4 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Rich Cameron [3]Richard D. Cameron [1]
See also:
Profile: Rich Cameron (DePauw University)
  1. Rich Cameron (2010). Aristotle's Teleology. Philosophy Compass 5 (12):1096-1106.
    Teleology is the study of ends and goals, things whose existence or occurrence is purposive. Aristotle’s views on teleology are of seminal importance, particularly his views regarding biological functions or purposes. This article surveys core examples of Aristotle’s invocations of teleology; explores philosophically puzzling aspects of teleology (including their normativity and the fact that ends can, apparently, act as causes despite never coming to exist); articulates two of Aristotle’s arguments defending commitment to teleology against critics who attempt to explain nature (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Rich Cameron (2004). How to Be a Realist About Sui Generis Teleology Yet Feel at Home in the 21st Century. The Monist 87 (1):72-95.
    The reigning orthodoxy on biological teleology assumes that teleology either must be reduced (or eliminated) or it depends on a supernatural agent. The dominant orthodox sect rejects supernaturalism and eliminitivism, and, given the poverty of competing views has been allowed to become complacent about the adequacy of favored reductivist accounts. These are beset by more serious problems than proponents acknowledge. Moreover, the assumption underlying orthodoxy is false; there is an alternative scientifically and philosophically plausible naturalistic account of teleology. We can (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Rich Cameron (2003). The Ontology of Aristotle's Final Cause. Apeiron 35 (2):153-79.
    Modern philosophy is, for what appear to be good reasons, uniformly hostile to sui generis final causes. And motivated to develop philosophically and scientifically plausible interpretations, scholars have increasingly offered reductivist and eliminitivist accounts of Aristotle's teleological commitment. This trend in contemporary scholarship is misguided. We have strong grounds to believe Aristotle accepted unreduced sui generis teleology, and reductivist and eliminitivist accounts face insurmountable textual and philosophical difficulties. We offer Aristotelians cold comfort by replacing his apparent view with failed accounts. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Richard S. Calef, Earl McHewitt, Donald W. Murray, James R. Brogan, Richard D. Cameron & E. Scott Geller (1980). Negative Contrast as a Function of the Location of Small Reinforced Placements. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (3):185-187.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation