Search results for 'Art Psychology' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  17
    Tone Roald (2008). Toward a Phenomenological Psychology of Art Appreciation. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 39 (2):189-212.
    Experiences with art have been of longstanding concern for phenomenologists, yet the psychological question of the appearing of art appreciation has not been addressed. This article attends to this lack, exemplifying the merits of a phenomenological psychological investigation based on three semi-structured interviews conducted with museum visitors. The interviews were subjected to meaning condensation as well as to descriptions of the first aesthetic reception, the retrospective interpretation, and the “horizons of expectations” included in the meeting with art. The findings show (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  16
    Robert L. Solso (2003). The Psychology of Art and the Evolution of the Conscious Brain. MIT Press.
    How did the human brain evolve so that consciousness of art could develop? In The Psychology of Art and the Evolution of the Conscious Brain, Robert Solso describes how a consciousness that evolved for other purposes perceives and creates art.Drawing on his earlier book Cognition and the Visual Arts and ten years of new findings in cognitive research, Solso shows that consciousness developed gradually, with distinct components that evolved over time. One of these components is an adaptive consciousness that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  3. Thomas Munro (1956). Art Education, its Philosophy and Psychology. New York, Liberal Arts Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  59
    Maria Pachalska (2006). The Psychology of Art and the Evolution of the Conscious Brain. [REVIEW] Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 194 (8):632-634.
  5. A. Seth Pringle-Pattison & Burnett Hillman Streeter (1919). The Spirit God and His Relation to Man Considered From the Standpoint of Philosophy, Psychology and Art. Macmillan.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  5
    Annelies Monseré (2016). The Charge From Psychology and Art's Definition. Theoria 82 (2).
    This article argues that the so-called Charge from Psychology does not refute the project of defining art. The charge entails that the project is misguided because it falsely presupposes that the concept of art is classically structured. The charge is challenged by distinguishing philosophers’ normative from psychologists’ descriptive aims. Unlike what many philosophers of art themselves believe, defining art is a normative project, since proposed definitions formulate conditions under which the concept of art should be applied, rather than is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  1
    Rudolf Arnheim (1967). Toward a Psychology of Art. Collected Essays. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (1):138-141.
    From the Introduction: The papers collected in this book are based on the assumption that art, as any other activity of the mind, is subject to psychology, accessible to understanding, and needed for any comprehensive survey of mental functioning. The author believes, furthermore, that the science of psychology is not limited to measurements under controlled laboratory conditions, but must comprise all attempts to obtain generalizations by means of facts as thoroughly established and concepts as well defined as the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  8.  1
    Rudolf Arnheim (1955). Art and Visual Perception, a Psychology of the Creative Eye. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 13 (3):411-412.
    Since its publication fifty years ago, this work has established itself as a classic. It casts the visual process in psychological terms and describes the creative way one's eye organizes visual material according to specific psychological premises. In 1974 this book was revised and expanded, and since then it has continued to burnish Rudolf Arnheim's reputation as a groundbreaking theoretician in the fields of art and psychology.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9. Katherine R. Allison, David Scott Arnold, Brian Hines, Thomas Madden, Mike McElroy, Linda E. Olds, Philip Rubinov Jacobson & Mary Jane Zimmerman (2009). Spheres of Awareness: A Wilberian Integral Approach to Literature, Philosophy, Psychology, and Art. Upa.
    This book moves toward building a new and more comprehensive theory of literature, philosophy, psychology, and art. The extremely popular work of Ken Wilber, unites the best of both western and eastern thought and affirms that the stages of consciousness, more refined than that of the reasoning mind, do exist.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  5
    Thomas J. Schoeneman, Shannon Brooks, Carla Gibson, Julia Routbort & Dieter Jacobs (1994). Seeing the Insane in Textbooks of Abnormal Psychology: The Uses of Art in Histories of Mental Illness. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 24 (2):111–141.
