Results for 'deliberative democracy'

1000+ found
Order:
See also
  1. Why Deliberative Democracy is (Still) Untenable.Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij - 2012 - Public Affairs Quarterly 26 (3):199-220.
    A common objection to deliberative democracy is that available evidence on public ignorance makes it unlikely that social deliberation among the public is a process likely to yield accurate outputs. The present paper considers—and ultimately rejects—two responses to this objection. The first response is that the correct conclusion to draw from the evidence is simply that we must work harder to ensure that the deliberative process improves the deliberators’ epistemic situation. The main problem for this response is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  2.  22
    Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents.Kaveh L. Afrasiabi - 1999 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 1999 (117):190-192.
    Philosophy's “linguistic turn” was destined to find its way into derivative disciplines such as political theory. In the last two decades, this turn has led to an absurd reductionism extrapolating the essence of existing democracies from their mode of communication. Flattening political theory, followers of this fashion rarely relinquish their fixation with the communicative component of modern democracies to the level of a multifaceted analysis. The central notion here is “deliberative democracy.” But is this a distinct model of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3.  5
    Deliberative Democracy: A Critical Introduction.Zsuzsanna Chappell - 2012 - New York, NY, USA: Palgrave.
    In spite of the global diffusion of democracy and a general commitment to democratic values, there is a widespread alienation from the political process in advanced democracies. Deliberative democracy has received much attention in recent years as a possible solution to this malaise. Its promise of a more engaged and collective form of politics has drawn the interest of policy makers and political philosophers – generating new avenues of thought in contemporary democratic theory as well as heated (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  4. Robust Deliberative Democracy.Daniel Layman - 2016 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 28 (3-4):494-516.
    Deliberative democracy aspires to secure political liberty by making citizens the authors of their laws. But how can it do this in the face of deep disagreement, not to mention imperfect knowledge and limited altruism? Deliberative democracy can secure political liberty by affording each citizen an equal position as a co-author of public laws and norms. Moreover, fundamental deliberative democracy—in which institutional design is ultimately accountable to public deliberation but not necessarily subject to its (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5.  74
    Deliberative Democracy and Emotional Intelligence: An Internal Mechanism to Regulate the Emotions. [REVIEW]Martyn Griffin - 2011 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (6):517-538.
    Deliberative democracy, it is claimed, is essential for the legitimisation of public policy and law. It is built upon an assumption that citizens will be capable of constructing and defending reasons for their moral and political beliefs. However, critics of deliberative democracy suggest that citizens’ emotions are not properly considered in this process and, if left unconsidered, present a serious problem for this political framework. In response to this, deliberative theorists have increasingly begun to incorporate (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6.  56
    Deliberative Democracy and the Environment.Graham Smith - 2003 - Routledge.
    One of the key questions to have exercised green political theorists in recent years concerns the relationship of the environment 'agenda' and democracy. Both environmentalists and democrats have a tendency to think of each other as natural bedfellows but in fact there is little theoretical or practical reason why they should be. Indeed some theorists have argued that the environmental movement has grown from fundamentally authoritarian roots and it is arguable that the only really effective way of implementing environmental (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  7. Deliberative Democracy and the Politics of Reconciliation.Duncan Ivison - 2010 - In David Kahane, Melissa Williams & Daniel Weinstock (eds.), Deliberative Democracy in Practice. Vancouver: UBC Press. pp. 115-137.
    The problem of historical injustice presents a deep challenge to the aspirations of deliberative democrats, especially to those “deliberative activists” who seek to advance deliberation in deeply unjust circumstances (Fung 2005, 399). But the debate over historical injustice can itself benefi t from taking a “democratic turn.” Much of the literature is dominated by arguments over historical entitlement theories of justice or by a legalistic focus on the possibilities for compensation and reparation.1 That much of it is deeply (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  8.  15
    Toward Deliberative Democracy: The Institutional Forum as an Innovative Shared Governance Mechanism in South African Higher Education.Anne-Marea Griffin - 2018 - African Journal of Business Ethics 12 (1).
    The aim of this article is to explore the effects of the Istitutional Forum, a recent governance innovation legislated in South Africa in 1997, as a mechanism that contributes toward the democratisation of university governance. Forums were established to confront the legacy of structured disadvantage and to reorient the educational experience towards greater horizontal accountability. The article provides commentary on the Forum’s impact vis-a-vis participative ethos and deliberative democracy against the backdrop of the South African government’s post-apartheid commitments. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  6
    Debating Deliberative Democracy.James S. Fishkin & Peter Laslett (eds.) - 2003 - Wiley-Blackwell.
