3364 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
D. M. Jones [158]Peter Jones [123]E. E. C. Jones [73]David Jones [47]
O. R. Jones [47]Karen Jones [38]W. H. S. Jones [37]D. Mervyn Jones [36]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
Profile: Peter Jones
Profile: Peter Jones
Profile: Peter E. T. Jones (Carleton College)
Profile: Peter Jones
Profile: Karen Jones (University College London)
Profile: Henry Jones (University of Warwick)
Profile: David Jones
Profile: David Jones (Durham University)
Profile: David Jones
Profile: David L. Jones (College of St. Catherine)
Other users were found but are not shown.
  1. Campbell Jones (2005). For Business Ethics. Routledge.
    Taking a fundamentally critical approach to the subject of business ethics, this book deals with the traditional material of ethics in business, as well as introducing and surveying some of the most interesting developments in critical ethical theory which have not yet been introduced to the mainstream. Including chapters on different philosophical approaches to ethics, this is a highly structured and clearly written textbook, the first book of its kind on this often neglected aspect of business.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   54 citations  
  2.  23
    Matt Jones & Bradley C. Love (2011). Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the Explanatory Status and Theoretical Contributions of Bayesian Models of Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):169-188.
    The prominence of Bayesian modeling of cognition has increased recently largely because of mathematical advances in specifying and deriving predictions from complex probabilistic models. Much of this research aims to demonstrate that cognitive behavior can be explained from rational principles alone, without recourse to psychological or neurological processes and representations. We note commonalities between this rational approach and other movements in psychology that set aside mechanistic explanations or make use of optimality assumptions. Through these comparisons, we identify a number of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   37 citations  
  3. Nicholas K. Jones (2011). Williams on Supervaluationism and Logical Revisionism. Journal of Philosophy 108 (11):633-641.
    Central to discussion of supervaluationist accounts of vagueness is the extent to which they require revisions of classical logic and if so, whether those revisions are objectionable. In an important recent Journal of Philosophy article, J.R.G. Williams presents a powerful challenge to the orthodox view that supervaluationism is objectionably revisionary. Williams argues both that supervaluationism is non-revisionary and that even if it were, those revisions would be unobjectionable. This note shows that his arguments for both claims fail.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Mostyn W. Jones (2013). Electromagnetic-Field Theories of Mind. Journal of Consciousness Studies 20 (11-12).
    Neuroscience investigates how neuronal processing circuits work, but it has problems explaining experiences this way. For example, it hasn’t explained how colour and shape circuits bind together in visual processing, nor why colours and other qualia are experienced so differently yet processed by circuits so similarly, nor how to get from processing circuits to pictorial images spread across inner space. Some theorists turn from these circuits to their electromagnetic fields to deal with such difficulties concerning the mind’s qualia, unity, privacy, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. T. Jones, A. Wicks & R. Edward Freeman (2002). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. In Norman E. Bowie (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics. Blackwell 19--37.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   65 citations  
  6. Karl O. Jones, Juliet M. V. Reid & Rebecca Bartlett (2007). Views of Academics on Academic Impropriety: Work in Progress. Communication and Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal 40 (1):103-112.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Scott F. Aikin & Nicholaos Jones (2015). An Atheistic Argument From Ugliness. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 7 (1):209-217.
    The theistic argument from beauty has what we call an 'evil twin', the argument from ugliness. The argument yields either what we call 'atheist win', or, when faced with aesthetic theodicies, 'agnostic tie' with the argument from beauty.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Karen Jones (1996). Trust as an Affective Attitude. Ethics 107 (1):4-25.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   58 citations  
  9.  38
    Gwen E. Jones & Michael J. Kavanagh (1996). An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 15 (5):511 - 523.
