52 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Thomas D. Senor [48]Thomas Senor [4]Thomas David Senor [1]
See also:
Profile: Thomas Senor (University of Arkansas, Fayetteville)
  1. Thomas D. Senor (1996). The Prima/Ultima Facie Justification Distinction in Epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (3):551-566.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  2. Thomas D. Senor (2008). Defending Divine Freedom. In Jonathan Kvanvig (ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion. Oxford University Press 168-95.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  3. Thomas D. Senor (2010). On the Tenability of Brute Naturalism and the Implications of Brute Theism. Philosophia Christi 10 (2):273-280.
  4. Thomas D. Senor, Perception, Evidence, and the Epistemology of Disagreement.
    In this paper I argue for a version of the Total Evidence view according to which the rational response to disagreement depends upon one's total evidence. I argue that perceptual evidence of a certain kind is significantly weightier than many other types of evidence, including testimonial. Furthermore, what is generally called "The Uniqueness Thesis" is actually a conflation of two distinct principles that I dub "Evidential Uniqueness" and "Rationality Uniqueness." The former principle is likely true but the latter almost certainly (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. Thomas D. Senor (2007). Preserving Preservationism: A Reply to Lackey. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):199-208.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  6. Thomas D. Senor (2002). A Critical Review of Alvin Plantinga's Warranted Christian Belief. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):389-396.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Thomas D. Senor (2007). The Compositional Account of the Incarnation. Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):52-71.
    In a pair of recent articles, Brian Leftow and Eleonore Stump offer independent, although similar, accounts of the metaphysics of the Incarnation. Both believe that their Aquinas-inspired theories can offer solutions to the kind of Leibniz’s Law problems that can seem to threaten the logical possibility of this traditional Christian doctrine. In this paper, I’ll have a look at their compositional account of the nature of God incarnate. In the end, I believe their position can be seen to have unacceptable (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  8. Thomas D. Senor (1993). Internalistic Foundationalism and the Justification of Memory Belief. Synthese 94 (3):453 - 476.
    In this paper I argue that internalistic foundationalist theories of the justification of memory belief are inadequate. Taking a discussion of John Pollock as a starting point, I argue against any theory that requires a memory belief to be based on a phenomenal state in order to be justified. I then consider another version of internalistic foundationalism and claim that it, too, is open to important objections. Finally, I note that both varieties of foundationalism fail to account for the epistemic (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  9. Thomas D. Senor (1992). Two Factor Theories, Meaning Wholism and Intentionalistic Psychology: A Reply to Fodor. Philosophical Psychology 5 (2):133-151.
    In the third chapter of his book Psychosemantics , Jerry A. Fodor argues that the truth of meaning holism (the thesis that the content of a psychological state is determined by the totality of that state's epistemic liaisons) would be fatal for intentionalistic psychology. This is because holism suggests that no two people are ever in the same intentional state, and so a psychological theory that generalizes over such states will be composed of generalizations which fail to generalize. Fodor then (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Thomas D. Senor (2007). Preserving Preservationism: A Reply to Lackey. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (1):199–208.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11. Thomas D. Senor (1993). Divine Temporality and Creation Ex Nihilo. Faith and Philosophy 10 (1):86-92.
  12.  76
    Thomas D. Senor (2013). Justified Belief and Demon Worlds. Res Philosophica 90 (2):203-214.
    The New Demon World Objection claims that reliabilist accounts of justification are mistaken because there are justified empirical beliefs at demon worlds—worlds at which the subjects are systematically deceived by a Cartesian demon. In this paper, I defend strongly verific (but not necessarily reliabilist) accounts of justification by claiming that there are two ways to construct a theory of justification: by analyzing our ordinary concept of justification or by taking justification to be a theoretic term defined by its role in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13. Thomas D. Senor (2011). Drawing on Many Traditions: An Ecumenical Kenotic Christology. In Anna Marmadoro & Jonathan Hill (eds.), The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford University Press
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14. Thomas D. Senor (1987). What If There Are No Political Obligations? A Reply to A. J. Simmons. Philosophy and Public Affairs 16 (3):260-268.
