Results for ' norm proposition'

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Normative propositions and the ideal of an integrated and closed system.W. H. Werkmeister - 1951 - Philosophy of Science 18 (2):124-131.
    In a paper recently published in this quarterly I argued that modern quantum physics, as an integrated system of laws, supplements and completes in purely quantitative terms the fragmentary order of first-person experience, removing in a unique way ambiguities otherwise encountered at the level of common-sense things; and I contended that the choice of a different selective operator—purpose or value, let us say, rather than quantity—might entail an entirely different range and system of order. It is now my intention to (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2.  10
    Norm Propositions Defended.Ilkka Niiniluoto - 1991 - Ratio Juris 4 (3):367-373.
    Abstract.The author replies to some semantic and epistemic criticisms of the concept of norm proposition. The author's contention is that though some, many, or most norm formulations are uncertain or indefinite with respect to their validity or interpretations, insofar as at least some norms with definite content definitely belong to the legal order, the concept of norm proposition can be maintained to be sound. Three such cases are singled out. Finally the author argues for a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  3. Norm-proposition: Epistemic and Semantic Queries.Tecla Mazzarese - 1991 - Rechtstheorie 22:39-70.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4. Two Adaptive Logics of Norm-Propositions.Mathieu Beirlaen & Christian Straßer - 2013 - Journal of Applied Logic 11 (2):147-168.
    We present two defeasible logics of norm-propositions (statements about norms) that (i) consistently allow for the possibility of normative gaps and normative conflicts, and (ii) map each premise set to a sufficiently rich consequence set. In order to meet (i), we define the logic LNP, a conflict- and gap-tolerant logic of norm-propositions capable of formalizing both normative conflicts and normative gaps within the object language. Next, we strengthen LNP within the adaptive logic framework for non-monotonic reasoning in order (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  5.  55
    Fusion of Descriptive and Normative Propositions. The Concepts of 'Descriptive Proposition' and 'Normative Proposition' as Concepts of Degree.Svein Eng - 2000 - Ratio Juris 13 (3):236-260.
    I introduce the concept of ‘fused descriptive and normative proposition.’ I demonstrate that and how this concept has a basis in reality in lawyers' propositions de lege lata, and I point out that and why we do not find fused modality in language qua language, morals and the relationship between parents and children. The concept of ‘fused descriptive and normative proposition’ is of interest in a number of contexts, inter alia in relation to law, cf. the debate about (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  6. Norms, Normative Utterances, and Normative Propositions.Risto Hilpinen - 2006 - Análisis Filosófico 26 (2).
    It is argued that the distinction between the normative and the descriptive interpretation of norm sentences can be regarded as a distinction between two kinds of utterances. A norm or a directive has as its content a normative proposition. A normative utterance of a normative proposition in appropriate circumstances makes the proposition true, and an assertive utterance has as its truth-maker the norm system to which it refers. This account of norms, norm-contents, and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  7.  30
    Norms, Normative Utterances, and Normative Propositions.Risto Hilperin - 2006 - Análisis Filosófico 26 (2):229-241.
    It is argued that the distinction between the normative and the descriptive interpretation of norm sentences can be regarded as a distinction between two kinds of utterances. A norm or a directive has as its content a normative proposition. A normative utterance of a normative proposition in appropriate circumstances makes the proposition true, and an assertive utterance has as its truth-maker the norm system to which it refers. This account of norms, norm-contents, and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  13
    The Norms of Reason, RICHARD W. MILLER.Are Some Propositions Empirically Necessary - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):183-184.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9. Mutahhari on the System of Normative Propositions in Theistic Thought.Aliasghar Khandan - 2013 - پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین 11 (2):51-74.
    In this article, I shall describe the influence of theistic thought on variant dimensions of knowledge through classification and analysis of Mutahhari’s writings. In particular, I shall develop two criteria which have been inspired from 2: 156. These criteria are “from-him-ness” and “toward-him-ness” and they can be counted as a basis for normative propositions. I believe that divine orders have been manifested both in reason and revelation. Meanwhile, rational normative propositions can be divided into propositions of moral obligation and that (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  64
    Logic of norms and logic of normative propositions.Carlos E. Alchourrón - 1969 - Logique Et Analyse 12 (47):242-268.
