Search results for 'Andrew Rubin' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Sort by:
  1. Nigel C. Gibson & Andrew Rubin (eds.) (2002). Adorno: A Critical Reader. Blackwell.score: 240.0
    Those interested in the arts, politics, history, philosophy, psychoanalysis, and sociology will delight in this important collection of essays that re-evaluate ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Lawrence C. Rubin, Laura S. Brown, Walter M. Robinson, Andrew Sikula Sr & Lorraine P. Anderson (2003). The Forum. Ethics and Behavior 13 (4):401 – 413.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Wilson Carey McWilliams, Bob Pepperman Taylor, Bryan G. Norton, Robyn Eckersley, Joe Bowersox, J. Baird Callicott, Catriona Sandilands, John Barry, Andrew Light, Peter S. Wenz, Luis A. Vivanco, Tim Hayward, John O'Neill, Robert Paehlke, Timothy W. Luke, Robert Gottlieb & Charles T. Rubin (2002). Democracy and the Claims of Nature: Critical Perspectives for a New Century. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ronald Rubin (2008). Silencing the Demon's Advocate: The Strategy of Descartes' Meditations. Stanford University Press.score: 60.0
    In Silencing the Demon’s Advocate, Rubin presents an interpretation of Descartes’ Meditations that avoids many of the standard objections to Descartes’ ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Alfred P. Rubin (1997). Ethics and Authority in International Law. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    The specialised vocabularies of lawyers, ethicists, and political scientists obscure the roots of many real disagreements. In this book, the distinguished American international lawyer Alfred Rubin provides a penetrating account of where these roots lie, and argues powerfully that disagreements which have existed for 3,000 years are unlikely to be resolved soon. Current attempts to make 'war crimes' or 'terrorism' criminal under international law seem doomed to fail for the same reasons that attempts failed in the early nineteenth century (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Susan B. Rubin (1998). When Doctors Say No: The Battleground of Medical Futility. Indiana University Press.score: 60.0
    Who should decide? In When Doctors Say No, philosopher and bioethicist Rubin examines this controversial issue.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Dudley Andrew (1984). Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    Concepts in Film Theory is a continuation of Dudley Andrew's classic, The Major Film Theories. In writing now about contemporary theory, Andrew focuses on the key concepts in film study -- perception, representation, signification, narrative structure, adaptation, evaluation, identification, figuration, and interpretation. Beginning with an introductory chapter on the current state of film theory, Andrew goes on to build an overall view of film, presenting his own ideas on each concept, and giving a sense of the interdependence (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Mark A. Rubin (2011). Observers and Locality in Everett Quantum Field Theory. Foundations of Physics 41 (7):1236-1262.score: 60.0
    A model for measurement in collapse-free nonrelativistic fermionic quantum field theory is presented. In addition to local propagation and effectively-local interactions, the model incorporates explicit representations of localized observers, thus extending an earlier model of entanglement generation in Everett quantum field theory (Rubin in Found. Phys. 32:1495–1523, 2002). Transformations of the field operators from the Heisenberg picture to the Deutsch-Hayden picture, involving fictitious auxiliary fields, establish the locality of the model. The model is applied to manifestly-local calculations of the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Matatyahu Rubin & Saharon Shelah (1983). On the Expressibility Hierarchy of Magidor-Malitz Quantifiers. Journal of Symbolic Logic 48 (3):542-557.score: 60.0
    We prove that the logics of Magidor-Malitz and their generalization by Rubin are distinct even for PC classes. Let $M \models Q^nx_1 \cdots x_n \varphi(x_1 \cdots x_n)$ mean that there is an uncountable subset A of |M| such that for every $a_1, \ldots, a_n \in A, M \models \varphi\lbrack a_1, \ldots, a_n\rbrack$ . Theorem 1.1 (Shelah) $(\diamond_{\aleph_1})$ . For every n ∈ ω the class $K_{n + 1} = \{\langle A, R\rangle \mid \langle A, R\rangle \models \neg Q^{n + (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Andrew C. Blume (2001). Patricia Lee Rubin and Alison Wright, Renaissance Florence: The Art of the 1470s. With Contributions by Nicholas Penny. London: National Gallery Publications, 1999. Pp. 360; Color Frontispiece and Many Black-and-White and Color Figures. $50. Distributed in the US by Yale University Press. [REVIEW] Speculum 76 (3):788-789.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. William F. Bracken (2005). Is There a Puzzle About How Authentic Dasein Can Act?: A Critique of Dreyfus and Rubin on Being and Time, Division II. Inquiry 48 (6):533 – 552.score: 24.0