    Using a 2×2×2 experimental design, the effects of situational and individual variables on individuals' intentions to act unethically were investigated. Specifically examined were three situational variables: (1) quality of the work experience (good versus poor), (2) peer influences (unethical versus ethical), and (3) managerial influences (unethical versus ethical), and three individual variables: (4) locus of control, (5) Machiavellianism, and (6) gender, on individuals' behavioral intentions in an ethically ambiguous dilemma in an work setting. Experiment 1 revealed main effects for quality (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   62 citations  
  10. Sandra Lee Bartky, Paul Benson, Sue Campbell, Claudia Card, Robin S. Dillon, Jean Harvey, Karen Jones, Charles W. Mills, James Lindemann Nelson, Margaret Urban Walker, Rebecca Whisnant & Catherine Wilson (2004). Moral Psychology: Feminist Ethics and Social Theory. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Moral psychology studies the features of cognition, judgement, perception and emotion that make human beings capable of moral action. Perspectives from feminist and race theory immensely enrich moral psychology. Writers who take these perspectives ask questions about mind, feeling, and action in contexts of social difference and unequal power and opportunity. These essays by a distinguished international cast of philosophers explore moral psychology as it connects to social life, scientific studies, and literature.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  11.  9
    Thomas M. Jones & Will Felps (2013). Stakeholder Happiness Enhancement. Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (3):349-379.
    Employing utilitarian criteria, Jones and Felps, in “Shareholder Wealth Maximization and Social Welfare: A Utilitarian Critique” (Business Ethics Quarterly 23[2]: 207–38), examined the sequential logic leading from shareholder wealth maximization to maximal social welfare and uncovered several serious empirical and conceptual shortcomings. After rendering shareholder wealth maximization seriously compromised as an objective for corporate operations, they provided a set of criteria regarding what a replacement corporate objective would look like, but do not offer a specific alternative. In this article, we (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  12.  36
    F. Gobet, P. Lane, S. Croker, P. Cheng, G. Jones, I. OlIver & J. Pine (2001). Chunking Mechanisms in Human Learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (6):236-243.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   37 citations  
  13.  27
    S. JoneS & C. Fernyhough (2007). Thought as Action: Inner Speech, Self-Monitoring, and Auditory Verbal Hallucinations. Consciousness and Cognition 16 (2):391-399.
    Passivity experiences in schizophrenia are thought to be due to a failure in a neurocognitive action self-monitoring system . Drawing on the assumption that inner speech is a form of action, a recent model of auditory verbal hallucinations has proposed that AVHs can be explained by a failure in the NASS. In this article, we offer an alternative application of the NASS to AVHs, with separate mechanisms creating the emotion of self-as-agent and other-as-agent. We defend the assumption that inner speech (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  14. John H. Goldthorpe, A. H. Halsey, A. F. Heath, J. M. Ridge, Leonard Bloom & F. L. Jones (1982). Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Ethics 92 (4):766-768.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  15. Matt Jones & Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov (2014). Unfalsifiability and Mutual Translatability of Major Modeling Schemes for Choice Reaction Time. Psychological Review 121 (1):1-32.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  7
    Elisabeth Norman, Mark C. Price & Emma Jones (2011). Measuring Strategic Control in Artificial Grammar Learning. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4):1920-1929.
    In response to concerns with existing procedures for measuring strategic control over implicit knowledge in artificial grammar learning , we introduce a more stringent measurement procedure. After two separate training blocks which each consisted of letter strings derived from a different grammar, participants either judged the grammaticality of novel letter strings with respect to only one of these two grammars , or had the target grammar varying randomly from trial to trial which required a higher degree of conscious flexible control. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  17. Carolyn Drake, Mari Riess Jones & Clarisse Baruch (2000). The Development of Rhythmic Attending in Auditory Sequences: Attunement, Referent Period, Focal Attending. Cognition 77 (3):251-288.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  18.  52
    Nicholaos Jones (2014). Bowtie Structures, Pathway Diagrams, and Topological Explanation. Erkenntnis 79 (5):1135-1155.
    While mechanistic explanation and, to a lesser extent, nomological explanation are well-explored topics in the philosophy of biology, topological explanation is not. Nor is the role of diagrams in topological explanations. These explanations do not appeal to the operation of mechanisms or laws, and extant accounts of the role of diagrams in biological science explain neither why scientists might prefer diagrammatic representations of topological information to sentential equivalents nor how such representations might facilitate important processes of explanatory reasoning unavailable to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  19. Gill Langley, Tom Evans, Stephen T. Holgate & Anthony Jones (2007). Replacing Animal Experiments: Choices, Chances and Challenges. Bioessays 29 (9):918-926.
