Search results for 'Quantities' (try it on Scholar)

576 found
Order:
See also:
Bibliography: Quantities in Metaphysics
  1.  40
    Zee Perry, Intensive and Extensive Quantities.
    Quantities are properties and relations which exhibit "quantitative structure". For physical quantities, this structure can impact the non-quantitative world in different ways. In this paper I introduce and motivate a novel distinction between quantities based on the way their quantitative structure constrains the possible mereological structure of their instances. Specifically, I identify a category of “properly extensive” quantities, which are a proper sub-class of the additive or extensive quantities. I present and motivate this distinction using (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Jennifer McRobert, Kant on Negative Quantities, Real Opposition and Inertia.
    Kant's obscure essay entitled An Attempt to Introduce the Concept of Negative Quantities into Philosophy has received virtually no attention in the Kant literature. The essay has been in English translation for over twenty years, though not widely available. In his original 1983 translation, Gordon Treash argues that the Negative Quantities essay should be understood as part of an ongoing response to the philosophy of Christian Wolff. Like Hoffmann and Crusius before him, the Kant of 1763 is at (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  9
    Angelo Gilio & Giuseppe Sanfilippo (2014). Conditional Random Quantities and Compounds of Conditionals. Studia Logica 102 (4):709-729.
    In this paper we consider conditional random quantities (c.r.q.’s) in the setting of coherence. Based on betting scheme, a c.r.q. X|H is not looked at as a restriction but, in a more extended way, as \({XH + \mathbb{P}(X|H)H^c}\) ; in particular (the indicator of) a conditional event E|H is looked at as EH + P(E|H)H c . This extended notion of c.r.q. allows algebraic developments among c.r.q.’s even if the conditioning events are different; then, for instance, we can give (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  72
    Zee R. Perry (2015). Properly Extensive Quantities. Philosophy of Science 82 (5):833-844.
    This article introduces and motivates the notion of a “properly extensive” quantity by means of a puzzle about the reliability of certain canonical length measurements. An account of these measurements’ success, I argue, requires a modally robust connection between quantitative structure and mereology that is not mediated by the dynamics and is stronger than the constraints imposed by “mere additivity.” I outline what it means to say that length is not just extensive but properly so and then briefly sketch an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  33
    Patrick Suppes (1951). A Set of Independent Axioms for Extensive Quantities. Portugaliae Mathematica 10 (4):163-172.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  6. Paola Cantù (2010). Aristotle's Prohibition Rule on Kind-Crossing and the Definition of Mathematics as a Science of Quantities. Synthese 174 (2):225 - 235.
    The article evaluates the Domain Postulate of the Classical Model of Science and the related Aristotelian prohibition rule on kind-crossing as interpretative tools in the history of the development of mathematics into a general science of quantities. Special reference is made to Proclus’ commentary to Euclid’s first book of Elements , to the sixteenth century translations of Euclid’s work into Latin and to the works of Stevin, Wallis, Viète and Descartes. The prohibition rule on kind-crossing formulated by Aristotle in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  7. Yuri Balashov (1999). Zero-Value Physical Quantities. Synthese 119 (3):253-286.
    To state an important fact about the photon, physicists use such expressions as (1) “the photon has zero (null, vanishing) mass” and (2) “the photon is (a) massless (particle)” interchangeably. Both (1) and (2) express the fact that the photon has no non-zero mass. However, statements (1) and (2) disagree about a further fact: (1) attributes to the photon the property of zero-masshood whereas (2) denies that the photon has any mass at all. But is there really a difference between (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  8.  37
    Joongol Kim (2016). What Are Quantities? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (4):792-807.
    ABSTRACTThis paper presents a view of quantities as ‘adverbial’ entities of a certain kind—more specifically, determinate ways, or modes, of having length, mass, speed, and the like. In doing so, it will be argued that quantities as such should be distinguished from quantitative properties or relations, and are not universals but are particulars, although they are not objects, either. A main advantage of the adverbial view over its rivals will be found in its superior explanatory power with respect (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Daniel Nolan (2008). Finite Quantities. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 108 (1part1):23-42.
    Quantum Mechanics, and apparently its successors, claim that there are minimum quantities by which objects can differ, at least in some situations: electrons can have various “energy levels” in an atom, but to move from one to another they must jump rather than move via continuous variation: and an electron in a hydrogen atom going from -13.6 eV of energy to -3.4 eV does not pass through states of -10eV or -5.1eV, let along -11.1111115637 eV or -4.89712384 eV.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. Hans Halvorson (2001). On the Nature of Continuous Physical Quantities in Classical and Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (1):27-50.
