can scientific terms have empirical content, and Hintikka's game-theoretical semantics to analyse how can theories be empirically tested. The main conclusions are that scientific concepts gain their meaning through `basic (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10.  33
    Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. [REVIEW]Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2010 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 25 (1):96-99.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  38
    Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement.Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2014 - Argumentation 28 (1):39-65.
    Our main aim is to discuss the topic of scientific controversies in the context of a recent issue that has been the centre of attention of many epistemologists though not of argumentation theorists or philosophers of science, namely the ethics of belief in face of rational disagreement. We think that the consideration of scientific examples may be of help in the epistemological debate on rational disagreement, making clear some of the deficiencies of the discussion as it has been produced until (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  34
    El naturalismo científico de Ronald Giere y Philip Kitcher.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2000 - Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 24 (1):169.
    Se discute el proyecto de la naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia, a través de las teorías de Ronald Giere y Philip Kitcher. Ambas tienen en común la atención preferente que prestan a los procesos de decisión de los científicos individuales y la defensa de una concepción realista y racionalista de la ciencia. La comparación se lleva a cabo desde una triple perspectiva: su consideración como teorías darwinianas del desarrollo científico, su referencia a los modelos de la psicología cogni (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  12
    Presentation: Darwinism and Social Science: Is There Any Hope for the Reductionist?Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 2003 - Theoria 18 (3):255-257.
  14.  47
    Optimal Judgment Aggregation.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):813-824.
    The constitution of a collective judgment is analyzed from a contractarian point of view. The optimal collective judgment is defined as the one that maximizes the sum of the utility each member gets from the collective adoption of that judgment. It is argued that judgment aggregation is a different process from the aggregation of information and public deliberation. This entails that the adoption of a collective judgment should not make any rational member of the group change her individual opinion, and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. El naturalismo científico de Ronald Giere y Philip Kitcher: Un ensayo de comparación crítica.Jesús Pedro Zamora Bonilla - 2000 - Revista de filosofía (Chile) 24:169-190.
    Se discute el proyecto de la "naturalización de la filosofía de la ciencia", a través de las teorías de Ronald Giere y Philip Kitcher. Ambas tienen en común la atención preferente que prestan a los procesos de decisión de los científicos individuales y la defensa de una concepción realista y racionalista de la ciencia. La comparación se lleva a cabo desde una triple perspectiva: su consideración como teorías darwinianas del desarrollo científico, su referencia a los modelos de la psicología cognitiva, (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  39
    Credibility, Idealisation, and Model Building: An Inferential Approach.Xavier Donato Rodríguedez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2009 - Erkenntnis 70 (1).
    In this article we defend the inferential view of scientific models and idealisation. Models are seen as “inferential prostheses” (instruments for surrogative reasoning) construed by means of an idealisation-concretisation process, which we essentially understand as a kind of counterfactual deformation procedure (also analysed in inferential terms). The value of scientific representation is understood in terms not only of the success of the inferential outcomes arrived at with its help, but also of the heuristic power of representation and their capacity to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  9
    Representaciones En la Ciencia: De la Invariancia Estructural a la Significatividad Pragmática.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 1999 - Theoria 14 (2):380-382.
  18.  10
    18 Economists: Truth-Seekers or Rent-Seekers?Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla - 2002 - In Uskali Mäki (ed.), Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction. Cambridge University Press. pp. 356.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  8
    Úteros en alquiler.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 1998 - Isegoría: Revista de Filosofía Moral y Política 18:205-212.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  22
    The Politics of Positivism: Disinterested Predictions From Interested Agents.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - unknown
    Of the six sections composing «The Methodology of Posive Economics», the first one («The Relation between Positive and Normative Economics») is apparently the less discussed in the F53 literature, probably as a result of being the shortest one and the less relevant for the realism issue, all at once. In view of Milton Friedman’s subsequent career as a political preacher, it seems difficult not to wonder whether this first section ruled it the way the other five directed Friedman’s scientific performance. (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  11
    Un Modele Simple de Aproximación a la Verdad.Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla - 1993 - Theoria 8 (1):135-148.
