Results for 'Evaluation'

998 found
Order:
See also
  1.  27
    Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications.Maarten van Wesel - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):199-225.
    Criteria for the evaluation of most scholars’ work have recently received wider attention due to high-profile cases of scientific misconduct which are perceived to be linked to these criteria. However, in the competition for career advancement and funding opportunities almost all scholars are subjected to the same criteria. Therefore these evaluation criteria act as ‘switchmen’, determining the tracks along which scholarly work is pushed by the dynamic interplay of interests of both scholars and their institutions. Currently one of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  2.  4
    Thick Evaluation.Simon T. Kirchin - 2017 - Oxford University Press.
    The descriptions 'good' and 'bad' are examples of thin concepts, as opposed to 'kind' or 'cruel' which are thick concepts. Simon Kirchin provides one of the first full-length studies of the crucial distinction between 'thin' and 'thick' concepts, which is fundamental to many debates in ethics, aesthetics and epistemology.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  3.  87
    Understanding Evaluation of Faces on Social Dimensions.Alexander Todorov, Chris P. Said, Andrew D. Engell & Nikolaas N. Oosterhof - 2008 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12 (12):455-460.
  4.  37
    Brittleness Evaluation of Resource Plays by Integrating Petrophysical and Seismic Data Analysis.Bo Zhang, Tao Zhao, Xiaochun Jin & Kurt J. Marfurt - 2015 - Interpretation: SEG 3 (2):T81-T92.
    The main considerations for well planning and hydraulic fracturing in unconventional resources plays include the amount of total organic carbon and how much hydrocarbon can be extracted. Brittleness is the direct measurement of a formation about the ability to create avenues for hydrocarbons when applying hydraulic fracturing. Brittleness can be directly estimated from laboratory stress-strain measurements, rock-elastic properties, and mineral content analysis using petrophysical analysis on well logs. However, the estimated brittleness using these methods only provides “cylinder” estimates near the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  5.  22
    Clinicians' Evaluation of Clinical Ethics Consultations in Norway: A Qualitative Study. [REVIEW]Reidun Førde, Reidar Pedersen & Victoria Akre - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (1):17-25.
    Clinical ethics committees have existed in Norway since 1996. By now all hospital trusts have one. An evaluation of these committees’ work was started in 2004. This paper presents results from an interview study of eight clinicians who evaluated six committees’ deliberations on 10 clinical cases. The study indicates that the clinicians found the clinical ethics consultations useful and worth while doing. However, a systematic approach to case consultations is vital. Procedures and mandate of the committees should be known (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  6. Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology.David K. Henderson & John Greco (eds.) - 2015 - Oxford University Press UK.
    Epistemic Evaluation aims to explore and apply a particular methodology in epistemology. The methodology is to consider the point or purpose of our epistemic evaluations, and to pursue epistemological theory in light of such matters. Call this purposeful epistemology. The idea is that considerations about the point and purpose of epistemic evaluation might fruitfully constrain epistemological theory and yield insights for epistemological reflection. Several contributions to this volume explicitly address this general methodology, or some version of it. Others (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  7.  41
    Evaluation of Clinical Ethics Support Services and its Normativity.Jan Schildmann, Bert Molewijk, Lazare Benaroyo, Reidun Forde & Gerald Neitzke - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (11):681-685.
    Evaluation of clinical ethics support services (CESS) has attracted considerable interest in recent decades. However, few evaluation studies are explicit about normative presuppositions which underlie the goals and the research design of CESS evaluation. In this paper, we provide an account of normative premises of different approaches to CESS evaluation and argue that normativity should be a focus of considerations when designing and conducting evaluation research of CESS. In a first step, we present three different (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  8.  36
    Accidie, Evaluation, and Motivatlon.Sergio Tenenbaum - 2003 - In Christine Tappolet & Sarah Stroud (eds.), Weakness of Will and Practical Irrationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 147.
    Accidie, depression, and dejection seem to be psychological phenomena that are best characterized as cases in which an agent has no motivation to pursue what he or she judges to be good or valuable. The phenomena thus seem to present a challenge to any view that draws a close connection between motivation and evaluation. ‘Accidie, Evaluation, and Motivation’ aims to show that the phenomena are actually best explained by a theory that postulates a conceptual connection between motivation and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  9.  17
    Automatic Evaluation Isn't That Crude! Moderation of Masked Affective Priming by Type of Valence.Dirk Wentura & Juliane Degner - 2010 - Cognition and Emotion 24 (4):609-628.
