This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
119 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 119
  1. A. Altmann (1988). A Hitherto Unknown Critique of Kant Theory of Time and Space by Eberhard. Kant-Studien 79 (3):329-341.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Alexander Altmann (1988). Eine bisher unbekannte frühe Kritik Eberhards an Kants Raum-und Zeitlehre. Kant-Studien 79 (3):329-341.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Antonio J. Pacheco Amitesarove (2010). Las nociones de espacio y tiempo en la obra pre-crítica de Kant. Dikaiosyne: Revista Semestral de Filosofía Práctica 24 (13):89-124.
    El propósito de este trabajo es únicamente esclarecer el sentido de las nociones de espacio y tiempo, tal como Kant las entiende en esta obra precrítica suya de 1763. El propósito del trabajo se enmarca dentro de uno más amplio que examina estas nociones desde el primer escrito de Kant de 1747 , a través de todo el período precrítico, hasta concluir con la obra de 1770 , punto de inflexión y de partida de las reflexiones que once años después (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ralf M. Bader (2013). Self-Knowledge in § 7 of the Transcendental Aesthetic. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter 531-540.
    Kant's claim that time is a subjective form of intuition was first proposed in his Inaugural Dissertation. This view was immediately criticised by Schultz, Lambert and Mendelssohn. Their criticisms are based on the claim that representations change which implies that change is real. From the reality of change they then argue to the reality of time, which undermines its supposed status as a subjective form of intuition that only applies to appearances. Kant took these criticisms very seriously and attempted to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Sorin Baiasu (2011). Space, Time and Mind-Dependence. Kantian Review 16 (2):175-190.
  6. Adrian Bardon (2011). Kant and the Conventionality of Simultaneity. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):845-856.
    Kant’s three Analogies of Experience, in his Critique of Pure Reason, represent a highly condensed attempt to establish the metaphysical foundations of Newtonian physics. His strategy is to show that the organization of experience in terms of a world of enduring substances undergoing mutual causal interaction is a necessary condition of the temporal ordering even of one’s own subjective states, and thus of coherent experience itself. In his Third Analogy—an examination of the necessary conditions of judgments of simultaneous existence—he argues (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Adrian Bardon (2010). Time-Awareness and Projection in Mellor and Kant. Kant-Studien 101 (1):59-74.
    The theorist who denies the objective reality of non-relational temporal properties, or ‘A-series’ determinations, must explain our experience of the passage of time. D.H. Mellor, a prominent denier of the objective reality of temporal passage, draws, in part, on Kant in offering a theory according to which the experience of temporal passage is the result of the projection of change in belief. But Mellor has missed some important points Kant has to make about time-awareness. It turns out that Kant's theory (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Adrian Bardon (2002). Temporal Passage and Kant's Second Analogy. Ratio 15 (2):134–153.
    In this essay I address the question of the reality of temporal passage through a discussion of some of the implications of Kant's reasoning concerning the necessary conditions of objective judgement. Some theorists have claimed that the attribution of non‐relational temporal properties to objects and events represents a conceptual confusion, or ‘category mistake’. By means of an examination of Kant's Second Analogy, and a comparison between that argument and Cassam's recent exploration of an argument regarding the necessity of the conceptualisation (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Kristina Mussgnug Barrett (2006). Review: Sherover, Are We in Time? [REVIEW] Kantian Review 11 (1):133-136.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. B. Bavink (1927). Raum, Zeit und Kausalität im System des kritischen Realismus. Kant-Studien 32 (1-3):264-272.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Modesto Berciano (2005). Finitud y Tiempo En Kant y En Heidegger. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 61 (3/4):819 - 839.
    Segundo o autor do presente artigo, Martin Heidegger oferece-nos uma nova interpretação de Kant. Usando o método fenomenológico, Heidegger busca os pressupostos implícitos no conhecimento finito na Crítica da razão pura de Kant. O pressuposto fundamental seria a temporalidade do sujeito. Desta forma, Heidegger encontra em Kant um apoio para a sua hermenêutica do Dasein, cujo ser é a temporalidade. O artigo defende que, segundo Heidegger, Kant deu passos importantes para uma reflexão radical sobre o tempo, mas não chegou propriamente (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Sven Bernecker (2012). Kant on Spatial Orientation. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):519-533.
