- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Results for 'Stephanie C. Goodhew'
(not author) ( search as author name )
1000+ found
Order:
- Translating experimental paradigms into individual-differences research: Contributions, challenges, and practical recommendations.Stephanie C. Goodhew & Mark Edwards - 2019 - Consciousness and Cognition 69:14-25.
- Both negative and positive task-irrelevant stimuli contract attentional breadth in individuals with high levels of negative affect.Stephanie C. Goodhew & Mark Edwards - 2022 - Cognition and Emotion 36 (2):317-331.
- Attentional control both helps and harms empathy.Stephanie C. Goodhew & Mark Edwards - 2021 - Cognition 206 (C):104505.
- Understanding recovery from object substitution masking.Stephanie C. Goodhew, Paul E. Dux, Ottmar V. Lipp & Troy A. W. Visser - 2012 - Cognition 122 (3):405-415.No categories
- Implicit semantic perception in object substitution masking.Stephanie C. Goodhew, Troy A. W. Visser, Ottmar V. Lipp & Paul E. Dux - 2011 - Cognition 118 (1):130-134.No categories
- Broad attention does not buffer the impact of emotionally salient stimuli on performance.Stephanie C. Goodhew & Mark Edwards - forthcoming - Cognition and Emotion.It has been claimed that a broad attentional breadth buffers the impact of negative stimuli on human perception and cognition. Here we identify issues with the research on which this claim is based, and then rigorously test the claim. To induce narrow versus broad attentional breadth participants attended to the local versus global elements of Navon stimuli, and to investigate the impact of emotionally salient stimuli on performance we measured the effect of task-irrelevant stimuli of varying emotional salience (negative, neutral, (...)
- Enhanced semantic priming in synesthetes independent of sensory binding.Stephanie C. Goodhew, Melissa R. Freire & Mark Edwards - 2015 - Consciousness and Cognition 33:443-456.
- Object individuation is invariant to attentional diffusion: Changes in the size of the attended region do not interact with object-substitution masking.Stephanie C. Goodhew & Mark Edwards - 2016 - Cognition 157 (C):358-364.No categories
- The relationship between the subjective experience of real-world cognitive failures and objective target-detection performance in visual search.Katherine J. Thomson & Stephanie C. Goodhew - 2021 - Cognition 217 (C):104914.
- Temporal dynamics of anxiety-related attentional bias: is affective context a missing piece of the puzzle?Jolene A. Cox, Bruce K. Christensen & Stephanie C. Goodhew - 2017 - Cognition and Emotion 32 (6):1329-1338.ABSTRACTPrevious research has demonstrated that anxious individuals attend to negative emotional information at the expense of other information. This is commonly referred to as attentional bias. The field has historically conceived of this process as relatively static; however, research by [Zvielli, A., Bernstein, A., & Koster, E. H. W.. Dynamics of attentional bias to threat in anxious adults: Bias towards and/or away? PLoS ONE, 9, e104025; Zvielli, A., Bernstein, A., & Koster, E. H. W.. Temporal dynamics of attentional bias. Clinical (...)
- A Framework for Unrestricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: Respecting and Enhancing the Autonomy of Prospective Parents.Stephanie C. Chen & David T. Wasserman - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (1):3-18.Noninvasive, prenatal whole genome sequencing may be a technological reality in the near future, making available a vast array of genetic information early in pregnancy at no risk to the fetus or mother. Many worry that the timing, safety, and ease of the test will lead to informational overload and reproductive consumerism. The prevailing response among commentators has been to restrict conditions eligible for testing based on medical severity, which imposes disputed value judgments and devalues those living with eligible conditions. (...)
- Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “A Framework for Unrestricted Prenatal Whole-Genome Sequencing: Respecting and Enhancing the Autonomy of Prospective Parents”.Stephanie C. Chen & David T. Wasserman - 2017 - American Journal of Bioethics 17 (1):1-3.Noninvasive, prenatal whole genome sequencing may be a technological reality in the near future, making available a vast array of genetic information early in pregnancy at no risk to the fetus or mother. Many worry that the timing, safety, and ease of the test will lead to informational overload and reproductive consumerism. The prevailing response among commentators has been to restrict conditions eligible for testing based on medical severity, which imposes disputed value judgments and devalues those living with eligible conditions. (...)
- Epigenetic programing of depression during gestation.Stephanie C. Dulawa - 2014 - Bioessays 36 (4):353-358.Gestational factors play a role in the development of several neuropsychiatric disorders including schizophrenia and autism. In utero conditions influence future mental health through epigenetic mechanisms, which alter gene expression without affecting DNA coding sequence. Environmental factors account for at least 60% of the risk for developing major depression, and earlier onset of depressive illness has been observed over the past decades. I speculate that gestational factors may play a greater role in programing depression than previously recognized. Here, I examine (...)
