Results for ' Moral Responsibility'

989 found
Order:
See also
  1. Recent work on free will and moral responsibility.Neil Levy & Michael McKenna - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (1):96-133.
    In this article we survey six recent developments in the philosophical literature on free will and moral responsibility: (1) Harry Frankfurt's argument that moral responsibility does not require the freedom to do otherwise; (2) the heightened focus upon the source of free actions; (3) the debate over whether moral responsibility is an essentially historical concept; (4) recent compatibilist attempts to resurrect the thesis that moral responsibility requires the freedom to do otherwise; (5) (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  2. Control, responsibility, and moral assessment.Angela M. Smith - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 138 (3):367 - 392.
    Recently, a number of philosophers have begun to question the commonly held view that choice or voluntary control is a precondition of moral responsibility. According to these philosophers, what really matters in determining a person’s responsibility for some thing is whether that thing can be seen as indicative or expressive of her judgments, values, or normative commitments. Such accounts might therefore be understood as updated versions of what Susan Wolf has called “real self views,” insofar as they (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   147 citations  
  3. For Whom Does Determinism Undermine Moral Responsibility? Surveying the Conditions for Free Will Across Cultures.Ivar R. Hannikainen, Edouard Machery, David Rose, Stephen Stich, Christopher Y. Olivola, Paulo Sousa, Florian Cova, Emma E. Buchtel, Mario Alai, Adriano Angelucci, Renatas Berniûnas, Amita Chatterjee, Hyundeuk Cheon, In-Rae Cho, Daniel Cohnitz, Vilius Dranseika, Ángeles Eraña Lagos, Laleh Ghadakpour, Maurice Grinberg, Takaaki Hashimoto, Amir Horowitz, Evgeniya Hristova, Yasmina Jraissati, Veselina Kadreva, Kaori Karasawa, Hackjin Kim, Yeonjeong Kim, Minwoo Lee, Carlos Mauro, Masaharu Mizumoto, Sebastiano Moruzzi, Jorge Ornelas, Barbara Osimani, Carlos Romero, Alejandro Rosas López, Massimo Sangoi, Andrea Sereni, Sarah Songhorian, Noel Struchiner, Vera Tripodi, Naoki Usui, Alejandro Vázquez del Mercado, Hrag A. Vosgerichian, Xueyi Zhang & Jing Zhu - 2019 - Frontiers in Psychology 10.
    Philosophers have long debated whether, if determinism is true, we should hold people morally responsible for their actions since in a deterministic universe, people are arguably not the ultimate source of their actions nor could they have done otherwise if initial conditions and the laws of nature are held fixed. To reveal how non-philosophers ordinarily reason about the conditions for free will, we conducted a cross-cultural and cross-linguistic survey (N = 5,268) spanning twenty countries and sixteen languages. Overall, participants tended (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  4. Skepticism and Sanction: The Benefits of Rejecting Moral Responsibility.Neil Levy - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (5):477-493.
    It is sometimes objected that we cannot adopt skepticism about moral responsibility, because the criminal justice system plays an indispensable social function. In this paper, I examine the implications of moral responsibility skepticism for the punishment of those convicted of crime, with special attention to recent arguments by Saul Smilansky. Smilansky claims that the skeptic is committed to fully compensating the incarcerated for their detention, and that this compensation would both be too costly to be practical (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   16 citations  
  5. Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: A test of the Expertise Defense.Eric Schulz, Edward T. Cokely & Adam Feltz - 2011 - Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1722-1731.
    Many philosophers appeal to intuitions to support some philosophical views. However, there is reason to be concerned about this practice as scientific evidence has documented systematic bias in philosophically relevant intuitions as a function of seemingly irrelevant features (e.g., personality). One popular defense used to insulate philosophers from these concerns holds that philosophical expertise eliminates the influence of these extraneous factors. Here, we test this assumption. We present data suggesting that verifiable philosophical expertise in the free will debate-as measured by (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   89 citations  
  6.  45
    Identification, Situational Constraint, and Social Cognition: Studies in the Attribution of Moral Responsibility.Rob Woolfolk, John Doris & John Darley - 2008 - In Joshua Michael Knobe & Shaun Nichols (eds.), Experimental Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 61.
