292 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Harold W. Noonan [95]Jeff Noonan [61]Harold Noonan [39]H. W. Noonan [33]
J. T. Noonan [15]John T. Noonan [13]Herbert C. Noonan [6]Jeffrey Noonan [5]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
Profile: Harold Noonan (Nottingham University, Nottingham University)
Profile: Emma Noonan (St. Francis Xavier University)
Profile: Jeremiah Noonan (Seattle University)
Profile: Jan Noonan
  1.  34
    Harold Noonan, Plenitude, Pluralism and Neo-Lockean Persons.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  32
    Harold Noonan, Two Boxing is Not the Rational Option.
    In the standard Newcomb scenario two-boxing is not the rational act and, in general, in Newcomb-style cases the ‘two-boxing’ choice is not the rational act. Hence any decision theory which recommends two-boxing is unacceptable.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  6
    Doohwan Ahn, Sanda Badescu, Giorgio Baruchello, Raj Nath Bhat, Laura Boileau, Rosalind Carey, Camelia-Mihaela Cmeciu, Alan Goldstone, James Grieve, John Grumley, Grant Havers, Stefan Höjelid, Peter Isackson, Marguerite Johnson, Adrienne Kertzer, J.-Guy Lalande, Clinton R. Long, Joseph Mali, Ben Marsden, Peter Monteath, Michael Edward Moore, Jeff Noonan, Lynda Payne, Joyce Senders Pedersen, Brayton Polka, Lily Polliack, John Preston, Anthony Pym, Marina Ritzarev, Joseph Rouse, Peter N. Saeta, Arthur B. Shostak, Stanley Shostak, Marcia Landy, Kenneth R. Stunkel, I. I. I. Wheeler & Phillip H. Wiebe (2009). Null. The European Legacy 14 (6):731-771.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   34 citations  
  4.  17
    Harold Noonan, Two-Boxing is Irrational.
    Philosophers debate whether one-boxing or two-boxing is the rational act in a Newcomb situation. I shall argue that one-boxing is the only rational choice. This is so because there is no intelligible aim by reference to which you can justify the choice of two-boxing over one-boxing once you have come to think that you will two-box. The only aim by which the agent in the Newcomb situation can justify his two-boxing is the subjunctively described aim of ‘getting more than I (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Harold Noonan (2013). Presentism and Eternalism. Erkenntnis 78 (1):219 - 227.
    How is the debate between presentism and eternalism to be characterized? It is usual to suggest that this debate about time is analogous to the debate between the actualist and the possibilist about modality. I think that this suggestion is right. In what follows I pursue the analogy more strictly than is usual and offer a characterization of what is at the core of the dispute between presentists and eternalists that may be immune to worries often raised about the substantiality (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6. Harold W. Noonan (2012). Personal Pronoun Revisionism - Asking the Right Question. Analysis 72 (2):316-318.
    Personal pronoun revisionism (so-called by Olson, E. 2007. What are We? A Study in Personal Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press) is a response to the problem of the thinking animal on behalf of the neo-Lockean theorist. Many worry about this response. The worry rests on asking the wrong question, namely: how can two thinkers that are so alike differ in this way in their cognitive capacities? This is the wrong question because they don't. The right question is: how can they (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  27
    Harold W. Noonan & Peter Van Inwagen (1992). Material Beings. Philosophical Quarterly 42 (167):239.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   40 citations  
  8. Harold W. Noonan (1989). Personal Identity. Routledge.
    What is the self? And how does it relate to the body? In the second edition of Personal Identity, Harold Noonan presents the major historical theories of personal identity, particularly those of Locke, Leibniz, Butler, Reid and Hume. Noonan goes on to give a careful analysis of what the problem of personal identity is, and its place in the context of more general puzzles about identity. He then moves on to consider the main issues and arguments which are the subject (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  9. Harold W. Noonan (2004). Are There Vague Objects? Analysis 64 (282):131–134.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  10. Harold W. Noonan (2010). The Thinking Animal Problem and Personal Pronoun Revisionism. Analysis 70 (1):93-98.
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  11.  94
    Harold W. Noonan (2015). Relative Identity. Philosophical Investigations 38 (1-2):52-71.
