78 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Laurence BonJour [79]Laurence Alan Bonjour [1]
  1. Laurence BonJour (1998). In Defense of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
    A comprehensive defence of the rationalist view that insight independent of experience is a genuine basis for knowledge.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   146 citations  
  2. Laurence BonJour (1985). The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. Harvard University Press.
    1 Knowledge and Justification This book is an investigation of one central problem which arises in the attempt to give a philosophical account of empirical ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   250 citations  
  3. Laurence BonJour & Ernest Sosa (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues. Blackwell Pub..
    The regress problem and foundationalism -- Externalist accounts of justification -- In search of coherentism -- Back to foundationalism -- The conceptualization of sensory experience and the problem of the external world -- Knowledge and justification -- Does knowledge have foundation -- Skepticism and the internal/external divide -- A virtue epistemology -- Reply to Sosa -- Reply to Bonjour.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   72 citations  
  4. Laurence BonJour (2010). Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc..
    Introduction -- Part I: The classical problems of epistemology -- Descartes's epistemology -- The concept of knowledge -- The problem of induction -- A priori justification and knowledge -- Immediate experience -- Knowledge of the external world -- Some further epistemological issues : other minds, testimony, and memory -- Part II: Contemporary responses to the cartesian epistemological program -- Introduction to part II -- Foundationalism and coherentism -- Internalism and externalism -- Quine and naturalized epistemology -- Knowledge and skepticism.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  5. Laurence Bonjour (1980). Externalist Theories of Empirical Knowledge. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):53-73.
    One of the many problems that would have t o be solved by a satisfactory theory of empirical knowledge, perhaps the most central is a general structural problem which I shall call the epistemic regress problem: the problem of how to avoid an in- finite and presumably vicious regress of justification in ones account of the justifica- tion of empirical beliefs. Foundationalist theories of empirical knowledge, as we shall see further below, attempt t o avoid the regress by locating a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   74 citations  
  6. Richard Fumerton, Laurence Bonjour, John L. Pollock & Alvin Plantinga (2000). Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    The contributions in this volume make an important effort to resurrect a rather old fashioned form of foundationalism. They defend the position that there are some beliefs that are justified, and are not themselves justified by any further beliefs. This epistemic foundationalism has been the subject of rigorous attack by a wide range of theorists in recent years, leading to the impression that foundationalism is a thing of the past. DePaul argues that it is precisely the volume and virulence of (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  7. Laurence BonJour (2010). The Myth of Knowledge. Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):57-83.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  8. Laurence BonJour (2004). In Search of Direct Realism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (2):349-367.
  9. Laurence BonJour (1999). Foundationalism and the External World. Philosophical Perspectives 13 (s13):229-249.
    Outlines a tenable version of a traditional foundationalist account\nof empirical justification and its implications for the justification\nof beliefs about physical or material objects. Presupposing the acceptability\nof other beliefs about physical objects; Concept of a basic belief;\nMetabeliefs about one's own occurrent beliefs; Beliefs about sensory\nexperience.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   21 citations  
  10. Laurence BonJour (1978). Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation? American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1):1-14.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  11. Laurence BonJour (1999). The Dialectic of Foundationalism and Coherentism. In John Greco & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology. Malden, Ma: Blackwell 117-144.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   21 citations  
  12. Alvin Goldman, Ernest Sosa, Hilary Kornblith, John Greco, Jonathan Dancy, Laurence Bonjour, Linda Zagrebsky, Julia Driver, James Montmarquet, Chirstopher Hookway, Ricard Paul, Guy Axtell & Casey Swank (eds.) (2000). Knowledge, Belief, and Character: Readings in Contemporary Virtue Epistemology. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    This is a unique collection of new and recently-published articles which debate the merits of virtue-theoretic approaches to the core epistemological issues of knowledge and justified belief. The readings all contribute to our understanding of the relative importance, for a theory of justified belief, of the reliability of our cognitive faculties and of the individuals responsibility in gathering and weighing evidence. Highlights of the readings include direct exchanges between leading exponents of this approach and their critics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  13. Laurence BonJour, Epistemological Problems of Perception. Stanford Online Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    The historically most central epistemological issue concerning perception, to which this article will be almost entirely devoted, is whether and how beliefs about physical objects and about the physical world generally can be justified or warranted on the basis of sensory or perceptual experience—where it is internalist justification, roughly having a reason to think that the belief in question is true, that is mainly in question (see the entry justification, epistemic: internalist vs. externalist conceptions of). This issue, commonly referred to (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  14. Laurence BonJour (2013). What is It Like to Be Human. American Philosophical Quarterly 50 (4):373-386.