    Debating Deliberative Democracy explores the nature and value of deliberation, the feasibility and desirability of consensus on contentious issues, the implications of institutional complexity and cultural diversity for democratic decision making, and the significance of voting and majority rule in deliberative arrangements. Investigates the nature and value of deliberation, the feasibility and desirability of consensus on contentious issues, the implications of institutional complexity and cultural diversity for democratic decision making, and the significance of voting and majority rule (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  10. Deliberative Democracy Between Theory and Practice.Michael A. Neblo - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
    Deliberative democrats seek to link political choices more closely to the deliberations of common citizens, rather than consigning them to speak only in the desiccated language of checks on a ballot. Sober thinkers from Plato to today, however, have argued that if we want to make good decisions we cannot entrust them to the deliberations of common citizens. Critics argue that deliberative democracy is wildly unworkable in practice. Deliberative Democracy between Theory and Practice cuts across (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11.  4
    Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. [REVIEW]Roger Paden - 2002 - Review of Metaphysics 55 (4):856-857.
    Dryzek begins this complex and interesting book by noting that the “final decade of the second millennium saw the theory of democracy take a strong deliberative turn”. In this book, he argues for a particular interpretation of deliberative democracy, defends this theory of deliberative democracy against two types of criticism, and applies it to a number of important questions.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?Chantal Mouffe - 1999 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 66 (3):745-758.
    One of the main reasons that liberal democratic societies are not ill-prepared to confront the present challenge presented by disaffection with democratic institutions, is that the type of political theory currently in vogue is dominated by an individualistic, universalistic, and rationalistic framework. This erases the dimension of the political and impedes envisaging in an adequate manner the nature of a pluralistic democratic public sphere. This paper examines the most recent paradigm of liberal democracy: 'deliberative democracy', in order (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   121 citations  
  13.  26
    Why Deliberative Democracy?Amy Gutmann & Dennis F. Thompson - 2004 - Princeton University Press.
    The most widely debated conception of democracy in recent years is deliberative democracy--the idea that citizens or their representatives owe each other mutually acceptable reasons for the laws they enact. Two prominent voices in the ongoing discussion are Amy Gutmann and Dennis Thompson. In Why Deliberative Democracy?, they move the debate forward beyond their influential book, Democracy and Disagreement.What exactly is deliberative democracy? Why is it more defensible than its rivals? By offering (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   215 citations  
  14.  49
    Republicanism, Deliberative Democracy, and Equality of Access and Deliberation.Donald Bello Hutt - 2018 - Theoria 84 (1):83-111.
    The article elaborates an original intertwined reading of republican theory, deliberative democracy and political equality. It argues that republicans, deliberative democrats and egalitarian scholars have not paid sufficient attention to a number of features present in these bodies of scholarships that relate them in mutually beneficial ways. It shows that republicanism and deliberative democracy are related in mutually beneficial ways, it makes those relations explicit, and it deals with potential objections against them. Additionally, it elaborates (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  15. Making Deliberative Democracy a More Practical Political Ideal.Colin Farrelly - unknown
    Deliberative democrats conceive of the democratic process as a transformative process, one that requires citizens to participate in authentic deliberation with others rather than engaging in the strategic behaviour characteristic of existing democratic practices. Current practices often pit factions of society against one another in a struggle to win or retain political power. The moralized conception of democracy defended by deliberative democrats is one that emphasizes the importance of being open-minded, reasonable and accommodating. These civic virtues are (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  16.  3
    Deliberative Democracy and Inequality: Two Cheers for Enclave Deliberation Among the Disempowered.Allen S. Hammond, Chad Raphael & Christopher F. Karpowitz - 2009 - Politics and Society 37 (4):576-615.
    Deliberative democracy grounds its legitimacy largely in the ability of speakers to participate on equal terms. Yet theorists and practitioners have struggled with how to establish deliberative equality in the face of stark differences of power in liberal democracies. Designers of innovative civic forums for deliberation often aim to neutralize inequities among participants through proportional inclusion of disempowered speakers and discourses. In contrast, others argue that democratic equality is best achieved when disempowered groups deliberate in their own (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  17. Deliberative Democracy and the Institutions of Judicial Review.Christopher F. Zurn - 2007 - Cambridge University Press.