    Within the traditional Hilbert space formalism of quantum mechanics, it is not possible to describe a particle as possessing, simultaneously, a sharp position value and a sharp momentum value. Is it possible, though, to describe a particle as possessing just a sharp position value (or just a sharp momentum value)? Some, such as Teller, have thought that the answer to this question is No - that the status of individual continuous quantities is very different in quantum mechanics than in (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11.  83
    Jeremy Butterfield, On Symmetry and Conserved Quantities in Classical Mechanics.
    This paper expounds the relations between continuous symmetries and conserved quantities, i.e. Noether's ``first theorem'', in both the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian frameworks for classical mechanics. This illustrates one of mechanics' grand themes: exploiting a symmetry so as to reduce the number of variables needed to treat a problem. I emphasise that, for both frameworks, the theorem is underpinned by the idea of cyclic coordinates; and that the Hamiltonian theorem is more powerful. The Lagrangian theorem's main ``ingredient'', apart from cyclic (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  12. Hans Halvorson (2001). On the Nature of Continuous Physical Quantities in Classical and Quantum Mechanics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (1):27-50.
    Within the traditional Hilbert space formalism of quantum mechanics, it is not possible to describe a particle as possessing, simultaneously, a sharp position value and a sharp momentum value. Is it possible, though, to describe a particle as possessing just a sharp position value (or just a sharp momentum value)? Some, such as Teller, have thought that the answer to this question is No - that the status of individual continuous quantities is very different in quantum mechanics than in (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13.  45
    Henry E. Kyburg Jr (1997). Quantities, Magnitudes, and Numbers. Philosophy of Science 64 (3):377-410.
    Quantities are naturally viewed as functions, whose arguments may be construed as situations, events, objects, etc. We explore the question of the range of these functions: should it be construed as the real numbers (or some subset thereof)? This is Carnap's view. It has attractive features, specifically, what Carnap views as ontological economy. Or should the range of a quantity be a set of magnitudes? This may have been Helmholtz's view, and it, too, has attractive features. It reveals the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14. Mark Sharlow, Generalizing the Algebra of Physical Quantities.
    In this paper, I define and study an abstract algebraic structure, the dimensive algebra, which embodies the most general features of the algebra of dimensional physical quantities. I prove some elementary results about dimensive algebras and suggest some directions for future work.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. I. Pitowsky, On Symmetry and Conserved Quantities in Classical Mechanics.
    This paper expounds the relations between continuous symmetries and conserved quantities, i.e. Noether’s “first theorem”, in both the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian frameworks for classical mechanics. This illustrates one of mechanics’ grand themes: exploiting a symmetry so as to reduce the number of variables needed to treat a problem. I emphasise that, for both frameworks, the theorem is underpinned by the idea of cyclic coordinates; and that the Hamiltonian theorem is more powerful. The Lagrangian theorem’s main “ingredient”, apart from cyclic (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  39
    Tomislav Ivezić (2006). Four-Dimensional Geometric Quantities Versus the Usual Three-Dimensional Quantities: The Resolution of Jackson's Paradox. [REVIEW] Foundations of Physics 36 (10):1511-1534.
    In this paper we present definitions of different four-dimensional (4D) geometric quantities (Clifford multivectors). New decompositions of the torque N and the angular momentum M (bivectors) into 1-vectors Ns, Nt and Ms, Mt, respectively, are given. The torques Ns, Nt (the angular momentums Ms, Mt), taken together, contain the same physical information as the bivector N (the bivector M). The usual approaches that deal with the 3D quantities $\varvec{E,\,B,\,F,\,L,\,N}$ etc. and their transformations are objected from the viewpoint of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  49
    Bob Hale (2002). Real Numbers, Quantities, and Measurement. Philosophia Mathematica 10 (3):304-323.
    Defining the real numbers by abstraction as ratios of quantities gives prominence to then- applications in just the way that Frege thought we should. But if all the reals are to be obtained in this way, it is necessary to presuppose a rich domain of quantities of a land we cannot reasonably assume to be exemplified by any physical or other empirically measurable quantities. In consequence, an explanation of the applications of the reals, defined in this way, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  57
    Kathleen C. Cook (1975). On the Usefulness of Quantities. Synthese 31 (3-4):443 - 457.
