Order:
Disambiguations
Thomas Kelly [41]Thomas Forrest Kelly [6]Terrence Kelly [6]Thomas R. Kelly [4]
Thomas A. F. Kelly [4]T. Kelly [4]Thomas E. Kelly [3]Tony Kelly [3]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also
  1. Peer Disagreement and Higher Order Evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2010 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press. pp. 183--217.
    My aim in this paper is to develop and defend a novel answer to a question that has recently generated a considerable amount of controversy. The question concerns the normative significance of peer disagreement. Suppose that you and I have been exposed to the same evidence and arguments that bear on some proposition: there is no relevant consideration which is available to you but not to me, or vice versa. For the sake of concreteness, we might picture.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   128 citations  
  2. The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement.Thomas Kelly - 2005 - In John Hawthorne & Tamar Gendler (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Volume 1. Oxford University Press. pp. 167-196.
    Looking back on it, it seems almost incredible that so many equally educated, equally sincere compatriots and contemporaries, all drawing from the same limited stock of evidence, should have reached so many totally different conclusions---and always with complete certainty.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   163 citations  
  3.  96
    Evidence Can Be Permissive.Thomas Kelly - 2013 - In Matthias Steup & John Turri (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell. pp. 298.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   52 citations  
  4. Epistemic Rationality as Instrumental Rationality: A Critique.Thomas Kelly - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (3):612–640.
    In this paper, I explore the relationship between epistemic rationality and instrumental rationality, and I attempt to delineate their respective roles in typical instances of theoretical reasoning. My primary concern is with the instrumentalist conception of epistemic rationality: the view that epistemic rationality is simply a species of instrumental rationality, viz. instrumental rationality in the service of one's cognitive or epistemic goals. After sketching the relevance of the instrumentalist conception to debates over naturalism and 'the ethics of belief', I argue (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   115 citations  
  5. Disagreement and the Burdens of Judgment.Thomas Kelly - 2013 - In David Phiroze Christensen & Jennifer Lackey (eds.), The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford University Press.
  6. Evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2006 - Philosophy Compass.
    The concept of evidence is central to both epistemology and the philosophy of science. Of course, ‘evidence’ is hardly a philosopher's term of art: it is not only, or even primarily, philosophers who routinely speak of evidence, but also lawyers and judges, historians and scientists, investigative journalists and reporters, as well as the members of numerous other professions and ordinary folk in the course of everyday life. The concept of evidence would thus seem to be on firmer pre-theoretical ground than (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   71 citations  
  7. Evidence: Fundamental Concepts and the Phenomenal Conception.Thomas Kelly - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (5):933-955.
    The concept of evidence is among the central concerns of epistemology broadly construed. As such, it has long engaged the intellectual energies of both philosophers of science and epistemologists of a more traditional variety. Here I briefly survey some of the more important ideas to have emerged from this tradition of reflection. I then look somewhat more closely at an issue that has recently come to the fore, largely as a result of Williamson's Knowledge and Its Limits: that of whether (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   38 citations  
  8. Disagreement, Dogmatism, and Belief Polarization.Thomas Kelly - 2008 - Journal of Philosophy 105 (10):611-633.
    Suppose that you and I disagree about some non-straightforward matter of fact (say, about whether capital punishment tends to have a deterrent effect on crime). Psychologists have demonstrated the following striking phenomenon: if you and I are subsequently exposed to a mixed body of evidence that bears on the question, doing so tends to increase the extent of our initial disagreement. That is, in response to exactly the same evidence, each of us grows increasingly confident of his or her original (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   35 citations  
  9. The Rationality of Belief and Other Propositional Attitudes.Thomas Kelly - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 110 (2):163-96.
    In this paper, I explore the question of whether the expected consequences of holding a belief can affect the rationality of doing so. Special attention is given to various ways in which one might attempt to exert some measure of control over what one believes and the normative status of the beliefs that result from the successful execution of such projects. I argue that the lessons which emerge from thinking about the case ofbelief have important implications for the way we (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   53 citations  
  10.  41
    The Rationality of Belief and Some Other Propositional Attitudes.Thomas Kelly - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 110 (2):163-196.
    In this paper, I explore the question of whether the expected consequences of holding a belief can affect the rationality of doing so. Special attention is given to various ways in which one might attempt to exert some measure of control over what one believes and the normative status of the beliefs that result from the successful execution of such projects. I argue that the lessons which emerge from thinking about the case of belief have important implications for the way (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   51 citations  
  11. Evidence and Normativity: Reply to Leite.Thomas Kelly - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):465-474.