    In this book, Christopher F. Zurn shows why a normative theory of deliberative democratic constitutionalism yields the best understanding of the legitimacy of constitutional review. He further argues that this function should be institutionalized in a complex, multi-location structure including not only independent constitutional courts but also legislative and executive self-review that would enable interbranch constitutional dialogue and constitutional amendment through deliberative civic constitutional forums. Drawing on sustained critical analyses of diverse pluralist and deliberative democratic arguments concerning (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  18. Designing Deliberative Democracy: The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly.Mark E. Warren & Hilary Pearse (eds.) - 2008 - Cambridge University Press.
    Is it possible to advance democracy by empowering ordinary citizens to make key decisions about the design of political institutions and policies? In 2004, the government of British Columbia embarked on a bold democratic experiment: it created an assembly of 160 near-randomly selected citizens to assess and redesign the province's electoral system. The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly represents the first time a citizen body has had the power to reform fundamental political institutions. It was an innovative gamble that has (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  19.  51
    Deliberative Democracy and Epistemic Humility.Kevin Chien-Chang Wu - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):93-94.
    Deliberative democracy is one of the best designs that could facilitate good public policy decision making and bring about epistemic good based on Mercier and Sperber's (M&S's) theory of reasoning. However, three conditions are necessary: (1) an ethic of individual epistemic humility, (2) a pragmatic deflationist definition of truth, and (3) a microscopic framing power analysis during group reasoning.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  74
    Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics.James Bohman & William Rehg (eds.) - 1997 - MIT Press.
    The contributions in this anthology address tensions that arise between reason and politics in a democracy inspired by the ideal of achieving reasoned agreement among free and equal citizens.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   81 citations  
  21. Deliberative Democracy.Ian O'Flynn - 2021 - Medford, MA: Polity Press.
    The central concept in modern democratic theory outlined by a well-respected authority.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22.  43
    Deliberative Democracy as a Matter of Public Spirit: Reconstructing the Dewey-Lippmann Debate.Shane J. Ralston - 2002 - Proceedings of the Kent State University May 4th Philosophy Graduate Student Conference 1 (1):1-9.
    In his pithy indictments of democracy, Churchill captured a feeling prevalent among intellectuals in the first half of the twentieth century; a feeling that government-by-the-people warranted, at best, a limited or half-hearted faith; a feeling that might be described as the “majoritarian creed.” This creed can be characterized by the following propositions. A believer-inthe-democratic-faith defends majoritarian methods—such as popular votes, polls and representation—as the best available means to signal the people’s collective political preferences.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  23.  19
    Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of It’s Practical Implementation.Ivana Jankovic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):187-202.
    Stanoviste deliberativne demokratije jeste da se legitimnost demokratskih odluka zasniva na prethodnoj deliberaciji onih koji ucestvuju u procesu odlucivanja. Ovo znaci da se demokratske odluke ne mogu donositi samo na osnovu proste agregacije preferencija koje se izrazavaju prilikom glasanja. Kao rezultat promisljanja podstaknutih deliberativnom komunikacijom i uzimanjem u obzir stanovista drugih ljudi, gradjani mogu da promene svoje prvobitne stavove i preferencije. Cilj ovoga rada jeste da izlozi stanoviste deliberativne demokratije, kakvo zastupaju Ejmi Gatman i Denis Tompson, kao i da iznese (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  28
    Deliberative Democracy and the Problem of Tacit Knowledge.Jonathan Benson - 2019 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 18 (1):76-97.
    This article defends deliberative democracy against the problem of tacit knowledge. It has been argued that deliberative democracy gives a privileged position to linguistic communication and therefore excludes tacit forms of knowledge which cannot be expressed propositionally. This article shows how the exclusion of such knowledge presents important challenges to both proceduralist and epistemic conceptions of deliberative democracy, and how it has been taken by some to favour markets over democratic institutions. After pointing to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  25. Deliberative Democracy and Constitutional Review.F. C. - 2002 - Law and Philosophy 21 (s 4-5):467-542.
  26.  19
    Deliberative Democracy and Environmental Policy.John O'Neill - unknown
  27. Deliberative Democracy, the Public Sphere and the Internet.Antje Gimmler - 2001 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 (4):21-39.
    The internet could be an efficient political instrument if it were seen as part of a democracy where free and open discourse within a vital public sphere plays a decisive role. The model of deliberative democracy, as developed by Jürgen Habermas and Seyla Benhabib, serves this concept of democracy best. The paper explores first the model of deliberative democracy as a ‘two-track model’ in which representative democracy is backed by the public sphere and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  28.  24
    Deliberative Democracy and the Countermajoritarian Difficulty: Considering Constitutional Juries.Eric Ghosh - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2):327-359.