  15. Thomas D. Senor (2005). Dissatisfaction Theory and Punishment: A Reply to Webb. Southwest Philosophy Review 21 (2):187-190.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Thomas D. Senor (1999). The Incarnation and the Trinity. In Michael J. Murray (ed.), Reason for the Hope Within. Wm. B. Eerdmans
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Thomas D. Senor, Why There is No Justified Belief at Demon Worlds.
    The New Demon World Objection claims that reliabilist accounts of justification are mistaken because there are justified empirical beliefs at demon worlds—worlds at which the subjects are systematically deceived by a Cartesian demon. In this paper, I defend strongly verific (but not necessarily reliabilist) accounts of justification by claiming that there are two ways to construct a theory of justification: by analyzing our ordinary concept of justification or by taking justification to be a theoretic term defined by its role in (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Thomas D. Senor (2004). Should Cubs Fans Be Committed? What Bleacher Bums Have to Teach Us About the Nature of Faith. In Eric Bronson (ed.), Baseball and Philosophy. Open Court
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Thomas D. Senor (2007). The Incarnation. In Chad Meister & Paul Copan (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Routledge Press
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Thomas D. Senor (2010). Memory. In Jonathan Dancy, Ernest Sosa & Matthias Steup (eds.), A Companion to Epistemology (Second Edition). Wiley-Blackwell
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Thomas D. Senor (2009). The Real Presence of an Eternal God. In Kevin Timpe & Eleonore Stump (eds.), Metaphysics and God: Essays in Honor of Eleonore Stump. Routledge
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Thomas D. Senor (2002). Incarnation, Timelessness, and Leibniz's Law Problems. In Gregory E. Ganssle & David M. Woodruff (eds.), God and Time: Essays on the Divine Nature. Oxford University Press
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Thomas D. Senor (2008). In Defense of Serious Externalism. Southwest Philosophy Review 24 (1):1-13.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Thomas D. Senor (2003). E.J.Lowe: The Subjects of Experience. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 112 (3):416-419.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Thomas D. Senor (1990). Incarnation and Timeless. Faith and Philosophy 7 (2):149-164.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Thomas D. Senor (2011). Review of Paul K. Moser, The Evidence for God: Religious Knowledge Reexamined. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (1).
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Thomas D. Senor (2002). Review of Matthias Steup (Ed.), Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (3).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Thomas D. Senor (1995). Harman, Negative Coherentism, and the Problem of Ongoing Justification. Philosophia 24 (3-4):271-294.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Thomas D. Senor (1991). God, Supernatural Kinds, and the Incarnation. Religious Studies 27 (3):353-370.
    Traditionally, the term ’God’ has been understood either as a proper name or as a description. However, according to a new view, the term God’ in a sentence like "Jesus Christ is God" functions as a kind term, much as the term ’tiger’ functions in the sentence "Tigger is a tiger." In this paper I examine the claim that divinity can be construed as a ’supernatural’ kind, developing the outlines of an account of the semantics of God’ along these lines, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  18
    Thomas D. Senor (2014). Bread or Stone? [REVIEW] The Philosophers' Magazine 66:125-126.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Thomas D. Senor (2006). God's Goodness Needs No Privilege: A Reply to Funkhouser. Faith and Philosophy 23 (4):423-431.
    According to Eric Funkhouser, omnipotence and necessary moral perfection (what Funkhouser calls "impeccability") are not compatible. Funkhouser gives two arguments for this claim. In this paper, I argue that neither of Funkhouser's arguments is sound. The traditional theist can reasonably claim that, contra Funkhouser, (i) there is no possible being who possesses all of God's attributes sans impeccability, and (ii) the fact that there are things that God cannot do does not entail that God lacks omnipotence. Armed with (i) and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Thomas D. Senor (1995). On the Nature and Existence of God. Faith and Philosophy 12 (3):432-434.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Thomas D. Senor (2005). Trusting Lucy: Believing the Incredible. In Gregory Bassham & Jerry L. Walls (eds.), The Chronicles of Narnia and Philosophy. Open Court
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  14
    Thomas D. Senor (1991). God, Supernatural Kinds, and the Incarnation: THOMAS D. SENOR. Religious Studies 27 (3):353-370.
