Results for 'Ulf Lehmann'

835 found
Order:
  1. Johann Gottfried Herder: zur Herder-Rezeption in Ost- u. Südosteuropa: internat. Studienbd. unter d. Schirmherrschaft d. Internat. Assoziation für d. Erforschung u. d. Verbreitung d. Slaw. Kulturen.Gerhard Ziegengeist, Helmut Grasshoff & Ulf Lehmann (eds.) - 1978 - Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  58
    Facial reactions to emotional stimuli: Automatically controlled emotional responses.Ulf Dimberg, Monika Thunberg & Sara Grunedal - 2002 - Cognition and Emotion 16 (4):449-471.
  3.  34
    Die Schriften von Gerhard Lehmann.Gerhard Lehmann - 1965 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 19 (2):277-284.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Foot Without Achilles’ Heel.Ulf Hlobil & Katharina Nieswandt - 2019 - Philosophia 47 (5):1501-1515.
    It is often assumed that neo-Aristotelian virtue ethics postulates an obligation to be a good human being and that it derives further obligations from this idea. The paper argues that this assumption is false, at least for Philippa Foot’s view. Our argument blocks a widespread objection to Foot’s view, and it shows how virtue ethics in general can neutralize such worries.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  5.  15
    Enter Electricity: An Allegory's Stage Appearance between Verité and Varieté.Ulf Otto - 2015 - Centaurus 57 (3):192-211.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6.  18
    What does a conditional knowledge base entail?Daniel Lehmann & Menachem Magidor - 1992 - Artificial Intelligence 55 (1):1-60.
  7.  35
    Reconceptualizing Moral Disengagement as a Process: Transcending Overly Liberal and Overly Conservative Practice in the Field.Ulf Schaefer & Onno Bouwmeester - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 172 (3):525-543.
    Moral disengagement was initially conceptualized as a process through which people reconstrue unethical behaviors, with the effect of deactivating self-sanctions and thereby clearing the way for ethical transgressions. Our article challenges how researchers now conceptualize moral disengagement. The current literature is overly liberal, in that it mixes two related but distinct constructs—process moral disengagement and the propensity to morally disengage—creating ambiguity in the findings. It is overly conservative, as it adopts a challengeable classification scheme of “four points in moral self-regulation” (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  8.  17
    The Garden: blending in the semiotics of songs.Ulf Cronquist & Per Aage Brandt - 2022 - Semiotica 2022 (246):49-59.
    After giving some contextual information, we propose an analysis of music and meaning in the song “The Garden,” as performed by the rock group Einstürzende Neubauten in the official video from the 1996 release of the album Ende Neu. We present a semiotic blending model of the narrative content of the song and of its imagery, partly determined by the structure and character of the music. Finally, we add a view of the apocalyptic perspective of some comparable creations.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  8
    A Health Care Systems Approach to Improving Care for Seriously Ill Patients.Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, Jill Lowery, Virginia Ashby Sharpe & Kenneth A. Berkowitz - 2020 - Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 10 (1):79-88.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Against Boghossian, Wright and Broome on inference.Ulf Hlobil - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):419-429.
    I argue that the accounts of inference recently presented (in this journal) by Paul Boghossian, John Broome, and Crispin Wright are unsatisfactory. I proceed in two steps: First, in Sects. 1 and 2, I argue that we should not accept what Boghossian calls the “Taking Condition on inference” as a condition of adequacy for accounts of inference. I present a different condition of adequacy and argue that it is superior to the one offered by Boghossian. More precisely, I point out (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  11. The guise of good reason.Ulf Hlobil - 2021 - Philosophical Explorations 24 (2):204-224.
    The paper argues for a version of the Guise of the Good thesis, namely the claim that if someone acts as the result of practical reasoning, then she takes her premises to jointly provide a sufficient and undefeated reason for her action. I argue for this by showing, first, that it is an application of Boghossian's Taking Condition on inference to practical reasoning and, second, that the motivations for the Taking Condition for theoretical reasoning carry over to practical reasoning. I (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  12. A Prelinguistic Gestural Universal of Human Communication.Ulf Liszkowski, Penny Brown, Tara Callaghan, Akira Takada & Conny de Vos - 2012 - Cognitive Science 36 (4):698-713.