- Pharmaceutical Memory Modification and Christianity’s “Dangerous” Memory.Stephanie C. Edwards - 2020 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 40 (1):93-108.Pharmaceutical memory modification is the use of a drug to dampen, or eliminate completely, memories of traumatic experience. While standard therapeutic treatments, even those including intense pharmaceuticals, can potentially offer individual biomedical healing, they are missing an essential perspective offered by Christian bioethics: re/incorporation of individuals and traumatic memories into communities that confront and reinterpret suffering. This paper is specifically grounded in Christian ethics, engaging womanist understandings of Incarnational, embodied personhood, and Johann Baptist Metz’s “dangerous memory.” It develops an ethical (...)No categories
- Vicarious shame.Stephanie C. M. Welten, Marcel Zeelenberg & Seger M. Breugelmans - 2012 - Cognition and Emotion 26 (5):836-846.We examined an account of vicarious shame that explains how people can experience a self-conscious emotion for the behaviour of another person. Two divergent processes have been put forward to explain how another's behaviour links to the self. The group-based emotion account explains vicarious shame in terms of an in-group member threatening one's social identity by behaving shamefully. The empathy account explains vicarious shame in terms of empathic perspective taking; people imagine themselves in another's shameful behaviour. In three studies using (...)
- Fair Participant Selection: A Negative Obligation Not to Exclude.Stephanie C. Chen - 2016 - American Journal of Bioethics 16 (4):71-72.
- He never willed to have the will he has: Historicist narratives, “civilized” blame, and the need to distinguish two notions of free will.Michael J. Gill & Stephanie C. Cerce - 2017 - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 112 (3):361-382.Harsh blame can be socially destructive. This article examines how harsh blame can be “civilized.” A core construct here is the historicist narrative, which is a story-like account of how a person came to be the sort of person she is. We argue that historicist narratives regarding immoral actors can temper blame and that this happens via a novel mechanism. To illuminate that mechanism, we offer a novel theoretical perspective on lay beliefs about free will. We distinguish 2 senses of (...)
- Publishing fast and slow: A path toward generalizability in psychology and AI.Andrew K. Lampinen, Stephanie C. Y. Chan, Adam Santoro & Felix Hill - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45:e26.Artificial intelligence (AI) shares many generalizability challenges with psychology. But the fields publish differently. AI publishes fast, through rapid preprint sharing and conference publications. Psychology publishes more slowly, but creates integrative reviews and meta-analyses. We discuss the complementary advantages of each strategy, and suggest that incorporating both types of strategies could lead to more generalizable research in both fields.
- Individual differences in higher-level cognitive abilities do not predict overconfidence in complex task performance.Troy A. W. Visser, Angela D. Bender, Vanessa K. Bowden, Stephanie C. Black, Jayden Greenwell-Barnden, Shayne Loft & Ottmar V. Lipp - 2019 - Consciousness and Cognition 74:102777.
- Varieties of memory.Henry L. Roediger, Elizabeth J. Marsh & Stephanie C. Lee - 2002 - In J. Wixted & H. Pashler (eds.), Stevens' Handbook of Experimental Psychology. Wiley.
- Lessons for Enhancement From the History of Cocaine and Amphetamine Use.Stephanie K. Bell, Jayne C. Lucke & Wayne D. Hall - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 3 (2):24-29.Developments in neuroscience have raised the possibility that pharmaceuticals may be used to enhance memory, mood, and attention in people who do not have an illness or disorder, a practice known as “cognitive enhancement.” We describe historical experiences with two medicinal drugs for which similar enhancement claims were made, cocaine in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and amphetamines in the mid 20th century. These drugs were initially introduced as medicinal agents in Europe and North America before becoming more (...)
- Best Practices in Faith-Health Partnerships for Policy Implementation.Stephanie B. C. Bailey, Timothy M. Cerio, Covia L. Stanley & Toni N. Harp - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (s4):129-131.
- Best Practices in Faith-Health Partnerships for Policy Implementation.Stephanie B. C. Bailey, Timothy M. Cerio, Covia L. Stanley & Toni N. Harp - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (S4):129-131.
- Creating shared goals and experiences as a pathway to peace.Stephanie L. Brown, Michael Brown, David Cavallino, Ying-Syun Huang, Qianjing Li & Victor C. Monterroza - 2024 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 47:e5.Glowacki offers many new directions for understanding and even eliminating the problem of war, especially creating positive interdependencies with out-group members. We develop Glowacki's intriguing proposition that in-group dynamics provide a route to peace by describing a prosocial motivational system, the caregiving system, that aligns individual interests and eliminates the need to use coercion to achieve mutually beneficial outcomes.