    Dreyfus and Rubin's commentary on Division II of Being and Time raises three closely related puzzles about the possibility of authenticity: (i) how could Dasein ever choose to become authentic, (ii) how could authentic Dasein ever choose to take up any particular possibility, and (iii) how could anything <span class='Hi'>matter</span> to authentic Dasein? They argue that Heidegger has a convincing answer to the first two puzzles, but they find his answer to the third "indirect and not totally convincing" (D&R, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. David Saunders & Ian Hunter (2003). Bringing the State to England: Andrew Tooke's Translation of Samuel Pufendorf's 'De Officio Hominis Et Civis'. History of Political Thought 24 (2):218-234.score: 24.0
    Andrew Tooke's 1691 English translation of Samuel Pufendorf's De officio hominis et civis, published as The Whole Duty of Man According to the Law of Nature, brought Pufendorf's manual fo statist natural law into English politics at a moment of temporary equilibrium in the unfinished contest between Crown and Parliament for the rights and powers of sovereignty. Drawing on the authors' re-edition of The Whole Duty of Man, this article describes and analyses a telling instance of how--by translation--the core (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.) (2004). Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge.score: 21.0
    Andrew Collier is the boldest defender of objectivity - in science, knowledge, thought, action, politics, morality and religion. In this tribute and acknowledgement of the influence his work has had on a wide readership, his colleagues show that they have been stimulated by his thinking and offer challenging responses. This wide-ranging book covers key areas with which defenders of objectivity often have to engage. Sections are devoted to the following: 'objectivity of value', 'objectivity and everyday knowledge', 'objectivity in political (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Alastair Hannay (1994). Comments on Honderich, Sprigge, Dreyfus and Rubin, and Elster. Synthese 98 (1):95-112.score: 21.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, David Ingram, Sally Wyatt, Yoko Arisaka & Andrew Feenberg (2011). Book Symposium on Andrew Feenberg's Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity. Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):203-226.score: 21.0
    Book Symposium on Andrew Feenberg’s Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity Content Type Journal Article Pages 203-226 DOI 10.1007/s13347-011-0017-8 Authors Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA David B. Ingram, Loyola University Chicago, 6525 North Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60626, USA Sally Wyatt, e-Humanities Group, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) & Maastricht University, Cruquiusweg 31, 1019 AT Amsterdam, The Netherlands Yoko Arisaka, Forschungsinstitut für Philosophie (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Thomas Jeannot (2010). Reclaiming Marx's 'Capital': A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007. Historical Materialism 18 (4):189-206.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Andrew Botterell (2005). Review of Andrew Melnyk, A Physicalist Manifesto. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 114:125-128.score: 21.0
    A review of Andrew Melnyk, A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. William O. Stephens (2011). If Friendship Hurts, an Epicurean Deserts : A Reply to Andrew Mitchell. In Adrianne Leigh McEvoy (ed.), Sex, Love, and Friendship: Studies of the Society for the Philosophy of Sex and Love: 1993-2003. Rodopi. 7.score: 18.0
    In “Friendship Amongst the Self-Sufficient: Epicurus” (this Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, June 2001), Andrew Mitchell explores the Epicurean view of the relationship between self-sufficiency and friendship by contrasting it with the views of Aristotle and the Stoics. Epicurus, Aristotle, and the Stoics do indeed have interestingly different views on friendship that are well worth comparing. Yet Mitchell’s characterization of Aristotelian friendship is misleading, his account of Stoic friendship is inaccurate, and his interpretation of Epicurean friendship is curiously imaginative (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Douglas Kellner, Review-Article on Andrew Feenberg, Questioning Technology. New York and London, Routledge, 1999.score: 18.0