    My purpose in this paper is to discuss and defend an objection to physicalist or materialist accounts of the mind.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  87
    Laurence BonJour (2001). The Indispensability of Internalism. Philosophical Topics 29 (1/2):47-65.
  16. Laurence BonJour & Ernest Sosa (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues. Wiley-Blackwell.
    Ever since Plato it has been thought that one knows only if one's belief hits the mark of truth and does so with adequate justification. The issues debated by Laurence BonJour and Ernest Sosa concern mostly the nature and conditions of such epistemic justification, and its place in our understanding of human knowledge. Presents central issues pertaining to internalism vs. externalism and foundationalism vs. virtue epistemology in the form of a philosophical debate. Introduces students to fundamental questions within epistemology while (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  17. Laurence Bonjour (1976). The Coherence Theory of Empirical Knowledge. Philosophical Studies 30 (5):281 - 312.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  18. Laurence BonJour & Ernest Sosa (2003). Epistemic Justification: Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues. Wiley-Blackwell.
    Ever since Plato it has been thought that one knows only if one's belief hits the mark of truth and does so with adequate justification. The issues debated by Laurence BonJour and Ernest Sosa concern mostly the nature and conditions of such epistemic justification, and its place in our understanding of human knowledge. Presents central issues pertaining to internalism vs. externalism and foundationalism vs. virtue epistemology in the form of a philosophical debate. Introduces students to fundamental questions within epistemology while (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  19.  60
    Laurence Bonjour (1997). Haack on Justification and Experience. Synthese 112 (1):13-23.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  20. William P. Alston, Laurence Bonjour, Carl Ginet, Alvin I. Goldman, John Greco, George I. Mavrodes, Philip L. Quinn, Alessandra Tanesini, Nicholas Wolterstorff & Linda Zagzebski (2005). Perspectives on the Philosophy of William P. Alston. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    One of the most influential analytic philosophers of the late twentieth century, William P. Alston is a leading light in epistemology, philosophy of religion, and the philosophy of language. In this volume, twelve leading philosophers critically discuss the central topics of his work in these areas, including perception, epistemic circularity, justification, the problem of religious diversity, and truth.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  21.  12
    Laurence Bonjour (2001). Replies. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):673-698.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  22.  20
    Laurence Bonjour (2001). Replies. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):673–698.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  23. Laurence Bonjour (1994). Against Naturalized Epistemology. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 19 (1):283-300.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  24. Jonathan L. Kvanvig, Laurence Bonjour, Earl Conee, Richard Feldman, Richard Foley, Peter Klein, Jonathan Kvanvig, Keith Lehrer, William Lycan, Peter Markie, George Pappas, Alvin Plantinga, Ernest Sosa, Marshall Swain & Bas van Fraassen (1996). Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga's Theory of Knowledge. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In his widely influential two-volume work, Warrant: The Current Debate and Warrant and Proper Function, Alvin Plantinga argued that warrant is that which explains the difference between knowledge and true belief. Plantinga not only developed his own account of warrant but also mapped the terrain of epistemology. Motivated by Plantinga's work, fourteen prominent philosophers have written new essays investigating Plantingian warrant and its contribution to contemporary epistemology. The resulting collection, representing a broad array of views, not only gives readers a (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  25.  67
    Laurence BonJour (2013). Is There a Priori Knowledge? In Matthias Steup & John Turri (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell 177.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  4
    Laurence BonJour (1982). Review of James Cornman, Skepticism, Justification, and Explanation. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 91 (4):612-615.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  27. Laurence Bonjour (2004). C. I. Lewis on the Given and its Interpretation. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 28 (1):195–208.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28.  5
    Laurence BonJour (2005). Last Rejoinder. In Steup Matthias & Sosa Ernest (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell 120--21.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  29.  54
    Laurence Bonjour (2006). Replies. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 131 (3):673-698.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  30.  6
    Can Empirical Knowledge Have A. Foundation & Laurence Bonjour (1978). Current Periodical Articles. American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  31. Laurence Bonjour (2002). Review: Boghossian, Paul, New Essays on the A Priori. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (443):647-652.
