Search results for 'Intension' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. James A. Hampton (2014). Conceptual Combination: Extension and Intension. Commentary on Aerts, Gabora, and Sozzo. Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):53-57.score: 22.0
    Aerts et al. provide a valuable model to capture the interactive nature of conceptual combination in conjunctions and disjunctions. The commentary provides a brief review of the interpretation of these interactions that has been offered in the literature, and argues for a closer link between the more traditional account in terms of concept intensions, and the parameters that emerge from the fitting of the Quantum Probability model.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David J. Chalmers (2002). On Sense and Intension. Philosophical Perspectives 16 (s16):135-82.score: 21.0
    What is involved in the meaning of our expressions? Frege suggested that there is an aspect of an expression.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Peter Alward (2004). Is Phenomenal Pain the Primary Intension of 'Pain'? Metaphysica 5 (1):15-28.score: 21.0
    two-dimensional modal framework introduced by Evans [2] and developed by Davies and Humberstone. [3] This framework provides Chalmers with a powerful tool for handling the most serious objection to conceivability arguments for dualism: the problem of..
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Catherine Legg (1999). Extension, Intension and Dormitive Virtue. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35 (4):654 - 677.score: 21.0
    Would be fairer to call Peirce’s philosophy of language “extensionalist” or “intensionalist”? The extensionalisms of Carnap and Quine are examined, and Peirce’s view is found to be prima facie similar, except for his commitment to the importance of “hypostatic abstraction”. Rather than dismissing this form of abstraction (famously derided by Molière) as useless scholasticism, Peirce argues that it represents a crucial (though largely unnoticed) step in much working inference. This, it is argued, allows Peirce to transcend the extensionalist-intensionalist dichotomy itself, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. I. Hanzel (2006). Frege, the Identity ofSinnand Carnap's Intension. History and Philosophy of Logic 27 (3):229-247.score: 18.0
    The paper analyses Frege's approach to the identity conditions for the entity labelled by him as Sinn. It starts with a brief characterization of the main principles of Frege's semantics and lists his remarks on the identity conditions for Sinn. They are subject to a detailed scrutiny, and it is shown that, with the exception of the criterion of intersubstitutability in oratio obliqua, all other criteria have to be discarded. Finally, by comparing Frege's views on Sinn with Carnap's method of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Emmett L. Holman (1981). Intension, Identity, and the Colourless Physical World: A Revision and Further Discussion. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59 (2):203 – 205.score: 18.0
    (1981). Intension, identity, and the Colourless Physical World: A revision and further discussion. Australasian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 203-205.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Julien Bernard (2009). Notes on the First Chapter of The Continuum: Intension, Extension, and Arithmetism. Philosophia Scientiae 13 (1):155-176.score: 18.0
    Dans le Continu, Hermann Weyl donne une nouvelle assise aux notions d’ensemble et de fonction, pour assurer aux mathématiques leur applicabilité à la physique, et résoudre ainsi le problème du continu. Les notions introduites, éloignées de la théorie des ensembles, prêtent à confusion et à multiples interprétations.Nous nous proposons d’éclairer le sens du déplacement que Weyl opère dans ces notions. Nous présentons une synthèse des thèses épistémologiques soutenues dans Le Continu et résolvons certains problèmes interprétatifs. Par une approche comparative, nous (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Alain Gallerand (2013). Bolzano et le problème du rapport intension/extension : La redondance logique vs. le principe de proportionnalité inverse. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique.score: 18.0
    Cet article, qui fait suite à une publication précédente (« Les apories du concept de redondance logique chez Bolzano »), poursuit un double objectif : (I) démontrer que les apories que nous avions relevées peuvent être surmontées par l’analyse des rapports extensionnels entre représentations ; (II) évaluer la contribution de Bolzano à la question classique des rapports intension/extension telle qu’elle a été posée par Port-Royal. La logique des classes, dont Bolzano pose les fondements ( Théorie de la science, 2 (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jean-Pierre Desclés & Anca Pascu (2011). Logic of Determination of Objects (LDO): How to Articulate “Extension” with “Intension” and “Objects” with “Concepts”. [REVIEW] Logica Universalis 5 (1):75-89.score: 16.0