    Andrew Feenberg's Questioning Technology (1999) is his third book in a series of studies which undertake to provide critical theoretical and democratic political perspectives to engage technology in the contemporary era. In Critical Theory of Technology (1991), Feenberg draws on neo-Marxian and other critical theories of technology, especially the Frankfurt School, to criticize determinist and essentialist theories. In this ground-breaking work (which will go into its second edition in 2001), he discusses both how the labor process, science, and technology (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Gideon Calder & Andrew Collier (2009). Values and Ontology: An Interview with Andrew Collier, Part. Journal of Critical Realism 8 (1):63-90.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Andrew Collier & Gideon Calder (2008). Philosophy and Politics: An Interview with Andrew Collier, Part. Journal of Critical Realism 7 (2):276-296.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Huaiyu Wang (2010). Jiang, Wenye 江文也, a Discourse on Confucius's Music 孔子的樂論. Translated From 上代支那正樂考—孔子の音樂論 by Y Ang Rubin 楊儒賓. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (1):115-119.score: 18.0
    Jiang, Wenye 江文也, A Discourse on Confucius’s Music 孔子的樂論. Translated from 上代支那正樂考—孔子の音樂論 by Y ang Rubin 楊儒賓 Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11712-009-9148-3 Authors Huaiyu Wang, Georgia College & State University Department of History, Geography, and Philosophy Campus Box 47 Milledgeville GA 31061 USA Journal Dao Online ISSN 1569-7274 Print ISSN 1540-3009 Journal Volume Volume 9 Journal Issue Volume 9, Number 1.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Wayne C. Myrvold (1996). Bayesianism and Diverse Evidence: A Reply to Andrew Wayne. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):661-665.score: 18.0
    Andrew Wayne (1995) discusses some recent attempts to account, within a Bayesian framework, for the "common methodological adage" that "diverse evidence better confirms a hypothesis than does the same amount of similar evidence" (112). One of the approaches considered by Wayne is that suggested by Howson and Urbach (1989/1993) and dubbed the "correlation approach" by Wayne. This approach is, indeed, incomplete, in that it neglects the role of the hypothesis under consideration in determining what diversity in a body of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Cynthia Willett (2010). Response to Bill Martin and Andrew Cutrofello on Irony in the Age of Empire. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (1):96-99.score: 18.0
    What a pleasure to have such subtle thinkers and scholars as Bill Martin and Andrew Cutrofello reflect on the relation of irony and comedy to politics and philosophy through their commentary on my new book. To set the tone, Martin begins with a koan, or a parody of one, “What if a tree told a joke in the woods and there was no one there to hear it?” He means, I believe, to sound a warning on the limits of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Nicolas de Warren (2007). Off the Beaten Path: The Artworks of Andrew Goldsworthy. Environmental Philosophy 4 (1-2):29-48.score: 18.0
    This essay explores Heidegger’s “The Origin of the Work of Art” and Andrew Goldsworthy’s artworks. Both Heidegger and Goldsworthy can be seen as refashioning our ontological bearings towards nature through the work of art. After introducing a set of distinctions (e.g., world/earth) in the context of Heidegger’s conception of the artwork as the event of truth, I argue that Heidegger’s releasing of the work of art from metaphysical notions of “the thing” illuminates the ambiguous status of Goldsworthy’s artworks as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Mikel Burley (2013). Andrew Gleeson, A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012). Philosophical Papers 42 (1):127 - 131.score: 18.0