    Thinking about God often leads to thinking about ‘God’. And it has never been completely clear how best to understand this little English word. Traditionally, ‘God’ has been taken to be either a description or a name. However, a third option has recently captured the attention of philosophical theologians. It is claimed that just as one should think of, say, ‘humanity’ as a kind term, so one should think of ‘God’, or perhaps ‘divinity’, as a kind term. But given the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  10
    Thomas D. Senor (2008). In Defense of Serious Externalism. Southwest Philosophy Review 24 (1):1-12.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  51
    Thomas Senor (2012). Body and Soul. The Philosophers' Magazine 57 (57):113-114.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Thomas D. Senor (1995). Charles Taliaferro, Consciousness and the Mind of God Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 15 (6):428-430.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  8
    Thomas D. Senor (2006). Goodness Needs No Privilege. Faith and Philosophy 23 (4):423-431.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39.  25
    Thomas Senor (2012). Rationality and Religious Commitment by Robert Audi (Oxford University Press), $45/£ 25. The Philosophers' Magazine 57:113-114.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Thomas D. Senor (1995). JL Schellenberg, Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 15 (1):63-65.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  41
    Thomas D. Senor (1995). Warrant. Review of Metaphysics 48 (4):925-926.
  42.  65
    Thomas D. Senor, Epistemological Problems of Memory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  43.  16
    Thomas D. Senor (2007). The Compositional Account of the Incarnation. Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):52-71.
    In a pair of recent articles, Brian Leftow and Eleonore Stump offer independent, although similar, accounts of the metaphysics of the Incarnation. Both believe that their Aquinas-inspired theories can offer solutions to the kind of Leibniz’s Law problems that can seem to threaten the logical possibility of this traditional Christian doctrine. In this paper, I’ll have a look at their compositional account of the nature of God incarnate. In the end, I believe their position can be seen to have unacceptable (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  21
    Thomas D. Senor (1990). Incarnation and Timelessness. Faith and Philosophy 7 (2):149-164.
    In this paper I present and defend two arguments which purport to show that the doctrines of timelessness and the Incarnation are incompatible. An argument similar to the first argument I consider is briefly discussed by Stump and Kretzmann in their paper "Eternity." I argue that their treatment of this type of objection is inadequate. The second argument I present is, as far as I know, original; it depends on a certain subtlety in the doctrine of the Incarnation, viz., that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  6
    Thomas D. Senor (2007). The Compositional Account of the Incarnation. Faith and Philosophy 24 (1):52-71.
    In a pair of recent articles, Brian Leftow and Eleonore Stump offer independent, although similar, accounts of the metaphysics of the Incarnation. Both believe that their Aquinas-inspired theories can offer solutions to the kind of Leibniz’s Law problems that can seem to threaten the logical possibility of this traditional Christian doctrine. In this paper, I’ll have a look at their compositional account of the nature of God incarnate. In the end, I believe their position can be seen to have unacceptable (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. William P. Alston & Thomas D. Senor (1995). The Rationality of Belief & the Plurality of Faith Essays in Honor of William P. Alston. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
  47. Thomas Senor (1995). Charles Taliaferro, Consciousness and the Mind of God. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 15:428-430.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Thomas Senor (1995). J.L. Schellenberg, Divine Hiddenness And Human Reason. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 15:63-65.
  49. Thomas D. Senor (1995). Review of J.L. Schellenberg's Human Reason and the Hiddenness of God. [REVIEW] Canadian Philosophical Reviews (I):63-65.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Thomas D. Senor (1995). Review of Warrant: The Current Debate and Warrant and Proper Function. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics:925-26.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 52