  7. Answerability : a condition of autonomy or moral responsibility (or both)?Natalie Stoljar - 2018 - In Marina Oshana, Katrina Hutchison & Catriona Mackenzie (eds.), Social Dimensions of Moral Responsibility. New York: Oup Usa.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  8.  13
    Accepting Moral Luck and Taking Responsibility in Public Health Crises.Daniel Tigard - 2023 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 32 (1):34-40.
    We see cases of moral luck arising in recent times, as we face the uncertainties of provisional rules for navigating the coronavirus pandemic. How should we respond to rule-breakers, and how should they view themselves, when they cause harm inadvertently? Although some argue that guilt is unnecessary for any harm that may result from luck, this paper takes moral luck seriously and encourages consideration of the benefits to be achieved by expressions of self-blame amidst troubling circumstances, from pure (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9.  41
    The almost invisible ghost in the moral responsibility machine.Bruce N. Waller - 2004 - Journal of Philosophical Research 29 (February):255-266.
  10. Scientific Challenges to Free Will and Moral Responsibility.Joshua Shepherd - 2015 - Philosophy Compass 10 (3):197-207.
    Here, I review work from three lines of research in cognitive science often taken to threaten free will and moral responsibility. This work concerns conscious deciding, the experience of acting, and the role of largely unnoticed situational influences on behavior. Whether this work in fact threatens free will and moral responsibility depends on how we ought to interpret it, and depends as well on the nature of free and responsible behavior. I discuss different ways this work (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  11.  10
    Treating Moral Harm as Social Harm: Toward a Restorative Ethics of Christian Responsibility.Wonchul Shin & Elizabeth M. Bounds - 2017 - Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 37 (2):153-169.
    This essay explores small “ordinary” experiences of moral harm as problems of social injustice. Starting with two stories, we first argue against a dominant framework of personal responsibility that assigns responsibility to particular blameworthy agents. Instead we sketch an account of why structural responsibility for social harm must be considered, drawing on the work of Iris Marion Young and Pierre Bourdieu. Finally, drawing on Margaret Walker’s notion of moral repair and Christopher Marshall’s interpretation of the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12.  36
    Moral Psychology: Free Will and Moral Responsibility.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.) - 2014 - Bradford.
    Leading philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists address issues of moral responsibility and free will, drawing on new findings from empirical science.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  13.  56
    The Credit Crisis and the Moral Responsibility of Professionals in Finance.Johan J. Graafland & Bert W. Ven - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 103 (4):605-619.
    Starting from MacIntyre’s virtue ethics, we investigate several codes of conduct of banks to identify the type of virtues that are needed to realize their mission. Based on this analysis, we define three core virtues: honesty, due care, and accuracy. We compare and contrast these codes of conduct with the actual behavior of banks that led to the credit crisis and find that in some cases banks did not behave according to the moral standards they set themselves. However, although (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   21 citations  
  14. Manipulation Arguments, Basic Desert, and Moral Responsibility: Assessing Derk Pereboom’s Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life.Michael McKenna - 2017 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 11 (3):575-589.
    In this paper I critically assess Derk Pereboom’s book, Free Will, Agency, and Meaning in Life. In it, I resist Pereboom’s manipulation argument for incompatibilism and his indictment of desert-based accounts of moral responsibility.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  15. Introduction: Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility.Gregg Caruso - 2013 - In Gregg D. Caruso (ed.), Exploring the Illusion of Free Will and Moral Responsibility. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
    This introductory chapter discusses the philosophical and scientific arguments for free will skepticism and their implications--including the debate between Saul Smilansky's "illusionism," Thomas Nadelhoffer's "disillusionism," Shaun Nichols' "anti-revolution," and the "optimistic skepticism" of Derk Pereboom, Bruce Waller, Tamler Sommers, and others.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  16.  60
    Desert, Free Will, and Our Moral Responsibility Practices.Dana Kay Nelkin - 2019 - The Journal of Ethics 23 (3):265-275.
    In this paper, I assess a challenging argument made by McKenna (J Ethical Theory, 2019) that free will might be important in justifying our moral responsibility practices even if free will is not important insofar as it is required for desert of blame and praise. I offer an alternative picture, according to which while we can justify our practices of moral responsibility in terms that appeal to free will without using terms that explicitly appeal to desert, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  17.  9
    Van Inwagen on the 'Obviousness' of Libertarian Moral Responsibility.Saul Smilansky - 1990 - Analysis 50 (1):29.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  18.  20
    Moral courage, job-esteem, and social responsibility in disaster relief nurses.Qiang Yu, Huaqin Wang, Yusheng Tian, Qin Wang, Li Yang, Qiaomei Liu & Yamin Li - 2023 - Nursing Ethics 30 (7-8):1051-1067.