  10. Evaluation, Uncertainty and Motivation.Michael Smith - 2002 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 5 (3):305-320.
    Evaluative judgements have both belief-like and desire-like features. While cognitivists think that they can easily explain the belief-like features, and have trouble explaining the desire-like features, non-cognitivists think the reverse. I argue that the belief-like features of evaluative judgement are quite complex, and that these complexities crucially affect the way in which an agent's values explain her actions, and hence the desire-like features. While one form of cognitivism can, it turns out that non-cognitivism cannot, accommodate all of these complexities. The (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  11.  45
    Mental Models: An Alternative Evaluation of a Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Instruction.Meagan E. Brock, Andrew Vert, Vykinta Kligyte, Ethan P. Waples, Sydney T. Sevier & Michael D. Mumford - 2008 - Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (3):449-472.
    In spite of the wide variety of approaches to ethics training it is still debatable which approach has the highest potential to enhance professionals’ integrity. The current effort assesses a novel curriculum that focuses on metacognitive reasoning strategies researchers use when making sense of day-to-day professional practices that have ethical implications. The evaluated trainings effectiveness was assessed by examining five key sensemaking processes, such as framing, emotion regulation, forecasting, self-reflection, and information integration that experts and novices apply in ethical decision-making. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  12. The Evaluation Document Philosophic Structure.D. B. Gowin, Thomas Green, Research on Evaluation Program Laboratory) & National Institute of Education S.) - 1980 - Research on Evaluation Program, Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  10
    Expert Evaluation of Diagnostic Instrument for Personal and Organizational Value Congruence.Jolita Vveinhardt & Evelina Gulbovaitė - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 136 (3):481-501.
    The article aims to evaluate the quality of a newly constructed diagnostic instrument for personal and organizational value congruence. To attain this, an expert evaluation was invoked. The selected experts evaluated the questionnaire scales and their constituent subscales as well as the eligibility of the contained statements for diagnosing of personal and organizational value congruence. It should be emphasized that the experts were provided a possibility of commenting on each of the statements, making observations and providing suggestions in regard (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14. Aesthetic Evaluation and First-Hand Experience.Nils Franzén - 2018 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96 (4):669-682.
    ABSTRACTEvaluative aesthetic discourse communicates that the speaker has had first-hand experience of what is talked about. If you call a book bewitching, it will be assumed that you have read the book. If you say that a building is beautiful, it will be assumed that you have had some visual experience with it. According to an influential view, this is because knowledge is a norm for assertion, and aesthetic knowledge requires first-hand experience. This paper criticizes this view and argues for (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  15.  39
    Structural Evaluation for Distribution Networks with Distributed Generation Based on Complex Network.Fei Xue, Yingyu Xu, Huaiying Zhu, Shaofeng Lu, Tao Huang & Jinling Zhang - 2017 - Complexity:1-10.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  16.  12
    Evaluation of Program on Anomalous Mental Phenomena.Ray Hyman - unknown
    Professor Jessica Utts and I were given the task of evaluating the program on "Anomalous Mental Phenomena" carried out at SRI International (formerly the Stanford Research Institute) from 1973 through 1989 and continued at SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation) from 1992 through 1994. We were asked to evaluate this research in terms of its scientific value. We were also asked to comment on its potential utility for intelligence applications.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  17.  23
    Academic Evaluation: Universal Instrument? Tool for Development?Mariela Bianco, Natalia Gras & Judith Sutz - 2016 - Minerva 54 (4):399-421.
    Research agendas and academic evaluation are inevitably linked. By means of economic incentives, promotion, research funding, and reputation academic evaluation is a powerful influence on the production of knowledge; moreover, it is often conceived as a universal instrument without consideration of the context in which it is applied. Evaluation systems are social constructions in dispute, being the current focus of international debates regarding criteria, indicators, and their associated methods. A universalist type of productivity indicators is gaining centrality (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  18.  7
    An Evaluation of Unit-Based Ethics Conversations.Lucia D. Wocial, Maureen Hancock, Patricia D. Bledsoe, Amy R. Chamness & Paul R. Helft - 2010 - Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 12 (2):48-54.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  19. Evaluation of Case Consultations in Clinical Ethics Committees.R. Forde & R. Pedersen - 2012 - Clinical Ethics 7 (1):45-50.
