Search results for 'nosological validity' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Benjamin James Alexander Dickins, David William Dickins & Thomas Edmund Dickins (2008). Is This Conjectural Phenotypic Dichotomy a Plausible Outcome of Genomic Imprinting? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (3):267-268.score: 30.0
    What is the status of the dichotomy proposed and the nosological validity of the contrasting pathologies described in the target article? How plausibly can dysregulated imprinting explain the array of features described, compared with other genetic models? We believe that considering alternative models is more likely to lead in the long term to the correct classification and explanation of the component behaviours.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Sinan Dogramaci (2010). Knowledge of Validity. Noûs 44 (3):403-432.score: 24.0
    What accounts for how we know that certain rules of reasoning, such as reasoning by Modus Ponens, are valid? If our knowledge of validity must be based on some reasoning, then we seem to be committed to the legitimacy of rule-circular arguments for validity. This paper raises a new difficulty for the rule-circular account of our knowledge of validity. The source of the problem is that, contrary to traditional wisdom, a universal generalization cannot be inferred just on (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Julien Murzi (2014). The Inexpressibility of Validity. Analysis 74 (1):65-81.score: 24.0
    Tarski's Undefinability of Truth Theorem comes in two versions: that no consistent theory which interprets Robinson's Arithmetic (Q) can prove all instances of the T-Scheme and hence define truth; and that no such theory, if sound, can even express truth. In this note, I prove corresponding limitative results for validity. While Peano Arithmetic already has the resources to define a predicate expressing logical validity, as Jeff Ketland has recently pointed out (2012, Validity as a primitive. Analysis 72: (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Hartry Field (forthcoming). What Is Logical Validity? In Colin Caret & Ole Hjortland (eds.), Foundations of Logical Consequence.score: 24.0
    What are people who disagree about logic disagreeing about? The paper argues that (in a wide range of cases) they are primarily disagreeing about how to regulate their degrees of belief. An analogy is drawn between beliefs about validity and beliefs about chance: both sorts of belief serve primarily to regulate degrees of belief about other matters, but in both cases the concepts have a kind of objectivity nonetheless.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Edgar Andrade-Lotero & Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2012). Validity, the Squeezing Argument and Alternative Semantic Systems: The Case of Aristotelian Syllogistic. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):387-418.score: 24.0
    We investigate the philosophical significance of the existence of different semantic systems with respect to which a given deductive system is sound and complete. Our case study will be Corcoran’s deductive system D for Aristotelian syllogistic and some of the different semantic systems for syllogistic that have been proposed in the literature. We shall prove that they are not equivalent, in spite of D being sound and complete with respect to each of them. Beyond the specific case of syllogistic, the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Hartry Field (forthcoming). Disarming a Paradox of Validity. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic.score: 24.0
    Abstract. Any theory of truth must find a way around Curry’s paradox, and there are well-known ways to do so. This paper concerns an apparently analogous paradox, about validity rather than truth, which JC Beall and Julien Murzi (“Two Flavor's of Curry's Paradox”) call the v-Curry. They argue that there are reasons to want a common solution to it and the standard Curry paradox, and that this rules out the solutions to the latter offered by most “naive truth theorists”. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Roberta Ballarin (2005). Validity and Necessity. Journal of Philosophical Logic 34 (3):275 - 303.score: 24.0
    In this paper I argue against the commonly received view that Kripke's formal Possible World Semantics (PWS) reflects the adoption of a metaphysical interpretation of the modal operators. I consider in detail Kripke's three main innovations vis-à-vis Carnap's PWS: a new view of the worlds, variable domains of quantification, and the adoption of a notion of universal validity. I argue that all these changes are driven by the natural technical development of the model theory and its related notion of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Roy T. Cook (2014). There is No Paradox of Logical Validity. Logica Universalis 8 (3-4):447-467.score: 24.0
    A number of authors have argued that Peano Arithmetic supplemented with a logical validity predicate is inconsistent in much the same manner as is PA supplemented with an unrestricted truth predicate. In this paper I show that, on the contrary, there is no genuine paradox of logical validity—a completely general logical validity predicate can be coherently added to PA, and the resulting system is consistent. In addition, this observation lead to a number of novel, and important, insights (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Michael Baumgartner (2013). Exhibiting Interpretational and Representational Validity. Synthese:1-25.score: 24.0