    Pictures in historical chapters of textbooks convey information about the values and assumptions of the authors’professions and the larger culture. We scrutinized 15 recent abnormal psychology textbooks for reproductions of art created before 1900. Thirteen works appeared in three or more textbooks. Overall, these pictures support a “Whiggish” account of history that celebrates the present and gives a distorted, incomplete rendering of the past. The 13 pictures tended to depict the mentally ill as an underclass who are released from (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11. William Cobb & James M. Edie (eds.) (1964). The Primacy of Perception: And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics. Northwestern University Press.
    _The Primacy of Perception_ brings together a number of important studies by Maurice Merleau-Ponty that appeared in various publications from 1947 to 1961. The title essay, which is in essence a presentation of the underlying thesis of his _Phenomenology of Perception,_ is followed by two courses given by Merleau-Ponty at the Sorbonne on phenomenological psychology. "Eye and Mind" and the concluding chapters present applications of Merleau-Ponty's ideas to the realms of art, philosophy of history, and politics. Taken together, the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. James Lough & Patricia Herron (eds.) (2009). Spheres of Awareness: A Wilberian Integral Approach to Literature, Philosophy, Psychology, and Art. Upa.
    This book moves toward building a new and more comprehensive theory of literature, philosophy, psychology, and art. The extremely popular work of Ken Wilber, unites the best of both western and eastern thought and affirms that the stages of consciousness, more refined than that of the reasoning mind, do exist.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Tone Roald (2015). The Subject of Aesthetics: A Psychology of Art and Experience. Brill | Rodopi.
    In _The Subject of Aesthetics_ Tone Roald develops a psychology of art based on people’s descriptions of their own engagement with visual art.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Robert L. Solso (2005). The Psychology of Art and the Evolution of the Conscious Brain. A Bradford Book.
    How did the human brain evolve so that consciousness of art could develop? In The Psychology of Art and the Evolution of the Conscious Brain, Robert Solso describes how a consciousness that evolved for other purposes perceives and creates art.Drawing on his earlier book Cognition and the Visual Arts and ten years of new findings in cognitive research, Solso shows that consciousness developed gradually, with distinct components that evolved over time. One of these components is an adaptive consciousness that (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Thomas Munro (1957). Art Education: Its Philosophy and Psychology. Selected Essays. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15 (4):489-490.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Logan J. Fox (1972). Psychology as Philosophy, Science, and Art. Pacific Palisades, Calif.,Goodyear Pub. Co..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17. Robert Morris Ogden (1940). The Psychology of Art. Philosophical Review 49 (6):682-684.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. E. H. Gombrich & Richard Woodfield (1996). Gombrich on Art and Psychology. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. André Malraux (1949). The Psychology of Art. London, A. Zwemmer.
    1. Museum without walls.--2. The creative act. -- 3. The Aftermath of the Absolute.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Rudolf Arnheim (1986). New Essays on the Psychology of Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (2):200-201.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  21.  6
    Ciaran Benson (2001). The Cultural Psychology of Self: Place, Morality and Art in Human Worlds. Routledge.
    Philosophers and psychologists both investigate the self, but often in isolation from one another. this book brings together studies by philosophers and psychologists in an exploration of the self and its function. It will be of interest to all those involved in philosophy, psychology and sociology.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  22.  1
    Rudolf Arnheim, David Barnett & R. W. Beardsmore (1973). Toward a Psychology of Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31 (3):421-421.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  23.  37
    João Pedro Fróis (2011). Introductory Note to “Contemporary Psychology and Art: Toward a Debate” by Lev S. Vygotsky. Journal of Aesthetic Education 45 (1):107-117.
    The importance of an author can be evaluated by the extent to which his theoretical contribution transforms a certain area of knowledge: major researchers create new vistas. This certainly applies to Lev Vygotsky (1896–1934), one of the most brilliant authors of contemporary psychology. His work, owing to its originality, is of epistemological interest to several areas of knowledge. In fact, Vygotsky was at the center of a historical time of change in twentieth-century Russia, in which Mikhail Bakhtin, Roman Jakobson, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  28
    Joseph Lyons (1967). Paleolithic Aesthetics: The Psychology of Cave Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 26 (1):107-114.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  26
    Michael A. Wallach (1959). Art, Science, and Representation: Toward an Experimental Psychology of Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 18 (2):159-173.
