Results for 'Carnap'S. Inductive Logic'

999 found
Order:
  1. Theo Af Kuipers.A. Generalization Of Carnap'S. & Inductive Logic - 1975 - In Jaakko Hintikka (ed.), Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives. D. Reidel Pub. Co.. pp. 361.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Richard C. Jeffrey.Carnap'S. Inductive Logic - 1975 - In Jaakko Hintikka (ed.), Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist: Materials and Perspectives. D. Reidel Pub. Co.. pp. 73--325.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. BELIEF IN CAUSATION: ONE APPLICATION OF CARNAP's INDUCTIVE LOGIC.Yusuke Kaneko - 2012 - Academic Research International 3 (1).
    This paper takes two tasks. The one is elaborating on the relationship of inductive logic with decision theory to which later Carnap planned to apply his system (§§1-7); this is a surveying side of this article. The other is revealing the property of our prediction of the future, subjectivity (§§8-11); this is its philosophical aspect. They are both discussed under the name of belief in causation. Belief in causation is a kind of “degree of belief” born about the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. The Confirmation of Singular Causal Statements by Carnap’s Inductive Logic.Yusuke Kaneko - 2012 - Logica Year Book 2011.
    The aim of this paper is to apply inductive logic to the field that, presumably, Carnap never expected: legal causation. Legal causation is expressible in the form of singular causal statements; but it is distinguished from the customary concept of scientific causation, because it is subjective. We try to express this subjectivity within the system of inductive logic. Further, by semantic complement, we compensate a defect found in our application, to be concrete, the impossibility of two-place (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Carnap’s Thought on Inductive Logic.Yusuke Kaneko - 2012 - Philosophy Study 2 (11).
    Although we often see references to Carnap’s inductive logic even in modern literatures, seemingly its confusing style has long obstructed its correct understanding. So instead of Carnap, in this paper, I devote myself to its necessary and sufficient commentary. In the beginning part (Sections 2-5), I explain why Carnap began the study of inductive logic and how he related it with our thought on probability (Sections 2-4). Therein, I trace Carnap’s thought back to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus as (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Philosophy as Conceptual Engineering: Inductive Logic in Rudolf Carnap's Scientific Philosophy.Christopher F. French - 2015 - Dissertation, University of British Columbia
  7. Inductive Logic and the Foundations of Probability Theory: A Revaluation of Carnap's Program.Maria Concetta Di Maio - 1992 - Dissertation, Princeton University
    In this thesis I defend and pursue that line about the foundations of probability theory which has come to be known as "the logicist view about probability", and, in particular, the shape which it took in Carnap's Inductive Logic. ;Most philosophers who now deal with probability theory claim that Carnap's program of Inductive Logic has failed. The main aim of my thesis is to show that this judgment is based on a fundamental misunderstanding about the nature (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8.  11
    Inductive Logic as Explication: The Evolution of Carnap’s Notion of Logical Probability.Marta Sznajder - 2018 - The Monist 101 (4):417-440.
    According to a popular interpretation, Carnap’s interpretation of probability had evolved from a logical towards a subjective conception. However Carnap himself insisted that his basic philosophical view of probability was always the same. I address this apparent clash between Carnap's self-identification and the subsequent interpretations of his work. Following its original intentions, I reconstruct inductive logic as an explication. The emerging picture is of a versatile linguistic framework, whose main function is not the discovery of objective logical relations (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. A Generalization of Carnap's Inductive Logic.Theo A. F. Kuipers - 1973 - Synthese 25 (3-4):334 - 336.
    In section I the notions of logical and inductive probability will be discussed as well as two explicanda, viz. degree of confirmation, the base for inductive probability, and degree of evidential support, Popper's favourite explicandum. In section II it will be argued that Popper's paradox of ideal evidence is no paradox at all; however, it will also be shown that Popper's way out has its own merits.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10.  2
    Infinity and Verifiability in Carnapʼs Inductive Logic.Ruurik Holm - 2013 - Journal of Applied Logic 11 (4):487-504.
  11.  54
    Carnap's Inductive Logic.Richard C. Jeffrey - 1973 - Synthese 25 (3-4):299 - 306.