  32.  70
    Laurence BonJour (1991). Is Thought a Symbolic Process? Synthese 89 (3):331-52.
  33. Laurence BonJour, Analytic Philosophy and the Nature of Thought.
    In this paper, I will discuss three arguments which have been advanced by three of the most important recent analytic philosophers: Willard Van Orman Quine, Hilary Putnam, and Michael Dummett. Each argument is central to the views of the philosopher in question, and each leads to sweeping and, to my mind, highly implausible conclusions concerning the content of our thoughts about the world. The philosophers in question claim, of course, that these implications should be accepted, but few others have been (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Laurence BonJour (2001). Michael DePaul and William Ramsey (Eds) Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (1):151-158.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Laurence Bonjour (2006). Kornblith on Knowledge and Epistemology. Philosophical Studies 127 (2):317 - 335.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  57
    Laurence BonJour (2000). Four Theses Concerning a Priori Justification. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:13-20.
    In my book In Defense of Pure Reason, I offer an extended defense of the idea of a priori justification and, more specifically, of a rationalist conception of such justification: one according to which rational insight or intuition provides genuine justification for claims that need not be merely definitional or tautological in character. In the relatively brief space available to me on the present occasion, I want to present and defend, necessarily in rather broad strokes, four of the most central (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  53
    Laurence BonJour (1988). Reply to Moser. Analysis 48 (4):164 - 165.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  18
    Laurence BonJour (2002). Internalism and Externalism. In Paul K. Moser (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Epistemology. Oxford University Press 234--264.
  39.  79
    Laurence Bonjour (2006). Précis. Philosophical Studies 131 (3):669 - 675.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Laurence BonJour (1987). Nozick, Externalism, and Skepticism. In Luper-Foy Steven (ed.), The Possibility of Knowledge: Nozick and His Critics. Rowman & Littlefield
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41.  58
    Laurence BonJour (1976). Deeterminism, Libertarianism, and Agent Causation. Southern Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):145-56.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  1
    Laurence Bonjour (2006). Replies. Philosophical Studies 131 (3):743-759.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43. Laurence BonJour & Robert Audi (1995). A Priori. In Audi Robert (ed.), The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  44.  66
    Laurence Bonjour (2001). Précis of in Defense of Pure Reason. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (3):625–631.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  34
    Laurence Bonjour (2000). Evan Fales, a Defense of the Given (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1996). Noûs 34 (3):468–480.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  27
    Laurence Bonjour (1986). A Reconsideration of the Problem of Induction. Philosophical Topics 14 (1):93-124.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  36
    Laurence Bonjour (1995). Toward a Moderate Rationalism. Philosophical Topics 23 (1):47-78.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  28
    Laurence Bonjour (1976). Rescher's Idealistic Pragmatism. Review of Metaphysics 29 (4):702 - 726.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  13
    Laurence Bonjour (1992). A Rationalist Manifesto. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (sup1):53-88.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  43
    Laurence Bonjour (1995). Sosa on Knowledge, Justification, and Aptness. Philosophical Studies 78 (3):207--220.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 78