This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
110 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 110
  1. A. Altmann (1988). A Hitherto Unknown Critique of Kant Theory of Time and Space by Eberhard. Kant-Studien 79 (3):329-341.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Alexander Altmann (1988). Eine bisher unbekannte frühe Kritik Eberhards an Kants Raum-und Zeitlehre. Kant-Studien 79 (3):329-341.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ralf M. Bader (forthcoming). Self-Knowledge in §7 of the Transcendental Aesthetic. In Stefano Bacin (ed.), Proceedings of the XIth International Kant Kongress. de Gruyter.
    Kant's claim that time is a subjective form of intuition was first proposed in his Inaugural Dissertation. This view was immediately criticised by Schultz, Lambert and Mendelssohn. Their criticisms are based on the claim that representations change which implies that change is real. From the reality of change they then argue to the reality of time, which undermines its supposed status as a subjective form of intuition that only applies to appearances. Kant took these criticisms very seriously and attempted to (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Sorin Baiasu (2011). Space, Time and Mind-Dependence. Kantian Review 16 (2):175-190.
  5. Adrian Bardon (2011). Kant and the Conventionality of Simultaneity. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):845-856.
    Kant’s three Analogies of Experience, in his Critique of Pure Reason, represent a highly condensed attempt to establish the metaphysical foundations of Newtonian physics. His strategy is to show that the organization of experience in terms of a world of enduring substances undergoing mutual causal interaction is a necessary condition of the temporal ordering even of one’s own subjective states, and thus of coherent experience itself. In his Third Analogy—an examination of the necessary conditions of judgments of simultaneous existence—he argues (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Adrian Bardon (2002). Temporal Passage and Kant's Second Analogy. Ratio 15 (2):134–153.
  7. Kristina Mussgnug Barrett (2006). Review: Sherover & Johnson (Ed), Are We in Time? [REVIEW] Kantian Review 11:133-136.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Kristina Mussgnug Barrett (2006). Review: Sherover, Are We in Time? [REVIEW] Kantian Review 11 (1):133-136.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. B. Bavink (1927). Raum, Zeit und Kausalität im System des kritischen Realismus. Kant-Studien 32 (1-3):264-272.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Anne Margaret Baxley (2007). Review: Melnick, Themes in Kant's Metaphysics and Ethics. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 116 (1):142-144.
  11. Sven Bernecker (2012). Kant on Spatial Orientation. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (4):519-533.
    This paper develops a novel interpretation of Kant's argument from incongruent counterparts to the effect that the representations of space and time are intuitions rather than concepts. When properly understood, the argument anticipates the contemporary position whereby the meaning of indexicals cannot be captured by descriptive contents.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Martin A. Bertman (1986). Augustine on Time, with Reference to Kant. Journal of Value Inquiry 20 (3):223-234.
  13. Karl Beurlen (1936). Der zeitbegriff in der modernen naturwissenschaft und Das kausalitätsprinzip. Kant-Studien 41 (1):16-37.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Graham Bird (2013). Reply to Edward Kanterian. Kantian Review 18 (2):289-300.
    The reply to Kanterian offers a rebuttal of his central criticisms. It reaffirms the difference between Kant's arguments in the Aesthetic and at B 148-9; it rejects the alleged error of logic in Fischer's (and my) arguments; and it rejects Kanterian's reading of passages in the Preface (A xx-xxii) and of the Amphiboly. Beyond these specific points Kanterian assumes that Kant's project in the first Critique cannot be understood as a and so begs the question at issue.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Michel Bitbol (2011). Traces of Objectivity: Causality and Probabilities in Quantum Physics. Diogenes 58 (4):30-57.
  16. William Blattner (1994). Is Heidegger a Kantian Idealist? Inquiry 37 (2):185 – 201.
    It is argued that Heidegger should be seen as something of a Kantian Idealist. Like Kant, Heidegger distinguishes two standpoints (transcendental and empirical) which we can occupy when we ask the question whether natural things depend on us. He agrees with Kant that from the empirical or human standpoint we are justified in saying that natural things do not depend on us. But in contrast with Kant, Heidegger argues that from the transcendental standpoint we can say neither that natural things (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Eugen Böckli (1924). Paradoxien der Zeit. Kant-Studien 29 (2):460-471.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. W. H. Bossart (1978). Kant's “Analytic” and the Two-Fold Nature of Time. Kant-Studien 69 (1-4):288-298.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Christophe Bouton (2012). Idéalité transcendantale ou réalité absolue du temps? Temps du sujet et temps du monde chez Kant. Kant-Studien 103 (4):429-447.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 103 Heft: 4 Seiten: 429-447.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Christophe Bouton (2012). Transcendental Ideality or Absolute Reality of Time? Time for the Subject and Time for the World in Kant. Kant-Studien 103 (4).
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jill Vance Buroker (1997). Review: Falkenstein, Kant's Intuitionism: A Commentary on the Transcendental Aesthetic. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 1:162-171.
  22. Mario Caimi (2012). The Logical Structure of Time According to the Chapter on the Schematism. Kant-Studien 103 (4):415-428.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Rudolf Carnap (1925). Über die Abhängigkeit der Eigenschaften des Raumes von denen der Zeit. Kant-Studien 30 (1-2):331-345.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Quassim Cassam (1993). Inner Sense, Body Sense, and Kant's "Refutation of Idealism&Quot;. European Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):111-127.
  25. François-Xavier Chenet (1993). Que sont donc l'espace et le temps? Les hypothèses considérées par Kant et la lancinante objection de la «troisième possibilité». Kant-Studien 84 (2):129-153.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Mark T. Conard (1994). Allison's Reading of Kant's Paradox of Inner Sense. Philosophy Today 38 (3-4):317-325.