  12.  54
    Carnap's Inductive Logic.Wesley C. Salmon - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (21):725-739.
  13.  14
    Semantical Questions in Carnap's Inductive Logic.Howard Smokler - 1977 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (2):129-135.
  14.  20
    Karl R. Popper. The Demarcation Between Science and Metaphysics. A Reprint of XXXVI 533. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 11, Open Court, La Salle, Ill., and Cambridge University Press, London, 1963, Pp. 183–226. - John G. Kemeny. Carnap's Theory of Probability and Induction. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 11, Open Court, La Salle, Ill., and Cambridge University Press, London, 1963, Pp. 711–738. - Arthur W. Burks. On the Significance of Carnap's System of Inductive Logic for the Philosophy of Induction. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, The Library of Living Philosophers, Vol. 11, Open Court, La Salle, Ill., and Cambridge University Press, London, 1963, Pp. 739–759. - Hilary Putnam. “Degree of Confirmation” and Inductive Logic. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, The Library of Living. [REVIEW]Richard C. Jeffrey - 1972 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (3):631-633.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15.  8
    Rudolf Carnap and Richard C. Jeffrey. Introduction. Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Volume I, Edited by Rudolf Carnap and Richard C. Jeffrey, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1971, Pp. 1–4. - Rudolf Carnap. Inductive Logic and Rational Decisions. A Modified and Expanded Version of XXXII 104. Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Pp. 5–31. - Rudolf Carnap. A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part I. Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Pp. 33–165. - Richard C Jeffrey. Probability Measures and Integrals. Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Pp. 167–223. - Jürgen Humburg. The Principle of Instantial Relevance. Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Pp. 225–233. - Haim Gaifman. Applications of de Finetti's Theorem to Inductive Logic. Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Pp. 235–251. [REVIEW]David Miller - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (4):581-583.
  16.  22
    Carnap's Robot and Inductive Logic.Stephen Spielman - 1976 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 5 (3):407 - 415.
  17.  3
    Churchman C. West. Carnap's ‘On Inductive Logic.” Philosophy of Science, Vol. 13 , Pp. 339–342.Carl G. Hempel - 1947 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 12 (3):99-100.
  18.  2
    Review: C. West Churchman, Carnap's "On Inductive Logic.". [REVIEW]Carl G. Hempel - 1947 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 12 (3):99-100.
  19.  1
    Carnap's "On Inductive Logic.".C. West Churchman - 1947 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 12 (3):99-100.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20.  16
    What Conceptual Spaces Can Do for Carnap's Late Inductive Logic.Marta Sznajder - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:62-71.
  21.  51
    Carnap's New System of Inductive Logic.Risto Hilpinen - 1973 - Synthese 25 (3-4):307 - 333.
  22.  39
    The Solution of Hempel's Raven Paradox in Rudolf Carnap's System of Inductive Logic.Jürgen Humburg - 1986 - Erkenntnis 24 (1):57 - 72.
  23.  39
    On an Alleged Contradiction in Carnap's Theory of Inductive Logic.Yehoshua Bar-Hillel - 1964 - Mind 73 (290):265-267.
  24.  28
    Carnap's "on Inductive Logic".C. West Churchman - 1946 - Philosophy of Science 13 (4):339-342.
  25. On an Alleged Contradiction in Carnap's Theory of Inductive Logic. Y. Bar-Hillel - 1964 - Mind 73:265.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26.  71
    Hume's Inductive Logic.Alberto Mura - 1998 - Synthese 115 (3):303-331.
    This paper presents a new account of Hume’s “probability of causes”. There are two main results attained in this investigation. The first, and perhaps the most significant, is that Hume developed – albeit informally – an essentially sound system of probabilistic inductive logic that turns out to be a powerful forerunner of Carnap’s systems. The Humean set of principles include, along with rules that turn out to be new for us, well known Carnapian principles, such as the axioms (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27.  57
    An Observation on Carnapʼs Continuum and Stochastic Independencies.J. B. Paris - 2013 - Journal of Applied Logic 11 (4):421-429.