  11.  18
    Alchourrón and Bulygin on deontic logic and the logic of norm-propositions: Axiomatization and representability results.Lennart Åqvist - 2008 - Logique Et Analyse 203:225-261.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  12.  22
    Propositions as (non-linguistic) objects and philosophy of law: Norms-as-propositions.Guglielmo Feis - 2020 - Filozofija I Društvo 31 (3):406-419.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  13.  15
    Carlos E. Alchourrón. Logic of norms and logic of normative propositions. Logique et analyse, n.s. vol. 12 , pp. 242–268. [REVIEW]Hector-Neri Castañeda - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (3):628-629.
  14.  18
    Normatively determined propositions.Matteo Pascucci & Claudio E. A. Pizzi - 2022 - In V. Giardino, S. Linker, S. Burns, F. Bellucci, J. M. Boucheix & P. Viana (eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2022. Springer. pp. 78-85.
    In the present work we provide a logical analysis of normatively determined and non-determined propositions. The normative status of these propositions depends on their relation with another proposition, here named reference proposition. Using a formal language that includes a monadic operator of obligation, we define eight dyadic operators that represent various notions of “being normatively (non-)determined”; then, we group them into two families, each forming an Aristotelian square of opposition. Finally, we show how the two resulting squares can (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  26
    La norme, l'action et la théorie des propositions normatives.Jerzy Kalinowski - 1963 - Studia Logica 14 (1):99-111.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16. Calcul automatique des normes et propositions juridiques.Miguel Sánchez Mazas - 1972 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):25-56.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Morality, normativity, and society.David Copp - 1995 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    Moral claims not only purport to be true, they also purport to guide our choices. This book presents a new theory of normative judgment, the "standard-based theory," which offers a schematic account of the truth conditions of normative propositions of all kinds, including moral propositions and propositions about reasons. The heart of Copp 's approach to moral propositions is a theory of the circumstances under which corresponding moral standards qualify as justified, the " society -centered theory." He argues that because (...)
  18. Propositional Attitudes as Commitments: Unleashing Some Constraints.Alireza Kazemi - 2020 - Dialogue 59 (3):437-457.
    ABSTRACTIn a series of articles, Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen and Nick Zangwill argue that, since propositional attitude ascription judgements do not behave like normative judgements in being subject to a priori normative supervenience and the Because Constraint, PAs cannot be constitutively normative.1 I argue that, for a specific version of normativism, according to which PAs are normative commitments, these arguments fail. To this end, I argue that commitments and obligations should be distinguished. Then, I show that the intuitions allegedly governing all normative (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  19.  8
    Théorie des Propositions Normatives.Ota Weinberger & Jerzy Kalinowski - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (2):311-312.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20. The Normativity of Belief and Self-Fulfilling Normative Beliefs.Nishi Shah - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Supplementary Volume 35 (S1):189-212.
    As Descartes famously pointed out in theSecond Meditation,the thought that someone is thinking is true anytime anyone thinks it. Furthermore, thinking it makes it true. Conversely, anytime anyone thinks that it is not the case that someone is thinking, this thought is false, and thinking it makes it false.l will argue that the propositions ‘There is at least one true normative proposition’ and ‘There are no true normative propositions’ have very similar properties. The proposition ‘There is at least (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  21.  38
    Théorie Des propositions normatives.Ota Weinberger - 1960 - Studia Logica 9 (1):7 - 25.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  22.  44
    Theorie Des propositions normatives.J. Kalinowski - 1953 - Studia Logica 1 (1):147-182.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  23. Expressivism and Cognitive Propositions.James L. D. Brown - 2019 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 5 (3):371-387.
    Expressivists about normative thought and discourse traditionally deny that there are nondeflationary normative propositions. However, it has recently been suggested that expressivists might avoid a number of problems by providing a theory of normative propositions compatible with expressivism. This paper explores the prospects for developing an expressivist theory of propositions within the framework of cognitive act theories of propositions. First, I argue that the only extant expressivist theory of cognitive propositions—Michael Ridge's ‘ecumenical expressivist’ theory—fails to explain identity conditions for normative (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  24.  93
    Are Propositions Mere Measures Of Mind?Gurpreet Rattan - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 94 (2):433-452.
    According to the Relational View of Propositional Attitude Reports (‘Relational View of Reports’, for short), attitude reports report thinkers as standing in cognitive relations to propositions. One difficult question for the view is: What is the nature of the cognitive relation(s) thinkers stand in to propositions in having propositional attitudes? One promise of The Measure Theory of Mind (sometimes, ‘The Measure Theory’ or ‘Measure Theory’ for short) is that it can avoid having to answer this question by allowing attitude reports (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  25. The Normative Stance.Marcus Arvan - 2021 - Philosophical Forum 52 (1):79-89.
