Search results for 'Overgaard Morten' (try it on Scholar)

256 found
Sort by:
  1. Morten Overgaard (2004). On the Naturalizing of Phenomenology. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (4):365-79.score: 300.0
    In the attempt to construct a scientific approach to consciousness, it has been proposed that transcendental phenomenology or phenomenological psychology be introduced into the framework of cognitive neuroscience. In this article, the consequences of such an approach in terms of basic assumptions, methods for the collection of data, and evaluation of the collected data are discussed. Especially, the proposed notions of mutual constraint and the second perso are discussed. It is concluded that even though naturalising of phenomenology might not prove (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Morten Overgaard & Mads Jensen (eds.) (2012). Consciousness and Neural Plasticity. Frontiers Books.score: 300.0
  3. Morten Overgaard (2006). Introspection in Science. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (4):629-633.score: 300.0
  4. Thomas Zoega Ramsøy & Morten Overgaard (2004). Introspection and Subliminal Perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (1):1-23.score: 300.0
    Subliminal perception (SP) is today considered a well-supported theory stating that perception can occur without conscious awareness and have a significant impact on later behaviour and thought. In this article, we first present and discuss different approaches to the study of SP. In doing this, we claim that most approaches are based on a dichotomic measure of awareness. Drawing upon recent advances and discussions in the study of introspection and phenomenological psychology, we argue for both the possibility and necessity of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Anil K. Seth, Zoltan Dienes, Axel Cleeremans, Morten Overgaard & Luiz Pessoa (2008). Measuring Consciousness: Relating Behavioural and Neurophysiological Approaches. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (8):314-321.score: 300.0
  6. Morten Overgaard (2006). Consciousness Studies: The View From Psychology. [REVIEW] British Journal of Psychology 97 (3):425-438.score: 300.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Morten Overgaard, Mika Koivisto, Thomas Alrik Sorensen, Signe Vangkilde & Antti Revonsuo (2006). The Electrophysiology of Introspection. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (4):662-672.score: 300.0
  8. Morten Overgaard (2004). Confounding Factors in Contrastive Analysis. Synthese 141 (2):217-31.score: 300.0
    Several authors within psychology, neuroscience and philosophy take for granted that standard empirical research techniques are applicable when studying consciousness. In this article, it is discussed whether one of the key methods in cognitive neuroscience – the contrastive analysis – suffers from any serious confounding when applied to the field of consciousness studies; that is to say, if there are any systematic difficulties when studying consciousness with this method that make the results untrustworthy. Through an analysis of theoretical arguments in (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Morten Overgaard, Jorgen Feldbaek Nielsen & Anders Fuglsang-Frederiksen (2004). A TMS Study of the Ventral Projections From V1 with Implications for the Finding of Neural Correlates of Consciousness. Brain and Cognition 54 (1):58-64.score: 300.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Morten Overgaard, Julian Rote, Kim Mouridsen & Thomas Zoega Ramsoy (2006). Is Conscious Perception Gradual or Dichotomous? A Comparison of Report Methodologies During a Visual Task. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (4):700-708.score: 300.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Morten Overgaard (2001). The Role of Phenomenological Reports in Experiments on Consciousness. Psycoloquy 12 (29):1-10.score: 300.0
  12. Morten Overgaard (2004). Special Issue on the Return of Subjectivity Edited by Dan Zahavi. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3:399-400.score: 300.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Morten Overgaard & T. A. Sorenson (2004). Introspection Distinct From First-Order Experiences. Journal of Consciousness Studies 11 (7-8):11--7.score: 300.0
  14. Morten Overgaard & Thor Grünbaum (2011). Consciousness and Modality: On the Possible Preserved Visual Consciousness in Blindsight Subjects. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1855-1859.score: 300.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Morten Overgaard, Bert Timmermans, Kristian Sandberg & Axel Cleeremans (2010). Optimizing Subjective Measures of Consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (2):682-684.score: 300.0
    Dienes and Seth (2010) conclude that confidence ratings and post-decision wagering are two comparable and recommendable measures of conscious experience. In a recently submitted paper, we have however found that both methods are problematic and seem less suited to measure consciousness than a direct introspective measure. Here, we discuss the methodology and conclusions put forward by Dienes and Seth, and why we think the two experiments end up with so different recommendations.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Morten Overgaard, Problems in the "Functional" Investigations of Consciousness.score: 300.0