    From a logical viewpoint, object is never defined, even by a negative definition. This paper is a theoretical contribution about object using a new constructivist logical approach called Logic of Determination of Objects founded on a basic operation, called determination. This new logic takes into account cognitive problems such as the inheritance of properties by non typical occurrences or by indeterminate atypical objects in opposition to prototypes that are typical completely determinate objects. We show how extensional classes, intensions, more and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jonathan Stoltz (2006). Concepts, Intension, and Identity in Tibetan Philosophy of Language. Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 29 (2):383-400.score: 15.0
    This article examines one highly localized set of developments to the Buddhist doctrine of word meaning that was made by twelfth and thirteenth century Tibetan Buddhist epistemologists primarily schooled at gSaṅ phu Monastery in central Tibet. I will show how these thinkers developed the notion of a concept (don spyi) in order to explain how it is that words are capable of applying to real objects, and how concepts can be used to capture elements of word meaning extending beyond reference (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Itay Shani (2005). Intension and Representation: Quine's Indeterminacy Thesis Revisited. Philosophical Psychology 18 (4):415 – 440.score: 15.0
    This paper re-addresses Quine's indeterminacy of translation/inscrutability of reference thesis, as a problem for cognitive theories of content. In contradistinction with Quine's behavioristic semantics, theories of meaning, or content, in the cognitivist tradition endorse intentional realism, and are prone to be unsympathetic to Quine's thesis. Yet, despite this fundamental difference, I argue that they are just as vulnerable to the indeterminacy. I then argue that the vulnerability is rooted in a theoretical commitment tacitly shared with Quine, namely, the commitment to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Evert W. Beth (1960). Extension and Intension. Synthese 12 (4):375 - 379.score: 15.0
  13. O. Bradley Bassler (1998). Leibniz on Intension, Extension, and the Representation of Syllogistic Inference. Synthese 116 (2):117-139.score: 15.0
    New light is shed on Leibniz’s commitment to the metaphysical priority of the intensional interpretation of logic by considering the arithmetical and graphical representations of syllogistic inference that Leibniz studied. Crucial to understanding this connection is the idea that concepts can be intensionally represented in terms of properties of geometric extension, though significantly not the simple geometric property of part-whole inclusion. I go on to provide an explanation for how Leibniz could maintain the metaphysical priority of the intensional interpretation while (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Anil Gupta & Nuel Belnap (1987). A Note on Extension, Intension, and Truth. Journal of Philosophy 84 (3):168-174.score: 15.0
  15. Fred M. Katz & Jerrold J. Katz (1977). Is Necessity the Mother of Intension? Philosophical Review 86 (1):70-96.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Chris Swoyer (1995). Leibniz on Intension and Extension. Noûs 29 (1):96-114.score: 15.0
  17. Pavel Tichý (1969). Intension in Terms of Turing Machines. Studia Logica 24 (1):7 - 25.score: 15.0
  18. St Kirschner (2000). Oresme on Intension and Remission of Qualities in His Commentary on Aristotle's Physics. Vivarium 38 (2):255-274.score: 15.0
  19. Stefano Caroti (2004). Some Remarks on Buridan's Discussion on Intension and Remission. Vivarium 42 (1):58-85.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. W. Mays (1961). Pragmatics and Intension. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 39 (1):1 – 12.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Mary Spencer (1971). Why the "s" in "Intension"? Mind 80 (317):114-115.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Barbara Stanosz (1964). Formal Theories of Extension and Intension of Expressions. Studia Logica 15 (1):48-48.score: 15.0
