Search results for 'Incorrigibility' (try it on Scholar)

119 found
  1. Frank Jackson (1973). Is There a Good Argument Against the Incorrigibility Thesis? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (May):51-62.
    "the incorrigibility thesis", The thesis that it is logically impossible to be mistaken about such things as whether I am now in pain or am seeing or seeming to see something red, Is very widely supposed to be false. I consider the arguments designed to show this, And argue that they all fail.
    Direct download (9 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   42 citations  
  2.  20
    Peter Langland-Hassan (forthcoming). Pain and Incorrigibility. In J. Corns (ed.), Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Pain. Routledge.
    This chapter (from Routledge's forthcoming handbook on the philosophy of pain) considers the question of whether people are always correct when they judge themselves to be in pain, or not in pain. While I don't show sympathy for traditional routes to the conclusion that people are "incorrigible" in their pain judgments, I explore--and perhaps even advocate--a different route to such incorrigibility. On this low road to incorrigibility, a sensory state's being judged unpleasant is what makes it a pain (...)
      Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  3. Gerald Doppelt (1977). Incorrigibility, the Mental, and Materialism. Philosophy Research Archives 3:504-536.
    This paper constitutes a thoroughgoing critique of Rorty's interesting attempt to characterize the mental and its elimination within materialism in terms of the incorrigibility of mental reports. I elucidate, criticize, and improve the concept of incorrigibility his position requires. Then I argue: that although mental-state reports are as corrigible as physical reports, this reflects contingent matters which do not affect the boundary of the mental and the physical; that even if the familiar paradigm mental-event reports are incorrigible, there (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  4. Richard Rorty (1970). Incorrigibility as the Mark of the Mental. Journal of Philosophy 67 (June):399-424.
  5. Charles Raff (1966). Introspection and Incorrigibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (September):69-73.
  6.  34
    Gerald Doppelt (1978). Incorrigibility and the Mental. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 56 (1):3-20.
  7.  69
    George Bailey (1979). Pappas, Incorrigibility, and Science. Philosophical Studies 35 (April):319-321.
  8.  56
    Bernard Berofsky (1958). Minkus-Benes on Incorrigibility. Mind 67 (April):264-266.
  9.  81
    Manuel Campos (2003). Analyticity and Incorrigibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):689-708.
    The traditional point of view on analyticity implies that truth in virtue only of meaning entails a priori acceptability and vice versa. The argument for this claim is based on the idea that meaning as it concerns truth and meaning as it concerns competence are one and the same thing. In this paper I argue that the extensions of these notions do not coincide. I hold that truth in virtue of meaning— truth for semantic reasons—doesn't imply a priori acceptability, and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  10.  57
    Richard Rorty (1972). Functionalism, Machines and Incorrigibility. Journal of Philosophy 64 (April):203-20.
  11.  4
    Stephanie M. Hare & Nicole A. Vincent (2016). Happiness, Cerebroscopes and Incorrigibility: Prospects for Neuroeudaimonia. Neuroethics 9 (1):69-84.
    Suppose you want to live a happy life. Who should you turn to for advice? We normally think that we know best about our own happiness. But recent work in psychology and neuroscience suggests that we are often mistaken about our own natures, and that sometimes scientists know us better than we know ourselves. Does this mean that to live a happy life we should ask scientists for advice rather than relying on our introspection? In what follows, we highlight ways (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  12.  59
    Frank Jackson (1967). A Note on Incorrigibility and Authority. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 45 (December):358-363.
  13. J. J. C. Smart (1962). Brain Processes and Incorrigibility - a Reply to Professor Baier. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 40 (May):68-70.
  14.  51
    John E. Atwell (1966). Austin on Incorrigibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (December):261-266.
  15.  51
    Richard K. Scheer (1998). How to Criticize an Incorrigibility Thesis. Philosophical Investigations 21 (4):359-368.
  16.  51
    David M. Armstrong (1976). Incorrigibility, Materialism, and Causation. Philosophical Studies 30 (August):125-28.
  17.  29
    George S. Pappas (1974). Incorrigibility, Knowledge, and Justification. Philosophical Studies 25 (April):219-25.
  18.  4
    Gregory Sheridan (1969). The Electroencephalogram Argument Against Incorrigibility. American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (January):62-70.
  19.  17
    Charles E. M. Dunlop (1977). Lehrer and Ellis on Incorrigibility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 55 (December):201-5.
  20.  15
    Richard Rorty (1974). More on Incorrigibility. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (September):195-197.
  21.  34
    George S. Pappas (1976). Incorrigibility and Central-State Materialism. Philosophical Studies 29 (June):445-56.
  22.  17
    George Nakhnikian (1968). Incorrigibility. Philosophical Quarterly 18 (July):207-15.
  23.  9
    Richard H. Robinson (1972). The Concept of Incorrigibility. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1 (June):427-441.