    Several cognitive accounts of human communication argue for a language-independent, prelinguistic basis of human communication and language. The current study provides evidence for the universality of a prelinguistic gestural basis for human communication. We used a standardized, semi-natural elicitation procedure in seven very different cultures around the world to test for the existence of preverbal pointing in infants and their caregivers. Results were that by 10–14 months of age, infants and their caregivers pointed in all cultures in the same basic (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  13. Anti-Normativism Evaluated.Ulf Hlobil - 2015 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (3):376-395.
    I argue that recent attempts to show that meaning and content are not normative fail. The two most important arguments anti-normativists have presented are what I call the ‘argument from constitution’ and the ‘argument from guidance’. Both of these arguments suffer from the same basic problem: they overlook the possibility of focusing on assessability by norms, rather than compliance with norms or guidance by norms. Moreover, I argue that the anti-normativists arguments fail even if we ignore this basic problem. Thus, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  14.  56
    Twelve-month-olds communicate helpfully and appropriately for knowledgeable and ignorant partners.Ulf Liszkowski, Malinda Carpenter & Michael Tomasello - 2008 - Cognition 108 (3):732-739.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   46 citations  
  15.  15
    What does a conditional knowledge base entail?D. Lehmann & M. Magidor - 1994 - Artificial Intelligence 68 (2):411.
  16. Faithfulness for naive validity.Ulf Hlobil - 2019 - Synthese 196 (11):4759-4774.
    Nontransitive responses to the validity Curry paradox face a dilemma that was recently formulated by Barrio, Rosenblatt and Tajer. It seems that, in the nontransitive logic ST enriched with a validity predicate, either you cannot prove that all derivable metarules preserve validity, or you can prove that instances of Cut that are not admissible in the logic preserve validity. I respond on behalf of the nontransitive approach. The paper argues, first, that we should reject the detachment principle for naive validity. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  17. Inferring by Attaching Force.Ulf Hlobil - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (4):701-714.
    The paper offers an account of inference. The account underwrites the idea that inference requires that the reasoner takes her premises to support her conclusion. I reject views according to which such ‘takings’ are intuitions or beliefs. I sketch an alternative view on which inferring consists in attaching what I call ‘inferential force’ to a structured collection of contents.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  18. Limits of Abductivism About Logic.Ulf Hlobil - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 103 (2):320-340.
    I argue against abductivism about logic, which is the view that rational theory choice in logic happens by abduction. Abduction cannot serve as a neutral arbiter in many foundational disputes in logic because, in order to use abduction, one must first identify the relevant data. Which data one deems relevant depends on what I call one's conception of logic. One's conception of logic is, however, not independent of one's views regarding many of the foundational disputes that one may hope to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  19.  34
    Philosophische Dimensionen des Impersonalen.Robert Lehmann (ed.) - 2021 - Ergon – ein Verlag in der Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
    This volume presents, for the first time, an assemblage of contributions on the philosophical dimensions of the impersonal, the multiplicity of its linguistic, social, scientific, religious and artistic perspectives, as well as initial approaches to its unified definition. Linguistic and logical impersonality The “It" in K. Kraus “Impersonality” in the subject and in events The impersonal ontology of H. Rombach Levinas on the “Il y a” Organisation in non-egological consciousness The witness of consciousness in the Vedānta traditions Anonymous self-consciousness G. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20. Cosmopolitans and Locals in World Culture.Ulf Hannerz - 1990 - Theory, Culture and Society 7 (2-3):237-251.
  21.  42
    Liberal Thought in Reasoning on CSR.Ulf Henning Richter - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 97 (4):625 - 649.