    A natural language argument may be valid in at least two nonequivalent senses: it may be interpretationally or representationally valid (Etchemendy in The concept of logical consequence. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1990). Interpretational and representational validity can both be formally exhibited by classical first-order logic. However, as these two notions of informal validity differ extensionally and first-order logic fixes one determinate extension for the notion of formal validity (or consequence), some arguments must be formalized by unrelated nonequivalent (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Adela Cortina (2000). Civil Ethics and the Validity of Law. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (1):39-55.score: 24.0
    This paper aims to clarify the nature and contents of 'civil ethics' and the source of the binding force of its obligations. This ethics should provide the criteria for evaluating the moral validity of social, legal and morally valid law. The article starts with observing that in morally pluralist Western societies civil ethics already exists, and has gradually started to play the role of guiding the law. It is argued that civil ethics should not be conceived as 'civic morals' (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. James A. Woodbridge & Bradley Armour-Garb (2008). The Pathology of Validity. Synthese 160 (1):63 - 74.score: 24.0
    Stephen Read has presented an argument for the inconsistency of the concept of validity. We extend Read’s results and show that this inconsistency is but one half of a larger problem. Like the concept of truth, validity is infected with what we call semantic pathology, a condition that actually gives rise to two symptoms: inconsistency and indeterminacy. After sketching the basic ideas behind semantic pathology and explaining how it manifests both symptoms in the concept of truth, we present (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Andrea Polonioli (2012). Gigerenzer's 'External Validity Argument' Against the Heuristics and Biases Program: An Assessment. [REVIEW] Mind and Society 11 (2):133-148.score: 24.0
    Gigerenzer’s ‘external validity argument’ plays a pivotal role in his critique of the heuristics and biases research program (HB). The basic idea is that (a) the experimental contexts deployed by HB are not representative of the real environment and that (b) the differences between the setting and the real environment are causally relevant, because they result in different performances by the subjects. However, by considering Gigerenzer’s work on frequencies in probability judgments, this essay attempts to show that there are (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Nicholas Bardsley (2010). Sociality and External Validity in Experimental Economics. Mind and Society 9 (2):119-138.score: 24.0
    It is sometimes argued that experimental economists do not have to worry about external validity so long as the design sticks closely to a theoretical model. This position mistakes the model for the theory. As a result, applied economics designs often study phenomena distinct from their stated objects of inquiry. Because the implemented models are abstract, they may provide improbable analogues to their stated subject matter. This problem is exacerbated by the relational character of the social world, which also (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. George Mendelson (1991). Chronic Pain, Compensation and Clinical Knowledge. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 12 (3).score: 24.0
    The nosological status of the putative clinical entity of compensation neurosis and the relationship of chronic pain complaints to compensation are explored. It is concluded that, using the traditional criteria of diagnostic validity, there is no support for the view that a specific type of psychiatric disorder related to compensation or litigation can be demonstrated. Although it has been generally considered that chronic pain complaints reflect an underlying disease state, recent evidence has shown that in the medico-legal setting (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Lionel Shapiro (2013). Validity Curry Strengthened. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):100-107.score: 24.0
    Several authors have argued that a version of Curry's paradox involving validity motivates rejecting the structural rule of contraction. This paper criticizes two recently suggested alternative responses to “validity Curry.” There are three salient stages in a validity Curry derivation. Rejecting contraction blocks the first, while the alternative responses focus on the second and third. I show that a distinguishing feature of validity Curry, as contrasted with more familiar forms of Curry's paradox, is that paradox arises (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Gordon Stobart (2001). The Validity of National Curriculum Assessment. British Journal of Educational Studies 49 (1):26 - 39.score: 24.0