- Informing, transforming, inquiring: Approaches to elementary social studies in methods course syllabi.Stephanie Schroeder, Natasha C. Murray-Everett, Jacob Gates & Sarah B. Shear - 2021 - Journal of Social Studies Research 45 (2):102-117.This study investigated approaches to the elementary social studies methods syllabus from instructors of courses across the United States. Using qualitative content analysis, we explored 48 methods syllabi using a deductive framework of Information Based Systems d:\Sarjeet_Work\2023\Apr-2023\15apr\lot1\j-saib0004-20492\ssr_2014_38_1\spssr_38_1_meta_issue.xml:3: 18:E: there is no attribute "volume" d:\Sarjeet_Work\2023\Apr-2023\15apr\lot1\j-saib0004-20492\ssr_2014_38_1\spssr_38_1_meta_issue.xml:3: 29:E: there is no attribute "issue" d:\Sarjeet_Work\2023\Apr-2023\15apr\lot1\j-saib0004-20492\ssr_2014_38_1\spssr_38_1_meta_issue.xml:3: 32:E: element "MetaIssue" undefined d:\Sarjeet_Work\2023\Apr-2023\15apr\lot1\j-saib0004-20492\ssr_2014_38_1\spssr_38_1_meta_issue.xml:4: 9:E: element "Provider" undefined d:\Sarjeet_Work\2023\Apr-2023\15apr\lot1\j-saib0004-20492\ssr_2014_38_1\spssr_38_1_meta_issue.xml:4: 9: open elements: MetaIssue d:\Sarjeet_Work\2023\Apr-2023\15apr\lot1\j-saib0004-20492\ssr_2014_38_1\spssr_38_1_meta_issue.xml:5: 4:E: element "TOC" undefined d:\Sarjeet_Work\2023\Apr-2023\15apr\lot1\j-saib0004-20492\ssr_2014_38_1\spssr_38_1_meta_issue.xml:5: 4: open elements: MetaIssue d:\Sarjeet_Work\2023\Apr-2023\15apr\lot1\j-saib0004-20492\ssr_2014_38_1\spssr_38_1_meta_issue.xml:6: 11:E: element "TocSection" undefined d:\Sarjeet_Work\2023\Apr-2023\15apr\lot1\j-saib0004-20492\ssr_2014_38_1\spssr_38_1_meta_issue.xml:6: 11: open elements: MetaIssue TOC d:\Sarjeet_Work\2023\Apr-2023\15apr\lot1\j-saib0004-20492\ssr_2014_38_1\spssr_38_1_meta_issue.xml:7: 8:E: element "Heading" undefined (...)
- Measuring the Performance of Attention Networks with the Dalhousie Computerized Attention Battery : Methodology and Reliability in Healthy Adults.Stephanie A. H. Jones, Beverly C. Butler, Franziska Kintzel, Anne Johnson, Raymond M. Klein & Gail A. Eskes - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
- Judging Athenian dramatic competitions.C. W. Marshall & Stephanie van Willigenburg - 2004 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 124:90-107.This paper presents a new model for how the voting worked at the Athenian dramatic competitions, and demonstrates its viability mathematically. Previous proposals have either failed to take full account of the ancient sources or have not considered all the possible permutations of judging results. As is generally recognized, ten votes were cast, but in most circumstances not all were counted. Sections I-IV consider the tragic competition at the Dionysia, in which three competitors vied for the prize. For the questions (...)
- Investigating the Effects of the Classroom Learning Environment on Students' Motivation in Social Studies.Stephanie L. Knight & Hersholt C. Waxman - 1990 - Journal of Social Studies Research 14 (1):1-12.Export citation
Bookmark - Deflating the Neuroenhancement Bubble.Jayne C. Lucke, Stephanie Bell, Brad Partridge & Wayne D. Hall - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 2 (4):38-43.
- Inhibition, Updating Working Memory, and Shifting Predict Reading Disability Symptoms in a Hybrid Model: Project KIDS.Mia C. Daucourt, Christopher Schatschneider, Carol M. Connor, Stephanie Al Otaiba & Sara A. Hart - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
- Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles.Steven J. C. Gaulin, Donald H. McBurney & Stephanie L. Brakeman-Wartell - 1997 - Human Nature 8 (2):139-151.In a study of the kin investment of aunts and uncles we show that the laterality effect expected as a result of paternity uncertainty is statistically reliable but somewhat smaller than the sex effect. Matrilateral aunts invest significantly more than patrilateral aunts, and the same is true for uncles. Regardless of laterality, however, aunts invest significantly more than uncles. Multivariate controls show that the matrilateral bias is fully independent of any age or distance confounds that might result from sex differences (...)