    According to one view about the rationality of belief, such rationality is ultimately nothing other than the rationality that one exhibits in taking the means to one’s ends. On this view, epistemic rationality is really a species or special case of instrumental rationality. In particular, epistemic rationality is instrumental rationality in the service of one’s distinctively cognitive or epistemic goals (perhaps: one’s goal of holding true rather than false beliefs). In my (2003), I dubbed this view the instrumentalist conception of (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   24 citations  
  12. Is Reflective Equilibrium Enough?Thomas Kelly & Sarah McGrath - 2010 - Philosophical Perspectives 24 (1):325-359.
    Suppose that one is at least a minimal realist about a given domain, in that one thinks that that domain contains truths that are not in any interesting sense of our own making. Given such an understanding, what can be said for and against the method of reflective equilibrium as a procedure for investigating the domain? One fact that lends this question some interest is that many philosophers do combine commitments to minimal realism and a reflective equilibrium methodology. Here, for (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  13. Moorean Facts and Belief Revision, or Can the Skeptic Win?Thomas Kelly - 2005 - Philosophical Perspectives 19 (1):179-209.
    A Moorean fact, in the words of the late David Lewis, is ‘one of those things that we know better than we know the premises of any philosophical argument to the contrary’. Lewis opens his seminal paper ‘Elusive Knowledge’ with the following declaration.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  14. Following the Argument Where It Leads.Thomas Kelly - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (1):105-124.
    Throughout the history of western philosophy, the Socratic injunction to ‘follow the argument where it leads’ has exerted a powerful attraction. But what is it, exactly, to follow the argument where it leads? I explore this intellectual ideal and offer a modest proposal as to how we should understand it. On my proposal, following the argument where it leaves involves a kind of modalized reasonableness. I then consider the relationship between the ideal and common sense or ‘Moorean’ responses to revisionary (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  15. Common Sense as Evidence: Against Revisionary Ontology and Skepticism.Thomas Kelly - 2008 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 32 (1):53-78.
    In this age of post-Moorean modesty, many of us are inclined to doubt that philosophy is in possession of arguments that might genuinely serve to undermine what we ordinarily believe. It may perhaps be conceded that the arguments of the skeptic appear to be utterly compelling; but the Mooreans among us will hold that the very plausibility of our ordinary beliefs is reason enough for supposing that there must be something wrong in the skeptic’s arguments, even if we are unable (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  16. How to Be an Epistemic Permissivist.Thomas Kelly - unknown
    Roger’s official statement of the thesis that he defends reads as follows: Uniqueness : If an agent whose total evidence is E is fully rational in taking doxastic attitude D to P, then necessarily, any subject with total evidence E who takes a different attitude to P is less than fully rational. Following Roger, I’ll call someone who denies Uniqueness a Permissivist . In what follows, I’ll argue against Uniqueness and defend Permissivism.
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  17.  60
    CSR Rating Agencies: What is Their Global Impact?Steven Scalet & Thomas F. Kelly - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics 94 (1):69-88.
    In the last two decades, there has been a pronounced growth of CSR rating agencies that assess corporations based on their social and environmental performance. This article investigates the impact of CSR ratings on the behavior of individual corporations. To what extent do corporations adjust their behavior based on how they rank? Our primary finding is that being dropped from a CSR ranking appears to do little to encourage firms to acknowledge and address problems related to their social and environmental (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  18.  7
    Are There Any Successful Philosophical Arguments?Sarah McGrath & Thomas Kelly - 2017 - In John A. Keller (ed.), Being, Freedom, and Method: Themes From the Philosophy of Peter van Inwagen. Oxford University Press UK.
    According to Peter van Inwagen, there are no successful philosophical arguments for substantive conclusions. He argues for this thesis in two steps. First, he puts forward and defends a “criterion of philosophical success,” according to which a philosophical argument is a success just in case it has the power to convert any ideally rational agnostic to its conclusion. He then argues that, given the kind of disagreement we find among philosophers, we have good reason to think that no philosophical arguments (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  19. The Ethics of Credit Rating Agencies: What Happened and the Way Forward. [REVIEW]Steven Scalet & Thomas F. Kelly - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 111 (4):477-490.