    This paper reviews the validity of National Curriculum assessment in England. It works with the concept of 'consequential validity' (Messick, 1989) which incorporates both conventional 'reliability' issues and the use to which any assessment is put. The review uses the eight stage 'threats to validity' model developed by Crooks, Kane and Cohen (1996). The complexity of National Curriculum assessment makes evaluation difficult. These assessments are used for a variety of purposes so that the 'consequential' aspects are compounded. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Federica Russo (2011). Correlational Data, Causal Hypotheses, and Validity. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 42 (1):85 - 107.score: 24.0
    A shared problem across the sciences is to make sense of correlational data coming from observations and/or from experiments. Arguably, this means establishing when correlations are causal and when they are not. This is an old problem in philosophy. This paper, narrowing down the scope to quantitative causal analysis in social science, reformulates the problem in terms of the validity of statistical models. Two strategies to make sense of correlational data are presented: first, a 'structural strategy', the goal of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Stephan Leuenberger (2013). De Jure and De Facto Validity in the Logic of Time and Modality. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):196-205.score: 24.0
    What formulas are tense-logically valid depends on the structure of time, for example on whether it has a beginning. Logicians have investigated what formulas correspond to what physical hypotheses about time. Analogously, we can investigate what formulas of modal logic correspond to what metaphysical hypotheses about necessity. It is widely held that physical hypotheses about time may be contingent. If so, tense-logical validity may be contingent. In contrast, validity in modal logic is typically taken to be non-contingent, as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jan J. Wilbanks (2010). Defining Deduction, Induction, and Validity. Argumentation 24 (1):107-124.score: 24.0
    In this paper I focus on two contrasting concepts of deduction and induction that have appeared in introductory (formal) logic texts over the past 75 years or so. According to the one, deductive and inductive arguments are defined solely by reference to what arguers claim about the relation between the premises and the conclusions. According to the other, they are defined solely by reference to that relation itself. Arguing that these definitions have defects that are due to their simplicity, I (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Edgar Andrade-Lotero & Catarina Dutilh Novaes (2012). Validity, the Squeezing Argument and Alternative Semantic Systems: The Case of Aristotelian Syllogistic. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (2):387 - 418.score: 24.0
    We investigate the philosophical significance of the existence of different semantic systems with respect to which a given deductive system is sound and complete. Our case study will be Corcoran's deductive system D for Aristotelian syllogistic and some of the different semantic systems for syllogistic that have been proposed in the literature. We shall prove that they are not equivalent, in spite of D being sound and complete with respect to each of them. Beyond the specific case of syllogistic, the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Stephen Intille Genevieve Fridlund Dunton, Yue Liao, Keito Kawabata (2012). Momentary Assessment of Adults' Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior: Feasibility and Validity. Frontiers in Psychology 3.score: 24.0
    Introduction: Mobile phones are ubiquitous and easy to use, and thus have the capacity to collect real-time data from large numbers of people. Research tested the feasibility and validity of an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) self-report protocol using electronic surveys on mobile phones to assess adults’ physical activity and sedentary behaviors. Methods: Adults (N = 110) (73% female, 30% Hispanic, 62% overweight/obese) completed a four-day signal-contingent EMA protocol (Sat. - Tues.) with eight surveys randomly spaced throughout each day. EMA (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Tony Myers & Nigel Balmer (2012). The Impact of Crowd Noise on Officiating in Muay Thai: Achieving External Validity in an Experimental Setting. Frontiers in Psychology 3.score: 24.0
    Numerous factors have been proposed to explain the home advantage in sport. Several authors have suggested that a partisan home crowd enhances home advantage and that this is at least in part a consequence of their influence on officiating. However, while experimental studies examining this phenomenon have high levels of internal validity (since only the ‘crowd noise’ intervention is allowed to vary), they suffer from a lack of external validity, with decision-making in a laboratory setting typically bearing little (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Hedwig Boudrez & Dirk De Bacquer (2012). A Dutch Version of the Modified Reasons for Smoking Scale: Factorial Structure, Reliability and Validity. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (4):799-806.score: 24.0