    In this article, I argue that conventional reasoning on corporate social responsibility (CSR) is based on the assumption of a liberal market economy in the context of a nation state. I build on the study of Scherer and Palazzo (Acad Manage Rev 32(4):1096-1120, 2007), developing a number of criteria to identify elements of liberal philosophy in the ongoing CSR debate. I discuss their occurrence in the CSR literature in detail and reflect on the implications, taking into account the emerging political (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  22. There Are Diachronic Norms of Rationality.Ulf Hlobil - 2015 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):38-45.
    Some philosophers have recently argued that there are no diachronic norms of epistemic rationality, that is, that there are no norms regarding how you should change your attitudes over time. I argue that this is wrong on the grounds that there are norms governing reasoning.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  23.  11
    Karl Popper, falsifieringens profet.Ulf Persson - 2014 - Stockholm: CKM Förlag.
    I var tid ar ambitionen att sa mycket verksamhet som mojlig skall vila pa vetenskaplig grund. Darmed utokas vetenskapens domaner, samtidigt som begreppet som sadant forflackas. Filosofen Karl Poppers syn pa vetenskapen ar mera subtil. Enligt honom kan vi ingenting veta med sakerhet, ingenting bevisa, endast falsifiera, det vill saga visa att nagot ar oforenligt med faktiska forhallanden. Det som undandrar sig falsifieringen kan vi acceptera tillsvidare. Ulf Persson provar i denna bok Poppers teori pa ett antal vetenskapsomraden, daribland ekonomi, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24. A Nonmonotonic Sequent Calculus for Inferentialist Expressivists.Ulf Hlobil - 2016 - In Pavel Arazim & Michal Dancak (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2015. College Publications. pp. 87-105.
    I am presenting a sequent calculus that extends a nonmonotonic consequence relation over an atomic language to a logically complex language. The system is in line with two guiding philosophical ideas: (i) logical inferentialism and (ii) logical expressivism. The extension defined by the sequent rules is conservative. The conditional tracks the consequence relation and negation tracks incoherence. Besides the ordinary propositional connectives, the sequent calculus introduces a new kind of modal operator that marks implications that hold monotonically. Transitivity fails, but (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  25. Goodness-Fixing Isn’t Good Enough: A Reply to McHugh and Way.Ulf Hlobil - 2019 - Mind 128 (512):1309-1318.
    According to McHugh and Way reasoning is a person-level attitude revision that is regulated by its constitutive aim of getting fitting attitudes. They claim that this account offers an explanation of what is wrong with reasoning in ways one believes to be bad and that this explanation is an alternative to an explanation that appeals to the so-called Taking Condition. I argue that their explanation is unsatisfying.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  26.  15
    Making Peace with Libertarians.Ulf Nilsson - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 16:227-236.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  45
    Pragmatism and Moral Critique of Religion.Ulf Zackariasson - 2010 - American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 31 (1):3 - 14.
  28.  6
    Studie zur »skeptischen Generation«.Ulf Weissenfels - 1959 - Zeitschrift Für Evangelische Ethik 3 (1):166-174.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  38
    What’s Wrong with the Adequacy-argument? A Pragmatic Diagnosis.Ulf Zackariasson - 2011 - Sophia 50 (1):11-23.
    When confronted with the question of which philosophical conception of religion to consider most adequate, many philosophers appeal to what I call the adequacy-argument: that we should prefer the one that looks most adequate from the perspective of religious believers. In this paper, I provide a critique of the adequacy-argument based on a pragmatic analysis of adequacy-judgments according to which reflective adequacy-judgments are forward-looking, and hence include considerations of the consequences of adopting different judgments as guides for conduct. It is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. The Cut‐Free Approach and the Admissibility‐Curry.Ulf Hlobil - 2018 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (1):40-48.
    The perhaps most important criticism of the nontransitive approach to semantic paradoxes is that it cannot truthfully express exactly which metarules preserve validity. I argue that this criticism overlooks that the admissibility of metarules cannot be expressed in any logic that allows us to formulate validity-Curry sentences and that is formulated in a classical metalanguage. Hence, the criticism applies to all approaches that do their metatheory in classical logic. If we do the metatheory of nontransitive logics in a nontransitive logic, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  31. Expressing Validity: Towards a Self-Sufficient Inferentialism.Ulf Hlobil - 2020 - In Martin Blicha & Igor Sedlar (eds.), The Logica Yearbook 2019. College Publications. pp. 67-82.