    (2013). Andrew Gleeson, A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012) Philosophical Papers: Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 127-131. doi: 10.1080/05568641.2013.774726.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Andrew J. Reck (1958). The Philosophy of Andrew Ushenko: II. Review of Metaphysics 11 (4):673 - 688.score: 18.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Rubin Gotesky (1972). Modern Civilization: Its Demise Rubin Gotesky. World Futures 12 (1):67-111.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Andrew J. Reck (1958). The Philosophy of Andrew Ushenko: I. Review of Metaphysics 11 (3):471 - 485.score: 18.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. J. Andrew DeWoody, John W. Bickham, Charles H. Michler, Krista M. Nichols, Olin E. Rhodes & Keith E. Woeste (2011). Conservation Genetics for Natural ResourcesMolecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management.J. Andrew DeWoody , John W. Bickham , Charles H. Michler , Krista M. Nichols , Olin E. Rhodes Jr. , and Keith E. Woeste , Eds . Cambridge University Press , 2010 . 392 Pp., Illus. $55.00 (ISBN 9780521731348 Paper). [REVIEW] BioScience 61 (4):330-331.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Andrew Dodsworth (2000). Andrew's Literary Death Quiz. Philosophy Now 27:47-47.score: 18.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Gregory Flaxman (2001). The Laws of Cinematic Hospitality: A Response to Andrew Murphie. Film-Philosophy 5 (2).score: 18.0
    Andrew Murphie 'Is Philosophy Ever Enough?' _Film-Philosophy_, Deleuze Special Issue vol. 5 no. 38, November 2001.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Adam Stewart (2010). John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn. Newman Studies Journal 7 (2):6-17.score: 18.0
    This essay examines the contrasting conceptualizations of reason in the thought of John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn in their articles published in The Contemporary Review in 1885. This essay articulates both Fairbairn’s charge of philosophical scepticism against Newman as well as Newman’s defense of his position and concomitantly details Fairbairn’s and Newman’s competing notions of the efficacy of reason to provide reliable knowledge of God. The positions of Fairbairn and Newman remain two of the most important perspectives (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Doohwan Ahn (2011). From Greece to Babylon:The Political Thought of Andrew Michael Ramsay (1686–1743). History of European Ideas 37 (4):421-437.score: 18.0
    This paper explores the political thought of Andrew Michael Ramsay with particular reference to his highly acclaimed book called A New Cyropaedia, or the Travels of Cyrus (1727). Dedicated to Prince Charles Edward Stuart, the Young Pretender, to whom he was tutor, this work has been hitherto viewed as a Jacobite imitation of the Telemachus, Son of Ulysses(1699) of his eminent teacher archbishop Fénelon of Cambrai. By tracing the dual legacy of the first Persian Emperor Cyrus in Western thought, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. John Andrew Fisher (1996). The Myth of Anthropomorphism John Andrew Fisher. In Colin Allen & D. Jamison (eds.), Readings in Animal Cognition. Mit Press.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. William Hasker (2010). Which God? What Power? A Response to Andrew H. Gleeson. Sophia 49 (3):433-445.score: 18.0
    Andrew H. Gleeson has written an essay commenting on an exchange between Dewi Z. Phillips and me, arguing that I was mistaken to dismiss Phillips’ criticism of the standard definition of omnipotence as unsuccessful. Furthermore, he charges Swinburne, me, and analytic theists in general, with an excessive anthropomorphism that obliterates the distinction between Creator and creature. In response, I contend that all of Gleeson’s criticisms are unsound.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. John Apczynski (2008). Andrew Grosso on Polanyi as a Resource for Christian Theology. Tradition and Discovery 35 (1):46-48.score: 18.0
    These reflections on Andrew Grosso’s recent book Personal Being highlight his philosophical construction of a concept of personhood based on themes from the writings Of Michael Polanyi and his use of this conception to express creatively elements of the traditional Christian doctrines on the trinity. Additional clarifications are sought regarding his formulations on the divine personhood of Jesus, the adequacy of his formulations on the intra-trinitarian relations, and the insightfulness of the absolute personhood of the divine. This study is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Andrew Dobson, Luc Semal, Mathilde Szuba & Olivier Petit (2014). Andrew Dobson: Trajectories of Green Political Theory Interview by Luc Semal, Mathilde Szuba and Olivier Petit. Natures Sciences Sociétés 22 (2):132-141.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. David Hitchcock (2014). Andrew Aberdein and Ian J. Dove (Eds): The Argument of Mathematics (Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science, Vol. 30). Argumentation 28 (2):245-258.score: 18.0
