This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
172 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Sort by:
1 — 50 / 172
  1. Francisca Javier Rodríguez Alcázar (2004). Normatividad En Filosofia de la Ciencia: El Caso de la Ciencia Reguladora (Normativity in the Philosophy of Science: The Case of Regulatory Science). Theoria 19 (2):173-190.
    En este articulo se examina la tradicional caracterización de la filosofía de la ciencia como una disciplina normativa. Se discuten varias concepciones de esta disciplina, cada una de las cuales ofrece una respuesta diferente a la pregunta de si es posible, y cómo, una filosofía de la ciencia genuinamente normativa. De entre esas concepciones, se opta por una forma de naturalismo que se diferencia de otras en la exigeneia de que la normatividad de la filosofía de la ciencia inc!uya la (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. R. Lanier Anderson (2001). Synthesis, Cognitive Normativity, and the Meaning of Kant's Question, 'How Are Synthetic Cognitions a Priori Possible?'. European Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):275–305.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Daniel Andler (2000). The Normativity of Context. Philosophical Studies 100 (3):273-303.
    This paper attempts to show that context is normative. Perceiving and acting, speaking and understanding, reasoning and evaluating, judging and deciding, doing and not doing, as accomplished by humans, invariably occur within a context. The context dictates, or at least constrains, the proper accomplishment of the act. One may construe this undisputed fact in a naturalistic way: one can think of the context as a positive given, and of the constraints it creates as constituting a natural fact. Whether the act (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Andre Ariew, Robert C. Cummins & Mark Perlman (eds.) (2002). Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford University Press.
    But what are functions? Here, 15 leading scholars of philosophy of psychology and philosophy of biology present new essays on functions.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. C. Arnsperger (2002). The Gift as Insufficient Source of Normativity. Diogenes 49 (195):83-85.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Guy Axtell (2012). The Dialectics of Objectivity. Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (3):339-368.
    This paper develops under-recognized connections between moderate historicist methodology and character (or virtue) epistemology, and goes on to argue that their combination supports a “dialectical” conception of objectivity. Considerations stemming from underdetermination problems motivate our claim that historicism requires agent-focused rather than merely belief-focused epistemology; embracing this point helps historicists avoid the charge of relativism. Considerations stemming from the genealogy of epistemic virtue concepts motivate our claim that character epistemologies are strengthened by moderate historicism about the epistemic virtues and values (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Frederick Beiser (2009). Normativity in Neo-Kantianism: Its Rise and Fall. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 17 (1):9 – 27.
    This article discusses the historical background to the concept of normativity which has a wide use in contemporary philosophy. It locates the origin of that concept in the Southwestern Neo-Kantian school, the writings of Windelband, Rickert and Lask. The Southwestern school made the concept of normativity central to epistemology, ethics and the interpretation of German idealism. It was their solution to the threats of psycologism and historicism. However, Windelband, Rickert and Lask found difficulties with the concept which eventually forced them (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jose Luis Bermudez (2001). Normativity and Rationality in Delusional Psychiatric Disorders. Mind and Language 16 (5):457-493.
  9. Stefano Bertea (2011). Normativity, Human Constitution and Legal Theory. In Jerzy Stelmach & Bartosz Brożek (eds.), The Normativity of Law. Copernicus Center Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Zamora Bonilla & P. Jesús (2008). Normativity and Self-Interest in Scientific Research. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):71-81.
    In this paper I want to present the guiding lines of a research programme into the economics of scientific knowledge, a programme whose ultimate goal is to develop what I would like to call a contractarian epistemology. The structure of the paper is as follows: in the first section I will comment on two conflicting approaches to the topic of rationality in science: the view of the rationality of scientific knowledge as deriving from the employment of sound methodological norms, and (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Michael S. Brady (2002). Skepticism, Normativity, and Practical Identity. Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (4):403-412.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Michael E. Bratman (1998). The Sources of Normativity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 58 (3):699 - 709.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Geoffrey Brennan, Lina Eriksson, Robert E. Goodin & Nicholas Southwood (2013). Explaining Norms. Oxford University Press.
    Norms are a pervasive yet mysterious feature of social life. In Explaining Norms, four philosophers and social scientists team up to grapple with some of the many mysteries, offering a comprehensive account of norms: what they are; how and why they emerge, persist and change; and how and to what extent they themselves serve to explain what we do. Norms, they argue, should be understood in non-reductive terms as clusters of normative attitudes that serve the function of making us accountable (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. A. Caille (2002). The Gift as Sufficient Source of Normativity. Diogenes 49 (195):77-82.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Ruth Chang (ed.) (1997). Introduction, Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reasoning. Harvard University Press.