    For semantic inferentialists, the basic semantic concept is validity. An inferentialist theory of meaning should offer an account of the meaning of "valid." If one tries to add a validity predicate to one's object language, however, one runs into problems like the v-Curry paradox. In previous work, I presented a validity predicate for a non-transitive logic that can adequately capture its own meta-inferences. Unfortunately, in that system, one cannot show of any inference that it is invalid. Here I extend the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  32. We cannot infer by accepting testimony.Ulf Hlobil - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (10):2589-2598.
    While we can judge and believe things by merely accepting testimony, we cannot make inferences by merely accepting testimony. A good theory of inference should explain this. The theories that are best suited to explain this fact seem to be theories that accept a so-called intuitional construal of Boghossian’s Taking Condition.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  33. A truth-maker semantics for ST: refusing to climb the strict/tolerant hierarchy.Ulf Hlobil - 2022 - Synthese 200 (5):1-23.
    The paper presents a truth-maker semantics for Strict/Tolerant Logic (ST), which is the currently most popular logic among advocates of the non-transitive approach to paradoxes. Besides being interesting in itself, the truth-maker presentation of ST offers a new perspective on the recently discovered hierarchy of meta-inferences that, according to some, generalizes the idea behind ST. While fascinating from a mathematical perspective, there is no agreement on the philosophical significance of this hierarchy. I aim to show that there is no clear (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  34. Why you cannot make people better by telling them what is good.Ulf Hlobil - 2020 - European Journal of Philosophy 28 (4):986-996.
    So-called optimists about moral testimony argue, against pessimists, that, ceteris paribus, we ought to accept and act in accordance with trustworthy, pure moral testimony. I argue that even if we grant this, we need to explain why moral testimony cannot make us more virtuous. I offer an explanation that appeals to the fact that we cannot share inferential abilities via testimony. This explanation is compatible with the core commitments of optimism, but it also allows us to see what is right (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Social norms and unthinkable options.Ulf Hlobil - 2016 - Synthese 193 (8):2519–2537.
    We sometimes violate social norms in order to express our views and to trigger public debates. Many extant accounts of social norms don’t give us any insight into this phenomenon. Drawing on Cristina Bicchieri’s work, I am putting forward an empirical hypothesis that helps us to understand such norm violations. The hypothesis says, roughly, that we often adhere to norms because we are systematically blind to norm-violating options. I argue that this hypothesis is independently plausible and has interesting consequences. It (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  36.  46
    Iterated reflection principles and the ω-rule.Ulf R. Schmerl - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (4):721-733.
  37. Forces by Which We Live: Religion and Religious Experience from the Perspective of a Pragmatic Philosophical Anthropology.Ulf Zackariasson - 2002
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  38.  8
    Impulsgedicht "Gehalt Vs. Gestalt".Ulf Stolterfoht - 2017 - Zeitschrift für Kulturphilosophie 2017 (1):149-153.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39.  1
    Making Peace with Libertarians.Ulf Nilsson - 2000 - Social Philosophy Today 16:227-236.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  34
    Turning the history of medical ethics from its head onto its feet: A critical commentary on Baker and McCullough.Ulf Schmidt - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (1):31-42.
    The paper provides a critical commentary on the article by Baker and McCullough on Medical Ethic's Appropriation of Moral Philosophy. The author argues that Baker and McCullough offer a more "pragmatic" approach to the history of medical ethics that has the potential to enrich the bioethics field with a greater historical grounding and sound methodology. Their approach can help us to come to a more nuanced understanding about the way in which medical ethics has connected, disconnected, and reconnected with philosophical (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  25
    A first-order logic of knowledge and belief with identity. I.Scott K. Lehmann - 1976 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 17 (1):59-77.