    This article presents the view that the “problem of consciousness” – per definition – can not be seen as a strictly scientific or strictly philosophical problem. The first idea, especially, leads to important difficulties: First of all, the idea has in most cases implied some rather superficial reductionistic or functionalistic a priori assumptions, and, secondly, it can be shown that some of the most commonly used empirical methods in these regards are inadequate. Especially so in the case of contrastive analysis, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Bert Timmermans, Kristian Sandberg, Axel Cleeremans & Morten Overgaard (2010). Partial Awareness Distinguishes Between Measuring Conscious Perception and Conscious Content: Reply to Dienes and Seth. Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1081-1083.score: 300.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Mikkel C. Vinding, Michael N. Pedersen & Morten Overgaard (2013). Unravelling Intention: Distal Intentions Increase the Subjective Sense of Agency. Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):810-815.score: 300.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Morten Overgaard & Thor Grünbaum (2012). Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Conceptions of Consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (3):137.score: 300.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. [deleted]Mads Jensen & Morten Overgaard (2011). Neural Plasticity and Consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology 2:191-191.score: 300.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Kristian Sandberg, Bert Timmermans, Morten Overgaard & Axel Cleeremans (2010). Measuring Consciousness: Is One Measure Better Than the Other? Consciousness and Cognition 19 (4):1069-1078.score: 300.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Kristian Sandberg, Bo Martin Bibby, Bert Timmermans, Axel Cleeremans & Morten Overgaard (2011). Measuring Consciousness: Task Accuracy and Awareness as Sigmoid Functions of Stimulus Duration. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1659-1675.score: 300.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Morten Overgaard & Rikke Overgaard (2010). Neural Correlates of Contents and Levels of Consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology 1:164.score: 300.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Morten Overgaard & Soeren Willert (2003). On the Encompassing of the Behaviour of Man. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):615-616.score: 300.0
    One supposition underlying the Anderson & Lebiere (A&L) target article is that the maximally broad “encompassing of its subject matter – the behavior of man” (cf. sect. 6, last para.) is regarded as an unquestioned quality criterion for guiding cognitive research. One might argue for an explicit specification of the limitations of a given paradigm, rather than extending it to apply to as many domains as possible.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Morten Overgaard (2011). Visual Experience and Blindsight: A Methodological Review. Experimental Brain Research 209:473-479.score: 300.0
    Blindsight is classically defined as residual visual capacity, e.g., to detect and identify visual stimuli, in the total absence of perceptual awareness following lesions to V1. However, whereas most experiments have investigated what blindsight patients can and cannot do, the literature contains several, often contradictory, remarks about remaining visual experience. This review examines closer these remarks as well as experiments that directly approach the nature of possibly spared visual experiences in blindsight.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Kristian Sandberg, Bo Martin Bibby & Morten Overgaard (2013). Measuring and Testing Awareness of Emotional Face Expressions. Consciousness and Cognition 22 (3):806-809.score: 300.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Shaun Gallagher & Morten Overgaard (2005). Introspections Without Introspeculations. In Murat Aydede (ed.), Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. Cambridge Ma: Bradford Book/Mit Press.score: 300.0
  28. [deleted]John Michael, Kristian Sandberg, Joshua Skewes, Thomas Wolf, Jakob Blicher, Morten Overgaard & Chris Frith (2014). Unconvincing Statistical and Functional Inferences: Reply to Catmur. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8.score: 300.0
  29. Morten Overgaard & Jesper Mogensen (2011). A Framework for the Study of Multiple Realizations: The Importance of Levels of Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 2.score: 300.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Morten Overgaard (2003). Voluntary Action. Science and Consciousness Review 8:1-2.score: 300.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. [deleted]Kristian Sandberg, Lau M. Andersen & Morten Overgaard (2014). Using Multivariate Decoding to Go Beyond Contrastive Analyses in Consciousness Research. Frontiers in Psychology 5.score: 300.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Overgaard Morten (2008). An Integration of First-Person Methodologies in Cognitive Science. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15 (5):100-120.score: 240.0