    Examples suggest that one and the same A may be different Bs, and hence that there is some sort of incompleteness in the unqualified statement that x and y are the same which needs to be eliminated by answering the question “the same what?” One way to make this more precise is by appeal to Geach's idea that identity is relative. In this paper I evaluate Geach's relative identity thesis.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Harold W. Noonan (1993). Constitution is Identity. Mind 102 (405):133-146.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  13.  55
    Harold Noonan & Benjamin L. Curtis, Identity. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Much of the debate about identity in recent decades has been about personal identity, and specifically about personal identity over time, but identity generally, and the identity of things of other kinds, have also attracted attention. Various interrelated problems have been at the centre of discussion, but it is fair to say that recent work has focussed particularly on the following areas: the notion of a criterion of identity; the correct analysis of identity over time, and, in particular, the disagreement (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  14. Harold W. Noonan (1998). Animalism Versus Lockeanism: A Current Controversy. Philosophical Quarterly 48 (192):302-318.
  15. Harold W. Noonan (1994). In Defence of the Letter of Fictionalism. Analysis 54 (3):133-39.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  16. John T. Noonan (1962). The Concept of Law. By H. L. A. Hart. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1961. Pp. VIII, 263. 21s. American Journal of Jurisprudence 7 (1):169-177.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Harold W. Noonan (1991). Indeterminate Identity, Contingent Identity and Abelardian Predicates. Philosophical Quarterly 41 (163):183-193.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  18.  85
    Harold W. Noonan (2013). The Adequacy of Genuine Modal Realism. Mind 123 (491):851-860.
    What are the requirements on an adequate genuine modal realist analysis of modal discourse? One is material adequacy: the modal realist must provide for each candidate analysandum an analysans in the language of counterpart theory which by his lights has the same truth value as the candidate analysandum. Must the material biconditional joining these be necessarily true? This is the requirement of strict adequacy. It is not satisfied if Lewis’s 1968 scheme provides the analysis. John Divers puts forward a modification, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. John T. Noonan (2009). The Secular Citadel and the Untended Garden. Social Research: An International Quarterly 76 (4):1173-1180.
    Functionally, religion is what is held as sacred, that is, as untouchable. In the United States, taxes and military manpower are untouchable and, therefore, beyond objection by particular religions. The courts, too, are untouchable in determining what is and what is not religion. Despite these severe limitations on religious freedom, sometimes religion has broken the national consensus - most notably in the abolitionist movement of 1829-1865 and in the civil rights movement of 1959-1964. Such acts of religious freedom have been (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  97
    Harold W. Noonan (2006). Non-Branching and Circularity -- Reply to Brueckner. Analysis 66 (290):163-167.
  21. H. W. Noonan (2010). A Flaw in Sider's Vagueness Argument for Unrestricted Mereological Composition. Analysis 70 (4):669-672.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22. Harold Noonan, Moderate Monism, Persistence and Sortal Concepts.
    Coincidence comes in two varieties – permanent and temporary. Moderate monism is the position that permanent coincidence, but not temporary coincidence, entails identity. Extreme monism is the position that even temporary coincidence entails identity. Pluralists are opponents of monism tout court. The intuitively obvious, commonsensical position is moderate monism. It is therefore important to see if it can be sustained.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  38
    Harold W. Noonan (2014). Tollensing van Inwagen. Philosophia 42 (4):1055-1061.
    Van Inwagen has an ingenious argument for the non-existence of human artefacts . But the argument cannot be accepted, since human artefacts are everywhere. However, it cannot be ignored. The proper response to it is to treat it as a refutation of its least plausible premise, i.e., to ‘tollens’ it. I first set out van Inwagen’s argument. I then identify its least plausible premise and explain the consequence of denying it, that is, the acceptance of a plenitudinous, pluralist ontology. I (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  6
    Harold W. Noonan (2003). Personal Identity (2nd Edition). Routledge.