  42.  21
    A general propositional logic of conditionals.Scott Lehmann - 1979 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 20 (1):77-83.
  43. Objectivity and historiographical research.Ulf SjOdell - 1978 - Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 14:175.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  8
    Gruppensolidarität zwischen Rationalität und Ritualität.Ulf Tranow - 2022 - Zeitschrift Für Kultur- Und Kollektivwissenschaft 8 (1):13-44.
    Group solidarity requires that members are committed to solidarity norms. Addressing the question of how such commitments are socially produced, the starting point of this article is Lindenberg's Theory of Social Rationality and its notion of solidarity frames. These frames consist of solidarity as a goal of action and associated stocks of knowledge and moral feelings. TSR makes it clear that solidarity frames are fragile and precarious. They must be regularly recharged with motivational energy and symbols in order to prevail (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45.  57
    Stakeholder theory: A deliberative perspective.Ulf Henning Richter & Kevin E. Dow - 2017 - Business Ethics: A European Review 26 (4):428-442.
    Organizations routinely make choices when addressing conflicting stakes of their stakeholders. As stakeholder theory continues to mature, scholars continue to seek ways to make it more usable, yet proponents continue to debate its legitimacy. Various scholarly attempts to ground stakeholder theory have not narrowed down this debate. We draw from the work of Juergen Habermas to theoretically advance stakeholder theory, and to provide practical examples to illustrate our approach. Specifically, we apply Habermas’ language-pragmatic approach to extend stakeholder theory by advancing (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  46. The Laws of Thought and the Laws of Truth as Two Sides of One Coin.Ulf Hlobil - 2022 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (1):313-343.
    Some think that logic concerns the “laws of truth”; others that logic concerns the “laws of thought.” This paper presents a way to reconcile both views by building a bridge between truth-maker theory, à la Fine, and normative bilateralism, à la Restall and Ripley. The paper suggests a novel way of understanding consequence in truth-maker theory and shows that this allows us to identify a common structure shared by truth-maker theory and normative bilateralism. We can thus transfer ideas from normative (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  47. Chains of Inferences and the New Paradigm in the Psychology of Reasoning.Ulf Hlobil - 2016 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 7 (1):1-16.
    The new paradigm in the psychology of reasoning draws on Bayesian formal frameworks, and some advocates of the new paradigm think of these formal frameworks as providing a computational-level theory of rational human inference. I argue that Bayesian theories should not be seen as providing a computational-level theory of rational human inference, where by “Bayesian theories” I mean theories that claim that all rational credal states are probabilistically coherent and that rational adjustments of degrees of belief in the light of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  48. Is Falsification Falsifiable?Ulf Persson - 2016 - Foundations of Science 21 (3):461-475.
    This is a response to a claim by Sven Ove Hansson to the effect that Poppers dictum that falsification lies at the heart of all pursuit of science has once and for all been falsified by his study of articles published in Nature during the year 2000. We claim that this is based on a misunderstanding of Poppers philosophy of science interpreting it too literally, and that alternative readings of those papers are fully compliant with falsification. We scrutinize Hansson’s arguments (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  49.  40
    Logic is Not Science.Ulf Hlobil - forthcoming - In Sanderson Molick (ed.), Demarcating logic and science: exploring new frontiers. Springer.
    I argue that logic is unlike science in its methodology, thus rejecting anti-exceptionalism about logic. Logic has a mathematical and a philosophical part. In its mathematical part, the methodology of logic is like that of mathematics, and no need to choose between theories arises in that part. In its philosophical part, the methodology of logic is like that of philosophy. Philosophy and mathematics are both unlike the empirical sciences in their methodology. So logic is unlike the empirical sciences in its (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50.  9
    Studi Graeco-Parthica: Political and Cultural Relations between Greeks and Parthians. By Edward Dabrowa.Ulf Jäger - 2021 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 137 (3).
    Studi Graeco-Parthica: Political and Cultural Relations between Greeks and Parthians. By Edward Dabrowa. Philippika, vol. 49. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, 2011. Pp. 196. €48.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 835