    This paper is the introduction to the volume. It gives an argumentative view of the philosophical landscape concerning incommensurability and incomparability. It argues that incomparability, not incommensurability, is the important phenomenon on which philosophers should be focusing and that the arguments for the existence of incomparability are so far not compelling.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jennifer Church (2005). Space and Normativity. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 12 (1):59-61.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Sharyn Clough (2004). Having It All: Naturalized Normativity in Feminist Science Studies. Hypatia 19 (1):102-118.
    : The relationship between facts and values—in particular, naturalism and normativity—poses an ongoing challenge for feminist science studies. Some have argued that the fact/value holism of W.V. Quine's naturalized epistemology holds promise. I argue that Quinean epistemology, while appropriately naturalized, might weaken the normative force of feminist claims. I then show that Quinean epistemic themes are unnecessary for feminist science studies. The empirical nature of our work provides us with all the naturalized normativity we need.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. David Copp (2011). Normativity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (1):180-183.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. David Copp (2009). Toward a Pluralist and Teleological Theory of Normativity. Philosophical Issues 19 (1):21-37.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. M. Victoria Costa (2007). Freedom as Non-Domination, Normativity, and Indeterminacy. Journal of Value Inquiry 41 (2-4):291-307.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Steven Crowell (2008). Measure-Taking: Meaning and Normativity in Heidegger's Philosophy. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 41 (3):261-276.
    Following Marc Richir and others, László Tengelyi has recently developed the idea of Sinnereignis (meaning-event) as a way of capturing the emergence of meaning that does not flow from some prior project or constitutive act. As such, it might seem to pose something of a challenge to phenomenology: the paradox of an experience that is mine without being my accomplishment. This article offers a different sort of interpretation of meaning-events, claiming that in their structure they always involve what the late (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Steven Crowell (2007). Sorge or Selbstbewußtsein? Heidegger and Korsgaard on the Sources of Normativity. European Journal of Philosophy 15 (3):315-333.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Justin Cruickshank (2006). Postdisciplinarity and the Study of Lay Normativity — Re-Theorising Class in Social Science. Journal of Critical Realism 5 (1):110-121.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Terence Cuneo (2009). Book Reviews:The Nature of Normativity. [REVIEW] Ethics 119 (2):397-402.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Jonathan Dancy (ed.) (2000). Normativity. Blackwell Publishers.
    This volume is built on the papers given at the 1998" Ratio" conference on normativity.
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Stephen Darwall (2000). Normativity and Projection in Hobbes's Leviathan. Philosophical Review 109 (3):313-347.
  27. Inmaculada de Melo-Martin (2010). Defending Human Enhancement Technologies: Unveiling Normativity. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (8):483-487.
    Recent advances in biotechnologies have led to speculations about enhancing human beings. Many of the moral arguments presented to defend human enhancement technologies have been limited to discussions of their risks and benefits. The author argues that in so far as ethical arguments focus primarily on risks and benefits of human enhancement technologies, these arguments will be insufficient to provide a robust defence of these technologies. This is so because the belief that an assessment of risks and benefits is a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Wim de Muijnck (2010). Thinking About Normativity: Ralph Wedgwood on 'Ought'. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):133-144.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Claude Debru (2011). The Concept of Normativity From Philosophy to Medicine: An Overview. Medicine Studies 3 (1):1-7.
    In this introductory paper, I try to give an overview of the concept of normativity in its philosophical history and its contemporary interpretations and uses in different fields. From philosophy of logic and mathematics to philosophy of language and mind, and to philosophy of medicine and care, normativity is found as a key concept pointing at the possibility of scientific and technical progress and improvement of human life in the interaction between the individual and his environment.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Teun J. Dekker (2009). Out-Kanting Rawls: An Argument for Responsibility-Sensitive Theories of Justice From an Autonomy-Based Account of Normativity. Dialogue 48 (02):353-.
  31. Wendy Donner (1999). The Sources of Normativity Christine M. Korsgaard, with G. A. Cohen, Raymond Geuss, Thomas Nagel, and Bernard Williams Onora O'Neill, Editor Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, Xv + 273 Pp. [REVIEW] Dialogue 38 (03):653-.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Robert M. Ellis (2011). Truth on the Edge: A Brief Western Philosophy of the Middle Way. Lulu.com.
    This book is a briefer and updated account of the Middle Way Philosophy developed in 'A Theory of Moral Objectivity'. Its starting point is the argument that we are not justified in making any claims about truth, whether moral or scientific, but the idea of truth is still meaningful. Instead of making or denying metaphysical claims about truth, we need to think in terms of incrementally objective justification within experience. This standpoint is related to an account of objectivity as psychological (...)
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. David Enoch (2010). The Epistemological Challenge to Metanormative Realism: How Best to Understand It, and How to Cope with It. Philosophical Studies 148 (3):413 - 438.