  20. Jeffrey P. Jones, Geoffrey Baym & Amber Day (2012). Mr. Stewart and Mr. Colbert Go to Washington: Television Satirists Outside the Box. Social Research: An International Quarterly 79 (1):33-60.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. David O. Jones, Ian G. Cowell & Prim B. Singh (2000). Mammalian Chromodomain Proteins: Their Role in Genome Organisation and Expression. Bioessays 22 (2):124-137.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  22.  1
    Thomas M. Jones & I. I. I. Frederick H. Gautschi (1988). Will the Ethics of Business Change? A Survey of Future Executives. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (4):231-248.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   50 citations  
  23.  25
    Campbell Jones (2007). Friedman with Derrida. Business and Society Review 112 (4):511-532.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  24.  30
    Marc T. Jones (1999). The Institutional Determinants of Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 20 (2):163 - 179.
    Previous research in the social responsibility/social performance area has failed to systematically address the institutional determinants of social responsibility and its various manifestations in terms of social performance. This paper examines the relationship between the configuration of institutional structures at various levels and the necessary and sufficient conditions for the concept of social responsibility to manifest in the practice of stakeholder management. In particular we hypothesize that smaller, closely held firms in profitable niches are in the optimum position to practice (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  25. M. Jones & B. C. Love (forthcoming). Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
  26. Matthew Haigh, Marc T. Jones & Netherlands Amsterdam (2007). Appraising the Relation Between Corporate Responsibility Research and Practice. Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organization Studies 12 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  18
    Frederick H. Gautschi & Thomas M. Jones (1998). Enhancing the Ability of Business Students to Recognize Ethical Issues: An Empirical Assessment of the Effectiveness of a Course in Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (2):205 - 216.
    This paper presents the results of a study of the effect of a business ethics course in enhancing the ability of students to recognize ethical issues. The findings show that compared to students who do not complete such a course, students enrolled in a business ethics course experience substantial improvement in that ability.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   29 citations  
  28.  22
    Mostyn W. Jones (forthcoming). Avoiding Perennial Mind-Body Problems. Journal of Consciousness Studies.
    Russell argued that we can’t know what brains are really like behind our perceptions of them, so minds can conceivably reside in brains. Physicalist-leaning Russellians from Feigl to Strawson try to avoid physicalist and dualist issues with this Russellian idea. Strawson also tries to avoid emergentist issues through panpsychism. Yet critics feel that these Russellians don’t really avoid these issues, but just recast them in new forms. For example, dualist issues arguably remain because it’s hard to see how private pains (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Karen Jones (2006). Metaethics and Emotions Research: A Response to Prinz. Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):45-53.
    Prinz claims that empirical work on emotions and moral judgement can help us resolve longstanding metaethical disputes in favour of simple sentimentalism. I argue that the empirical evidence he marshals does not have the metaethical implications he claims: the studies purporting to show that having an emotion is sufficient for making a moral judgement are tendentiously described. We are entitled to ascribe competence with moral concepts to experimental subjects only if we suppose that they would withdraw their moral judgement on (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  30.  86
    Nancy L. Jones (2007). A Code of Ethics for the Life Sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):25-43.
    The activities of the life sciences are essential to provide solutions for the future, for both individuals and society. Society has demanded growing accountability from the scientific community as implications of life science research rise in influence and there are concerns about the credibility, integrity and motives of science. While the scientific community has responded to concerns about its integrity in part by initiating training in research integrity and the responsible conduct of research, this approach is minimal. The scientific community (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  31.  5
    Charles Jones (2002). [Book Review] Global Justice, Defending Cosmopolitanism. [REVIEW] Ethics 112 (3):618-621.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  32.  35
    Thomas M. Jones & Will Felps (2013). Shareholder Wealth Maximization and Social Welfare. Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (2):207-238.
