This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
224 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 224
  1. Francisca Javier Rodríguez Alcázar (2004). Normatividad En Filosofia de la Ciencia: El Caso de la Ciencia Reguladora (Normativity in the Philosophy of Science: The Case of Regulatory Science). Theoria 19 (2):173-190.
    En este articulo se examina la tradicional caracterización de la filosofía de la ciencia como una disciplina normativa. Se discuten varias concepciones de esta disciplina, cada una de las cuales ofrece una respuesta diferente a la pregunta de si es posible, y cómo, una filosofía de la ciencia genuinamente normativa. De entre esas concepciones, se opta por una forma de naturalismo que se diferencia de otras en la exigeneia de que la normatividad de la filosofía de la ciencia inc!uya la (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Maria Alvarez (2013). Kinds of Reasons: An Essay in the Philosophy of Action. Oxford University Press Uk.
    Understanding human beings and their distinctive rational and volitional capacities is one of the central tasks of philosophy. The task requires a clear account of such things as reasons, desires, emotions and motives, and of how they combine to produce and explain human behaviour. In Kinds of Reasons, Maria Alvarez offers a fresh and incisive treatment of these issues, focusing in particular on reasons as they feature in contexts of agency. Her account builds on some important recent work in the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. R. Lanier Anderson (2001). Synthesis, Cognitive Normativity, and the Meaning of Kant's Question, 'How Are Synthetic Cognitions a Priori Possible?'. European Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):275–305.
  4. Daniel Andler (2000). The Normativity of Context. Philosophical Studies 100 (3):273-303.
    This paper attempts to show that context is normative. Perceiving and acting, speaking and understanding, reasoning and evaluating, judging and deciding, doing and not doing, as accomplished by humans, invariably occur within a context. The context dictates, or at least constrains, the proper accomplishment of the act. One may construe this undisputed fact in a naturalistic way: one can think of the context as a positive given, and of the constraints it creates as constituting a natural fact. Whether the act (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Chrisoula Andreou (2005). The Voices of Reason. American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1):33 - 45.
    It is widely held that instrumental reasoning to a practical conclusion is parasitic on non-instrumental practical reasoning. This conclusion is based on the claim that when there is no reason to adopt a certain end, there is no reason to take the means (qua means) to that end. But, as will be argued, while there is a sense of reason according to which the previous statement is true, there is another sense according to which it is false. Furthermore, in both (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6. Andre Ariew, Robert C. Cummins & Mark Perlman (eds.) (2002). Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford University Press.
  7. C. Arnsperger (2002). The Gift as Insufficient Source of Normativity. Diogenes 49 (195):83-85.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Guy Axtell (2012). The Dialectics of Objectivity. Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (3):339-368.
    This paper develops under-recognized connections between moderate historicist methodology and character (or virtue) epistemology, and goes on to argue that their combination supports a “dialectical” conception of objectivity. Considerations stemming from underdetermination problems motivate our claim that historicism requires agent-focused rather than merely belief-focused epistemology; embracing this point helps historicists avoid the charge of relativism. Considerations stemming from the genealogy of epistemic virtue concepts motivate our claim that character epistemologies are strengthened by moderate historicism about the epistemic virtues and values (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Robert W. Barnard (2013). A Theory of Logical Normativity. Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):49-59.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Frederick Beiser (2009). Normativity in Neo-Kantianism: Its Rise and Fall. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):9 – 27.
    This article discusses the historical background to the concept of normativity which has a wide use in contemporary philosophy. It locates the origin of that concept in the Southwestern Neo-Kantian school, the writings of Windelband, Rickert and Lask. The Southwestern school made the concept of normativity central to epistemology, ethics and the interpretation of German idealism. It was their solution to the threats of psycologism and historicism. However, Windelband, Rickert and Lask found difficulties with the concept which eventually forced them (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11. Jose Luis Bermudez (2001). Normativity and Rationality in Delusional Psychiatric Disorders. Mind and Language 16 (5):457-493.