    The Duhem-Quine thesis famously holds that a single hypothesis cannot be confirmed or disconfirmed in isolation, but instead only in conjunction with other background hypotheses. This article argues that this has important and underappreciated implications for metaethics. Section 1 argues that if one begins metaethics firmly wedded to a naturalistic worldview—due (e.g.) to methodological/epistemic considerations—then normativity will appear to be reducible to a set of social-psycho-semantic behaviors that I call the ‘normative stance.’ Contra Hume and Bedke (2012), I argue that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Epistemic Blame and the Normativity of Evidence.Sebastian Schmidt - 2024 - Erkenntnis 89 (1):1-24.
    The normative force of evidence can seem puzzling. It seems that having conclusive evidence for a proposition does not, by itself, make it true that one ought to believe the proposition. But spelling out the condition that evidence must meet in order to provide us with genuine normative reasons for belief seems to lead us into a dilemma: the condition either fails to explain the normative significance of epistemic reasons or it renders the content of epistemic norms practical. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   22 citations  
  27.  58
    Normative Myopia, Executives' Personality, and Preference for Pay Dispersion.Marc Orlitzky, Diane L. Swanson & Laura-Kate Quartermaine - 2006 - Business and Society 45 (2):149-177.
    In this preliminary study, the authors extend Swanson's concept of normative myopia (the propensity of executives to downplay or ignore the values at stake in their decision making) by using it as a point of reference for studying executives' preference for high pay dispersion. Specifically, the authors designed a survey to examine hypothesized relationships among myopia, personality, and executives' preference for highly stratified organizational pay structures. Data from 133 executive respondents suggest that myopic executives tend to prefer top-heavy compensation systems. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  28. The Normative Role of Knowledge.Declan Smithies - 2011 - Noûs 46 (2):265-288.
    What is the normative role of knowledge? I argue that knowledge plays an important role as a norm of assertion and action, which is explained and unified by its more fundamental role as a norm of belief. Moreover, I propose a distinctive account of what this normative role consists in. I argue that knowledge is the aim of belief, which sets a normative standard of correctness and a corresponding normative standard of justification. According to my proposal, it is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   131 citations  
  29.  98
    Normative naturalism and normative nihilism: Parfit's dilemma for naturalism.David Copp - 2017 - In Simon Kirchin (ed.), Reading Parfit: On What Matters. New York: Routledge.
    The fundamental issue dividing normative naturalists and non-naturalists concerns the nature of normativity. Non-naturalists hold that the normativity of moral properties and facts sets them apart from natural properties and facts in an important and deep way. As Derek Parfit explains matters, the normative naturalist distinguishes between normative concepts and the natural properties to which these concepts refer and also between normative propositions and the natural facts in virtue of which such propositions are true when they are true. This chapter (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  30. Calcul automatique des normes et propositions juridiques.Miguel Sánchez-Mazas Ferlosio - 1972 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 2 (6):25-56.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Attitudinal Objects and Propositions.Friederike Moltmann - 2022 - In Chris Tillman & Adam Murray (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Propositions. Routledge.
    This paper defends the view that attitudinal objects such as claims, beliefs, judgments, and requests form an ontological category of its own sharply distinguished from that of events and states and that of propositions. Attitudinal objects play a central role in attitude reports and avoid the conceptual and empirical problems for propositions. Unlike the latter, attitudinal objects bear a particular connection to normativity. The paper will also discuss the syntactic basis of a semantics of attitude reports based on attitudinal objects.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  32. The normativity of the mental.Nick Zangwill - 2005 - Philosophical Explorations 8 (1):1-19.
    I describe and defend the view in a philosophy of mind that I call 'Normative Essentialism', according to which propositional attitudes have normative essences. Those normative essences are 'horizontal' rational requirements, by which I mean the requirement to have certain propositional attitudes given other propositional attitudes. Different propositional attitudes impose different horizontal rational requirements. I distinguish a stronger and a weaker version of this doctrine and argue for the weaker version. I explore the consequences for knowledge of mind, and I (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   47 citations  
  33. Epistemic norms, closure, and no-Belief hinge epistemology.Mona Ioana Simion, Johanna Schnurr & Emma C. Gordon - 2021 - Synthese 198 (15):3553-3564.