    Aims : The Modified Reasons for Smoking Scale (MRSS) is a widely accepted scale that measures psychological functions of smoking. The scale has been translated in Dutch and has been validated, in order to be used in clinical smoking cessation practice in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium. This study examined the factorial structure, reliability and validity of the scale in a sample of smokers, who are characterized by a high level of dependence and an explicit motivation to stop smoking. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Miguel A. García-Pérez (2012). Statistical Conclusion Validity: Some Common Threats and Simple Remedies. Frontiers in Psychology 3.score: 24.0
    The ultimate goal of research is to produce dependable knowledge or to provide the evidence that may guide practical decisions. Statistical conclusion validity (SCV) holds when the conclusions of a research study are founded on an adequate analysis of the data, generally meaning that adequate statistical methods are used whose small-sample behavior is accurate, besides being logically capable of providing an answer to the research question. Compared to the three other traditional aspects of research validity (external validity, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Nigel Balmer Tony Myers (2012). The Impact of Crowd Noise on Officiating in Muay Thai: Achieving External Validity in an Experimental Setting. Frontiers in Psychology 3.score: 24.0
    Numerous factors have been proposed to explain the home advantage in sport. Several authors have suggested that a partisan home crowd enhances home advantage and that this is at least in part a consequence of their influence on officiating. However, while experimental studies examining this phenomenon have high levels of internal validity (since only the ‘crowd noise’ intervention is allowed to vary), they suffer from a lack of external validity, with decision-making in a laboratory setting typically bearing little (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Julie Pozzebon, Rodica Ioana Damian, Patrick Hill, Yuchen Lin, Susan Lapham & Brent W. Roberts (2013). Establishing the Validity and Reliability of the Project Talent Personality Inventory. Frontiers in Psychology 4:968.score: 24.0
    Project Talent is a national longitudinal study that started in 1960. The original sample included over 440,000 students, which amounted to a 5% representative sample of high school students across the United States. Previous research has not yet established the validity and reliability of the personality measure used in this study, that is, the Project Talent Personality Inventory (PTPI). Given the potential interest and use of the PTPI in forthcoming research, the goals of the present paper were to establish (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Romain Schneckenburger (2011). Biological Psychiatry and Normative Problems: From Nosology to Destigmatization Campaigns. Medicine Studies 3 (1):9-17.score: 22.0
    Psychiatry is becoming a cognitive neuroscience. This new paradigm not only aims to give new ways for explaining mental diseases by naturalizing them, but also to have an influence on different levels of psychiatric norms. We tried here to verify whether a biological paradigm is able to fulfill this normative goal. We analyzed three main normative assumptions that is to say the will of giving psychiatry a valid nosology, a rigorous definition of what is a mental disease, and new tools (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Julien Murzi & Lionel Shapiro (forthcoming). Validity and Truth-Preservation. In D. Achourioti, H. Galinon & J. Martinez (eds.), Unifying the Philosophy of Truth Springer. Springer.score: 22.0
    The revisionary approach to semantic paradox is commonly thought to have a somewhat uncomfortable corollary, viz. that, on pain of triviality, we cannot affirm that all valid arguments preserve truth (Beall2007, Beall2009, Field2008, Field2009). We show that the standard arguments for this conclusion all break down once (i) the structural rule of contraction is restricted and (ii) how the premises can be aggregated---so that they can be said to jointly entail a given conclusion---is appropriately understood. In addition, we briefly rehearse (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Pierdaniele Giaretta & Giuseppe Spolaore (2012). Validity and Effectiveness of Ambiguity: A Famous Argument by Socrates. [REVIEW] Argumentation 26 (3):393-407.score: 22.0
    An argument can be superficially valid and rhetorically effective even if what is plausibly meant, what is derived from what, and how it is derived is not at all clear. An example of such an argument is provided by Socrates’s famous refutation of Euthyphro’s second definition of holy, which is generally regarded as clearly valid and successful. This paper provides a stricter logical analysis than the ones in the literature. In particular, it is shown that the argument contains a syntactically (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Kenneth F. Schaffner (2012). A Philosophical Overview of the Problems of Validity for Psychiatric Disorders. In Kenneth S. Kendler & Josef Parnas (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry Ii: Nosology. Oup Oxford. 169.score: 22.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Peter Zachar (2012). Validity, Utility and Reality: Explicating Schaffner's. In Kenneth S. Kendler & Josef Parnas (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry Ii: Nosology. Oup Oxford. 190.score: 22.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Robert F. Krueger & Nicholas R. Eaton (2012). Structural Validity And. In Kenneth S. Kendler & Josef Parnas (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry Ii: Nosology. Oup Oxford. 199.score: 22.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Mark Vorobej (1995). Linked Arguments and the Validity Requirement. Argumentation 9 (2):291-304.score: 22.0