    During the short span of a few months in 2008, 14 trillion dollars of highly rated bonds fell into junk status, surprising the global financial system and accelerating an economic decline. The result was the worst fracture of the US financial system since the Great Depression. Credit rating agencies (CRAs) in particular have come under intense scrutiny as a result of this latest disaster, both domestically and internationally, including many congressional inquiries and government investigations. Most of the public and scholarly (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  20. Sunk Costs, Rationality, and Acting for the Sake of the Past.Thomas Kelly - 2004 - Noûs 38 (1):60–85.
    If you are more likely to continue a course of action in virtue of having previously invested in that course of action, then you tend to honor sunk costs. It is widely thought both that (i) individuals often do give some weight to sunk costs in their decision-making and that (ii) it is irrational for them to do so. In this paper I attempt to cast doubt on the conventional wisdom about sunk costs, understood as the conjunction of these two (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  21. Hume, Norton, and Induction Without Rules.Thomas Kelly - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (5):754-764.
    With respect to inductive reasoning, there are at least two broad projects that have been of interest to philosophers. The first project is that of accurately describing paradigmatic instances of inductive reasoning in the sciences and in everyday life. Thus, we might ask, of some particular historical episode, how exactly Newton, or Darwin, or Einstein arrived at some conclusion on the basis of the evidence that was before him. The second project is one of justification. The task here is that (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  22. Consensus Gentium: Reflections on the 'Common Consent' Argument for the Existence of God.Thomas Kelly - 2011 - In Kelly James Clark & Raymond J. VanArragon (eds.), Evidence and Religious Belief. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  23.  19
    Sociological Not Political: Rawls and the Reconstructive Social Sciences.Terrence Kelly - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):3-19.
    Like many critics of Rawls, Habermas believes that the Original Position (OP) implicitly utilizes normative (and unargued for) assumptions. The author defends the OP by arguing that its basic concepts are the product of a rational reconstruction of the everyday know-how, or common sense, employed by citizens in democratic practices. The author identifies this reconstruction in Rawls's work but suggests that while this answers the charge of circularity, it raises the problem of contextual relativism. It is concluded that Rawls can (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  24.  79
    The Cost of Skepticism: Who Pays?Thomas Kelly - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 131 (3):695-712.
    Those who favor externalist accounts of knowledge and justification often accuse their internalist opponents of playing into the hands of skeptic. According to this line of thought, internalists characteristically set overly demanding requirements for knowledge and justification, requirements which ordinary believers infrequently satisfy: the internalist is thus committed by his or her own theory to a massive and implausible revisionism about the extent of what we know and justifiably believe. For reasons that I explore, the version of internalist foundationalism developed (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  25. Intelligibility, Rationality and Comparison: The Rationality Debates Revisited.James Bohman & Terrence Kelly - 1996 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 22 (1):81-100.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  26.  90
    Soames and Moore on Method in Ethics and Epistemology.Sarah McGrath & Thomas Kelly - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (6):1661-1670.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  23
    Argument Schemes in Computer System Safety Engineering.Tangming Yuan & Tim Kelly - 2011 - Informal Logic 31 (2):89-109.
    Safe Safety arguments are key components in a safety case. Too often, safety arguments are constructed without proper reasoning. To address this, we argue that informal logic argument schemes have important roles to play in safety argument construction and reviewing process. Ten commonly used reasoning schemes in computer system safety domain are proposed. The role of informal logic dialogue games in computer system safety arguments reviewing is also discussed and the intended work in this area is proposed. It is anticipated (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28.  32
    On Remembering and Forgetting Being: Aquinas, Heidegger, and Caputo.Thomas A. F. Kelly - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (2):321-340.
    This essay consists of an exploration of the relation between Aquinas and Heidegger as this is discussed in the work of John Caputo, and an attempt, in the light of what is learned from the previous discussion, to rethink the essence of Thomistic metaphysics in a way that is both faithful to the spirit of Thomism, remaining attentive to its mystical source, and alive to the mystery of Being in a Heideggerian sense. In this way the argumental structure central to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  8
    SoTL and National Difference: Musings From Three Historians From Three Countries.Sean Brawley, T. Kelly & Geoff Timmins - 2009 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 8 (1):8-25.
    What role does/should national difference play in our understanding of the scholarship of teaching and learning as a concept and a practice? Three historians from Australia, the UK and the USA muse on this important issue. Informed by their engagement with the literature and the field, they argue that national difference is an observable phenomenon within SoTL but that each national response has been shaped by the broader transnational/international engagements of recent years.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  30.  54
    About the Bishop: Episcopal Entourage and the Economy of Government in Post-Roman Gaul.Jamie Kreiner, Thomas Forrest Kelly, Alex J. Novikoff & Ryan Perry - 2011 - Speculum 86 (2):321-60.