    Personal Identity is a comprehensive introduction to the nature of the self and its relation to the body. Harold Noonan places the problem of personal identity in the context of more general puzzles about identity, discussing the major historical theories and more recent debates. The second edition of Personal Identity contains a new chapter on 'animalism' and a new section on vagueness.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  25.  7
    C. Hooker & E. Noonan (2011). Medical Humanities as Expressive of Western Culture. Medical Humanities 37 (2):79-84.
    In this paper we articulate a growing awareness within the field of the ways in which medical humanities could be deemed expressive of Western cultural values. The authors suggest that medical humanities is culturally limited by a pedagogical and scholarly emphasis on Western cultural artefacts, as well as a tendency to enact an uncritical reliance upon foundational concepts (such as ‘patient’ and ‘experience’) within Western medicine. Both these tendencies within the field, we suggest, are underpinned by a humanistic emphasis on (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  26. H. W. Noonan (1985). The Only X and Y Principle. Analysis 45 (2):79 - 83.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  27. Harold W. Noonan (2001). Animalism Versus Lockeanism: Reply to Mackie. Philosophical Quarterly 51 (202):83-90.
  28.  68
    Harold W. Noonan (2004). Against Absence-Dependent Thoughts. Analysis 64 (1):92 - 93.
  29.  4
    Harold W. Noonan (2013). Frege: A Critical Introduction. Polity.
    This new book offers a comprehensive and accessible introduction to Frege's remarkable philosophical work, examining the main areas of his writings and demonstrating the connections between them. Frege's main contribution to philosophy spans philosophical logic, the theory of meaning, mathematical logic and the philosophy of mathematics. The book clearly explains and assesses Frege's work in these areas, systematically examining his major concepts, and revealing the links between them. The emphasis is on Frege's highly influential work in philosophical logic and the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  86
    Harold W. Noonan (1990). Vague Identity Yet Again. Analysis 50 (3):157 - 162.
    The paper defends Gareth Evans's argument against vague identity. It appeals to a principle I name the principle of the diversity of the definitely dissimilar to defend the thesis that vague identity statements owe their indeterminacy to vagueness in language.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  31. H. W. Noonan (1978). On the Notion of a Sortal Concept. Philosophical Quarterly 28 (110):58-64.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  32
    Harold W. Noonan (2013). In Defence of the Sensible Theory of Indeterminacy. Metaphysica 14 (2):239-252.
    Can the world itself be vague, so that rather than vagueness be a deficiency in our mode of describing the world, it is a necessary feature of any true description of it? Gareth Evans famously poses this question in his paper ‘Can There Be Vague Objects’ :208, 1978). In his recent paper ‘Indeterminacy and Vagueness: Logic and Metaphysics’, Peter van Inwagen elaborates the account of vagueness and, in particular, in the case of sentences, consequent indeterminacy in truth value, to which (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  64
    Harold W. Noonan (1999). Identity, Constitution and Microphysical Supervenience. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 99 (3):273-288.
    The aim of the paper is to discuss some recent variants of familiar puzzles concerning the relations of parts to wholes put forward by Trenton Merricks and Eric Olson. The argument is put forward that so long as the familiar distinction between 'loose and popular' and 'strict and philosophical' senses of identity claims is accepted the paradoxical conclusions at which Merricks and Olson arrive can be resisted. It is not denied that accepting the distinction between 'loose and popular' and 'strict (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  34.  64
    Harold W. Noonan (1985). The Only X and y Principle. Analysis 45 (2):79-83.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  77
    Harold W. Noonan (1988). Reply to Lowe on Ships and Structures. Analysis 48 (4):221 - 223.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  36.  33
    Harold W. Noonan (2015). Two Boxing is Not the Rational Option. Ratio 29 (2):168-183.
    In the standard Newcomb scenario two-boxing is not the rational act and, in general, in Newcomb-style cases the ‘two-boxing’ choice is not the rational act. Hence any decision theory which recommends two-boxing is unacceptable.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Harold W. Noonan (2010). Bird Against the Humeans. Ratio 23 (1):73-86.
    Debate between Humean contingentists and anti-Humean necessitarians in the philosophy of science is ongoing. One of the most important contemporary anti-Humeans is Alexander Bird. Bird calls the particular version of Humeanism he is opposed to 'categoricalism'. In his paper (2005) and in Chapter 4 of his book (2007) Bird argues against categoricalism about properties and laws. His arguments against categoricalism about properties are intended to support the necessitarian position he calls dispositional monism. His arguments against categoricalism about laws are intended (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  11
    Harold Noonan, Perdurance, Location and Classical Mereology.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  20
    Harold W. Noonan (2015). Against Strong Pluralism. Philosophia 43 (4):1081-1087.