  26.  23
    Douglas N. Morgan (1950). Psychology and Art Today: A Summary and Critique. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 9 (2):81-96.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  14
    Thomas Munro (1948). Methods in the Psychology of Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 6 (3):225-235.
  28.  12
    Rudolf Arnheim (1952). Agenda for the Psychology of Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 10 (4):310-314.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  11
    Lucien Rudrauf (1954). The Morphology of Art and the Psychology of the Artist. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 13 (1):18-36.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  6
    Thomas Munro (1963). The Psychology of Art: Past, Present, Future. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 21 (3):263-282.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Ciaran Benson (2002). The Cultural Psychology of Self: Place, Morality and Art in Human Worlds. Routledge.
    Philosophers and psychologists both investigate the self, but often in isolation from one another. this book brings together studies by philosophers and psychologists in an exploration of the self and its function. It will be of interest to all those involved in philosophy, psychology and sociology.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Kurt Koffka (1940). Problems in the Psychology of Art. In Richard Bernheimer (ed.), Art: A Bryn Mawr Symposium. New York,Oriole Editions 180--273.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  16
    Maurice Merleau-Ponty (1964). The Primacy of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics. Northwestern University Press.
    This book consists of Northwestern University Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  34.  13
    E. I. (1939). The Psychology of Art. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 36 (23):639-640.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  12
    K. H. (1944). A Psychology of Art Creation. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 41 (3):83-83.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  14
    Wolfgang Huemer (2009). Experiencing Art: Austrian Aesthetics Between Psychology and Psychologism. In B. Centi & W. Huemer (eds.), Values and Ontology: Problems and Perspectives. Ontos 12--267.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  1
    Martin Robertson & E. H. Gombrich (1963). Art and Illusion: A Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. Journal of Hellenic Studies 83 (18):207.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  38.  9
    Nelson Goodman (1960). Art and Illusion; a Study in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 57 (18):595-599.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39. Rudolph Arnheim (1956). Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 16 (3):425-426.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  40.  48
    R. W. Pickford (1970). Dream-Work, Art-Work, and Sublimation in Relation to the Psychology of Art. British Journal of Aesthetics 10 (3):275-283.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  9
    Aline Groff Vivian & Jorge Trindade (2003). Psicologia E Arte: Um Paradigma Estético Dos Processos de Criação; Psychology and Art: An Aesthetic Model of the Creation Process. Aletheia 17:107-121.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  1
    Christoph Teschers (2015). The Art of Living and Positive Psychology in Dialogue. Educational Philosophy and Theory 47 (9):970-981.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  4
    Louis A. Moffett (1975). Art Objects as People: A New Paradigm for the Psychology of Art. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 5 (2):215–223.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  2
    Felix Alcan, Paul Claudel & Victor Basch (1939). Deuxième Congrès International d'Esthetique Et de Science de l'Art. 2 Vols. I. General Aesthetics., II. Psychology. III. Sociology. IV. History of Art. V. The Science of Art. VI. Contemporary Art. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 48 (2):225-226.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  4
    Michael Ann Holly (1989). The Psychology of Perspective and Renaissance Art. History of European Ideas 10 (3):383-384.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  4
    Listowel (1939). The Psychology of Art. By R. M. Ogden . (New York: Scribner's Sons. 1938. Pp. Xviii + 291. Price $2.50.). Philosophy 14 (56):482-.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  13
    James Sully (1876). Art and Psychology. Mind 1 (4):467-478.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  11
    W. Ray Crozier & Paul Greenhalgh (1992). The Empathy Principle: Towards a Model for the Psychology of Art. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22 (1):63–79.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  7
    S. Davies (2007). The Psychology of Art and the Evolution of the Conscious Brain. British Journal of Aesthetics 47 (1):97-99.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  3
    Claire Golomb (forthcoming). Rudolf Arnheim and the Psychology of Child Art. Journal of Aesthetic Education.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000