- Immediate lexical integration of novel word forms.Efthymia C. Kapnoula, Stephanie Packard, Prahlad Gupta & Bob McMurray - 2015 - Cognition 134:85-99.No categories
- Beyond Exposure to Outdoor Nature: Exploration of the Benefits of a Green Building’s Indoor Environment on Wellbeing.Bianca C. Dreyer, Simon Coulombe, Stephanie Whitney, Manuel Riemer & Delphine Labbé - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
- Quasi-Randomized Trial of Contact With Nature and Effects on Attention in Children.Shannon A. Johnson, Stephanie Snow, Michael A. Lawrence & Daniel G. C. Rainham - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
- An Ethical Framework for Research Using Genetic Ancestry.Anna C. F. Lewis, Santiago J. Molina, Paul S. Appelbaum, Bege Dauda, Agustin Fuentes, Stephanie M. Fullerton, Nanibaa' A. Garrison, Nayanika Ghosh, Robert C. Green, Evelynn M. Hammonds, Janina M. Jeff, David S. Jones, Eimear E. Kenny, Peter Kraft, Madelyn Mauro, Anil P. S. Ori, Aaron Panofsky, Mashaal Sohail, Benjamin M. Neale & Danielle S. Allen - 2023 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 66 (2):225-248.ABSTRACT:A wide range of research uses patterns of genetic variation to infer genetic similarity between individuals, typically referred to as genetic ancestry. This research includes inference of human demographic history, understanding the genetic architecture of traits, and predicting disease risk. Researchers are not just structuring an intellectual inquiry when using genetic ancestry, they are also creating analytical frameworks with broader societal ramifications. This essay presents an ethics framework in the spirit of virtue ethics for these researchers: rather than focus on (...)
- Living with HIV and Dying with AIDS: Diversity, Inequality and Human Rights in the Global Pandemic, by Lesley Doyal with Len Doyal. Surrey, UK: Ashgate, 2013, xii + 249pp, £22.50 (website price), £25.00 (regular), ISBN: 978‐1‐4094‐3111‐4. [REVIEW]Stephanie A. Nixon & Margaret C. Maimbolwa - 2014 - Developing World Bioethics 14 (1):56-57.
- Does anxiety sensitivity correlate with startle habituation? An examination in two independent samples.Miranda L. Campbell, Stephanie M. Gorka, Sarah K. McGowan, Brady D. Nelson, Casey Sarapas, Andrea C. Katz, E. Jenna Robison-Andrew & Stewart A. Shankman - 2014 - Cognition and Emotion 28 (1):46-58.
- Ontology, reduction, emergence: A general frame. Authors' reply.C. Ulises Moulines & Stéphanie Ruphy - 2006 - Synthese 151 (3):313-334.Export citation Bookmark
- Are individual differences in appetitive and defensive motivation related? A psychophysiological examination in two samples.Casey Sarapas, Andrea C. Katz, Brady D. Nelson, Miranda L. Campbell, Jeffrey R. Bishop, E. Jenna Robison-Andrew, Sarah E. Altman, Stephanie M. Gorka & Stewart A. Shankman - 2014 - Cognition and Emotion 28 (4):636-655.
- Too much substance, not enough cognition.Vincent C. Müller & Stephanie Kelter - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1):80-80.Millikan's account of substance concepts is based on a notion of “substance” expanded from realist notions of individuals and natural kinds. Her metaphysical notion, based on “inductive potential,” is shown to be too puristic and needs to incorporate cognizing subjects. This could preserve the realist/nondescriptionist insight that the extension of substances is determined by the world.
- The Old Babylonian Tablets from Al-RimahThe Old Babylonian Tablets from Tell al Rimah.Jack M. Sasson, Stephanie Dalley, C. B. F. Walker & J. D. Hawkins - 1980 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 100 (4):453.No categories
- Developmental Perceptual Impairments: Cases When Tone-Deafness and Prosopagnosia Co-occur.Sébastien Paquette, Hui C. Li, Sherryse L. Corrow, Stephanie S. Buss, Jason J. S. Barton & Gottfried Schlaug - 2018 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12.
- Grounding Medical Education in Health Equity: The Time is Now.Folasade C. Lapite, Stephanie R. Morain & Faith E. Fletcher - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (9):23-25.Berger and Miller raise important considerations regarding the ongoing relevance and use of cultural competency in medical education. In particular, the authors critique the United States’ L...