    BackgroundSocial responsibility can motivate disaster relief nurses to devote themselves to safeguarding rights and interests of people when facing challenges that threaten public health. However, few studies focused on the relationship of moral courage, job-esteem, and social responsibility among disaster relief nurses.ObjectiveTo explore the influence of moral courage and job-esteem on the social responsibility in disaster relief nurses and clarify the relationship model between them.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among 716 disaster relief nurses from 14 (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19.  79
    Moral Responsibility.Matthew Talbert - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    This is the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy entry on moral responsibility.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   52 citations  
  20. Responsibility, Moral and Otherwise.Susan Wolf - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (2):127-142.
    Philosophers frequently distinguish between causal responsibility and moral responsibility, but that distinction is either ambiguous or confused. We can distinguish between causal responsibility and a deeper kind of responsibility, that licenses reactive attitudes and judgments that a merely causal connection would not, and we can distinguish between holding people accountable for their moral qualities and holding people accountable for their nonmoral qualities. But, because we sometimes hold people deeply responsible for nonmoral qualities of behavior (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  21.  89
    Climate Change, No‐Harm Principle, and Moral Responsibility of Individual Emitters.Simo Kyllönen - 2016 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 35 (4):737-758.
    The article defends the no-harm principle as an intuitively plausible and a common-sense way to justify individual emitters’ duties to take more radical steps in the fight against climate change. The appearance of climate change as requiring large-scale collective action should not lead us astray with respect to the fundamental moral nature of the problem: individual emitters who knowingly sustain and foster the carbon intensive ways of acting also bear personal moral responsibility for the foreseeable climate-related harm (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  22. Can we interpret Kant as a compatibilist about determinism and moral responsibility?Ben Vilhauer - 2004 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12 (4):719 – 730.
    In this paper, I discuss Hud Hudson's compatibilistic interpretation of Kant's theory of free will, which is based on Davidson's anomalous monism. I sketch an alternative interpretation of my own, an incompatibilistic interpretation according to which agents qua noumena are responsible for the particular causal laws which determine the actions of agents qua phenomena. Hudson's interpretation should be attractive to philosophers who value Kant's epistemology and ethics, but insist on a deflationary reading of things in themselves. It is in an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  23.  9
    Reflections (3 of 4): A response to Jamieson’s "discourse and moral responsibility in biotechnical communication".Raymond E. Spier - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (2):279-284.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  82
    Van Inwagen on the "obviousness" of libertarian moral responsibility.Saul Smilansky - 1990 - Analysis 50 (1):29-33.
  25.  39
    Working with Fischer and Ravizza’s Account of Moral Responsibility.Carl Ginet - 2006 - The Journal of Ethics 10 (3):229-253.
    This paper examines the account of guidance control given in Fischer and Ravizza's book, Responsibility and Control, with the aim of revising it so as to make it a better account of what needs to be added to having alternatives open to yield a specification of the control condition for responsibility that will be acceptable to an adherent of the principle that one is responsible for something only if one could have avoided it.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  26. Agency as difference-making: causal foundations of moral responsibility.Johannes Himmelreich - 2015 - Dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science
    We are responsible for some things but not for others. In this thesis, I investigate what it takes for an entity to be responsible for something. This question has two components: agents and actions. I argue for a permissive view about agents. Entities such as groups or artificially intelligent systems may be agents in the sense required for responsibility. With respect to actions, I argue for a causal view. The relation in virtue of which agents are responsible for actions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  27.  76
    Empirical free will and the ethics of moral responsibility.Bruce N. Waller - 2003 - Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (4):533-542.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  28. Moral Sense and the Foundations of Responsibility.Paul Russell - 2011 - In Robert Kane (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Free Will: Second Edition. Oup Usa. pp. 199-220.
    Throughout much of the first half of the twentieth century, the free-will debate was largely concerned with the question of what kind of freedom was required for moral responsibility and whether the kind of freedom required was compatible with the thesis of determinism. This issue was itself addressed primarily with reference to the question of how freedom is related to alternative possibilities and what the relevant analysis of “could have done otherwise” comes to. The discussion of these topics (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  29.  63
    Navigating the Penumbra: Children and Moral Responsibility.Michael D. Burroughs - 2020 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 58 (1):77-101.