    A number of recent publications have argued that a scientific approach to consciousness needs a rigorous approach to first-person data collection. As mainstream experimental psychology has long abandoned such introspective or phenomenological method, there is at present no generally agreed upon method for first-person data collection in experimental consciousness studies. There are, however, a number of recent articles that all claim to provide a unique contribution to such a methodology. This article reviews these suggestions and extracts their core features. It (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Murat Aydede & Donald D. Price (2005). Introspection and Unrevisability: Reply to Commentaries. In , Pain: New Essays on its Nature and the Methodology of its Study. Cambridge Ma: Bradford Book/Mit Press.score: 60.0
  34. Søren Overgaard & Joel Krueger, Seeing Subjectivity: Defending a Perceptual Account of Other Minds.score: 30.0
    The problem of other minds has a distinguished philosophical history stretching back more than two hundred years. Taken at face value, it is an epistemological question: it concerns how we can have knowledge of, or at least justified belief in, the existence of minds other than our own. In recent decades, philosophers, psychologists, neuroscientists, anthropologists and primatologists have debated a related question: how we actually go about attributing mental states to others (regardless of whether we ever achieve knowledge or rational (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Joel Krueger & Søren Overgaard (forthcoming). Seeing Subjectivity: Defending a Perceptual Account of Other Minds. Protosociology.score: 30.0
    The problem of other minds has a distinguished philosophical history stretching back more than two hundred years. Taken at face value, it is an epistemological question: it concerns how we can have knowledge of, or at least justified belief in, the existence of minds other than our own. In recent decades, philosophers, psychologists, neuroscientists, anthropologists and primatologists have debated a related question: how we actually go about attributing mental states to others (regardless of whether we ever achieve knowledge or rational (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Søren Overgaard (2006). The Problem of Other Minds: Wittgenstein's Phenomenological Perspective. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 5 (1):53-73.score: 30.0
    This paper discusses Wittgenstein's take on the problem of other minds. In opposition to certain widespread views that I collect under the heading of the “No Problem Interpretation,” I argue that Wittgenstein does address some problem of other minds. However, Wittgenstein's problem is not the traditional epistemological problem of other minds; rather, it is more reminiscent of the issue of intersubjectivity as it emerges in the writings of phenomenologists such as Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, and Heidegger. This is one sense in which (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Dan Zahavi & Søren Overgaard, Phenomenological Sociology - the Subjectivity of Everyday Life.score: 30.0
    In Jacobsen, M.H. (ed.): Sociologies of the Unnoticed. Palgrave/Macmillan, 2008.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Søren Overgaard (2005). Rethinking Other Minds: Wittgenstein and Levinas on Expression. Inquiry 48 (3):249 – 274.score: 30.0
    One reason why the problem of other minds keeps cropping up in modern philosophy is that we seem to have conflicting intuitions about our access to the mental lives of others. On the one hand, we are inclined to think that it is wrong to claim, like Cartesian dualists must, that the minds of others are essentially inaccessible to direct experience. But on the other hand we feel that it is equally wrong to claim, like the behaviorists, that the mental (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Søren Overgaard (2008). How to Analyze Immediate Experience:. Hintikka, Husserl, and the Idea of Phenomenology. Metaphilosophy 39 (3):282–304.score: 30.0
    This article discusses Jaakko Hintikka's interpretation of the aims and method of Husserl's phenomenology. I argue that Hintikka misrepresents Husserl's phenomenology on certain crucial points. More specifically, Hintikka misconstrues Husserl's notion of "immediate experience" and consequently fails to grasp the functions of the central methodological tools known as the "epoché" and the "phenomenological reduction." The result is that the conception of phenomenology he attributes to Husserl is very far from realizing the philosophical potential of Husserl's position. Hence if we want (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Søren Overgaard (2010). On the Looks of Things. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91 (2):260-284.score: 30.0