  24.  10
    Bengt Hansson (2006). Infallibility and Incorrigibility. In Erik J. Olsson (ed.), Knowledge and Inquiry: Essays on the Pragmatism of Isaac Levi. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 65.
  25.  30
    Edward Kroiter (1972). On Defining Incorrigibility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (December):279-282.
  26.  25
    James E. Tomberlin (1975). A Problem with Incorrigibility. Philosophia 5 (October):507-12.
  27.  22
    F. G. Verges (1974). Jackson on Incorrigibility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (December):243-50.
  28.  24
    Robert C. Solomon (1975). Minimal Incorrigibility. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (December):254-56.
  29.  16
    Sidney D. Johnson (1970). Statements and Incorrigibility. Mind 79 (October):600-601.
  30.  11
    Stephen J. Noren (1973). A Note on Statements and Incorrigibility. Mind 82 (April):273-275.
  31.  10
    Bruce Waters (1942). Basic Sentences and Incorrigibility. Philosophy of Science 9 (July):239-244.
  32.  9
    Irving Thalberg (1965). Looks, Impressions and Incorrigibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 25 (March):365-374.
  33. Francis W. Dauer (1981). Incorrigibility. Ratio 23 (December):98-113.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  34. John Exdell & James Hamilton (1975). The Incorrigibility of First Person Disavowals. Personalist 56 (4):389-394.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  35. Laurence F. Mucciolo (1974). Incorrigibility Revisited. Personalist 55 (3):253-260.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  36. George S. Pappas (1975). Defining Incorrigibility. Personalist 56 (4):395-402.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  37. George W. Roberts (1974). Incorrigibility, Behaviourism and Predictionism. In Renford Bambrough (ed.), Wisdom: Twelve Essays. Oxford: Blackwell.
  38. Richard Warner (1993). Incorrigibility. In Howard M. Robinson (ed.), Objections to Physicalism. Oxford University Press.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  39. Earl Winkler (1969). Incorrigibility: The Standard Contemporary Doctrine. Personalist 50 (2):179-193.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  40.  53
    Nicholas De Genova (2010). The Queer Politics of Migration: Reflections on “Illegality” and Incorrigibility. Studies in Social Justice 4 (2):101-126.
    The most resounding expression of the truly unprecedented mobilizations of migrants throughout the United States in 2006 was a mass proclamation of collective defiance: ¡Aquí Estamos, y No Nos Vamos! [Here we are, and we're not leaving!]. This same slogan was commonly accompanied by a still more forcefully incorrigible rejoinder: ¡Y Si Nos Sacan, Nos Regresamos! [... and if they throw us out, we'll come right back!]. It is quite striking and, as this essay contends, not merely provocative but genuinely (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  41.  38
    Richard Warner (1996). Facing Ourselves: Incorrigibility and the Mind-Body Problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (3):217-30.
    In the keynote essay, David Chalmers proposes that we explain consciousness by a non-reductive theory of experience which adds new basic principles to the laws of nature. This essay endorses Chalmers’ proposal but argues -- contrary to Chalmers -- that the principles of such a theory interfere with purely physical laws, since the principles entail violations of physical conservation laws. The essay argues that the qualified incorrigibility of the mental nonetheless provides compelling reason to opt for a non-reductive theory.
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  42.  1
    Martin Guggenheim (1985). Incorrigibility Laws: The State's Role in Resolving Intrafamily Conflict. Criminal Justice Ethics 4 (1):11-19.
    (1985). Incorrigibility laws: The state's role in resolving intrafamily conflict. Criminal Justice Ethics: Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 11-19. doi: 10.1080/0731129X.1985.9991767.
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  43.  20
    Alan Tormey (1973). Access, Incorrigibility, and Identity. Journal of Philosophy 70 (5):115.
  44. Christopher London (2012). Coffee, Certification, and the Incorrigibility of Capitalism. Social Research: An International Quarterly 79 (4):1045-1069.
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  45.  74
    Fred Feldman & Herbert Heidelberger (1973). Tormey on Access and Incorrigibility. Journal of Philosophy 70 (May):297-298.
  46.  86
    Jonathan Harrison (1984). The Incorrigibility of the Cogito. Mind 93 (July):321-335.
  47.  12
    Nikola Z. Grahek (1992). Knowledge, Certainty and Incorrigibility. Theoria 35 (3):45-52.
  48.  46
    William R. Carter (1974). On Incorrigibility and Eliminative Materialism. Philosophical Studies 28 (2):113-21.
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  49.  31
    Gerald Doppelt (1979). The Austin-Malcolm Argument for the Incorrigibility of Perceptual Reports. Dialectica 33 (1):59-75.
  50.  8
    James Ford (1974). Richard Robinson on Incorrigibility. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):199 - 200.
1 — 50 / 119