    The process of scientific investigation is reconstructed as a process of empirical approximation to the truth. This last concept is explicated as a combination of “degree of simmilarity between theory A and the strongest accepted empirical law at moment t” and the “degree of depth of this empirical law”. A number of methodological theorems are proved, and avision of science closer to sophisticated falsificationism is mathematically deduced from our definitions.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  13
    Scientific Controversies and the Ethics of Arguing and Belief in the Face of Rational Disagreement.Xavier de Donato Rodríguez & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - forthcoming - Argumentation.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  29
    What's New in the Philosophy of the Social Sciences?: Guest Editors' Introduction.Julian Reiss, David Teira & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2008 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (3):311-313.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  11
    Introduction:Also Sprach der Homo Oeconomicus.Miranda Del Corral & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2008 - Journal of Economic Methodology 15 (3):241-244.
  25. Pure Intuition: Miranda Fricker on the Economy of Prejudice.Jesús Pedro Zamora Bonilla - 2008 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 23 (61):77-80.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  10
    Editors' Introduction: Science, Normativity and the Public.David Teira Serrano & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2007 - Social Epistemology 21 (1):1 – 4.
  27.  7
    Where is Economic Methodology Going?Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla - 2001 - Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1):135-138.
  28. La adaptación del darwinismo al medio hostil de la ficción audiovisual.Miguel Álvarez Peralta & Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2010 - Endoxa 24:377-407.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. ¿ Metodonomía de la ciencia? Una aplicación de la idea de verosimilitud.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 1993 - Endoxa 2:153-169.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  1
    Meaning and Testability in the Structuralist Theory of Science.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2004 - Erkenntnis 59 (1):47-76.
    The connection between scientific knowledge and our empirical access to reality is not well explained within the structuralist approach to scientific theories. I argue that this is due to the use of a semantics not rich enough from the philosophical point of view. My proposal is to employ Sellars-Brandom's inferential semantics to understand how can scientific terms have empirical content, and Hintikka's game-theoretical semantics to analyse how can theories be empirically tested. The main conclusions are that scientific concepts gain their (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Brian Skyrms. 2010. Signals: Evolution, Learning, and Information. [REVIEW]Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2012 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 27 (3):400-402.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Cooperation, Competition, and the Contractarian View of Scientific Research.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2013 - Etica E Politica 15 (2):14-24.
    Using the approach known as ‘Economics of Scientific Knowledge’, this paperdefends the view of scientific norms as the result of a ‘social contract’, i.e., as anequilibrium in the game of selecting the norms under which toproceed to play the game of scientific research and publication. Acategorisation of the relevant types of scientific norms is offered, as well as adiscussion about the incentives of the researchers in choosing some or otheralternative rules.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Truthlikeness with a Human Face: On Some Connections Between the Theory of Verisimilitude and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83:361-369.
    Verisimilitude theorists assume that science attempts to provide hypotheses with an increasing degree of closeness to the full truth; on the other hand, radical sociologists of science assert that flesh and bone scientists struggle to attain much more mundane goals . This paper argues that both points of view can be made compatible, for rational individuals only would be interested in engaging in a strong competition if they knew in advance the rules under which their outcomes are to be assessed, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Credibility, Idealisation, and Model Building: An Inferential Approach.Xavier De Donato Rodriguez & Jesus Zamora Bonilla - 2009 - Erkenntnis 70 (1):101-118.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. 1. David J. Buller: Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature, David J. Buller: Adapting Minds: Evolutionary Psychology and the Persistent Quest for Human Nature, (Pp. 232-246). [REVIEW]Edward Erwin, Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla & Jeremy Simon - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Where is Economic Methodology Going? Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla.Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla - 2001 - Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (1):135-138.
  37.  21
    The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences by Ian Jarvie & Jesús Zamora-Bonilla, Eds. [REVIEW]Johanna Thoma - 2014 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 29 (2):311-315.
  38.  11
    On Bridging Philosophy and Sociology of Science: Reply to Jesús Zamora Bonilla.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):370-372.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  16
    The SAGE Handbook of the Philosophy of Social Sciences.Ian C. Jarvie & Jesus Zamoro Bonilla (eds.) - 2011 - SAGE.
    In this excting Handbook, Jarvie and Bonilla provide a broad and democratic coverage of the many currents in social science.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. El debate sobre el cambio climático como un juego de persuasion (The climate change as a persuasion game).Forner Leonardo Monzonís & Bonilla Jesús Zamora - 2013 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 28 (1):77-96.