    If ethics consultation services influence medical decisions it is important to evaluate how ethical dilemmas are dealt with by clinical ethics committees (CECs). Such evaluation is rare. This study presents a feasible and practical method of evaluating case discussions in CECs and the results emerging from the use of this method. A written presentation of an end-of-life dilemma was sent to all Norwegian ethics committees. The committees were asked to deal with the case as they would do if it (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  20.  88
    An Evaluation of Adverse Incident Reporting.Nicola Stanhope, Margaret Crowley-Murphy, Charles Vincent, Anne M. O'Connor & Sally E. Taylor-Adams - 1999 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 5 (1):5-12.
  21.  28
    Developing an Evaluation Tool for Assessing Clinical Ethics Consultation Skills in Simulation Based Education: The ACES Project.Katherine Wasson, Kayhan Parsi, Michael McCarthy, Viva Jo Siddall & Mark Kuczewski - 2016 - HEC Forum 28 (2):103-113.
    The American Society for Bioethics and Humanities has created a quality attestation process for clinical ethics consultants; the pilot phase of reviewing portfolios has begun. One aspect of the QA process which is particularly challenging is assessing the interpersonal skills of individual clinical ethics consultants. We propose that using case simulation to evaluate clinical ethics consultants is an approach that can meet this need provided clear standards for assessment are identified. To this end, we developed the Assessing Clinical Ethics Skills (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  22.  17
    Evaluation of Moral Case Deliberation at the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate: A Pilot Study.Wike Seekles, Guy Widdershoven, Paul Robben, Gonny van Dalfsen & Bert Molewijk - 2016 - BMC Medical Ethics 17 (1):31.
    BackgroundMoral case deliberation as a form of clinical ethics support is usually implemented in health care institutions and educational programs. While there is no previous research on the use of clinical ethics support on the level of health care regulation, employees of regulatory bodies are regularly confronted with moral challenges. This pilot study describes and evaluates the use of MCD at the Dutch Health Care Inspectorate.The objective of this pilot study is to investigate: 1) the current way of dealing with (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  23.  2
    Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications.Maarten Wesel - 2016 - Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (1):199-225.
    Criteria for the evaluation of most scholars’ work have recently received wider attention due to high-profile cases of scientific misconduct which are perceived to be linked to these criteria. However, in the competition for career advancement and funding opportunities almost all scholars are subjected to the same criteria. Therefore these evaluation criteria act as ‘switchmen’, determining the tracks along which scholarly work is pushed by the dynamic interplay of interests of both scholars and their institutions. Currently one of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24.  14
    Implicit Evaluation Bias Induced by Approach and Avoidance.M. L. Woud, E. S. Becker & M. Rinck - 2011 - Cognition and Emotion 25 (7):1309-1310.
  25.  3
    Evaluation of Neural Degeneration Biomarkers in the Prefrontal Cortex for Early Identification of Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: An fNIRS Study.Dalin Yang, Keum-Shik Hong, So-Hyeon Yoo & Chang-Soek Kim - 2019 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13.
  26.  10
    Evaluation of Evidence in Causal Inference.Miriam W. Schustack & Robert J. Sternberg - 1981 - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 110 (1):101-120.
  27.  18
    Model Evaluation: An Adequacy-for-Purpose View.Wendy S. Parker - 2020 - Philosophy of Science 87 (3):457-477.
    According to an adequacy-for-purpose view, models should be assessed with respect to their adequacy or fitness for particular purposes. Such a view has been advocated by scientists and philosophers...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  28.  17
    Evaluation Anxiety.Moshe Zeidner, Gerald Matthews, A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck - 2005 - In Andrew J. Elliot & Carol S. Dweck (eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation. The Guilford Press.
  29.  86
    Evaluation of Information Retrieval for E-Discovery.Douglas W. Oard, Jason R. Baron, Bruce Hedin, David D. Lewis & Stephen Tomlinson - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (4):347-386.
    The effectiveness of information retrieval technology in electronic discovery (E-discovery) has become the subject of judicial rulings and practitioner controversy. The scale and nature of E-discovery tasks, however, has pushed traditional information retrieval evaluation approaches to their limits. This paper reviews the legal and operational context of E-discovery and the approaches to evaluating search technology that have evolved in the research community. It then describes a multi-year effort carried out as part of the Text Retrieval Conference to develop (...) methods for responsive review tasks in E-discovery. This work has led to new approaches to measuring effectiveness in both batch and interactive frameworks, large data sets, and some surprising results for the recall and precision of Boolean and statistical information retrieval methods. The paper concludes by offering some thoughts about future research in both the legal and technical communities toward the goal of reliable, effective use of information retrieval in E-discovery. (shrink)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  30.  20
    Evaluation of a Prototype Tool for Communicating Body Perception Disturbances in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome.Ailie J. Turton, Mark Palmer, Sharon Grieve, Timothy P. Moss, Jenny Lewis & Candida S. McCabe - 2013 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.