    This paper develops a novel interpretation of Kant's argument from incongruent counterparts to the effect that the representations of space and time are intuitions rather than concepts. When properly understood, the argument anticipates the contemporary position whereby the meaning of indexicals cannot be captured by descriptive contents.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Martin A. Bertman (1986). Augustine on Time, with Reference to Kant. Journal of Value Inquiry 20 (3):223-234.
  14. Karl Beurlen (1936). Der zeitbegriff in der modernen naturwissenschaft und Das kausalitätsprinzip. Kant-Studien 41 (1):16-37.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Graham Bird (2013). Reply to Edward Kanterian. Kantian Review 18 (2):289-300.
    The reply to Kanterian offers a rebuttal of his central criticisms. It reaffirms the difference between Kant's arguments in the Aesthetic and at B 148-9; it rejects the alleged error of logic in Fischer's (and my) arguments; and it rejects Kanterian's reading of passages in the Preface (A xx-xxii) and of the Amphiboly. Beyond these specific points Kanterian assumes that Kant's project in the first Critique cannot be understood as a and so begs the question at issue.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Michel Bitbol (2011). Traces of Objectivity: Causality and Probabilities in Quantum Physics. Diogenes 58 (4):30-57.
  17. William Blattner (1994). Is Heidegger a Kantian Idealist? Inquiry 37 (2):185 – 201.
    It is argued that Heidegger should be seen as something of a Kantian Idealist. Like Kant, Heidegger distinguishes two standpoints (transcendental and empirical) which we can occupy when we ask the question whether natural things depend on us. He agrees with Kant that from the empirical or human standpoint we are justified in saying that natural things do not depend on us. But in contrast with Kant, Heidegger argues that from the transcendental standpoint we can say neither that natural things (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Eugen Böckli (1924). Paradoxien der Zeit. Kant-Studien 29 (2):460-471.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. W. H. Bossart (1978). Kant's “Analytic” and the Two-Fold Nature of Time. Kant-Studien 69 (1-4):288-298.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Christophe Bouton (2012). Idéalité transcendantale ou réalité absolue du temps? Temps du sujet et temps du monde chez Kant. Kant-Studien 103 (4):429-447.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 103 Heft: 4 Seiten: 429-447.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Christophe Bouton (2012). Transcendental Ideality or Absolute Reality of Time? Time for the Subject and Time for the World in Kant. Kant-Studien 103 (4).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jill Vance Buroker (1997). Review: Falkenstein, Kant's Intuitionism: A Commentary on the Transcendental Aesthetic. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 1 (1):162-171.
  23. V. C. C. (1955). Review: Korner, Kant. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 9 (2):361-361.
  24. Mario Caimi (2012). The Logical Structure of Time According to the Chapter on the Schematism. Kant-Studien 103 (4):415-428.
    : Usually, when studying schematism we devote almost exclusive attention to the study of the modifications that the categories suffer when combined with time. Instead, we have focused our attention on the determinations that time receives when combined with the categories. Departing from the definition of the transcendental schemata as “determinations of time”, an attempt is made to establish the various determinations that time receives from each one of the categories, as these perform the determination of time in schematism. The (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John J. Callanan (2014). Contemporary Kantian Metaphysics: New Essays on Space and Time. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 22 (1):144-148.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Rudolf Carnap (1925). Über die Abhängigkeit der Eigenschaften des Raumes von denen der Zeit. Kant-Studien 30 (1-2):331-345.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Quassim Cassam (1993). Inner Sense, Body Sense, and Kant's "Refutation of Idealism". European Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):111-127.
  28. François-Xavier Chenet (1993). Que sont donc l'espace et le temps? Les hypothèses considérées par Kant et la lancinante objection de la «troisième possibilité». Kant-Studien 84 (2):129-153.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Mark T. Conard (1994). Allison's Reading of Kant's Paradox of Inner Sense. Philosophy Today 38 (3-4):317-325.
  30. Francesco Paolo De Sanctis (2008). Le problème du temps chez Michel Henry: L'origine de l'espacement. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique (1).
    Le problème du temps chez Michel Henry n’a pas encore fait l’objet d’une étude séparée. Le rejet abrupt de cette question chez l’auteur n’a certainement pas favorisé l’intérêt des critiques pour ce sujet. Dans un premier temps, en 1963 dans L’Essence de la manifestation , Michel Henry considère le problème du temps (à travers le filtre du Kantbuch de Heidegger) comme étant le « même » que celui de la récepti­vité, soit en le renvoyant à l’auto-affection. Celle-ci étant comprise comme (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Alwin Diemer (1959). Gott und die zeit bei aristoteles. Kant-Studien 50 (1-4):273-286.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Steven M. Duncan, Mind, Body, Space, and Time.