    Psychiatric treatment and diagnosis rests upon a richer conception of normativity than, for example, cognitive neuropsychology. This paper explores the role that considerations of rationality can play in defining this richer conception of normativity. It distinguishes two types of rationality and considers how each type can break down in different ways in delusional psychiatric disorders.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  12. Stefano Bertea (2011). Normativity, Human Constitution and Legal Theory. In Jerzy Stelmach & Bartosz Brożek (eds.), The Normativity of Law. Copernicus Center Press
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Thomas M. Besch (2015). On the Right to Justification and Discursive Respect. Dialogue 54 (4):703-726.
    Rainer Forst’s constructivism argues that a right to justification provides a reasonably non-rejectable foundation of justice. With an exemplary focus on his attempt to ground human rights, I argue that this right cannot provide such a foundation. To accord to others such a right is to include them in the scope of discursive respect. But it is reasonably contested whether we should accord to others equal discursive respect. It follows that Forst’s constructivism cannot ground human rights, or justice, categorically. At (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Zamora Bonilla & P. Jesús (2008). Normativity and Self-Interest in Scientific Research. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):71-81.
    In this paper I want to present the guiding lines of a research programme into the economics of scientific knowledge, a programme whose ultimate goal is to develop what I would like to call a contractarian epistemology. The structure of the paper is as follows: in the first section I will comment on two conflicting approaches to the topic of rationality in science: the view of the rationality of scientific knowledge as deriving from the employment of sound methodological norms, and (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Michael S. Brady (2002). Skepticism, Normativity, and Practical Identity. Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (4):403-412.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Michael E. Bratman (1998). The Sources of Normativity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (3):699 - 709.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Geoffrey Brennan, Lina Eriksson, Robert E. Goodin & Nicholas Southwood (2013). Explaining Norms. Oxford University Press.
    Norms are a pervasive yet mysterious feature of social life. In Explaining Norms, four philosophers and social scientists team up to grapple with some of the many mysteries, offering a comprehensive account of norms: what they are; how and why they emerge, persist and change; and how and to what extent they themselves serve to explain what we do. Norms, they argue, should be understood in non-reductive terms as clusters of normative attitudes that serve the function of making us accountable (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Maria Brincker (2015). Beyond Sensorimotor Segregation: On Mirror Neurons and Social Affordance Space Tracking. Cognitive Systems Research 34:18-34.
    <span class='Hi'>Mirror</span> neuron research has come a long way since the early 1990s, and many theorists are now stressing the heterogeneity and complexity of the sensorimotor properties of fronto-parietal circuits. However, core aspects of the initial ‘<span class='Hi'>mirror</span> <span class='Hi'>mechanism</span>’ theory, i.e. the idea of a symmetric encapsulated mirroring function translating sensory action perceptions into motor formats, still appears to be shaping much of the debate. This article challenges the empirical plausibility of the sensorimotor segregation implicit in the original <span (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. A. Caille (2002). The Gift as Sufficient Source of Normativity. Diogenes 49 (195):77-82.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Emanuela Ceva (2012). Pluralism. In Antonella Besussi (ed.), A Companion to Political Philosophy. Ashagte
  21. Ruth Chang (1997). Introduction. In Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press 1-34.
    This paper is the introduction to the volume. It gives an argumentative view of the philosophical landscape concerning incommensurability and incomparability. It argues that incomparability, not incommensurability, is the important phenomenon on which philosophers should be focusing and that the arguments for the existence of incomparability are so far not compelling.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  22. Jennifer Church (2005). Space and Normativity. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 12 (1):59-61.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Sharyn Clough (2004). Having It All: Naturalized Normativity in Feminist Science Studies. Hypatia 19 (1):102-118.