    Post-war argumentation theorists have tended to regard argumentation as one thing and mathematical proof as another. Perelman (1958, 1969), for example, defined the word ‘argumentation’ stipulatively as a contrast term to ‘demonstration’: whereas mathematical reasoning as theorized by modern formal logic, he writes, is a matter of deducing theorems from axioms in accordance with stipulated rules of transformation, argumentation aims at gaining the adherence of minds (Perelman 1969, pp. 1–2). Toulmin (1958) contrasted his “jurisprudential model” of argument, according to which (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Russell Kelly (forthcoming). Andrew P. Carlin and Roger S. Slack (Eds): Ethnographic Studies: Special Memorial Issue: Egon Bittner: Phenomenology in Action. Human Studies:1-4.score: 18.0
    The purpose of this review is to bring to the attention to a wider, specialised audience a special issue of the UK journal, Ethnographic Studies. The special issue, compiled and edited by Andrew Carlin and Roger Slack, is a Festschrift in honour of Egon Bittner (1921–2011). The readership of Human Studies might be aware of Egon Bittner as one of the circle surrounding Harold Garfinkel and Harvey Sacks in the early and preparatory days of ethnomethodology between 1955 and 1965.This (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Andrew Mansfield (2012). Aristocratic Reform and the Extirpation of Parliament in Early Georgian Britain: Andrew Michael Ramsay and French Ideas of Monarchy. History of European Ideas 40 (2):1-19.score: 18.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Peter Murphy (2011). Painting's Double: Andrew Benjamin's Disclosing Spaces. Thesis Eleven 104 (1):108-113.score: 18.0
    Andrew Benjamin’s book Disclosing Spaces (2004) presents a theory of painting. The theory is developed via a meticulous analysis of a series of individual artworks. The pivot of Benjamin’s theory of painting is the idea of relationality. The theory is critically reviewed with reference to the works of Edward Hopper, Gerhard Richter and Jacques-Louis David.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Andrew V. Abela (2001). Catholic Social Teaching and the Purpose of the Firm1 Andrew I/. Abela. Journal of Business Ethics 31:2.score: 18.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Roy Bhaskar (2004). A Personal and Intellectual Tribute to Andrew Collier. In Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.), Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge. 1.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Justin Cruickshank (2004). Practical Knowledge and Realism: Linking Andrew Collier on Lay Knowledge to Karl Popper on the Philosophy of Science.'. In Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.), Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Matt Matravers (forthcoming). Symposium on Andrew Simester and Andreas von Hirsch, Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-3.score: 18.0
    Andrew Simester and Andreas von Hirsch’s Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation (Simester and von Hirsch 2011) is an important contribution to the philosophical debate over the nature and ethical limits of criminalisation. As they note in their reply in this symposium, one of the novel aspects of their account is that they do not advance one “unified, grand theory”. Rather, they analyse each ground of criminal prohibition—wrongfulness, harm-based, offense, and paternalistic prohibitions aimed at preventing self-harm—so (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Andrew J. Mckenna & Mark Youngerman (1994). Andrew J. McKenna., Violence and Difference: Girard, Derrida, and Deconstruction. International Studies in Philosophy 26 (4):149-150.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Enrique Peruzzotti, Martín Plot & Andrew Arato (eds.) (2012). Critical Theory and Democracy: Essays in Honour of Andrew Arato. Routledge.score: 18.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Andrew Vandenberg (2007). Chapter Seven Postmodern Conservatism and Reactionary Recognition Andrew Vandenberg, Matthew Sharpe and Geoff Boucher. In Julie Connolly, Michael Leach & Lucas Walsh (eds.), Recognition in Politics: Theory, Policy and Practice. Cambridge Scholars. 116.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Walter L. Adamson (1983). Andrew Feenberg, Lukács, Marx and the Sources of Critical Theory (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (2).score: 15.0
1 — 50 / 999