    Child moral agency is dismissed in many historical and contemporary accounts based on children's supposed lack or marginal possession of agency-bearing capacities, including reason, deliberation, and judgment, amongst others. Given its prominence in the philosophical canon, I call this the traditional view of child agency. Recent advancements in moral developmental psychology challenge the traditional view, pointing toward the possession of relevant capacities and competencies for moral and responsible agency in early and middle childhood. I argue that both (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  30.  58
    Why We Should Reject Semiretributivism and Be Skeptics about Basic Desert Moral Responsibility.Gregg D. Caruso - 2023 - The Harvard Review of Philosophy 30:63-93.
    John Martin Fischer has recently critiqued the skeptical view that no one is ever morally responsible for their actions in the basic desert sense and has defended a view he calls semiretributivism. This paper responds to Fischer’s concerns about the skeptical perspective, especially those regarding victims’ rights, and further explains why we should reject his semiretributivism. After briefly summarizing the Pereboom/Caruso view and Fischer’s objections to it, the paper argues that Fischer’s defense of basic desert moral responsibility is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  27
    Ecumenical Attributability and the Structural Ownership Condition on Moral Responsibility.Cody Harris - 2024 - Southwest Philosophy Review 40 (1):79-86.
    This paper discusses the non-historicist structural ownership condition on moral responsibility forwarded by Benjamin Matheson. The structural ownership condition requires that a morally relevant action be grounded or partly grounded in psychological states that are generally coherent. While Matheson does not mean to settle the debate on historicism vs. non-historicism, he does mean to secure the position of the ownership condition against the problems that structuralist theories have faced in the past. This paper will focus on how the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  38
    Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility.N. Levy - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (257):661-664.
  33.  32
    Thoughtlessness and resentment: Determinism and moral responsibility in the case of Adolf Eichmann.Benjamin A. Schupmann - 2014 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 40 (2):127-144.
    Is a devoted Nazi or a zombie bureaucrat a greater moral and political problem? Because the dangers of immoral fanaticism are so clear, the dangers of mindless bureaucracy are easy to overlook. Yet zombie bureaucrats have contributed substantially to the greatest catastrophes of the 20th century, doing so seemingly oblivious to the monstrous qualities of their actions. Hannah Arendt’s work on thoughtlessness raises a dilemma: if Eichmann, the architect of the Nazi Final Solution, truly was a thoughtless ‘cog’, lacking (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  34.  21
    Should all medical research be published? The moral responsibility of medical journal editors.Thomas Ploug - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (10):703.2-709.
    This article reinvigorates a key question in publication ethics: Is there research that it is permissible to conduct but that ought not to be published? The article raises the question in relation to two recent medical studies. It is argued that the publication of these studies may cause significant harm to individuals, that editors of medical journals have a moral responsibility for such harm, that denial of publication is inadequate as an instrument to fulfil this moral (...) and that internationally acknowledged publication ethics codes should incorporate this aspect of editors’ moral responsibility. (shrink)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  35. Resultant moral luck and the scope of moral responsibility.Matthias Rolffs - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (8):2355-2376.
    Resultant moral luck occurs whenever aspects of an agent’s moral responsibility are affected by luck pertaining to the outcomes of their actions. Many authors reject the existence of moral luck in this sense, but they do so in different ways. Michael Zimmerman argues that resultant luck affects the scope of moral responsibility, but not its degree. That is, it affects what agents are responsible for, but not how responsible they are. Andrew Khoury takes a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36.  21
    Manuel Vargas , Building Better Beings: A Theory of Moral Responsibility . Reviewed by.V. Alan White - 2014 - Philosophy in Review 34 (3-4):192-194.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. Susan Suave Meyer, Aristotle on Moral Responsibility.C. Young - 1996 - Philosophical Investigations 19:372-377.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Strawson, Moral Responsibility, and the "Order of Explanation": An Intervention.Patrick Todd - 2016 - Ethics 127 (1):208-240.
