Search results for 'Jeffrey Kantor' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  11
    Jeanne M. David, Jeffrey Kantor & Ira Greenberg (1994). Possible Ethical Issues and Their Impact on the Firm: Perceptions Held by Public Accountants. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):919 - 937.
    The accounting profession is concerned with the ethical beliefs of its members. To this end, the authors surveyed public accountants, questioning them about the AICPA''s Code of Professional Conduct and their perceptions of how potentially unethical behaviors impact the firm. The paper focuses on respondents'' perceptions of the impact on the firm''s practice, image and degree of concern.Public accountants appear to agree with the AICPA''s Code of Professional Ethics. Their mean responses indicate they believe the Code components are important and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  2.  13
    Rudolf Carnap & Richard C. Jeffrey (1972). Book Review:Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability Rudolf Carnap, Richard C. Jeffrey. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 39 (4):549-.
  3. Domenico Costantini, Maria Carla Galavotti & Richard C. Jeffrey (1997). Probability, Dynamics, and Causality Essays in Honour of Richard C. Jeffrey.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Richard C. Jeffrey (1970). Miller David. A Paradox of Information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 1 , Pp. 59–61.Popper Karl R.. A Comment on Miller's New Paradox of Information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 1 , Pp. 61–69.Popper Karl R.. A Paradox of Zero Information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 2, Pp. 141–143.Mackie J. L.. Miller's so-Called Paradox of Information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 2, Pp. 144–147.Miller David. On a so-Called so-Called Paradox: A Reply to Professor J. L. Mackie. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17 No. 2, Pp. 147–149.Bub Jeffrey and Radner Michael. Miller's Paradox of Information. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 19 No. 1 , Pp. 63–67.Miller David. The Straight and Narrow Rule of Induction: A Reply to Dr Bub and Mr Radner. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 19 No. 2, Pp. 145–151.Rozeboom. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (1):124-127.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. J. R. Kantor, Paul T. Mountjoy, Douglas H. Ruben & Noel W. Smith (1983). Reassessment in Psychology the Interbehavioral Alternative. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  27
    Richard C. Jeffrey (2004). Formal Logic: Its Scope and Limits. Hackett Pub..
    This brief paperback is designed for symbolic/formal logic courses. It features the tree method proof system developed by Jeffrey. The new edition contains many more examples and exercises and is reorganized for greater accessibility.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  7. Richard C. Jeffrey (1992). Probability and the Art of Judgment. Cambridge University Press.
    Richard Jeffrey is beyond dispute one of the most distinguished and influential philosophers working in the field of decision theory and the theory of knowledge. His work is distinctive in showing the interplay of epistemological concerns with probability and utility theory. Not only has he made use of standard probabilistic and decision theoretic tools to clarify concepts of evidential support and informed choice, he has also proposed significant modifications of the standard Bayesian position in order that it provide a (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   54 citations  
  8. J. R. Kantor (1919). Instrumental Transformism and the Unrealities of Realism. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 16 (17):449-461.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  64
    Richard C. Jeffrey (1974). Preference Among Preferences. Journal of Philosophy 71 (13):377-391.
  10.  55
    Richard C. Jeffrey (1956). Valuation and Acceptance of Scientific Hypotheses. Philosophy of Science 23 (3):237-246.
  11. Richard C. Jeffrey (1966). Goodman's Query. Journal of Philosophy 63 (11):281-288.
  12. Richard Jeffrey (2002). Logicism Lite. Philosophy of Science 69 (3):474-496.
    Logicism Lite counts number‐theoretical laws as logical for the same sort of reason for which physical laws are counted as as empirical: because of the character of the data they are responsible to. In the case of number theory these are the data verifying or falsifying the simplest equations, which Logicism Lite counts as true or false depending on the logical validity or invalidity of first‐order argument forms in which no numbertheoretical notation appears.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  30
    Richard Jeffrey (1987). Indefinite Probability Judgment: A Reply to Levi. Philosophy of Science 54 (4):586-591.
    Isaac Levi and I have different views of probability and decision making. Here, without addressing the merits, I will try to answer some questions recently asked by Levi (1985) about what my view is, and how it relates to his.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  14.  16
    J. R. Kantor (1938). The Rôle of Language in Logic and Science. Journal of Philosophy 35 (17):449-463.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  21
    Richard Jeffrey (1992). Radical Probabilism (Prospectus for a User's Manual). Philosophical Issues 2:193-204.
  16.  71
    J. R. Kantor (1932). Logic and Superstition. Journal of Philosophy 29 (9):232-236.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  58
    Jacob Robert Kantor (1922). Memory: A Triphase Objective Action. Journal of Philosophy 19 (23):624-639.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  35
    J. R. Kantor (1923). Concerning Some Faulty Conceptions of Social Psychology. Journal of Philosophy 20 (16):421-433.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  44
    Jacob Robert Kantor (1925). The Significance of the Gestalt Conception in Psychology. Journal of Philosophy 22 (9):234-241.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  27
    Richard C. Jeffrey (1971). On Interpersonal Utility Theory. Journal of Philosophy 68 (20):647-656.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  20
    Richard C. Jeffrey (1965). Ethics and the Logic of Decision. Journal of Philosophy 62 (19):528-539.
  22.  5
    J. R. Kantor (1919). Human Personality and its Pathology. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 16 (9):236-246.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  24
    Hans-Rudolf Kantor (2006). Ontological Indeterminacy and its Soteriological Relevance: An Assessment of Mou Zhongsan's (1909-1995) Interpretation of Zhiyi's (538-597) Tiantai Buddhism. [REVIEW] Philosophy East and West 56 (1):16-68.
    : This is an attempt to clarify a vital ontological aspect of Tiantai teaching created by the sixth-century Chinese Buddhist monk Zhiyi. To do this Tiantai must first be distanced from Mou Zongsan's interpretation of its central pattern of nonduality, a reconstructive theory that refers to both Chinese Buddhism and Confucianism and sees a "two-level ontology" in Chinese philosophical traditions, grounded in both the Chinese Buddhist patterns of "nonduality between the sacred and the profane" and the Kantian distinction between "noumena (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  5
    K. M. Kantor (1993). A Quick and Unjust Trial. Studies in East European Thought 45 (1-2):75 - 88.
  25.  19
    Richard Jeffrey (1993). Take Back the Day! Jon Dorling's Bayesian Solution of the Duhem Problem. Philosophical Issues 3:197-207.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  15
    J. R. Kantor (1935). Man and Machine in Science. Journal of Philosophy 32 (25):673-684.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  17
    Jacob Robert Kantor (1922). The Nervous System, Psychological Fact or Fiction? Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):38-49.
  28.  9
    Jacob R. Kantor (1918). The Ethics of Internationalism and the Individual. International Journal of Ethics 29 (1):29-38.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  11
    James H. Leuba & J. R. Kantor (1917). Statistics of Belief in God and Immortality. International Journal of Ethics 28 (1):109-114.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  13
    Richard C. Jeffrey (1964). Popper on the Rule of Succession. Mind 73 (289):129.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  2
    J. R. Kantor (1923). The Psychology of the Ethically Rational. International Journal of Ethics 33 (3):316-327.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  10
    J. R. Kantor (1929). Language as Behavior and as Symbolism. Journal of Philosophy 26 (6):150-159.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  2
    J. R. Kantor (1940). Postulates for a Logic of Specificity. Journal of Philosophy 37 (2):29-42.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  6
    J. R. Kantor (1921). A Tentative Analysis of the Primary Data of Psychology. Journal of Philosophy 18 (10):253-269.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  6
    J. R. Kantor (1920). Intelligence and Mental Tests. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 17 (10):260-268.
  36.  5
    Richard C. Jeffrey (1959). A Note on Finch's "an Explication of Counterfactuals by Probability Theory". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (1):116.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  1
    J. R. Kantor (1921). The Twenty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association. Journal of Philosophy 18 (7):185-192.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  1
    J. R. Kantor (1923). What Are the Data and Problems of Social Psychology? Journal of Philosophy 20 (17):449-457.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Franz Dietrich, Christian List & Richard Bradley (2016). Belief Revision Generalized: A Joint Characterization of Bayes's and Jeffrey's Rules. Journal of Economic Theory 162:352-371.
    We present a general framework for representing belief-revision rules and use it to characterize Bayes's rule as a classical example and Jeffrey's rule as a non-classical one. In Jeffrey's rule, the input to a belief revision is not simply the information that some event has occurred, as in Bayes's rule, but a new assignment of probabilities to some events. Despite their differences, Bayes's and Jeffrey's rules can be characterized in terms of the same axioms: "responsiveness", which requires (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Ittay Nissan-Rozen (2013). Jeffrey Conditionalization, the Principal Principle, the Desire as Belief Thesis, and Adams's Thesis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):axs039.
    I show that David Lewis’s principal principle is not preserved under Jeffrey conditionalization. Using this observation, I argue that Lewis’s reason for rejecting the desire as belief thesis and Adams’s thesis applies also to his own principal principle. 1 Introduction2 Adams’s Thesis, the Desire as Belief Thesis, and the Principal Principle3 Jeffrey Conditionalization4 The Principal Principles Not Preserved under Jeffrey Conditionalization5 Inadmissible Experiences.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  14
    Timothy Pawl (2015). Aquinas’s Ontology of the Material World: Change, Hylomorphism, and Material Objects. By Jeffrey E. Brower. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):723-727.