    We characterize those identities and independencies which hold for all probability functions on a unary language satisfying the Principle of Atom Exchangeability. We then show that if this is strengthen to the requirement that Johnson's Sufficientness Principle holds, thus giving Carnap's Continuum of inductive methods for languages with at least two predicates, then new and somewhat inexplicable identities and independencies emerge, the latter even in the case of Carnap's Continuum for the language with just a single predicate.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28.  14
    Structural Reliabilism: Inductive Logic as a Theory of Justification.Kawalec Pawel - 2003 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    This book revives inductive logic by bringing out the underlying epistemology. The resulting structural reliabilist theory propounds the view that justification supervenes on syntactic and semantic properties of sentences as justification-bearers. It is claimed to set up a genuine alternative to the prevailing theories of justification. Kawalec substantiates this claim by confronting structural reliabilism with a number of epistemological problems. While the book is addressed to both professionals and students of philosophical logic, probability, epistemology, and philosophy of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  18
    A Note on Irrelevance in Inductive Logic.Jeff B. Paris & Alena Vencovská - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 40 (3):357 - 370.
    We consider two formalizations of the notion of irrelevance as a rationality principle within the framework of (Carnapian) Inductive Logic: Johnson's Sufficientness Principle, JSP, which is classically important because it leads to Carnap's influential Continuum of Inductive Methods and the recently proposed Weak Irrelevance Principle, WIP. We give a complete characterization of the language invariant probability functions satisfying WIP which generalizes the Nix-Paris Continuum. We argue that the derivation of two very disparate families of inductive methods (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  30.  27
    Some Modifications of Carnap’s Modal Logic.Vít Punčochář - 2012 - Studia Logica 100 (3):517-543.
    In this paper, Carnap's modal logic C is reconstructed. It is shown that the Carnapian approach enables us to create some epistemic logics in a relatively straightforward way. These epistemic modifications of C are axiomatized and one of them is compared with intuitionistic logic. At the end of the paper, some connections between this epistemic logic and Medvedev's logic of finite problems and inquisitive semantics are shortly discussed.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  31.  32
    Carnap and the Logic of Inductive Inference.S. L. Zabell - 2004 - In Dov M. Gabbay, John Woods & Akihiro Kanamori (eds.), Handbook of the History of Logic. Elsevier. pp. 10--265.
  32.  15
    Carnap Rudolf. Remarks on Induction and Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 6 No. 4 , Pp. 590–602.Kaufmann Felix. On the Nature of Inductive Inference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 6 No. 4 , Pp. 602–609.Carnap Rudolf. Rejoinder to Mr. Kaufmann's Reply. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 6 No. 4 , Pp. 609–611. [REVIEW]Carl G. Hempel - 1946 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 11 (4):124-125.
  33.  41
    Uniting Model Theory and the Universalist Tradition of Logic: Carnap's Early Axiomatics.Iris Loeb - 2014 - Synthese 191 (12):2815-2833.
    We shift attention from the development of model theory for demarcated languages to the development of this theory for fragments of a language. Although it is often assumed that model theory for demarcated languages is not compatible with a universalist conception of logic, no one has denied that model theory for fragments of a language can be compatible with that conception. It thus seems unwarranted to ignore the universalist tradition in the search for the origins and development of model (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  34.  3
    The Completeness of Carnap's Predicate Logic.Max Cresswell - 2014 - Australasian Journal of Logic 11 (1).
    The paper first proves the completeness of the first-order predicate logic presented in Carnap’s 1946 article ‘Modalities and quantification’. By contrast the modal logic defined by the semantics Carnap produces is unaxiomatisable. One can though adapt Carnap’s semantics so that a standard completeness proof for a Carnapian version of predicate S5 turns out to be available. //.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35.  71
    Carnap's Inductive Probabilities as a Contribution to Decision Theory.Joachim Hornung - 1980 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (3):325-367.
    Common probability theories only allow the deduction of probabilities by using previously known or presupposed probabilities. They do not, however, allow the derivation of probabilities from observed data alone. The question thus arises as to how probabilities in the empirical sciences, especially in medicine, may be arrived at. Carnap hoped to be able to answer this question byhis theory of inductive probabilities. In the first four sections of the present paper the above mentioned problem is discussed in general. After (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36.  91
    Carnap's Work in the Foundations of Logic and Mathematics in a Historical Perspective.Jaakko Hintikka - 1992 - Synthese 93 (1-2):167 - 189.