    P.F. Strawson’s (1962) “Freedom and Resentment” has provoked a wide range of responses, both positive and negative, and an equally wide range of interpretations. In particular, beginning with Gary Watson, some have seen Strawson as suggesting a point about the “order of explanation” concerning moral responsibility: it is not that it is appropriate to hold agents responsible because they are morally responsible, rather, it is ... well, something else. Such claims are often developed in different ways, but one (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  39.  74
    Is there a freedom requirement for moral responsibility?Phillip D. Gosselin - 1979 - Dialogue 18 (3):289-306.
    The Principle that freedom is necessary for moral responsibility has received a variety of explications, but few philosophers have doubted that in some plausible sense it is true. However, two philosophers have recently challenged it using very different but equally ingenious arguments. J.F.M. Hunter has provided the more obviously direct attack in arguing that considerations of freedom as such are in no way relevant to assessments of moral responsibility. Harry Frankfurt has directed his fire at the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  40. John Martin Fischer, My Way: Essays on Moral Responsibility.Zoltan Wagner - 2007 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 20:295-299.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  31
    Frankfurt-type cases and the necessary conditions for moral responsibility.P. A. Woodward - 2007 - Journal of Value Inquiry 41 (2-4):325-332.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  42.  22
    “One more time”: time loops as a tool to investigate folk conceptions of moral responsibility and human agency.Thibaut Giraud, Maicol Neves Leal & Florian Cova - 2023 - Synthese 202 (3):1-33.
    In the past 20 years, experimental philosophers have investigated folk intuitions about free will and moral responsibility, and their compatibility with determinism. To determine whether laypeople are “natural compatibilists” or “natural incompatibilists”, they have used vignettes describing agents living in deterministic universes. However, later research has suggested that participants’ answers to these studies are plagued with comprehension errors: either people fail to really accept that these universes are deterministic, or they confuse determinism with something else. This had led (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  46
    Adequate trust avails, mistaken trust matters: On the moral responsibility of doctors as proxies for patients' trust in biobank research.Linus Johnsson, Gert Helgesson, Mats G. Hansson & Stefan Eriksson - 2012 - Bioethics 27 (9):485-492.
    In Sweden, most patients are recruited into biobank research by non-researcher doctors. Patients' trust in doctors may therefore be important to their willingness to participate. We suggest a model of trust that makes sense of such transitions of trust between domains and distinguishes adequate trust from mistaken trust. The unique position of doctors implies, we argue, a Kantian imperfect duty to compensate for patients' mistaken trust. There are at least three kinds of mistaken trust, each of which requires a different (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  44. Against Moral Responsibility.Bruce N. Waller - 2011 - MIT Press.
    In Against Moral Responsibility, Bruce Waller launches a spirited attack on a system that is profoundly entrenched in our society and its institutions, deeply rooted in our emotions, and vigorously defended by philosophers from ancient times to the present. Waller argues that, despite the creative defenses of it by contemporary thinkers, moral responsibility cannot survive in our naturalistic-scientific system. The scientific understanding of human behavior and the causes that shape human character, he contends, leaves no room (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   70 citations  
  45. Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities.David Widerker & Michael McKenna (eds.) - 2003 - Ashgate.
    This book explores an important issue within the free will debate: the relation between free will and moral responsibility.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   77 citations  
  46. Précis of Neil Levy’s Consciousness and Moral Responsibility.Gregg Caruso - 2015 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 22 (7-8):7-15.
  47. 'The good that I would': impediments to free moral responsibility.Seymour Spencer - 1967 - London,: Darton Longman & Todd.
  48. AL Wigan, The Duality of the Mind: Proved by the Structure, Functions, and Diseases of the Brain and by the Phenomena of Mental Derangement, and Shown to be Essential to Moral Responsibility (ed. JE Bogan) Reviewed by.David L. Thompson - 1987 - Philosophy in Review 7 (1):43-45.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  62
    Moral Responsibility: An Introduction.Matthew Talbert - 2016 - Malden, MA: Polity.
    Most people would agree that a small child, or a cognitively impaired adult, is less responsible for their actions, good or bad, than an unimpaired adult. But how do we explain that difference, and how far can anyone be praised or blamed for what they have done? In this fascinating introduction, Matthew Talbert explores some of the key questions shaping current debates about moral responsibility, including: What is free will, and is it required for moral responsibility? (...)
  50.  28
    Guillaume Bignon. Excusing Sinner and Blaming God: A Calvinist Assessment of Determinism, Moral Responsibility, and Divine Involvement in Evil.Aku Visala - 2019 - Journal of Analytic Theology 7 (1):720-725.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 989