    St. Amand could count among his many feats the extraordinary achievement of social equilibrium. “The way he was in the midst of the rich and the poor,” his hagiographer marveled, “the poor saw him as a poor man, and the rich treated him as their better.” On a résumé of miracles performed and peoples converted, this accomplishment was no less impressive. Bishops in the post-Roman kingdoms of Gaul/Francia maintained an ongoing balancing act between seeking social and political distinction, on the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  8
    The Unhappy Liberal:CriticalTheory Without Cultural Dopes.Terrence Kelly - 2000 - Constellations 7 (3):372-381.
  32.  27
    Practical Rationality in Social Scientific Explanation: The Case of Residential Segregation.Terrence Kelly - 2004 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (1):3-19.
    Residential segregation according to race remains fairly entrenched in parts of the United States despite the fact that public attitudes toward racial integration have become dramatically more positive. This incongruity is often explained in terms of the irrationality of agents, whereby the agents’ support of integration is undermined by systematic/unconscious racism. The author argues that such accounts present an implausible model of practical rationality and places too great a justificatory burden on the critic/observer perspective. As an alternative, he suggests the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33. Theology at the Void the Retrieval of Experience.Thomas M. Kelly - 2002
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  34.  75
    Taking Things for Granted: Comments on Harman and Sherman.Thomas Kelly - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 156 (1):141-147.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  33
    Meyerson and the Epistemological Paradox.Thomas R. Kelly - 1934 - The Monist 44 (2):296-305.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  18
    In Memoriam: Eileen P. Kelly.Thomas E. Kelly - 2014 - Catholic Social Science Review 19:299-301.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  20
    The Value of Steady State Models of Cognition-Emotion.Trezise Kelly & Reeve Robert - 2015 - Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9.
  38.  25
    Power, Credibility and Expertise in a Colonized Medical Discourse.Terrence Kelly, Stephanie Bauer & Stephen Tower - unknown
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Language and Transcendence a Study in the Philosophy of Martin Heidegger and Karl-Otto Apel.Thomas A. F. Kelly - 1994
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40. Can the ‘Theological Virtues’ Have Meaning for Philosophy?Thomas Kelly - 2005 - Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society:147-164.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  53
    Review: Walking the Tightrope of Reason: The Precarious Life of a Rational Animal. [REVIEW]Thomas Kelly - 2004 - Mind 113 (452):750-753.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  13
    A History of Argos to 500 B.C. [REVIEW]R. A. Tomlinson & T. Kelly - 1978 - Journal of Hellenic Studies 98:194-194.
  43.  6
    George Birkbeck: Pioneer of Adult Education.Thomas Kelly - 1958 - British Journal of Educational Studies 6 (2):185-186.
  44.  13
    A Design for DemocracyAdult Education in Transition: A Study of Institutional InsecurityAdult Reading. The 55th Year Book of the National Society for the Study of Education. Part II.Thomas Kelly, Burton R. Clarke & Nelson B. Henry - 1957 - British Journal of Educational Studies 5 (2):172.
  45. Ex Possibili Et Necessario: A Re-Examination of Aquinas's Third Way.T. A. F. Kelly - 1997 - The Thomist 61 (1):63-84.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  46.  22
    Review Articles.J. J. B. Dempster, Thomas Kelly, J. P. Tuck, A. C. F. Beales, M. K. Richardson, Jean Floud, H. C. Barnard, P. P. Brown, Geoffrey Tillotson & Evelyn Lawrence - 1957 - British Journal of Educational Studies 5 (2):170-190.
  47.  10
    A History of Adult Education in Great Britain.Thomas Kelly - 1963 - British Journal of Educational Studies 11 (2):193-194.
  48.  19
    Beneventan fragments at Altamura.Thomas Forrest Kelly & Herman F. Holbrook - 1987 - Mediaeval Studies 49 (1):466-479.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49.  3
    The Origin of Mechanics’ Institutes.Thomas Kelly - 1952 - British Journal of Educational Studies 1 (1):17-27.
  50.  18
    The Meaning of Cleanness: Parable as Effective Sign.T. D. Kelly & John T. Irwin - 1973 - Mediaeval Studies 35 (1):232-260.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 86