    I review Jeffrey Brower's book, "Aquinas's Ontology of the Material World".
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  22
    Lydia McGrew (2014). Jeffrey Conditioning, Rigidity, and the Defeasible Red Jelly Bean. Philosophical Studies 168 (2):569-582.
    Jonathan Weisberg has argued that Jeffrey Conditioning is inherently “anti-holistic” By this he means, inter alia, that JC does not allow us to take proper account of after-the-fact defeaters for our beliefs. His central example concerns the discovery that the lighting in a room is red-tinted and the relationship of that discovery to the belief that a jelly bean in the room is red. Weisberg’s argument that the rigidity required for JC blocks the defeating role of the red-tinted light (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  14
    Ilho Park (2013). Simultaneous Belief Updates Via Successive Jeffrey Conditionalization. Synthese 190 (16):3511-3533.
    This paper discusses simultaneous belief updates. I argue here that modeling such belief updates using the Principle of Minimum Information can be regarded as applying Jeffrey conditionalization successively, and so that, contrary to what many probabilists have thought, the simultaneous belief updates can be successfully modeled by means of Jeffrey conditionalization.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  8
    Christopher F. French (2015). Explicating Formal Epistemology: Carnap's Legacy as Jeffrey's Radical Probabilism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53:33–42.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  7
    Jeffrey Church (2014). Nietzsche, Nihilism, and the Philosophy of the Future Ed. By Jeffrey Metzger (Review). Journal of Nietzsche Studies 44 (3):495-497.
    In his introduction, Jeffrey Metzger states that “at some point in the past 20 or 30 years … Nietzsche’s name [became] no longer associated primarily with nihilism” (1). Metzger is pointing to the increasing contemporary scholarly interest in Nietzsche’s epistemology, naturalism, and metaethics. The worthy aim of this volume is to ask us to examine once again the underlying philosophical problem to which these views are a response, namely, nihilism. This volume helpfully reminds us that Nietzsche’s philosophical motivation still (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  79
    Hartry Field (1978). A Note on Jeffrey Conditionalization. Philosophy of Science 45 (3):361-367.
    Bayesian decision theory can be viewed as the core of psychological theory for idealized agents. To get a complete psychological theory for such agents, you have to supplement it with input and output laws. On a Bayesian theory that employs strict conditionalization, the input laws are easy to give. On a Bayesian theory that employs Jeffrey conditionalization, there appears to be a considerable problem with giving the input laws. However, Jeffrey conditionalization can be reformulated so that the problem (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   31 citations  
  47.  8
    N. Deng (2016). Response to Jeffrey Bishop. Studies in Christian Ethics 29 (3):269-271.
    I respond to Jeffrey Bishop’s article ‘Arts of Dying and the Statecraft of Killing’, in this issue, and in particular to his remarks in support of the claim that assisted death should not be legalised.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  66
    Antje Kahl (2014). Jeffrey P. Bishop, The Anticipatory Corpse: Medicine, Power and the Care of the Dying. Human Studies 37 (4):589-596.
    “[T]here is something rotten at the heart of medicine” —this is one of the central statements of Jeffrey Paul Bishop in his book The Anticipatory Corpse. Medicine, Power and the Care of the Dying. The obvious, if somewhat morbid, thought that “rotten” would refer to the decaying body as the central subject of investigation is, however, misleading. Instead, Bishop aims to demonstrate that the modern trend of medicalizing dying and death is the wrong way.The book explores contemporary medicine’s practices, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  27
    Carl Wagner (2010). Jeffrey Conditioning and External Bayesianity. Logic Journal of the IGPL 18 (2):336-345.
    Suppose that several individuals who have separately assessed prior probability distributions over a set of possible states of the world wish to pool their individual distributions into a single group distribution, while taking into account jointly perceived new evidence. They have the option of first updating their individual priors and then pooling the resulting posteriors or first pooling their priors and then updating the resulting group prior. If the pooling method that they employ is such that they arrive at the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  50. J. Williamson (2006). From Bayesianism to the Epistemic View of Mathematics: Review of R. Jeffrey, Subjective Probability: The Real Thing. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 14 (3):365-369.
    Subjective Probability: The Real Thing is the last book written by the late Richard Jeffrey, a key proponent of the Bayesian interpretation of probability.Bayesians hold that probability is a mental notion: saying that the probability of rain is 0.7 is just saying that you believe it will rain to degree 0.7. Degrees of belief are themselves cashed out in terms of bets—in this case you consider 7:3 to be fair odds for a bet on rain. There are two extreme (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000