  31. Essential Contestability and Evaluation.Pekka Väyrynen - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):471-488.
    Evaluative and normative terms and concepts are often said to be "essentially contestable". This notion has been used in political and legal theory and applied ethics to analyse disputes concerning the proper usage of terms like democracy, freedom, genocide, rape, coercion, and the rule of law. Many philosophers have also thought that essential contestability tells us something important about the evaluative in particular. Gallie (who coined the term), for instance, argues that the central structural features of essentially contestable concepts secure (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  32. Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences: Proceedings of the First Trans-Disciplinary Symposium on Philosophy and Medicine, Held at Galveston, May 9-11, 1974. [REVIEW]H. Tristram Engelhardt & Stuart F. Spicker (eds.) - 1975 - D. Reidel Pub. Co..
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  33. Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason.Amartya Sen - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (9):477-502.
  34. A Utility Based Evaluation of Logico-Probabilistic Systems.Paul D. Thorn & Gerhard Schurz - 2014 - Studia Logica 102 (4):867-890.
    Systems of logico-probabilistic (LP) reasoning characterize inference from conditional assertions interpreted as expressing high conditional probabilities. In the present article, we investigate four prominent LP systems (namely, systems O, P, Z, and QC) by means of computer simulations. The results reported here extend our previous work in this area, and evaluate the four systems in terms of the expected utility of the dispositions to act that derive from the conclusions that the systems license. In addition to conforming to the dominant (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  35.  8
    An Evaluation of a Data Linkage Training Workshop for Research Ethics Committees.Kate M. Tan, Felicity S. Flack, Natasha L. Bear & Judy A. Allen - 2015 - BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):13.
    In Australia research projects proposing the use of linked data require approval by a Human Research Ethics Committee . A sound evaluation of the ethical issues involved requires understanding of the basic mechanics of data linkage, the associated benefits and risks, and the legal context in which it occurs. The rapidly increasing number of research projects utilising linked data in Australia has led to an urgent need for enhanced capacity of HRECs to review research applications involving this emerging research (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  32
    Joint Evaluation as a Real-World Tool for Managing Emotional Assessments of Morality.Max H. Bazerman, Francesca Gino, Lisa L. Shu & Chia-Jung Tsay - 2011 - Emotion Review 3 (3):290-292.
    Moral problems often prompt emotional responses that invoke intuitive judgments of right and wrong. While emotions inform judgment across many domains, they can also lead to ethical failures that could be avoided by using a more deliberative, analytical decision-making process. In this article, we describe joint evaluation as an effective tool to help decision makers manage their emotional assessments of morality.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  37.  52
    Consequential Evaluation and Practical Reason.Amartya Sen - 2000 - Journal of Philosophy 97 (9):477.
  38.  46
    Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalisation, Structure and Functions of the Referee System. [REVIEW]Harriet Zuckerman & Robert K. Merton - 1971 - Minerva 9 (1):66-100.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   80 citations  
  39.  17
    Evaluation of Research(Ers) and its Threat to Epistemic Pluralisms.Marco Viola - 2017 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 13 (2):55-78.
    While some form of evaluation has always been employed in science (e.g. peer review, hiring), formal systems of evaluation of research and researchers have recently come to play a more prominent role in many countries because of the adoption of new models of governance. According to such models, the quality of the output of both researchers and their institutions is measured, and issues such as eligibility for tenure or the allocation of public funding to research institutions crucially depends (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40.  57
    The Evaluation of “Outcomes” of Accounting Ethics Education.Stephen E. Loeb - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (2):77 - 84.
    This article explores five important issues relating to the evaluation of ethics education in accounting. The issues that are considered include: (a) reasons for evaluating accounting ethics education (see Caplan, 1980, pp. 133–35); (b) goal setting as a prerequisite to evaluating the outcomes of accounting ethics education (see Caplan, 1980, pp. 135–37); (c) possible broad levels of outcomes of accounting ethics education that can be evaluated; (d) matters relating to accounting ethics education that are in need of evaluation (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  41.  4
    Hypothesis Evaluation From a Bayesian Perspective.Baruch Fischhoff & Ruth Beyth-Marom - 1983 - Psychological Review 90 (3):239-260.