    In recent publications, Michael Tye and Alva Noë have claimed that there is a sense in which a tilted plate looks round and another sense in which it looks elliptical. This paper argues that their proposal faces decisive objections. On Tye and Noë's account of ordinary, veridical perception, appearances are in constant conflict. As a characterization of ordinary visual experience, this cannot be correct. I examine various responses to this criticism, and conclude that they all fail. I then argue that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Søren Overgaard (2011). Disjunctivism and the Urgency of Scepticism. Philosophical Explorations 14 (1):5-21.score: 30.0
  42. Søren Overgaard (2003). Heidegger's Early Critique of Husserl. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (2):157 – 175.score: 30.0
    This paper examines Heidegger's critique of Husserl in its earliest extant formulation, viz. the lecture courses Ontologie from 1923 and Einführung in die phänomenologische Forschung from 1923/4. Commentators frequently ignore these lectures, but I try to show that a study of them can reveal both the extent to which Heidegger remains committed to phenomenological research in something like its Husserlian form, and when and why Heidegger must part with Husserl. More specifically, I claim that Heidegger rightly criticizes Husserl's account of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Søren Overgaard (2004). Exposing the Conjuring Trick: Wittgenstein on Subjectivity. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (3):263-286.score: 30.0
    Since the publication of the Philosophical Investigations in 1953, Wittgenstein''s later philosophy of mind has been the subject of numerous books and articles. Although most commentators agree that Wittgenstein was neither a behaviorist nor a Cartesian dualist, many continue to ascribe to him a position that strongly resembles one of the alternatives. In contrast, this paper argues that Wittgenstein was strongly opposed to behaviorism and Cartesianism, and that he was concerned to show that these positions implicitly share a problematic assumption. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Søren Overgaard (2004). Husserl and Heidegger on Being in the World. Kluwer Academic Publishers.score: 30.0
    It is a study of the phenomenological philosophies of Husserl and Heidegger. Through a critical discussion including practically all previously published English and German literature on the subject, the aim is to present a thorough and evenhanded account of the relation between the two. The book provides a detailed presentation of their respective projects and methods, and examines several of their key phenomenological analyses, centering on the phenomenon of being-in-the-world. It offers new perspectives on Husserlian and Heideggerian phenomenology, e.g. concerning (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Søren Overgaard (2011). Movement is Our Mother Tongue. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (1):139-143.score: 30.0
  46. Søren Overgaard (2010). Ordinary Experience and the Epoché: Husserl and Heidegger Versus Rosen (and Cavell). [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):307-330.score: 30.0
    In various publications, Stanley Cavell and Stanley Rosen have emphasized the philosophical importance of what they both call the ordinary. They both contrast their recovery of the ordinary with traditional philosophy, including the phenomenological philosophy of Edmund Husserl. In this paper, I address Rosen’s claims in particular. I argue that Rosen turns the real situation on its head. Contra Rosen, it is not the case that the employment of Husserl’s epoché distorts the authentic voice of the ordinary—a voice that is (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Søren Overgaard (2002). Epoché and Solipsistic Reduction. Husserl Studies 18 (3):209-222.score: 30.0
  48. Søren Overgaard & Joel Krueger (2013). Social Perception and “Spectator Theories” of Other Minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (4):434 - 435.score: 30.0
    We resist Schilbach et al.’s characterization of the “social perception” approach to social cognition as a “spectator theory” of other minds. We show how the social perception view acknowledges the crucial role interaction plays in enabling social understanding. We also highlight a dilemma Schilbach et al. face in attempting to distinguish their second person approach from the social perception view.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Søren Overgaard (2009). S. Taguchi, Das Problem Des 'Ur-Ich' Bei Edmund Husserl: Die Frage Nach der Selbstverständlichen 'Nähe' Des Selbst. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 25 (1):89-95.score: 30.0
  50. Søren Overgaard (2011). Royaumont Revisited. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):899-924.score: 30.0
    Michael Dummett has claimed that the only way to establish communication between the analytic and Continental schools of philosophy is to go back to their point of divergence in Frege and the early Husserl. In this paper, I try to show that Dummett's claim is false. I examine in detail the discussions at the infamous 1958 Royaumont Colloquium on analytic philosophy. Many ? including Dummett ? believe that these discussions underscore the futility of attempting to bridge the gap between Continental (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 256