    Carnap's philosophy is examined from new viewpoints, including three important distinctions: (i) language as calculus vs language as universal medium; (ii) different senses of completeness: (iii) standard vs nonstandard interpretations of (higher-order) logic. (i) Carnap favored in 1930-34 the "formal mode of speech," a corollary to the universality assumption. He later gave it up partially but retained some of its ingredients, e.g., the one-domain assumption. (ii) Carnap's project of creating a universal self-referential language is encouraged by (ii) and by (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  37.  12
    The Context of the Development of Carnap’s Views on Logic Up to the Aufbau.Clinton Tolley - 2016 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 18:187-212.
  38.  31
    Explicating Formal Epistemology: Carnap's Legacy as Jeffrey's Radical Probabilism.Christopher F. French - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 53:33–42.
  39.  36
    Rudolf Carnap: Philosophy of Science as Engineering Explications.Christopher F. French - 2015 - In Uskali Mäki, Stephanie Ruphy, Gerhard Schurz & Ioannis Votsis (eds.), Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science: EPSA13 Helsinki. Springer. pp. 293-303.
    One way of explaining Rudolf Carnap’s mature philosophical view is by drawing an analogy between his technical projects—like his work on inductive logic—with a certain kind of conceptual engineering. After all, there are many mathematical similarities between Carnap’s work in inductive logic and a number of results from contemporary confirmation theory, statistics and mathematical probability theory. However, in stressing these similarities, the conceptual dependence of Carnap’s inductive logic on his work on semantics is downplayed. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40.  6
    Choice and Chance: An Introduction to Inductive Logic[REVIEW]S. M. F. - 1967 - Review of Metaphysics 20 (4):733-733.
    An admirable introduction to inductive logic, this book is both informative and lucidly written. After an excellent introductory chapter comparing deductive with inductive logic, the author presents Hume's problem of induction and several proposed methods for solving or dissolving it, none of which are adequate. Chapter III is devoted to Goodman's paradox about "grue" and the problems it poses for induction. No attempt, however, is made to develop a calculus of projectibility, which is needed to solve (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  46
    Carnapian Inductive Logic for Markov Chains.Brian Skyrms - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):439 - 460.
    Carnap's Inductive Logic, like most philosophical discussions of induction, is designed for the case of independent trials. To take account of periodicities, and more generally of order, the account must be extended. From both a physical and a probabilistic point of view, the first and fundamental step is to extend Carnap's inductive logic to the case of finite Markov chains. Kuipers (1988) and Martin (1967) suggest a natural way in which this can be done. The probabilistic (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   12 citations  
  42.  79
    Predictive Probability and Analogy by Similarity in Inductive Logic.Maria Concetta Di Maio - 1995 - Erkenntnis 43 (3):369 - 394.
    The λ-continuum of inductive methods was derived from an assumption, called λ-condition, which says that the probability of finding an individual having property $x_{j}$ depends only on the number of observed individuals having property $x_{j}$ and on the total number of observed individuals. So, according to that assumption, all individuals with properties which are different from $x_{j}$ have equal weight with respect to that probability and, in particular, it does not matter whether any individual was observed having some property (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  43.  92
    A Conception of Inductive Logic.Patrick Maher - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):513-523.
    I conceive of inductive logic as a project of explication. The explicandum is one of the meanings of the word `probability' in ordinary language; I call it inductive probability and argue that it is logical, in a certain sense. The explicatum is a conditional probability function that is specified by stipulative definition. This conception of inductive logic is close to Carnap's, but common objections to Carnapian inductive logic (the probabilities don't exist, are arbitrary, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  44.  48
    Linguistically Invariant Inductive Logic.Ian Hacking - 1969 - Synthese 20 (1):25 - 47.