  42.  15
    Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs (2006).Charles S. Taber & Milton Lodge - 2012 - Critical Review 24 (2):157-184.
    We propose a model of motivated skepticism that helps explain when and why citizens are biased information processors. Two experimental studies explore how citizens evaluate arguments about affirmative action and gun control, finding strong evidence of a prior attitude effect such that attitudinally congruent arguments are evaluated as stronger than attitudinally incongruent arguments. When reading pro and con arguments, participants (Ps) counterargue the contrary arguments and uncritically accept supporting arguments, evidence of a disconfirmation bias. We also find a confirmation bias?the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   41 citations  
  43.  11
    Evaluation and Perceived Results of Moral Case Deliberation.R. M. Janssens, E. van Zadelhoff, G. van Loo, G. A. Widdershoven & B. A. Molewijk - 2015 - Nursing Ethics 22 (8):870-880.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  44.  7
    The Evaluation Scale: Exploring Decisions About Societal Impact in Peer Review Panels.Gemma E. Derrick & Gabrielle N. Samuel - 2016 - Minerva 54 (1):75-97.
    Realising the societal gains from publicly funded health and medical research requires a model for a reflexive evaluation precedent for the societal impact of research. This research explores UK Research Excellence Framework evaluators’ values and opinions and assessing societal impact, prior to the assessment taking place. Specifically, we discuss the characteristics of two different impact assessment extremes – the “quality-focused” evaluation and “societal impact-focused” evaluation. We show the wide range of evaluator views about impact, and that these (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  45.  3
    Evaluation and Selection of Manufacturing Suppliers in B2B E-Commerce Environment.Quan Zhang, Zhen Guo, Feiyu Man & Jiyun Ma - 2020 - Complexity 2020:1-8.
    The evaluation and selection of manufacturing suppliers in B2B e-commerce environment is summed up as a multiple-attribute decision-making problem. In B2B E-commerce environment, some performance indicators of manufacturing suppliers present uncertainty and could not be expressed with precise numeric values. Linguistic terms, preference orderings, or interval numbers are commonly used to express the performances of the suppliers accurately instead of crisp values when the available information is uncertain or incomplete. This paper proposes an approach to the selection of manufacturing (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  46.  28
    L’évaluation: un pouvoir supposé savoir.Yves Charles Zarka - 2009 - Cités 37 (1):113-123.
    Il semble que, malgré les nombreuses mises en garde de ces dernières années venant de différents côtés, l’installation de dispositifs d’évaluation s’opère actuellement dans tous les secteurs de la société et les institutions : l’hôpital et le système de santé, les institutions d’éducation et de formation en général, les universités et la recherche en particulier,...
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47.  30
    Dialectics, Evaluation, and Argument.Maurice A. Finocchiaro - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (1).
    A critical examination of the dialectical approach, focusing on a comparison ofthe illative and the dialectical definitions of argument. I distinguish a moderate, a strong and a hyper dialectical conception of argument. I critique Goldman's argument for the moderate conception and Johnson's argument for the strong conception, and argue that the moderate conception is correct.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  48.  54
    Consumers' Evaluation of Unethical Marketing Behaviors: The Role of Customer Commitment. [REVIEW]Rhea Ingram, Steven J. Skinner & Valerie A. Taylor - 2005 - Journal of Business Ethics 62 (3):237 - 252.
    While there is a significant amount of research investigating managerial ethical judgments, a limited amount examines consumer judgments of unethical corporate behavior and its impact on the marketplace. This study examines how consumers’ commitment to a company impacts not only their ethical judgment of corporate behavior but also the outcomes of that judgment. The authors test hypotheses with data from 334 consumers and find that consumers’ level of commitment attenuates the level of perceived fairness. More specifically, highly committed consumers may (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  49.  18
    Manuscript Evaluation by Journal Referees and Editors: Randomness or Bias?Andrew M. Colman - 1982 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):205-206.
  50. Thick Concepts: Where’s Evaluation? 1.Pekka Väyrynen - 2012 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 7:235-70.
    This chapter presents an alternative to the standard view that at least some of the evaluations that the so-called “thick” terms and concepts in ethics may be used to convey belong to their sense or semantic meaning. After introducing the topic and making some methodological remarks, the chapter presents a wide variety of linguistic data that are well explained by the alternative view that at least a very wide range of thick terms and concepts are such that even the evaluations (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
1 — 50 / 998