    : The relationship between facts and values—in particular, naturalism and normativity—poses an ongoing challenge for feminist science studies. Some have argued that the fact/value holism of W.V. Quine's naturalized epistemology holds promise. I argue that Quinean epistemology, while appropriately naturalized, might weaken the normative force of feminist claims. I then show that Quinean epistemic themes are unnecessary for feminist science studies. The empirical nature of our work provides us with all the naturalized normativity we need.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  24. David Copp (2011). Normativity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):180-183.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. David Copp (2009). Toward a Pluralist and Teleological Theory of Normativity. Philosophical Issues 19 (1):21-37.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  26. M. Victoria Costa (2007). Freedom as Non-Domination, Normativity, and Indeterminacy. Journal of Value Inquiry 41 (2-4):291-307.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  27. Charles Côté-Bouchard (2015). Epistemic Instrumentalism and the Too Few Reasons Objection. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (3):337-355.
    According to epistemic instrumentalism, epistemic normativity arises from and depends on facts about our ends. On that view, a consideration C is an epistemic reason for a subject S to Φ only if Φ-ing would promote an end that S has. However, according to the Too Few Epistemic Reasons objection, this cannot be correct since there are cases in which, intuitively, C is an epistemic reason for S to Φ even though Φ-ing would not promote any of S’s ends. After (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28. Steven Crowell (2008). Measure-Taking: Meaning and Normativity in Heidegger's Philosophy. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 41 (3):261-276.
    Following Marc Richir and others, László Tengelyi has recently developed the idea of Sinnereignis (meaning-event) as a way of capturing the emergence of meaning that does not flow from some prior project or constitutive act. As such, it might seem to pose something of a challenge to phenomenology: the paradox of an experience that is mine without being my accomplishment. This article offers a different sort of interpretation of meaning-events, claiming that in their structure they always involve what the late (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Steven Crowell (2007). Sorge or Selbstbewußtsein? Heidegger and Korsgaard on the Sources of Normativity. European Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):315-333.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  30. Justin Cruickshank (2006). Postdisciplinarity and the Study of Lay Normativity — Re-Theorising Class in Social Science. Journal of Critical Realism 5 (1):110-121.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Terence Cuneo (2009). Book Reviews:The Nature of Normativity. [REVIEW] Ethics 119 (2):397-402.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Jonathan Dancy (ed.) (2000). Normativity. Blackwell Publishers.
    This volume is built on the papers given at the 1998" Ratio" conference on normativity.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  33. Stephen Darwall (2000). Normativity and Projection in Hobbes's Leviathan. Philosophical Review 109 (3):313-347.
  34. Inmaculada de Melo-Martin (2010). Defending Human Enhancement Technologies: Unveiling Normativity. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (8):483-487.
    Recent advances in biotechnologies have led to speculations about enhancing human beings. Many of the moral arguments presented to defend human enhancement technologies have been limited to discussions of their risks and benefits. The author argues that in so far as ethical arguments focus primarily on risks and benefits of human enhancement technologies, these arguments will be insufficient to provide a robust defence of these technologies. This is so because the belief that an assessment of risks and benefits is a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  35. Wim de Muijnck (2010). Thinking About Normativity: Ralph Wedgwood on 'Ought'. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):133-144.
    Ralph Wedgwood's The Nature of Normativity provides a theory about the semantics, metaphysics, and epistemology of normative judgments, taken to be judgments of the form 'I ought to ___'. The theory is based on the principle of Normative Judgment Internalism, and the principle that 'the intentional is normative'. I argue, first, that by being merely about oughts, Wedgwood's account leaves out one essential constituent of normativity: value. Secondly, I argue that mainly because of this, the account faces a serious issue (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Ronald De Sousa (2006). Restoring Emotion's Bad Rep: The Moral Randomness of Norms. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 2 (1):29-47.
    Despite the fact that common sense taxes emotions with irrationality, philosophers have, by and large, celebrated their functionality. They are credited with motivating, steadying, shaping or harmonizing our dispositions to act, and with policing norms of social behaviour. It's time to restore emotion's bad rep. To this end, I shall argue that we should expect that some of the “norms” enforced by emotions will be unevenly distributed among the members of our species, and may be dysfunctional at the individual, social, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Claude Debru (2011). The Concept of Normativity From Philosophy to Medicine: An Overview. Medicine Studies 3 (1):1-7.