    The literature on the democratic legitimacy of judicial review and also on institutionalizing deliberative democracy neglects the possibility of employing juries rather than judges to determine bill-of-rights matters. This neglect is unfortunate, for there are findings emerging especially from deliberative polling that support the feasibility of such juries. Such feasibility would raise a new countermajoritarian concern with judicial review. The argument supporting this new concern also casts fresh light on the traditional countermajoritarian concern.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  29. Deliberative Democracy, the Discursive Dilemma and Republican Theory.Philip Pettit - 2003 - In James Fishkin & Peter Laslett (eds.), Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford, UK: Blackwel. pp. 138-162.
  30.  13
    Deliberative Democracy.Russell Hardin - 2009 - In Thomas Christiano & John Philip Christman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Political Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 17--231.
  31.  21
    Deliberative Democracy, Diversity, and Restraint.James Boettcher - 2020 - Res Publica 26 (2):215-235.
    Public reason liberals disagree about the relationship between public justification and deliberative democracy. My goal is to argue against the recent suggestion that public reason liberals seek a ‘divorce’ from deliberative democracy. Defending this thesis will involve discussing the benefits of deliberation for public justification as well as revisiting public reason’s standard Rawlisan restraint requirement. I criticize Kevin Vallier’s alternative convergence-based principle of restraint and respond to the worry that the standard Rawlsian restraint requirement reduces the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32. Deliberative Democracy and the Epistemic Benefits of Diversity.James Bohman - 2006 - Episteme 3 (3):175-191.
    It is often assumed that democracies can make good use of the epistemic benefi ts of diversity among their citizenry, but difficult to show why this is the case. In a deliberative democracy, epistemically relevant diversity has three aspects: the diversity of opinions, values, and perspectives. Deliberative democrats generally argue for an epistemic form of Rawls' difference principle: that good deliberative practice ought to maximize deliberative inputs, whatever they are, so as to benefi t all (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  33.  15
    Deliberative Democracy and the Regress Problem: Response to Michelman.Kenneth Baynes - 1997 - Modern Schoolman 74 (4):331-336.
  34.  14
    Decolonizing Deliberative Democracy: Perspectives From Below.Subhabrata Bobby Banerjee - 2021 - Journal of Business Ethics 181 (2):283-299.
    AbstractIn this paper I provide a decolonial critique of received knowledge about deliberative democracy. Legacies of colonialism have generally been overlooked in theories of democracy. These omissions challenge several key assumptions of deliberative democracy. I argue that deliberative democracy does not travel well outside Western sites and its key assumptions begin to unravel in the ‘developing’ regions of the world. The context for a decolonial critique of deliberative democracy is the ongoing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  35.  31
    Deliberative Democracy, Critical Rationality and Social Memory: Theoretical Resources of an ‘Education for Discourse’.Tony Fitzpatrick - 2008 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (4):313-327.
    This article brings interconnects three debates to show what this might imply for the ‘redemocratisation’ of UK society and for pedagogical reform. One debate concerns deliberative types of democratic reform, arguing in favour of a ‘creative agnosticism’ towards the two philosophical frameworks which dominate this literature. This leads into a discussion of education and critical rationality, arguing for an aptitude-based account of moral agency, one which relates to the sociocultural resources we inherit from the past. The final debate therefore (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  29
    Deliberative Democracy, Critical Thinking, and the Deliberating Individual: Empirical Challenges to the Reasonability of the Citizen.Juho Ritola - 2015 - Studier i Pædagogisk Filosofi 4 (1):29-54.
    In this essay, I first discuss the conditions set by theorists of democratic deliberation on proper deliberation. These conditions call for reasoned decisions from mutually acceptable premises. Next, I present the ideal of critical thinking that should guide the citizen in this deliberation. I then examine the empirical literature on human reasoning. Some research results in the empirical literature paint a bleak picture of human rationality: we fall victim to heuristics and biases, persevere in our beliefs in the face of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  37.  31
    :Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics.Christopher McMahon - 1999 - Ethics 109 (3):648-650.
    Ideals of democratic participation and rational self-government have long informed modern political theory. As a recent elaboration of these ideals, the concept of deliberative democracy is based on the principle that legitimate democracy issues from the public deliberation of citizens. This remarkably fruitful concept has spawned investigations along a number of lines. Areas of inquiry include the nature and value of deliberation, the feasibility and desirability of consensus on contentious issues, the implications of institutional complexity and cultural (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38.  1
    Deliberative Democracy at China’s Grassroots: Case Studies of a Hidden Phenomenon.Him Chung, Anita Chan & Jonathan Unger - 2014 - Politics and Society 42 (4):513-535.