    Recent views in hinge epistemology rely on doxastic normativism to argue that our attitudes towards hinge propositions are not beliefs. This paper has two aims; the first is positive: it discusses the general normative credentials of this move. The second is negative: it delivers two negative results for No-Belief hinge epistemology such construed. The first concerns the motivation for the view: if we’re right, doxastic normativism offers little in the way of theoretical support for the claim that our attitudes towards (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  34. Stokes’s malleability thesis and the normative grounding of propositional attitudes.Christopher Mole - 2023 - Philosophy and the Mind Sciences 4:1-8.
    The position that Stokes’s Thinking and Perceiving aims to overthrow is committed to the idea that the facts about one’s propositional attitudes and the facts about one’s perceptual experiences are alike grounded in facts about representations (in various formats) that are being held in a short or long term memory store, so that computations can be performed upon them. Claims about modularity are claims about the distinctness of these memory stores, and of these representations. One way in which to reject (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. III—Normative Facts and Reasons.Fabienne Peter - 2019 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 119 (1):53-75.
    The main aim of this paper is to identify a type of fact-given warrant for action that is distinct from reason-based justification for action and defend the view that there are two types of practical warrant. The idea that there are two types of warrant is familiar in epistemology, but has not received much attention in debates on practical normativity. On the view that I will defend, normative facts, qua facts, give rise to entitlement warrant for action. But they do (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  36.  39
    The Logic of Norms Founded on Descriptive Language.Ota Weinberger - 1991 - Ratio Juris 4 (3):284-307.
    Abstract.The author gives a short survey of the different methods which have been proposed to deal with the logic of norm sentences on the basis of logical systems of descriptive language: deontic logic, logic of norms as an isomorphism of propositional logic, restriction of logical relations to the propositional content of norm sentences, transformation of norms into sanction sentences, preference interpretation of norm sentences, double interpretation of ought‐sentences and the use of the descriptive interpretation as a tool (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  37. Against essential normativity of the mental.Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 140 (2):263 - 283.
    A number of authors have recently developed and defended various versions of ‘normative essentialism’ about the mental, i.e. the claim that propositional attitudes are constitutively or essentially governed by normative principles. I present two arguments to the effect that this claim cannot be right. First, if propositional attitudes were essentially normative, propositional attitude ascriptions would require non-normative justification, but since this is not a requirement of folk-psychology, propositional attitudes cannot be essentially normative. Second, if propositional attitudes were essentially normative, propositional (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  38. The Nature of Normativity.Ralph Wedgwood - 2007 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
    This is a book about normativity -- where the central normative terms are words like 'ought' and 'should' and their equivalents in other languages. It has three parts: The first part is about the semantics of normative discourse: what it means to talk about what ought to be the case. The second part is about the metaphysics of normative properties and relations: what is the nature of those properties and relations whose pattern of instantiation makes propositions about what ought to (...)
  39. Norm Performatives and Deontic Logic.Rosja Mastop - 2011 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 7 (2):83-105.
    Deontic logic is standardly conceived as the logic of true statements about the existence of obligations and permissions. In his last writings on the subject, G. H. von Wright criticized this view of deontic logic, stressing the rationality of norm imposition as the proper foundation of deontic logic. The present paper is an attempt to advance such an account of deontic logic using the formal apparatus of update semantics and dynamic logic. That is, we first define norm systems (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  40. Contextualism, Moral Disagreement, and Proposition Clouds.Jussi Suikkanen - 2019 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 14. Oxford Studies in Metaethics. pp. 47-69.
    According to contextualist theories in metaethics, when you use a moral term in a context, the context plays an ineliminable part in determining what natural property will be the semantic value of the term. Furthermore, on subjectivist and relativist versions of these views, it is either the speaker's own moral code or her moral community's moral code that constitutes the reference-fixing context. One standard objection to views of this type is that they fail to enable us to disagree in ordinary (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  41. Normativity and practical judgement.Onora O'Neill - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (3):393-405.
    Norms are apt for reasoning because they have propositional structure and content; they are practical because they aim to guide action, rather than to describe aspects of the world. These two features hold equally of norms construed sociologically as the norms of specific social groups, and of norms conceived abstractly as principles of action. On either view, norms are indeterminate while acts are particular and determinate. Consequently norms cannot fully specify which particular act is to be done. Are they then (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  42.  30
    Axiomatizing norms across time and the 'Paradox of the Court'.Daniela Glavaničová & Matteo Pascucci - 2021 - In Fenrong Liu, Alessandra Marra, Paul Portner & Frederik Van de Putte (eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. Proceedings of DEON 2020/2021. College Publications. pp. 201-218.