    I have argued that there is a philosophical problem posed by a need to determine the reference of expressions which seem to refer to kinds of stuff or matter and to make identity claims about it (e.g., ‘the gold’, ‘the same clay’). Ordinary sortal expressions such as ‘lump’, and ‘piece’ have been shown to be inadequate to the task of providing reference for the expressions in question. What is necessary is an expression which does not have an ordinary sortal use (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  17
    Fred Ablondi (2012). On the Ghosts of Departed Quantities. Metascience 21 (3):681-683.
    On the ghosts of departed quantities Content Type Journal Article Category Book Review Pages 1-3 DOI 10.1007/s11016-011-9606-5 Authors Fred Ablondi, Department of Philosophy, Hendrix College, Conway, AR, USA Journal Metascience Online ISSN 1467-9981 Print ISSN 0815-0796.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  8
    Antonina Kowalska (2008). Quantities Enduring in Time. Dialogue and Universalism 18 (9-10):27-38.
    Despite changeability of the world, the human mind also ponders on those quantities that remain constant over time. This was the case in ancient times, in the middle ages, and the same applies in modern physics. This paper discusses i.a. Zenon paradoxes, the principle of inertia, and the Emma Noether theorem, ending with the modern, so-called Zeno’s quantum effect. The foot-notes concern the ancient “Achilles” paradox, spot speed, as well as some of the facts taken out of the life-history (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  9
    Julian Reiss (2001). Natural Economic Quantities and Their Measurement. Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (2):287-311.
    This paper discusses and develops an important distinction drawn by Jevons, viz . that between natural and fictitious quantities. This distinction provides a basis for a theory of economic concept formation that aims at picking out families of models that are phenomenally adequate, explanatory and exact simultaneously. Essentially, the theory demands of an economic quantity to be natural that (1) it is explained by a causal model, (2) it is measurable and (3) the measurement procedure is justified. The proposed (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  35
    Amanda Brandone, Andrei Cimpian, Sarah-Jane Leslie & Susan Gelman (2012). Do Lions Have Manes? For Children, Generics Are About Kinds, Not Quantities. Child Development 83:423-433.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  23.  12
    Chantal Roggeman, Tom Verguts & Wim Fias (2007). Priming Reveals Differential Coding of Symbolic and Non-Symbolic Quantities. Cognition 105 (2):380-394.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  24. M. Eddon (2007). Armstrong on Quantities and Resemblance. Philosophical Studies 136 (3):385 - 404.
    Resemblances obtain not only between objects but between properties. Resemblances of the latter sort - in particular resemblances between quantitative properties - prove to be the downfall of a well-known theory of universals, namely the one presented by David Armstrong. This paper examines Armstrong's efforts to account for such resemblances within the framework of his theory and also explores several extensions of that theory. All of them fail.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  25.  43
    D. M. Armstrong (1988). Are Quantities Relations? A Reply to Bigelow and Pargetter. Philosophical Studies 54 (3):305 - 316.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  26.  53
    Phil Dowe (1995). Causality and Conserved Quantities: A Reply to Salmon. Philosophy of Science 62 (2):321-333.
    In a recent paper (1994) Wesley Salmon has replied to criticisms (e.g., Dowe 1992c, Kitcher 1989) of his (1984) theory of causality, and has offered a revised theory which, he argues, is not open to those criticisms. The key change concerns the characterization of causal processes, where Salmon has traded "the capacity for mark transmission" for "the transmission of an invariant quantity." Salmon argues against the view presented in Dowe (1992c), namely that the concept of "possession of a conserved quantity" (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  27.  76
    Jonathan Riley (1993). On Quantities and Qualities of Pleasure. Utilitas 5 (2):291.
  28. Helen Morris Cartwright (1970). Quantities. Philosophical Review 79 (1):25-42.
  29.  91
    John Forge (1999). Laws of Nature as Relations Between Quantities? In Howard Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature. Kluwer 111--124.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  90
    Noam Agmon (1977). Relativistic Transformations of Thermodynamic Quantities. Foundations of Physics 7 (5-6):331-339.
    A unique solution is proposed to the problem of how thermodynamic processes between thermodynamic systems at relative rest “appear” to a moving observer. Assuming only transformations for entropy, pressure, and volume and the invariance of the “fundamental thermodynamic equation,” one can derive transformations for (thermodynamic) energy and temperature. The invariance of the first and second laws entails transformations for work and heat. All thermodynamic relations become Lorentz-invariant. The transformations thus derived are in principle equivalent to those of Einstein and Planck, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. G. Boniolo, R. Faraldo & A. Saggion (2011). Explicating the Notion of Causation: The Role of Extensive Quantities. In Phyllis McKay Illari, Federica Russo & Jon Williamson (eds.), Causality in the Sciences. Oxford University Press 502--525.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32. John Bigelow, Robert Pargetter & D. M. Armstrong (1988). Quantities. Philosophical Studies 54 (3):287 - 304.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  33.  18
    Linda M. Moxey & Anthony J. Sanford (1993). Communicating Quantities: A Psychological Perspective (Essays in Cognitive Psychology). Psychology Press.