  23. Leo Abraham (1933). Implication, Modality and Intension in Symbolic Logic. The Monist 43 (1):119-153.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Sylvester J. Hartman (1946). Intension and Extension. New Scholasticism 20 (4):368-373.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Garrel Pottinger (1985). Intension, Designation, and Extension. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 26 (4):309-340.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Ingvar Johansson (1986). Levels of Intension and Theories of Reference. Theoria 52 (1-2):1-15.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Elżbieta Jung (2011). Intension and Remission of Forms. In. In H. Lagerlund (ed.), Encyclopedia of Medieval Philosophy. Springer. 551--555.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. G. B. Keene & Richard M. Martin (1966). Intension and Decision: A Philosophical Study. Philosophical Quarterly 16 (62):83.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. John Peterson (1972). Intension, Extension, and Metaphysics. The Modern Schoolman 50 (1):57-64.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Archie J. Bahm (1946). Intension and Extension. New Scholasticism 20 (2):183-183.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Bruno Leclercq (2010). Quand c?est l?intension qui compte: Opacité référentielle et intentionalité. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique (8).score: 15.0
    Ce sont, on le sait, globalement les mêmes questions philosophiques qui sont à l?origine, d?une part, de la thèse de l?intentionalité des phénomènes psychiques formulée dans l?école de Franz Brentano et, d?autre part, de la thèse de l?inten s ionalité de certaines expressions linguistiques développée dans l?école de Gottlob Frege. Dans les deux cas, il s?agit de rendre compte de la capacité qu?ont les actes mentaux et les signes linguistiques de « se rapporter à » ou de « viser » (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Richard Montague (1996). Martin Richard M.. Intension and Decision. A Philosophical Study. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1963, Xv+ 159 Pp. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1):98-102.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Nicholas Rescher (1959). The Distinction Between Predicate Intension and Extension. Revue Philosophique de Louvain 57 (56):623-636.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Arto Salomaa (1963). Review: Raili Kauppi, Intension and Extension of Concepts. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 28 (1):106-106.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Peter M. Simons (1991). Inadequacies of Intension and Extension. In Georg Schurz (ed.), Advances in Scientific Philosophy. 24--393.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. R. W. (1962). Über Die Leibnizsche Logik, Mit Besonderer Berücksichtigung des Problems der Intension Und der Extension. Review of Metaphysics 16 (2):396-396.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Jaime Sarabia Alvarez-Ude (1990). Sobre tópicos y términos primitivos de la intensión. Revista de Filosofía 4:5-30.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. J. Biard (2002). L'être et la mesure dans¡'intension et la rémission des formes (Jean Buridan, Blaise de Parme). Medioevo 27:415-447.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. C. David (2002). On Sense and Intension. Philosophical Perspectives 16.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Donald Davidson (1963). The Method of Extension and Intension. In Paul Arthur Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle, Ill.,Open Court. 311--349.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. George Dickie (2004). Defining Art : Intension and Extension. In Peter Kivy (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics. Blackwell Pub..score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Gary Goertz (2009). Point of Departure: Intension and Extension. In David Collier & John Gerring (eds.), Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori. Routledge. 181--203.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. R. H. K. (1964). Intension and Decision. Review of Metaphysics 18 (1):180-180.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. W. Kneale & Raili Kauppi (1962). Uber die Leibnizsche Logik, mit Besonderer Berucksichtigung des Problems der Intension und der Extension (Acta Philosophica Fennica, Fasc. xii). Philosophical Quarterly 12 (48):281.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Richard Montague (1966). Review: Richard M. Martin, Intension and Decision. A Philosophy Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (1):98-102.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Luis Fernández Moreno (2011). Intensión/Extensión. In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. Editorial Trotta.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Everett J. Nelson (1933). On Three Logical Principles in Intension. The Monist 43 (2):268-284.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Dominique Pradelle (2004). Intension ou extension ? (sur le statut du concept chez Frege). Philosophie 83 (3):28.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Nicholas Rescher (1951). Review: C. I. Lewis, Notes on the Logic of Intension. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 16 (3):231-232.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Jaime Sarabia (1990). Sobre tópicos y términos primitivos de la intensión. Revista de Filosofía (Madrid) 4:5.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000