    In normative reasoning one typically refers to intervals of time across which norms are intended to hold, as well as to alternative possibilities representing hypothetical developments of a given scenario. Thus, deontic modalities are naturally intertwined with temporal and metaphysical ones. Furthermore, contemporary debates in philosophy suggest that a proper understanding of fundamental ethical principles, such as the Ought-Implies-Can thesis, requires a simultaneous analysis of these three families of concepts. In the present article we propose a general formal framework which (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43.  83
    Knowledge Norms and Assessing Them Well.Dustin Locke - 2014 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):80-89.
    Jonathan Ichikawa (2012) argues that the standard counterexamples to the knowledge norm of practical reasoning are no such thing. More precisely, he argues that those alleged counterexamples rest on claims about which actions are appropriate rather than on claims about which propositions can be appropriately treated as reasons for action. Since the knowledge norm of practical reasoning concerns the latter and not the former, Ichikawa contends that proponents of the alleged counterexamples must offer a theory that bridges the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  44. Belief Norms & Blindspots.Thomas Raleigh - 2013 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (2):243-269.
    I defend the thesis that beliefs are constitutively normative from two kinds of objection. After clarifying what a “blindspot” proposition is and the different types of blindspots there can be, I show that the existence of such propositions does not undermine the thesis that beliefs are essentially governed by a negative truth norm. I argue that the “normative variance” exhibited by this norm is not a defect. I also argue that if we accept a distinction between subjective (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  45.  31
    Believable Normative Error Theory.Gerald K. Harrison - 2022 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 8 (2):208-223.
    Normative error theory is thought by some to be unbelievable because they suppose the incompatibility of believing a proposition at the same time as believing that one has no normative reason to believe it—which believing in normative error theory would seem to involve. In this article, I argue that normative holism is believable and that a normative holist will believe that the truth of a proposition does not invariably generate a normative reason to believe it. I outline five (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. The normativity of content and 'the Frege point'.Jeff Speaks - 2009 - European Journal of Philosophy 17 (3):405-415.
    In "Assertion," Geach identified failure to attend to the distinction between meaning and speech act as a source of philosophical errors. I argue that failure to attend to this distinction, along with the parallel distinction between attitude and content, has been behind the idea that meaning and content are, in some sense, normative. By an argument parallel to Geach's argument against performative analyses of "good" we can show that the phenomena identified by theorists of the normativity of content are properties (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  47. Regulative Rules: A Distinctive Normative Kind.Reiland Indrek - 2024 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 108 (3):772-791.
    What are rules? In this paper I develop a view of regulative rules which takes them to be a distinctive normative kind occupying a middle ground between orders and normative truths. The paradigmatic cases of regulative rules that I’m interested in are social rules like rules of etiquette and legal rules like traffic rules. On the view I’ll propose, a rule is a general normative content that is in force due to human activity: enactment by an authority or acceptance by (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48.  12
    Weinberger Ota. Théorie des propositions normatives. French, with Polish and Russian summaries. Studia logica, vol. 9 , pp. 7–25.Kaunowski Jerzy. La norme, l'action et la théorie des propositions normatives. French, with Polish and Russian summaries. Studia logica, vol. 14 , pp. 99–117. [REVIEW]Hector-Neri Castaneda - 1968 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 33 (2):311-312.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Interpretative expressivism: A theory of normative belief.James L. D. Brown - 2021 - Philosophical Studies 179 (1):1-20.
    Metaethical expressivism is typically characterised as the view that normative statements express desire-like attitudes instead of beliefs. However, in this paper I argue that expressivists should claim that normative statements express beliefs in normative propositions, and not merely in some deflationary sense but in a theoretically robust sense explicated by a theory of propositional attitudes. I first argue that this can be achieved by combining an interpretationist understanding of belief with a nonfactualist view of normative belief content. This results in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  50. Propositional and Doxastic Justification: Their Relationship and a Questionable Supervenience Claim.Giorgio Volpe - 2017 - In Bartosz Brożek, Antonino Rotolo & Jerzy Stelmach (eds.), Supervenience and Normativity. Cham: Springer. pp. 25-48.
    Propositional justification pertains to propositions: it is the sort of justification that a proposition enjoys for an agent when the agent is epistemically justified to believe it. By contrast, doxastic justification is justification of beliefs, i.e., of doxastic states actually instantiated by an agent. The ‘orthodox’ view of the relationship between propositional and doxastic justification is that the latter should be explained in terms of the former, so that an agent’s belief is (doxastically) justified just in case (i) it (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000