    Carnap's early system of inductive logic make degrees of confirmation depend on the languages in which they are expressed. They are sensitive to which predicates are, in the language, taken as primitive. Hence they fail to be ‘linguistically invariant’. His later systems, in which prior probabilities are assigned to elements of a model rather than sentences of a language, are sensitive to which properties in the model are called primitive. Critics have often protested against these features of his (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  45.  81
    Foster Marguerite H. And Martin Michael L.. General Introduction. Probability, Confirmation, and Simplicity. Readings in the Philosophy of Inductive Logic. Edited by Foster Marguerite H. And Martin Michael L.. The Odyssey Press Inc., New York 1966, Pp. 1–13.Foster Marguerite H. And Martin Michael L.. The Meaning of Probability. Introduction. Probability, Confirmation, and Simplicity. Readings in the Philosophy of Inductive Logic. Edited by Foster Marguerite H. And Martin Michael L.. The Odyssey Press Inc., New York 1966, Pp. 17–26.Carnap Rudolf. On Inductive Logic. A Reprint of XI19. Probability, Confirmation, and Simplicity. Readings in the Philosophy of Inductive Logic. Edited by Foster Marguerite H. And Martin Michael L.. The Odyssey Press Inc., New York 1966, Pp. 35–61.Barker Stephen F.. Enumerative Induction. A Reprint of Pp. 82–90 of XXVII 122. Probability, Confirmation, and Simplicity. Readings in the Philosophy of Inductive Logic. Edited by Foster Marguerite H. And Martin Micha. [REVIEW]David Miller - 1970 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (3):451-454.
  46.  18
    Carnap's Problem: What is It Like to Be a Normal Interpretation of Classical Logic?Arnold Koslow - 2010 - Abstracta 6 (1):117-135.
    Carnap in the 1930s discovered that there were non-normal interpretations of classical logic - ones for which negation and conjunction are not truth-functional so that a statement and its negation could have the same truth value, and a disjunction of two false sentences could be true. Church ar-gued that this did not call for a revision of classical logic. More recent writers seem to disa-gree. We provide a definition of "non-normal interpretation" and argue that Church was right, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  47.  36
    Rudolf Carnap. Inductive Logic and Inductive Intuition. The Problem of Inductive Logic, Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965, Volume 2, Edited by Imre Lakatos, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam1968, Pp. 258–267. - M. Bunge, J. W. N. Watkins, Y. Bar-Hillel, K. R. Popper, J. Hintikka, R. Carnap. Discussion. The Problem of Inductive Logic, Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London, 1965, Volume 2, Edited by Imre Lakatos, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam1968, Pp. 268–314. [REVIEW]Henry E. Kyburg - 1975 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 40 (3):449-450.
  48.  25
    Frege's Lectures on Logic: Carnap's Student Notes, 1910–1914. Translated and Edited by Erich H. Reck and Steve Awodey, Open Court, Chicago, 2004, Xiv + 170 Pp. [REVIEW]Michael Beaney - 2005 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 11 (3):445-447.
  49.  22
    Warren Goldfarb. Poincaré Against the Logicists. History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, Edited by William Aspray and Philip Kitcher, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 11, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis1988, Pp. 61–81. - Michael Friedman. Logical Truth and Analyticity in Carnap's “Logical Syntax of Language.”History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, Edited by William Aspray and Philip Kitcher, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 11, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis1988, Pp. 82–94. - Gregory H. Moore. The Emergence of First-Order Logic. History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, Edited by William Aspray and Philip Kitcher, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 11, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis1988, Pp. 95–135. - Joseph W. Dauben. Abraham Robinson and Nonstandard Analysis: History, Philosophy, and Foundations of Mathematics. History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, Edited by William As. [REVIEW]Michael Hallett - 1990 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (3):1315-1319.
  50.  20
    Richard Jeffrey. Introduction. Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Volume II, Edited by Richard C. Jeffrey, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1980, Pp. 1–6. - Rudolf Carnap. A Basic System of Inductive Logic, Part II. Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Volume II, Edited by Richard C. Jeffrey, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1980, Pp. 7–155. - Jaakko Hintikka and Ilkka Niiniluoto. An Axiomatic Foundation for the Logic of Inductive Generalization. Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Volume II, Edited by Richard C. Jeffrey, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1980, Pp. 157–181. - Theo A. F. Kuipers. A Survey of Inductive Systems. Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability, Volume II, Edited by Richard C. Jeffrey, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London, 1980, Pp. 183–192. - Jens Erik Fenstad. The Structure of Probabilities Defined on First-O. [REVIEW]C. Howson - 1984 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (4):1409-1410.
1 — 50 / 999