    Metaethical—or, more generally, metanormative—realism faces a serious epistemological challenge. Realists owe us—very roughly speaking—an account of how it is that we can have epistemic access to the normative truths about which they are realists. This much is, it seems, uncontroversial among metaethicists, myself included. But this is as far as the agreement goes, for it is not clear—nor uncontroversial—how best to understand the challenge, what the best realist way of coping with it is, and how successful this attempt is. In (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. David Enoch (2003). An Argument for Robust Metanormative Realism. Dissertation, New York University
    In this essay, I defend a view I call “Robust Realism” about normativity. According to this view, there are irreducibly, perfectly objective, normative truths, that when successful in our normative inquiries we discover rather than create or construct. My argument in support of Robust Realism is modeled after arguments from explanatory indispensability common in the philosophy of science and the philosophy of mathematics. I argue that irreducibly normative truths, though not explanatorily indispensable, are nevertheless deliberatively indispensable, and that this kind (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Federico L. G. Faroldi (2012). Fallacia Deontica. From "Ought" to "is&Quot;. Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Del Diritto 89 (3):413–418.
  36. Alessandro Ferrara (2004). The Relation of Authenticity to Normativity: A Response to Larmore and Honneth. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (1):17-24.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Hartry Field (2009). Epistemology Without Metaphysics. Philosophical Studies 143 (2):249 - 290.
    The paper outlines a view of normativity that combines elements of relativism and expressivism, and applies it to normative concepts in epistemology. The result is a kind of epistemological anti-realism, which denies that epistemic norms can be (in any straightforward sense) correct or incorrect; it does allow some to be better than others, but takes this to be goal-relative and is skeptical of the existence of best norms. It discusses the circularity that arises from the fact that we need to (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Julian Fink (2011). Are There Process-Requirements of Rationality? Organon F 18 (4):475-88.
    Does a coherentist version of rationality issue requirements on states? Or does it issue requirements on processes? This paper evalu- ates the possibility of process-requirements. It argues that there are two possible definitions of state- and process-requirements: a satisfaction- based definition and a content-based definition. I demonstrate that the satisfaction-based definition is inappropriate. It does not allow us to uphold a clear-cut distinction between state- and process-requirements. We should therefore use a content-based definition of state- and pro- cess-requirements. However, a (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Stephen Finlay (2010). Recent Work on Normativity. Analysis 70 (2):331-346.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. William J. FitzPatrick (2010). Thomson, Judith Jarvis . Normativity . Chicago: Open Court, 2008 . Pp. Ix+271. $27.97 (Paper). Ethics 120 (2):417-422.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Anna Paldam Folker, Hanne Andersen & Peter Sandøe (2008). Implicit Normativity in Scientific Advice: Values in Nutrition Scientists' Decisions to Give Public Advice. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 51 (2):199-206.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Maarten Franssen (2009). The Inherent Normativity of Functions in Biology and Technology. In Ulrich Krohs & Peter Kroes (eds.), Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds: Comparative Philosophical Perspectives. Mit Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Fabian Freyenhagen, The Good, the Bad, and the Normative: The Problem of Normativity in Adorno's Philosophy.
    Remove from this list |
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Fabian Freyenhagen (2009). No Easy Way Out : Adorno's Negativism and the Problem of Normativity. In Stefano Giacchetti Ludovisi & G. Agostini Saavedra (eds.), Nostalgia for a Redeemed Future: Critical Theory. University of Delaware.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Mike Gane (2002). Normativity and Pathology. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 9 (4):313-316.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Sergei Gepshtein (2009). Closing the Gap Between Ideal and Real Behavior: Scientific Vs. Engineering Approaches to Normativity. Philosophical Psychology 22 (1):61 – 75.
    Early normative studies of human behavior revealed a gap between the norms of practical rationality (what humans ought to do) and the actual human behavior (what they do). It has been suggested that, to close the gap between the descriptive and the normative, one has to revise norms of practical rationality according to the Quinean, engineering view of normativity. On this view, the norms must be designed such that they effectively account for behavior. I review recent studies of human perception (...)
    Remove from this list | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Joshua Gert & Michael McKenna (2008). Review of Normativity and the Will by R. Jay Wallace. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 58 (232):559–563.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Triantafyllos Gkouvas & George Pavlakos (2011). Preliminary Remarks on a Theory of Legal Normativity. In Jerzy Stelmach & Bartosz Brożek (eds.), The Normativity of Law. Copernicus Center Press.
    Remove from this list |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Lydia Goehr (2009). Normativity Without Norms. European Journal of Philosophy 17 (4):597-607.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Roel Van Goor, Frieda Heyting & Gert-Jan Vreeke (2004). Beyond Foundations - Signs of a New Normativity in Philosophy of Education. Educational Theory 54 (2):1-1.
    Remove from this list | Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 172