    Many scholars and managers endorse the idea that the primary purpose of the firm is to make money for its owners. This shareholder wealth maximization objective is justified on the grounds that it maximizes social welfare. In this article, the first of a two-part set, we argue that, although this shareholder primacy model may have been appropriate in an earlier era, it no longer is, given our current state of economic and social affairs. To make our case, we employ a (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  33.  32
    Angela Woods, Nev Jones, Marco Bernini, Felicity Callard, Ben Alderson-Day, Johanna Badcock, Vaughn Bell, Chris Cook, Thomas Csordas, Clara Humpston, Joel Krueger, Frank Laroi, Simon McCarthy-Jones, Peter Moseley, Hilary Powell & Andrea Raballo (2014). Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Phenomenology of Auditory Verbal Hallucinations. Schizophrenia Bulletin 40:S246-S254.
    Despite the recent proliferation of scientific, clinical, and narrative accounts of auditory verbal hallucinations, the phenomenology of voice hearing remains opaque and undertheorized. In this article, we outline an interdisciplinary approach to understanding hallucinatory experiences which seeks to demonstrate the value of the humanities and social sciences to advancing knowledge in clinical research and practice. We argue that an interdisciplinary approach to the phenomenology of AVH utilizes rigorous and context-appropriate methodologies to analyze a wider range of first-person accounts of AVH (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34. W. R. Jones (1983). The Clinic in Three Medieval Societies. Diogenes 31 (122):86-101.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35. Barbara Landau, Linda Smith & Susan Jones (1998). Object Perception and Object Naming in Early Development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (1):19-24.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  36. Christopher S. Jones (2003). Ethics and Politics in the Early Nishida: Reconsidering "Zen No Kenkyū". Philosophy East and West 53 (4):514-536.
    The early Nishida has conventionally been seen as an apolitical thinker, concerned primarily with religious philosophy. In itself this constitutes a political reading of Nishida's work, since it represents an attempt to distance (and thus "save") his wider philosophy from his dubious political practice during the 1930s and 1940s. However, a fresh reading of Nishida's debut, "Zen no kenkyū" (An inquiry into the good), reveals a distinctive political agenda and a sophisticated philosophy of political ethics. Counterintuitively, this essay suggests that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. M. Joycelyn Elders, Rueben C. Warren, Vivian W. Pinn, James H. Jones, Susan M. Reverby, David Satcher, Mary E. Northridge, Ronald Braithwaite, Mario DeLaRosa, Luther S. Williams, Monique M. Willams, Vickie M. Mays, Malika Roman Isler, R. L'Heureux Lewis, Harold L. Aubrey, Riggins R. Earl & Virginia M. Brennan (2011). The Search for the Legacy of the Usphs Syphilis Study at Tuskegee: Reflective Essays Based Upon Findings From the Tuskegee Legacy Project. Lexington Books.
    The Search for the Legacy of the USPHS Syphilis Study at Tuskegee is a collection of essays from experts in a variety of fields seeking to redefine the legacy of the infamous Tuskegee Syphilis Study. The essayists place the legacy of the study within the evolution of racial and ethnic relations in the United States. Contributors include two leading historians on the study, two former United States Surgeons General, and other prominent scholars from a wide range of fields.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  38. Catherine E. Kerr, Matthew D. Sacchet, Sara W. Lazar, Christopher I. Moore & Stephanie R. Jones (2013). Mindfulness Starts with the Body: Somatosensory Attention and Top-Down Modulation of Cortical Alpha Rhythms in Mindfulness Meditation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.
  39.  4
    Digby Elliott, Ruth Jones & Susan Gray (1990). Short-Term Memory for Spatial Location in Goal-Directed Locomotion. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 28 (2):158-160.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   34 citations  
  40.  10
    Linda B. Smith, Susan S. Jones & Barbara Landau (1996). Naming in Young Children: A Dumb Attentional Mechanism? Cognition 60 (2):143-171.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  41.  45
    Kenneth M. Hiltebeitel & Scott K. Jones (1992). An Assessment of Ethics Instruction in Accounting Education. Journal of Business Ethics 11 (1):37 - 46.