    In this paper I demonstrate that most textbook accounts of the linked/convergent distinction fail to conform to the widespread intuition that all valid arguments ought to be classified as linked arguments. I also show that standard textbook accounts of linkage and convergence cannot provide a satisfactory treatment of fallacies of irrelevance and, due to their general insensitivity to the epistemic context in which arguments are offered, must be supplemented by subjective accounts of linkage and convergence which appeal exclusively to authorial (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Peter Zachar (2012). Progress and the Calibration of Scientific Constructs: The Role of Comparative Validity. In Kenneth S. Kendler & Josef Parnas (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry Ii: Nosology. Oup Oxford. 21.score: 22.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. David Alm (2007). Non-Cognitivism and Validity. Theoria 73 (2):121-147.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Kirsten Lomborg & Marit Kirkevold (2003). Truth and Validity in Grounded Theory – a Reconsidered Realist Interpretation of the Criteria: Fit, Work, Relevance and Modifiability. Nursing Philosophy 4 (3):189-200.score: 21.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. David J. A. Dozois (2000). Influences on Freud's Mourning and Melancholia and its Contextual Validity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology 20 (2):167-195.score: 21.0
  38. Author unknown, Validity and Soundness. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. I. L. Janis & F. Frick (1943). The Relationship Between Attitudes Toward Conclusions and Errors in Judging Logical Validity of Syllogisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology 33 (1):73.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. [deleted]Judith Glück, Susanne König, Katja Naschenweng, Uwe Redzanowski, Lara Dorner, Irene Straßer & Wolfgang Wiedermann (2013). How to Measure Wisdom: Content, Reliability, and Validity of Five Measures. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. H. J. Eysenck (1941). The Validity and Reliability of Group Judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (5):427-434.score: 21.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. [deleted]Ching-Hung Lin, Tzu-Jiun Song, Ying-Ying Chen, We-Kang Lee & Yao-Chu Chiu (2013). Reexamining the Validity and Reliability of the Clinical Version of the Iowa Gambling Task: Evidence From a Normal Subject Group. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 21.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Yolandi Brink & Quinette A. Louw (2012). Clinical Instruments: Reliability and Validity Critical Appraisal. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (6):1126-1132.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Juan V. Luciano, Jordan Bertsch, Luis Salvador‐Carulla, José M. Tomás, Ana Fernández, Alejandra Pinto‐Meza, Josep M. Haro, Diego J. Palao & Antoni Serrano‐Blanco (2010). Factor Structure, Internal Consistency and Construct Validity of the Sheehan Disability Scale in a Spanish Primary Care Sample. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (5):895-901.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Earl A. Alluisi & Raymond C. Sidorsky (1958). The Empirical Validity of Equal Discriminability Scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology 55 (1):86.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Michael Berk, Felicity Ng, Seetal Dodd, Tom Callaly, Shirley Campbell, Michelle Bernardo & Tom Trauer (2008). The Validity of the CGI Severity and Improvement Scales as Measures of Clinical Effectiveness Suitable for Routine Clinical Use. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (6):979-983.score: 21.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Berndt Brehmer & Lars-AKe Lindberg (1970). Retention of Probabilistic Cue-Criterion Relations as a Function of Cue Validity and Retention Interval. Journal of Experimental Psychology 86 (2):331.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Berndt Brehmer & Lars A. Lindberg (1973). Retention of Single-Cue Probability Learning Tasks as a Function of Cue Validity, Retention Interval, and Degree of Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 101 (2):404.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Michael E. Dawson & Paul Reardon (1973). Construct Validity of Recall and Recognition Postconditioning Measures of Awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):308.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Inmaculada Failde, Pilar Medina, Carmen Ramirez & Roque Arana (2010). Construct and Criterion Validity of the SF‐12 Health Questionnaire in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Unstable Angina. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (3):569-573.score: 21.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000