    Strong pluralists hold that not even permanent material coincidence is enough for identity. Strong pluralism entails the possibility of purely material objects -- even if not coincident -- alike in all general respects, categorial and dispositional, relational and non-relational, past, present and future, at the microphysical level, but differing in some general modal, counterfactual or dispositional repscts at the macrophysical level. It is objectionable because it thus deprives us of the explanatory resources to explain why evident absurdities are absurd. A (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  76
    Harold W. Noonan (2009). What is a One-Level Criterion of Identity? Analysis 69 (2):274-277.
    Standardly, a one-level criterion of identity 1 is given in the form: ∀ x∀ y )where ‘ K’ denotes the kind of thing for which the criterion is being given and ‘ R’ denotes the criterial relation.Thus, we have, for example, the criterion of identity for sets: ∀ x∀ y))and for composites: ∀ x∀ y))and for events: ∀ x∀ y)). is equivalent to the conjunction of: ∀ x and ∀ x )),which just give two necessary 2 conditions for application of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41. H. W. Noonan (2010). The Complex and Simple Views of Personal Identity. Analysis 71 (1):72-77.
    What is the difference between the complex view of personal identity over time and the simple view? Traditionally, the defenders of the complex view are said to include Locke and Hume, defenders of the simple view to include Butler and Reid. In our own time it is standard to think of Chisholm and Swinburne as defenders of the simple view and Shoemaker, Parfit, Williams and Lewis as defenders of the complex view. But how exactly is the distinction to be characterized? (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Jeff Noonan (2012). Materialist Ethics and Life-Value. Mcgill-Queen's University Press.
    Current patterns of global economic activity are not only unsustainable, but unethical - this claim is central to Materialist Ethics and Life-Value. Grounding the definition of ethical value in the natural and social requirements of life-support and life-development shared by all human beings, Jeff Noonan provides a new way of understanding the universal conception of "the good life." Noonan argues that the true crisis affecting the world today is not sluggish rates of economic growth but the model of measuring economic (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  60
    Harold W. Noonan (2008). Does Ontic Indeterminacy in Boundaries Entail Ontic Indeterminacy in Identity? Analysis 68 (298):174–176.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  44. Harold W. Noonan (1990). Object-Dependent Thoughts and Psychological Redundancy. Analysis 50 (January):1-9.
  45.  26
    Benjamin L. Curtis & Harold W. Noonan (2014). Castles Built on Clouds: Vague Identity and Vague Objects. In Ken Akiba & Ali Abasnezhad (eds.), Vague Objects and Vague Identity: New Essays on Ontic Vagueness. Springer 305-326.
    Can identity itself be vague? Can there be vague objects? Does a positive answer to either question entail a positive answer to the other? In this paper we answer these questions as follows: No, No, and Yes. First, we discuss Evans’s famous 1978 argument and argue that the main lesson that it imparts is that identity itself cannot be vague. We defend the argument from objections and endorse this conclusion. We acknowledge, however, that the argument does not by itself establish (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Harold W. Noonan (1993). Object-Dependent Thoughts: A Case of Superficial Necessity but Deep Contingency? In John Heil & Alfred R. Mele (eds.), Mental Causation. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  47.  77
    Harold W. Noonan (1995). E. J. Lowe on Vague Identity and Quantum Indeterminacy. Analysis 55 (1):14 - 19.
    The paper defends Gareth Evan's argument against vague identity "de re" from a criticism that quantum mechanics provides actual counter-examples to its validity. A more general version of Evans's argument is stated in which identity involving properties are not essential and it is claimed that the scientific facts as so far known are consistent with the Evansian thesis that indeterminacy in truth-value must always be due to semantic indecision.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  48.  89
    Harold W. Noonan (2003). A Flawed Argument for Perdurance. Analysis 63 (279):213–215.
  49.  6
    H. W. Noonan (2011). The Complex and Simple Views of Personal Identity. Analysis 71 (1):72-77.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  48
    Harold W. Noonan (2008). Moderate Monism and Modality. Analysis 68 (297):88–94.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 292