  27. Francesco Paolo De Sanctis (2008). Le problème du temps chez Michel Henry: L'origine de l'espacement. Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique (1).
    Le problème du temps chez Michel Henry n’a pas encore fait l’objet d’une étude séparée. Le rejet abrupt de cette question chez l’auteur n’a certainement pas favorisé l’intérêt des critiques pour ce sujet. Dans un premier temps, en 1963 dans L’Essence de la manifestation , Michel Henry considère le problème du temps (à travers le filtre du Kantbuch de Heidegger) comme étant le « même » que celui de la récepti­vité, soit en le renvoyant à l’auto-affection. Celle-ci étant comprise comme (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Alwin Diemer (1959). Gott und die zeit bei aristoteles. Kant-Studien 50 (1-4):273-286.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Steven M. Duncan, Mind, Body, Space, and Time.
    In this essay I explore some of the basic elements of consciousness from a substance dualist point of view, incorporating some elements of Kant's Transcendental Analytic into an overall account of the constitution of consciousness.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Katherine Dunlop (2009). The Unity of Time's Measure: Kant's Reply to Locke. Philosophers' Imprint 9 (4):1-31.
    In a crucial passage of the second-edition Transcendental Deduction, Kant claims that the concept of motion is central to our understanding of change and temporal order. I show that this seemingly idle claim is really integral to the Deduction, understood as a replacement for Locke’s “physiological” epistemology (cf. A86-7/B119). Béatrice Longuenesse has shown that Kant’s notion of distinctively inner receptivity derives from Locke. To explain the a priori application of concepts such as succession to this mode of sensibility, Kant construes (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Klaus Düsing (1980). Objektive und subjektive Zeit. Untersuchungen zu Kants Zeittheorie und zu ihrer modernen kritischen Rezeption. Kant-Studien 71 (1-4):1-34.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Parvis Emad (1973). Review: Sherover, Heidegger, Kant and Time. [REVIEW] Southern Journal of Philosophy 11 (4):367-374.
  33. E. J. Engel (2004). Mendelssohn Versus Kant--Early Evidence of a Confrontation with Kant's Doctrine of Time and Space in the Dissertation of 1770. Kant-Studien 95 (3):269-282.
  34. Stephen A. Erickson (1969). Review: AI-Azm, Kant's Theory of Time. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 7 (2):214-217.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. B. Falkenburg (1995). Kant 2nd Antinomy and Physics. Kant-Studien 86 (1):4-25.
  36. Hellmuth Falkenfeld (1915). Der Begriff der Zeit. Kant-Studien 20 (1-3):376-383.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Lorne Falkenstein (1991). Kant, Mendelssohn, Lambert, and the Subjectivity of Time. Journal of the History of Philosophy 29 (2):227-251.
  38. Eckart Förster (2000). Kant's Final Synthesis: An Essay on the Opus Postumum. Harvard University Press.
  39. Richard M. Gale (1971). Kant's Theory of Time. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2 (1):95-96.
  40. W. Gent (1926). Leibnizens Philosophie der Zeit und des Raumes. Kant-Studien 31 (1-3):61-88.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Michelle Grier (1993). Illusion and Fallacy in Kant's First Antinomy. Kant-Studien 84:257-82.
  42. Paul Guyer (2006). Kant. Routledge.
    Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) is arguably the most influential of the Enlightenment Philosophers. In this outstanding introduction, Paul Guyer introduces and assesses all the major aspects of Kant's thought. Beginning with a helpful overview of Kant's life and times, Guyer introduces the "Copernican revolution" Kant brought about in metaphysics and epistemology, carefully introducing his arguments about the nature of experience, space and time in his most influential but difficult work, The Critique of Pure Reason. He gives a much-needed explanation of Kant's (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Shahen Hacyan (2006). On the Transcendental Ideality of Space and Time in Modern Physics. Kant-Studien 97 (3):382-395.
    In Newtonian physics, all phenomena take place in absolute space, which is a fixed scenario, and are referred to absolute time, which rules all processes. Motion is governed by a set of basic differential equations, and it is possible, at least in principle, to deduce future events from present initial conditions.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Espen Hammer (2011). Philosophy and Temporality From Kant to Critical Theory. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: Introduction; 1. The historicity of time; 2. Modern temporality; 3. Two responses to the time of modernity; 4. Hegel's temporalization of the absolute; 5. Schopenhauer and transcendence; 6. Time and myth in early Nietzsche; 7. Recurrence and authenticity: the later Nietzsche; 8. Heidegger on boredom and modernity; 9. A modernist critique of postmodern temporality; Conclusion.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Robert Hanna (2003). Review: Weatherston, Heidegger's Interpretation of Kant: Categories, Imagination, and Temporality. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (8).
  46. William Harper (1981). Kant's Empirical Realism and the Second Analogy of Experience. Synthese 47 (3):465 - 480.
  47. Gary Hatfield (2006). Kant on the Perception of Space (and Time). In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. 61--93.
  48. Joanna Hodge (2005). Ethics and Time: Levinas Between Kant and Husserl. Diacritics 32 (3):107-134.
  49. Desmond Hogan (2009). Three Kinds of Rationalism and the Non-Spatiality of Things in Themselves. Journal of the History of Philosophy 47 (3):pp. 355-382.
  50. Pamela H. Huby (1971). Kant or Cantor? That the Universe, If Real, Must Be Finite in Both Space and Time. Philosophy 46 (176):121-.
1 — 50 / 110