  34.  15
    Aaron M. Scherer, Paul D. Windschitl, Jillian O'Rourke & Andrew R. Smith (2012). Hoping for More: The Influence of Outcome Desirability on Information Seeking and Predictions About Relative Quantities. Cognition 125 (1):113-117.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  41
    Paul Teller (1979). Quantum Mechanics and the Nature of Continuous Physical Quantities. Journal of Philosophy 76 (7):345-361.
  36.  64
    Sébastien Gandon (2008). Which Arithmetization for Which Logicism? Russell on Relations and Quantities in The Principles of Mathematics. History and Philosophy of Logic 29 (1):1-30.
    This article aims first at showing that Russell's general doctrine according to which all mathematics is deducible 'by logical principles from logical principles' does not require a preliminary reduction of all mathematics to arithmetic. In the Principles, mechanics (part VII), geometry (part VI), analysis (part IV-V) and magnitude theory (part III) are to be all directly derived from the theory of relations, without being first reduced to arithmetic (part II). The epistemological importance of this point cannot be overestimated: Russell's logicism (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  14
    I. Grattan-Guinness (1976). Fuzzy Membership Mapped Onto Intervals and Many-Valued Quantities. Zeitschrift fur mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik 22 (1):149-160.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  18
    Axel Mecklinger, Christian Frings & Timm Rosburg (2012). Response to Paller Et Al. : The Role of Familiarity in Making Inferences About Unknown Quantities. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (6):315-316.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  18
    E. A. Sonnenschein (1913). Hidden Quantities. The Classical Review 27 (03):84-.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  22
    Helen De Cruz (2004). Why Humans Can Count Large Quantities Accurately. Philosophica 74.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  10
    E. A. Sonnenschein (1912). Hidden Quantities. The Classical Review 26 (3):78-80.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  10
    Paola Cantù (2010). Aristotle’s Prohibition Rule on Kind-Crossing and the Definition of Mathematics as a Science of Quantities. Synthese 174 (2):225-235.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  39
    John Forge (1995). Bigelow and Pargetter on Quantities. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 73 (4):594 – 605.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  44.  13
    Charles M. Stewart (1903). A Note on the Quantities Given in Dr. Marloth's Paper “on the Moisture Deposited From the South-East Clouds”. Transactions of the South African Philosophical Society 14 (1):413-417.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  2
    Elizabeth M. Brannon Kerry E. Jordan, Evan L. MacLean (2008). Monkeys Match and Tally Quantities Across Senses. Cognition 108 (3):617.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  5
    Bart Geurts (1997). Linda M. Moxey and Anthony J. Sanford: Communicating Quantities. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove (UK)/Hillsdale (USA), 1993. Pp. Xii+ 144.£ 19.95/$37.50 (Hardback). [REVIEW] Journal of Semantics 14:87-94.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  47.  1
    Kerry E. Jordan, Evan L. MacLean & Elizabeth M. Brannon (2008). Monkeys Match and Tally Quantities Across Senses. Cognition 108 (3):617-625.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48.  18
    Terhi Mäntylä & Ismo T. Koponen (2007). Understanding the Role of Measurements in Creating Physical Quantities: A Case Study of Learning to Quantify Temperature in Physics Teacher Education. Science and Education 16 (3-5):291-311.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  9
    Robert E. Shaw & M. T. Turvey (1999). Ecological Foundations of Cognition. II: Degrees of Freedom and Conserved Quantities in Animal-Environment Systems. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (11-12):11-12.
    Cognition means different things to different psychologists depending on the position held on the mind-matter problem. Ecological psychologists reject the implied mind-matter dualism as an ill-posed theoretic problem because the assumed mind-matter incommensurability precludes a solution to the degrees of freedom problem. This fundamental problem was posed by both Nicolai Bernstein and James J. Gibson independently. It replaces mind-matter dualism with animal-environment duality -- a better posed scientific problem because commensurability is assured. Furthermore, when properly posed this way, a conservation (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  4
    Diego Romero-Maltrana (2015). Symmetries as by-Products of Conserved Quantities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52:358-368.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 576