    Business school faculty have begun to increase ethics instruction, but very little has been done to assess the effectiveness of this instruction. Curricula-wide studies present conflicting results of the effect of ethics integration into the business curricula. Several studies suggest that courses like business ethics and business and society might have an effect on the ethical awareness or ethical reasoning of business students. A belief of many individuals interested in business ethics is that students must be exposed to ethical awareness (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   30 citations  
  42.  61
    Brian Riordan & Michael N. Jones (2011). Redundancy in Perceptual and Linguistic Experience: Comparing Feature-Based and Distributional Models of Semantic Representation. Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):303-345.
    Abstract Since their inception, distributional models of semantics have been criticized as inadequate cognitive theories of human semantic learning and representation. A principal challenge is that the representations derived by distributional models are purely symbolic and are not grounded in perception and action; this challenge has led many to favor feature-based models of semantic representation. We argue that the amount of perceptual and other semantic information that can be learned from purely distributional statistics has been underappreciated. We compare the representations (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  43. Leili Fatehi, Susan M. Wolf, Jeffrey McCullough, Ralph Hall, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P. Kahn, Cortney Jones, Stephen A. Campbell, Rebecca S. Dresser, Arthur G. Erdman, Christy L. Haynes, Robert A. Hoerr, Linda F. Hogle, Moira A. Keane, George Khushf, Nancy M. P. King, Efrosini Kokkoli, Gary Marchant, Andrew D. Maynard, Martin Philbert, Gurumurthy Ramachandran, Ronald A. Siegel & Samuel Wickline (2012). Recommendations for Nanomedicine Human Subjects Research Oversight: An Evolutionary Approach for an Emerging Field. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):716-750.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  44. Henry S. Richardson, Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek, Peter Singer, Karen Jones, Sergio Tenenbaum, Diana Raffman, Simon Căbulea May, Stephen C. Makin & Nancy E. Snow (2012). 10. Douglas Portmore, Commonsense Consequentialism: Wherein Morality Meets Rationality Douglas Portmore, Commonsense Consequentialism: Wherein Morality Meets Rationality (Pp. 179-183). [REVIEW] Ethics 123 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  45. Will Bynoe & Nicholas K. Jones (2013). Solitude Without Souls: Why Peter Unger Hasn't Established Substance Dualism. Philosophia 41 (1):109-125.
    Unger has recently argued that if you are the only thinking and experiencing subject in your chair, then you are not a material object. This leads Unger to endorse a version of Substance Dualism according to which we are immaterial souls. This paper argues that this is an overreaction. We argue that the specifically Dualist elements of Unger’s view play no role in his response to the problem; only the view’s structure is required, and that is available to Unger’s opponents. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46. O. Jones & P. Smith (2005). O que é uma acção? Critica.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  2
    Gary Jones & Bill Macken (2015). Questioning Short-Term Memory and its Measurement: Why Digit Span Measures Long-Term Associative Learning. Cognition 144:1-13.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  48.  85
    Nicholaos Jones & Olaf Wolkenhauer (2012). Diagrams as Locality Aids for Explanation and Model Construction in Cell Biology. Biology and Philosophy 27 (5):705-721.
    Using as case studies two early diagrams that represent mechanisms of the cell division cycle, we aim to extend prior philosophical analyses of the roles of diagrams in scientific reasoning, and specifically their role in biological reasoning. The diagrams we discuss are, in practice, integral and indispensible elements of reasoning from experimental data about the cell division cycle to mathematical models of the cycle’s molecular mechanisms. In accordance with prior analyses, the diagrams provide functional explanations of the cell cycle and (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  49. Karen Jones (1999). Second-Hand Moral Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 96 (2):55-78.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  50.  63
    Karen Jones (2012). Trustworthiness. Ethics 123 (1):61-85.
    I present and defend an account of three-place trustworthiness according to which B is trustworthy with respect to A in domain of interaction D, if and only if she is competent with respect to that domain, and she would take the fact that A is counting on her, were A to do so in this domain, to be a compelling reason for acting as counted on. This is not the whole story of trustworthiness, however, for we want those we can (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
1 — 50 / 3364