- What color is the sky on your planet? A review of Investigations in behavioral epistemology.John C. Malone, Maria Ea Armento & Stephanie T. Epps - 2003 - Behavior and Philosophy 31:47-62.
- Feeding Tubes and Health Care Service Utilization in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Benefits and Limits to a Retrospective, Multicenter Study Using Big Data.Keith M. Swetz, Stephanie M. Peterson, Lindsey R. Sangaralingham, Ryan T. Hurt, Shannon M. Dunlay, Nilay D. Shah & Jon C. Tilburt - 2017 - Inquiry: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 54:004695801773242.No categories
- Research Integrity and Peer Review—past highlights and future directions.Elizabeth C. Moylan, Elizabeth Wager, Joerg J. Meerpohl, Maria K. Kowalczuk & Stephanie L. Boughton - 2018 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 3 (1).In May 2016, we launched Research Integrity and Peer Review, an international, open access journal with fully open peer review (reviewers are identified on their reports and named reports are published alongside the article) to provide a home for research on research and publication ethics, research reporting, and research on peer review. As the journal enters its third year, we reflect on recent events and highlights for the journal and explore how the journal is faring in terms of gender and (...)No categories
- Quantification of Conflicts of Interest in an Online Point-of-Care Clinical Support Website.Ambica C. Chopra, Stephanie S. Tilberry, Kaitlyn E. Sternat, Daniel Y. Chung, Stephanie D. Nichols & Brian J. Piper - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2):921-930.Online medical reference websites are utilized by health care providers to enhance their education and decision making. However, these resources may not adequately reveal pharmaceutical-author interactions and their potential conflicts of interest. This investigation: evaluates the correspondence of two well-utilized CoI databases: the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments and ProPublica’s Dollars for Docs and quantifies CoIs among authors of a publicly available point of care clinical support website which is used to inform evidence-based medicine decisions. Two data (...)
- Quantification of Conflicts of Interest in an Online Point-of-Care Clinical Support Website.Ambica C. Chopra, Stephanie S. Tilberry, Kaitlyn E. Sternat, Daniel Y. Chung, Stephanie D. Nichols & Brian J. Piper - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2):921-930.Online medical reference websites are utilized by health care providers to enhance their education and decision making. However, these resources may not adequately reveal pharmaceutical-author interactions and their potential conflicts of interest. This investigation: evaluates the correspondence of two well-utilized CoI databases: the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments and ProPublica’s Dollars for Docs and quantifies CoIs among authors of a publicly available point of care clinical support website which is used to inform evidence-based medicine decisions. Two data (...)No categories
- Quantification of Conflicts of Interest in an Online Point-of-Care Clinical Support Website.Ambica C. Chopra, Stephanie S. Tilberry, Kaitlyn E. Sternat, Daniel Y. Chung, Stephanie D. Nichols & Brian J. Piper - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2):921-930.Online medical reference websites are utilized by health care providers to enhance their education and decision making. However, these resources may not adequately reveal pharmaceutical-author interactions and their potential conflicts of interest. This investigation: evaluates the correspondence of two well-utilized CoI databases: the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments and ProPublica’s Dollars for Docs and quantifies CoIs among authors of a publicly available point of care clinical support website which is used to inform evidence-based medicine decisions. Two data (...)
- Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Neurophysiology, Adaptive DBS, Virtual Reality, Neuroethics and Technology.Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora, James Giordano, Aysegul Gunduz, Jose Alcantara, Jackson N. Cagle, Stephanie Cernera, Parker Difuntorum, Robert S. Eisinger, Julieth Gomez, Sarah Long, Brandon Parks, Joshua K. Wong, Shannon Chiu, Bhavana Patel, Warren M. Grill, Harrison C. Walker, Simon J. Little, Ro’ee Gilron, Gerd Tinkhauser, Wesley Thevathasan, Nicholas C. Sinclair, Andres M. Lozano, Thomas Foltynie, Alfonso Fasano, Sameer A. Sheth, Katherine Scangos, Terence D. Sanger, Jonathan Miller, Audrey C. Brumback, Priya Rajasethupathy, Cameron McIntyre, Leslie Schlachter, Nanthia Suthana, Cynthia Kubu, Lauren R. Sankary, Karen Herrera-Ferrá, Steven Goetz, Binith Cheeran, G. Karl Steinke, Christopher Hess, Leonardo Almeida, Wissam Deeb, Kelly D. Foote & Okun Michael S. - 2020 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 14.
| 1 — 50 / 1000 |
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-64dd777598-b9rvg uwo