    Dictatorial China contains vivid examples of grassroots deliberative democracy on issues vital to local participants. Three elements in our case studies are relevant to programs of deliberative, participatory decision making elsewhere in the world. First, the Chinese examples have all occurred within longstanding communities. Second, the members of these communities have faced concrete issues of a type they felt they had the knowledge to resolve. And third, all of these communities had access to institutional frameworks established from (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  39.  52
    Justifying Deliberative Democracy: Are Two Heads Always Wiser Than One|[Quest]|.Zsuzsanna Chappell - 2011 - Contemporary Political Theory 10 (1):78.
    Democracy is usually justified either on intrinsic or instrumental, particularly epistemic, grounds. Intrinsic justifications stress the values inherent in the democratic process itself, whereas epistemic ones stress that it results in good outcomes. This article examines whether epistemic justifications for deliberative democracy are superior to intrinsic ones. The Condorcet jury theorem is the most common epistemic justification of democracy. I argue that it is not appropriate for deliberative democracy. Yet deliberative democrats often explicitly (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  40.  33
    Justifying Deliberative Democracy: Are Two Heads Always Wiser Than One?Zsuzsanna Chappell - 2011 - Contemporary Political Theory 10 (1):78-101.
    Democracy is usually justified either on intrinsic or instrumental, particularly epistemic, grounds. Intrinsic justifications stress the values inherent in the democratic process itself, whereas epistemic ones stress that it results in good outcomes. This article examines whether epistemic justifications for deliberative democracy are superior to intrinsic ones. The Condorcet jury theorem is the most common epistemic justification of democracy. I argue that it is not appropriate for deliberative democracy. Yet deliberative democrats often explicitly (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  41.  61
    Deliberative Democracy and Public Reason.Kenneth Baynes - 2010 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 55 (1):135-163.
    O artigo reexamina as concepções habermasianas de política deliberativa e democracia procedimental à luz de outras teorias deliberativas, de forma a explorar as suas semelhanças e diferenças e investigar o quanto devem à ideia de razão pública e as implicações práticas daquela ideia.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  42.  62
    Deliberative Democracy and the Internet: Could Online Deliberative Democracy Replace Classical Democracy.Zeljko Mancic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):168-186.
    Tekst analizira jedan od pokusaja da se ideja deliberativne demokratije ucini prihvatljivijom tako sto ce se sprovoditi preko interneta. Pozivajuci se na jednostavnost pristupa i koriscenja interneta, mnogi autori smatraju da je moguce spojiti deliberativnu demokratiju sa direktnom ili neposrednom demokratijom, i time doci do mozda najboljeg moguceg sistema donosenja politickih odluka. Medjutim, pokazace se da, iako ova ideja ima dosta prednosti u odnosu na standardne teorije deliberativne demokratije, ona ne uspeva da resi brojne nedoumice koje sa sobom donosi. Uprkos (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Deliberative Democracy for Bioethics: Could the Web Help?Leonard M. Fleck - 2001 - Hastings Center Report 31 (4):7.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Deliberative Democracy and Nanotechnology.Colin Farrelly - forthcoming - Nanoethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Nanotechnology.
  45. Deliberative Democracy.James S. Fishkin - 2002 - In Robert L. Simon (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Social and Political Philosophy. Blackwell.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  46. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations.John S. Dryzek - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (215):343-345.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   83 citations  
  47. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations.John Dryzek - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):276-279.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   93 citations  
  48. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. Liberals, Critics, Contestations (G. Brock).John S. Dryzek - 2000 - Philosophical Books 43 (2):165-166.
  49. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations.John S. Dryzek & Adolf G. Gundersen - 2000 - Political Theory 30 (5):746-750.
  50.  2
    Deliberative Democracy and Two Models of Pragmatism.Matthew Festenstein - 2004 - European Journal of Social Theory 7 (3):291-306.
    This article examines the relationship of pragmatism to the theory of deliberative democracy. It elaborates a dilemma in the latter theory, between its deliberative or epistemic and democratic or inclusive components, and distinguishes responses to this dilemma that are internal to the conception of deliberation employed from those that are external. The article goes on to identify two models of pragmatism and critically examines how well each one deals with the tension identified in deliberative democracy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000