    In this introductory paper, I try to give an overview of the concept of normativity in its philosophical history and its contemporary interpretations and uses in different fields. From philosophy of logic and mathematics to philosophy of language and mind, and to philosophy of medicine and care, normativity is found as a key concept pointing at the possibility of scientific and technical progress and improvement of human life in the interaction between the individual and his environment.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38. Teun J. Dekker (2009). Out-Kanting Rawls: An Argument for Responsibility-Sensitive Theories of Justice From an Autonomy-Based Account of Normativity. Dialogue 48 (2):353.
    ABSTRACT: When considering normative concepts, such as distributive justice, one must consider both the question how concepts can have normative force and which particular conceptions of these concepts have this normative force. In this article I consider the view that the human capacity for autonomy accounts for normativity, and argue that adopting this view commits one to a responsibility-sensitive theory of distributive justice. This conclusion puts me directly at odds with the work of John Rawls, who derives his responsibility-insensitive difference (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Katerina Deligiorgi (2013). The View From Within. Normativity and the Limits of Self‐Criticism. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 63 (253):816-819.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Meena Dhanda (1998). The Sources of Normativity. [REVIEW] Radical Philosophy 89.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Aleksandar T. Dobrijević (2004). On Different Kinds of Normativity. Theoria 47 (3-4):87-89.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Wendy Donner (1999). The Sources of Normativity Christine M. Korsgaard, with G. A. Cohen, Raymond Geuss, Thomas Nagel, and Bernard Williams Onora O'Neill, Editor Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, Xv + 273 Pp. [REVIEW] Dialogue 38 (03):653-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Wendy Donner (1999). The Sources of Normativity. Dialogue 38 (3):653-655.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. James Dreier (2010). 1. Wedgwood's Argument. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics. Oxford University Press 5--153.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Robert M. Ellis (2011). Truth on the Edge: A Brief Western Philosophy of the Middle Way. Lulu.Com.
    This book is a briefer and updated account of the Middle Way Philosophy developed in 'A Theory of Moral Objectivity'. Its starting point is the argument that we are not justified in making any claims about truth, whether moral or scientific, but the idea of truth is still meaningful. Instead of making or denying metaphysical claims about truth, we need to think in terms of incrementally objective justification within experience. This standpoint is related to an account of objectivity as psychological (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. David Enoch (2010). The Epistemological Challenge to Metanormative Realism: How Best to Understand It, and How to Cope with It. Philosophical Studies 148 (3):413-438.
    Metaethical—or, more generally, metanormative— realism faces a serious epistemological challenge. Realists owe us—very roughly speaking—an account of how it is that we can have epistemic access to the normative truths about which they are realists. This much is, it seems, uncontroversial among metaethicists, myself included. But this is as far as the agreement goes, for it is not clear—nor uncontroversial—how best to understand the challenge, what the best realist way of coping with it is, and how successful this attempt (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  47. David Enoch (2003). An Argument for Robust Metanormative Realism. Dissertation, New York University
    In this essay, I defend a view I call “Robust Realism” about normativity. According to this view, there are irreducibly, perfectly objective, normative truths, that when successful in our normative inquiries we discover rather than create or construct. My argument in support of Robust Realism is modeled after arguments from explanatory indispensability common in the philosophy of science and the philosophy of mathematics. I argue that irreducibly normative truths, though not explanatorily indispensable, are nevertheless deliberatively indispensable, and that this kind (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  48. W. N. F. (1965). Norm and Action: A Logical Enquiry. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 18 (3):594-594.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Federico L. G. Faroldi (2012). Fallacia Deontica. From "Ought" to "Is". Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Del Diritto 89 (3):413–418.
  50. Alessandro Ferrara (2004). The Relation of Authenticity to Normativity: A Response to Larmore and Honneth. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (1):17-24.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 224