    In this essay I explore some of the basic elements of consciousness from a substance dualist point of view, incorporating some elements of Kant's Transcendental Analytic into an overall account of the constitution of consciousness.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Katherine Dunlop (2009). The Unity of Time's Measure: Kant's Reply to Locke. Philosophers' Imprint 9 (4):1-31.
    In a crucial passage of the second-edition Transcendental Deduction, Kant claims that the concept of motion is central to our understanding of change and temporal order. I show that this seemingly idle claim is really integral to the Deduction, understood as a replacement for Locke’s “physiological” epistemology (cf. A86-7/B119). Béatrice Longuenesse has shown that Kant’s notion of distinctively inner receptivity derives from Locke. To explain the a priori application of concepts such as succession to this mode of sensibility, Kant construes (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Klaus Düsing (1980). Objektive und subjektive Zeit. Untersuchungen zu Kants Zeittheorie und zu ihrer modernen kritischen Rezeption. Kant-Studien 71 (1-4):1-34.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Corey W. Dyck, The Principles of Apperception.
    In this paper, I argue that there are multiple principles of apperception which jointly constitute the foundation of Kant's argument in the transcendental deduction.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Parvis Emad (1973). Review: Sherover, Heidegger, Kant and Time. [REVIEW] Southern Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):367-374.
  37. E. J. Engel (2004). Mendelssohn Versus Kant--Early Evidence of a Confrontation with Kant's Doctrine of Time and Space in the Dissertation of 1770. Kant-Studien 95 (3):269-282.
  38. Stephen A. Erickson (1969). Review: AI-Azm, Kant's Theory of Time. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 7 (2):214-217.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. B. Falkenburg (1995). Kant 2nd Antinomy and Physics. Kant-Studien 86 (1):4-25.
  40. Hellmuth Falkenfeld (1915). Der Begriff der Zeit. Kant-Studien 20 (1-3):376-383.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Lorne Falkenstein (1991). Kant, Mendelssohn, Lambert, and the Subjectivity of Time. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (2):227-251.
  42. Richard M. Gale (1971). Kant's Theory of Time. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2 (1):95-96.
  43. W. Gent (1926). Leibnizens Philosophie der Zeit und des Raumes. Kant-Studien 31 (1-3):61-88.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Paul Guyer (2006). Kant. Routledge.
    Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) is arguably the most influential of the Enlightenment Philosophers. In this outstanding introduction, Paul Guyer introduces and assesses all the major aspects of Kant's thought. Beginning with a helpful overview of Kant's life and times, Guyer introduces the "Copernican revolution" Kant brought about in metaphysics and epistemology, carefully introducing his arguments about the nature of experience, space and time in his most influential but difficult work, The Critique of Pure Reason. He gives a much-needed explanation of Kant's (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Shahen Hacyan (2006). On the Transcendental Ideality of Space and Time in Modern Physics. Kant-Studien 97 (3):382-395.
    In Newtonian physics, all phenomena take place in absolute space, which is a fixed scenario, and are referred to absolute time, which rules all processes. Motion is governed by a set of basic differential equations, and it is possible, at least in principle, to deduce future events from present initial conditions.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Espen Hammer (2011). Philosophy and Temporality From Kant to Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
    This book is a critical analysis of how key philosophers in the European tradition have responded to the emergence of a modern conception of temporality. Espen Hammer suggests that it is a feature of Western modernity that time has been forcibly separated from the natural cycles and processes with which it used to be associated. In a discussion that ranges over Kant, Hegel, Schopenhauer, Nietzsche, Heidegger and Adorno, he examines the forms of dissatisfaction which result from this, together with narrative (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Robert Hanna (2003). Review: Weatherston, Heidegger's Interpretation of Kant: Categories, Imagination, and Temporality. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (8).
  48. William Harper (1981). Kant's Empirical Realism and the Second Analogy of Experience. Synthese 47 (3):465 - 480.
  49. Gary Hatfield (2006). Kant on the Perception of Space (and Time). In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press 61--93.
  50. Norbert Hinske (1965). Kants Begriff der Antinomie und die Etappen seiner Ausarbeitung. Kant-Studien 56 (3-4):485-496.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 119