    Los científicos tratan de persuadir a sus colegas y, en última instancia, al conjunto de la sociedad, para que acepten sus tesis, descubrimientos y propuestas. Desarrollan para ello una serie de estrategias que pueden ser estudiadas como un"juego de persuasión" en el que intervienen, además de los procesos de argumentación formal e informal típicamente estudiados por la lógica y metodología de la ciencia, aspectos tradicionalmente considerados "sociológicos". En este artículo se analiza el debate sobre la ciencia del cambio climático como (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Confirmation, Empirical Progress, and Truth Approximation: Essays in Debate with Theo Kuipers. Volume 1.Festa Roberto, Aliseda Atocha & Peijnenburg Jeanne - 2005 - Rodopi.
    This book is the first of two volumes devoted to the work of Theo Kuipers, a leading Dutch philosopher of science. Philosophers and scientists from all over the world, thirty seven in all, comment on Kuipers' philosophy, and each of their commentaries is followed by a reply from Kuipers. The present volume focuses on Kuipers' views on confirmation, empirical progress, and truth approximation, as laid down in his From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism. In this book, Kuipers offered a synthesis of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Formal Modeling in Social Epistemology. [REVIEW]Stephan Hartmann, Carlo Martini & Jan Sprenger (eds.) - 2010 - Logic Journal of the IGPL (special issue).
    Special issue. With contributions by Rogier De Langhe and Matthias Greiff, Igor Douven and Alexander Riegler, Stephan Hartmann and Jan Sprenger, Carl Wagner, Paul Weirich, and Jesús Zamora Bonilla.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. La Lonja Del Saber.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2004
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. “’Christus Secundum Spiritum’: Spinoza, Jesus, and the Infinite Intellect”.Yitzhak Y. Melamed - 2012 - In Neta Stahl (ed.), The Jewish Jesus. Routledge.
  45. Scientific Inference and the Pursuit of Fame: A Contractarian Approach.P. Zamora Bonilla Jesús - 2002 - Philosophy of Science 69 (2):300-323.
    Methodological norms are seen as rules defining a competitive game, and it is argued that rational recognition-seeking scientists can reach a collective agreement about which specific norms serve better their individual interests, especially if the choice is made `under a veil of ignorance', i.e. , before knowing what theory will be proposed by each scientist. Norms for theory assessment are distinguished from norms for theory choice (or inference rules), and it is argued that pursuit of recognition only affects this second (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  46. The Nature of Co-Authorship: A Note on Recognition Sharing and Scientific Argumentation.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2014 - Synthese 191 (1):97-108.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  47.  98
    Einstein's Quandary, Socrates' Irony, and Jesus' Laughter: A 'Post-Modern' Meditation on Faith, Reason, Love, and the Paradox of the One and the Many.Richard Oxenberg - manuscript
    The paradox of 'the One and the Many' might, more generally, be understood as the paradox of relationship. In order for there to be relationship there must be at least two parties in relation. The relation must, at once, hold the parties apart (otherwise they would collapse into unity) while holding them together (otherwise relationship itself would cease). It must do so, further, without itself becoming a third party which would then, itself, need to be related. This paper considers this (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  29
    Science Studies and the Theory of Games.P. Zamora Bonilla Jesús - 2006 - Perspectives on Science 14 (4):525-557.
    Being scientific research a process of social interaction, this process can be studied from a game-theoretic perspective. Some conceptual and formal instruments that can help to understand scientific research as a game are introduced, and it is argued that game theoretic epistemology provides a middle ground for 'rationalist' and 'constructivist' theories of scientific knowledge. In the first part , a description of the essential elements of game of science is made, using an inferentialist conception of rationality. In the second part (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  49. An Economic Model of Scientific Rules.José Luis Ferreira & Jesús Zamora-bonilla - 2006 - Economics and Philosophy 22 (2):191-212.
    Empirical reports on scientific competition show that scientists can be depicted as self-interested, strategically behaving agents. Nevertheless, we argue that recognition-seeking scientists will have an interest in establishing methodological norms which tend to select theories of a high epistemic value, and that these norms will be still more stringent if the epistemic value of theories appears in the utility function of scientists, either directly or instrumentally. (Published Online July 11 2006) Footnotes1 The author gratefully acknowledges financial support from DGI grant (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  15
    The Nature of Co-Authorship: A Note on Recognition Sharing and Scientific Argumentation.Jesús Zamora Bonilla - 2012 - Synthese (1):1-12.
    Co-authorship of papers is very common in most areas of science, and it has increased as the complexity of research has strengthened the need for scientific collaboration. But the fact that papers have more than an author tends to complicate the attribution of merit to individual scientists. I argue that collaboration does not necessarily entail co-authorship, but that in many cases the latter is an option that individual authors might not choose, at least in principle: each author might publish in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000